on the basis of that a jobseeker will get job, further if you wish to validate your profile, there are validators for validating your documents and resume after that ratings will be provided to profile which will help recruiter to search right candidate for right profile.
The TrustLogics platform (which has a patent pending) is a cloud-hosted, SOA-based (Service Oriented Architecture) system and has a provision to create two different types of user profiles –
Recruiter and Jobseeker.
For jobseekers, do we need to pay even a small amount of TLT when we will use trustlogics application?
Recruiters can actually filter applicants based on the requirements they need. I do hope that this is also true for applicants. Applicants should also be able to choose their employers properly. Trustlogics concept is great since it aims to provide Trusted data for both applicants and recruiters.
As per my understanding reading through the WhitePaper of TrustLogics, reputation building are done by both the jobseekers and employers. Though as mentioned, it is usually a request from the Professionals or ISPs (Independent Service Providers) to have their work rated and reviewed by the service requestor so as to promulgate their so called Digital Portfolio and the basis will range from quality of work, to speed, scope, and the likes.
The rating can be done once the applicant is hired right? I think the rating of employers is good, but for jobseekers this might bring some discrimination for them in the future. I the rating can be done to freelancers but for regular employees this is not advisable.
TrustLogics helps ISPs maintain a Digital Portfolio which will contain all such ratings and reviews. There are no platforms which currently hold such information, we aim to make this more organized.
It seems that validators play a major role for Trustlogics. Who will shoulder the cost of validating the users profile? Will companies requesting for verified information of the applicant need to pay Trustlogics? Will this be better than companies making the background checking themselves?
Hello J.Kelvin!
Indeed true, validators will play a substantial role for TrustLogics as this is the key for reputation building.
As for the payment, it was mentioned in the whitepaper that who ever was the service requestor will be the one charged for the validation needed, so it means that any validation expenses can be addressed to either the jobseeker or the employer.
Yet again, the beauty of TrustLogics lie in the eradication o repetitive validation and submissiotns of credentials, information and the likes. If a jobseeker already has his professional data validated and is up-to-date, then there is no more need for a recruiter to revalidate them nor to request for background checks.
As per the cost, i am betting hard that TrustLogics will be cheaper than companies performing background check themselves since TrustLogics will be operating on a global scale eliminating the need to contract two or more validators to complete a series of veriication.
Thanks for clarifying that. Its good to know that once the jobseeker or the employers information has been validated, the same will not be repeated this will surely save cost for many companies. As Trustlogics grow and more users learn about Trustlogics, I believe that it will soon be among the top jobsite preferred by companies and job-seekers alike.
Trustlogics surely is a well thought of project. It turns traditional hiring process into a streamline process with validated information of both jobseekers and employers. Trustlogics will be similar to validators themselves since information provided by Trustlogics are verified by their partnered validators.
This is great to know. It will save companies more time and money in the verifying process. Trustlogics will surely help a lot of people find a better job. Background checking is only normal in the hiring process and with Trustlogics, it will be easier.