In my humble opinion, the platform can't be held responsible for experts' frauds and if some packages are overpriced or useless, why even talk about it, just don't use them.
Honestly, I believe one could complain about false ratings by greedy experts or one can be thankful, that such a platform exists. I haven't seen a platform with higher reputation and with experienced and well-known experts (not all, of course).
Though I like constructive critics, the points in the article, in my opinion, are not fair and sometimes even silly:
If a beautiful jewelry costs a lot, you don't call it a fraud.
Sometimes even advisors don't know if an ICO is going to be a scam. Having only a website, a whitepaper and some photos of the team, you can't make any arguments about the validity of an ICO and the plans of its creators.
Instead of complaining one could build something better and then make a comparison.
By sitting on the sofa and calling names one can't make any impact.
I have no connection to the platform, these are just my opinions
.