Author

Topic: [ANN] [HVC] Heavycoin - Ultra-secure, Decentralized Block Reward Voting, Fast - page 213. (Read 542277 times)

hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
Can someone clarify why voting on 1 is such a great idea (and so aggressively promoted here)?

Voting low will decrease the coin supply, and once you have a price set, lower supply gives more time for demand to build up. If you pair that with good development and promotion, demand raises, beats supply and that pushes price up.

Thanks for the clear explanation.

Do I need to keep the wallet app running for that, or enough just to change and save?
newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0


    Bounties



    • 30,000 HVC - professional grade commercial art and logos (specific guidelines, logo competition)



    MY WORK Smiley


    http://i.hizliresim.com/x348Pr.jpg


    http://i.hizliresim.com/KlgYrE.jpg

    HVC: HRm9H8wJxjoiqsD9MV1SgvBqX4hNoPx7Xr[/list]
    newbie
    Activity: 8
    Merit: 0
    Hello  Smiley

    Here's my attempt at a logo design for HVC.
    It ain't really something, but if you guys like it, I might throw some more time into it.

    Artistic version: http://postimg.org/image/j51megm2f/

    Logo/icon version:
    http://s18.postimg.org/ugefemydx/HVC_logo_icon_01.png


    hero member
    Activity: 686
    Merit: 500
    hello

    i am willing to complete this bounty

    50,000 HVC - professional grade promotional video explanation (specific guidelines apply)

    could you provide the guidelines.
    sr. member
    Activity: 460
    Merit: 250
    Can someone clarify why voting on 1 is such a great idea (and so aggressively promoted here)?

    Voting low will decrease the coin supply, and once you have a price set, lower supply gives more time for demand to build up. If you pair that with good development and promotion, demand raises, beats supply and that pushes price up.
    sr. member
    Activity: 382
    Merit: 256
    Can someone clarify why voting on 1 is such a great idea (and so aggressively promoted here)?

    It means there's a lower block reward, thus decreasing supply and making the coin more rarer and more valuable, increasing its price.
    sr. member
    Activity: 382
    Merit: 256
    guys any idea why i get 12kh/s on heavycoinpool but 17kh/s on 1gh?

    Same here, I get 70 kh/s with 1GH miner using 1GH pool, and 50 kh/s using heavycoin miner on heavycoinpool.
    hero member
    Activity: 656
    Merit: 500

    Why post that? It's nothing new, and there are Mintpal, Cryptoaltex and Poloniex

    devs are hesitant to put other exchanges in the op  Cheesy
    sr. member
    Activity: 382
    Merit: 256
    You lost me.

    I was about to buy 5 BTC worth until I clicked on the site and read

    "Bitcoin and other networks rely only on SHA-256, which was developed by the NSA. The Snowden revolations bring into question the security of SHA-256 and, thus, the true government independence of Bitcoin."

    This is absolutely dishonest as  SHA-256 is open source known algorithm studied by independent academics for a decade now. It's irrelevant who was original developer. If we are going to play that game, then
    Keccak was approved by NIST  (which is also US govt agency).  Tor was originally developed by US military.  Even the Internet itself is US military invention.  

    Not buying it when the author starts with dishonest propaganda.

    Goodbye
    RE the point about the Internet invented by the US Military.
    I'm pretty sure the Internet was invented by Tim Berners Lee (British).
    hero member
    Activity: 682
    Merit: 500
    Quick update:  Today we're hoping to release the stratum-mining software to another pool for testing (doge94 / heavy.stablehash.com).  (So there'd be three pools in total.)  Assuming all goes well (and we hear back good results today) then we hope to release the software to the general community.  The binaries will be release too (win32, win64, linux and osx)

    We are putting a strong emphasis on testing because we want to make sure the software is stable and robust.  Many miners these days are paying for their compute-power and could not afford lost blocks (for example) due to any bugs.

    Using 1GH miner software I get 170kh/s, with your miner I'm getting less than 120kh/s.

    Both are the Windows Miners, 64bit, using all 6 cores of my phenom II 1055.

    I was going to switch to another pool, but I'll stick with 1GH for now until this performance deficit is sorted.

    someone else with the same issue as me.

    Guys, try hvc.nonce-pool.com https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5662842

    Uses 1gh miner and I'm getting even a slightly higher hashrate there compared to 1gh.

    Let's spread the hashing.

    Thanks, will give it a go.
    sr. member
    Activity: 382
    Merit: 256
    Hello everyone,

    Please Vote 1, so your HVC will be worth more!!!!!!!!
    File>>Preferences>> "Vote on block reward 1"

    Also vote 1 on the miner batch file:

    minerd.exe -a heavy -v 1 -o stratum+tcp://stratum01.heavycoinpool.com:4333 -u user -p password

    It will help make the coin rarer and more valuable.
    full member
    Activity: 149
    Merit: 100
    HeavyCoin @ Nonce-Pool is OPEN!
    http://hvc.nonce-pool.com/index.php

    Pool is compatible with the stratum miners provided by 1GH

    Consider the pool in beta mode for now but trust us it should work, we only have little hash power.

    Pool is working well, we mined many blocks on test-net, come help find our first main-net block.

    We are giving away 2 ltc for the first block finder and 1 ltc for the next two blocks!

    Yaaee Smiley I found block number two ( Primera )

    1LTC to me Smiley    LTC: Le2YSXzX1HUJ9zexftFrRJrQ4hNpms65Vq   Thanks

    On it's way! thanks for supporting the pool.

    Those first 3 blocks couldn't have been any luckier, hopefully that will continue.
    member
    Activity: 112
    Merit: 10
    Quick update:  Today we're hoping to release the stratum-mining software to another pool for testing (doge94 / heavy.stablehash.com).  (So there'd be three pools in total.)  Assuming all goes well (and we hear back good results today) then we hope to release the software to the general community.  The binaries will be release too (win32, win64, linux and osx)

    We are putting a strong emphasis on testing because we want to make sure the software is stable and robust.  Many miners these days are paying for their compute-power and could not afford lost blocks (for example) due to any bugs.

    Using 1GH miner software I get 170kh/s, with your miner I'm getting less than 120kh/s.

    Both are the Windows Miners, 64bit, using all 6 cores of my phenom II 1055.

    I was going to switch to another pool, but I'll stick with 1GH for now until this performance deficit is sorted.

    We didn't provide the binaries, but my guess would be that cryptomind / heavycoinpool.com didn't compile with sse2 and -O3.  Also, could possibly be something related to pool's config.  In any case, I would not worry about it until the official release is made.  We've contacted a couple more pool operators today for testing our second release candidate.

    Cool thanks for the update Keccak
    full member
    Activity: 210
    Merit: 100
    Quick update:  Today we're hoping to release the stratum-mining software to another pool for testing (doge94 / heavy.stablehash.com).  (So there'd be three pools in total.)  Assuming all goes well (and we hear back good results today) then we hope to release the software to the general community.  The binaries will be release too (win32, win64, linux and osx)

    We are putting a strong emphasis on testing because we want to make sure the software is stable and robust.  Many miners these days are paying for their compute-power and could not afford lost blocks (for example) due to any bugs.

    Using 1GH miner software I get 170kh/s, with your miner I'm getting less than 120kh/s.

    Both are the Windows Miners, 64bit, using all 6 cores of my phenom II 1055.

    I was going to switch to another pool, but I'll stick with 1GH for now until this performance deficit is sorted.

    We didn't provide the binaries, but my guess would be that cryptomind / heavycoinpool.com didn't compile with sse2 and -O3.  Also, could possibly be something related to pool's config.  In any case, I would not worry about it until the official release is made.  We've contacted a couple more pool operators today for testing our second release candidate.
    sr. member
    Activity: 460
    Merit: 250
    Quick update:  Today we're hoping to release the stratum-mining software to another pool for testing (doge94 / heavy.stablehash.com).  (So there'd be three pools in total.)  Assuming all goes well (and we hear back good results today) then we hope to release the software to the general community.  The binaries will be release too (win32, win64, linux and osx)

    We are putting a strong emphasis on testing because we want to make sure the software is stable and robust.  Many miners these days are paying for their compute-power and could not afford lost blocks (for example) due to any bugs.

    Using 1GH miner software I get 170kh/s, with your miner I'm getting less than 120kh/s.

    Both are the Windows Miners, 64bit, using all 6 cores of my phenom II 1055.

    I was going to switch to another pool, but I'll stick with 1GH for now until this performance deficit is sorted.

    someone else with the same issue as me.

    Guys, try hvc.nonce-pool.com https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5662842

    Uses 1gh miner and I'm getting even a slightly higher hashrate there compared to 1gh.

    Let's spread the hashing.
    member
    Activity: 112
    Merit: 10
    Quick update:  Today we're hoping to release the stratum-mining software to another pool for testing (doge94 / heavy.stablehash.com).  (So there'd be three pools in total.)  Assuming all goes well (and we hear back good results today) then we hope to release the software to the general community.  The binaries will be release too (win32, win64, linux and osx)

    We are putting a strong emphasis on testing because we want to make sure the software is stable and robust.  Many miners these days are paying for their compute-power and could not afford lost blocks (for example) due to any bugs.

    Using 1GH miner software I get 170kh/s, with your miner I'm getting less than 120kh/s.

    Both are the Windows Miners, 64bit, using all 6 cores of my phenom II 1055.

    I was going to switch to another pool, but I'll stick with 1GH for now until this performance deficit is sorted.

    someone else with the same issue as me.
    sr. member
    Activity: 240
    Merit: 250
    HeavyCoin @ Nonce-Pool is OPEN!
    http://hvc.nonce-pool.com/index.php

    Pool is compatible with the stratum miners provided by 1GH

    Consider the pool in beta mode for now but trust us it should work, we only have little hash power.

    Pool is working well, we mined many blocks on test-net, come help find our first main-net block.

    We are giving away 2 ltc for the first block finder and 1 ltc for the next two blocks!

    Yaaee Smiley I found block number two ( Primera )

    1LTC to me Smiley    LTC: Le2YSXzX1HUJ9zexftFrRJrQ4hNpms65Vq   Thanks
    hero member
    Activity: 682
    Merit: 500
    Quick update:  Today we're hoping to release the stratum-mining software to another pool for testing (doge94 / heavy.stablehash.com).  (So there'd be three pools in total.)  Assuming all goes well (and we hear back good results today) then we hope to release the software to the general community.  The binaries will be release too (win32, win64, linux and osx)

    We are putting a strong emphasis on testing because we want to make sure the software is stable and robust.  Many miners these days are paying for their compute-power and could not afford lost blocks (for example) due to any bugs.

    Using 1GH miner software I get 170kh/s, with your miner I'm getting less than 120kh/s.

    Both are the Windows Miners, 64bit, using all 6 cores of my phenom II 1055.

    I was going to switch to another pool, but I'll stick with 1GH for now until this performance deficit is sorted.
    hero member
    Activity: 756
    Merit: 502
    Can someone clarify why voting on 1 is such a great idea (and so aggressively promoted here)?
    Jump to: