I have passed both.
Topic: [ANN] ICObench - ICO rating platform and community +Mobile App +API +Widgets - page 5. (Read 25756 times)
March 29, 2018, 04:11:27 AM
Can you please PM us with your name? We will be able to solve the situation then. Sorry for the inconvenience.
March 29, 2018, 04:10:06 AM
I have passed both.
March 29, 2018, 03:54:16 AM
Hello,
Did KYC show passed as part of the team? If yes, at the moment you need to pass KYC one more time as a user.
Did KYC show passed as part of the team? If yes, at the moment you need to pass KYC one more time as a user.
Any updates on this ? Thank you!
Kyc is shown as successfully, but still not updated on the 'Apply for expert' section
Kyc is shown as successfully, but still not updated on the 'Apply for expert' section
Unfortunately, I'm afraid it wasn't updated.
Here's a picture showing my profile not being eligible due to the KYC process: https://imgur.com/2dx4Csw
Here's a picture showing my profile not being eligible due to the KYC process: https://imgur.com/2dx4Csw
Hello,
Your form was updated 2 weeks ago and you can see it on the site.
Hi. It seems that was solved, but starting from 2 weeks ago, I get this message: "KYC passed successfully. Your profile will be updated shortly."
Your form was updated 2 weeks ago and you can see it on the site.
Hello,
Thank you for addressing this issue. We have a technical problem at the moment as the system sees such documents as duplicates. It will be fixed on Monday and we will send you new invitations.
Thank you for addressing this issue. We have a technical problem at the moment as the system sees such documents as duplicates. It will be fixed on Monday and we will send you new invitations.
Hi,
This will be a bit random. I'm co-founder of Open Collectors Network. I passed the requested KYC for the project and then I have created a personal account and wanted to apply for an expert role, so I had to do the KYC process again, but got a 'duplicate' error.
Can you help me with this ?
Thanks and sorry for intruding
This will be a bit random. I'm co-founder of Open Collectors Network. I passed the requested KYC for the project and then I have created a personal account and wanted to apply for an expert role, so I had to do the KYC process again, but got a 'duplicate' error.
Can you help me with this ?
Thanks and sorry for intruding
Hi. It seems that was solved, but starting from 2 weeks ago, I get this message: "KYC passed successfully. Your profile will be updated shortly."
March 28, 2018, 04:40:01 PM
Any updates on this ? Thank you!
Kyc is shown as successfully, but still not updated on the 'Apply for expert' section
Kyc is shown as successfully, but still not updated on the 'Apply for expert' section
Unfortunately, I'm afraid it wasn't updated.
Here's a picture showing my profile not being eligible due to the KYC process: https://imgur.com/2dx4Csw
Here's a picture showing my profile not being eligible due to the KYC process: https://imgur.com/2dx4Csw
Hello,
Your form was updated 2 weeks ago and you can see it on the site.
Hi. It seems that was solved, but starting from 2 weeks ago, I get this message: "KYC passed successfully. Your profile will be updated shortly."
Your form was updated 2 weeks ago and you can see it on the site.
Hello,
Thank you for addressing this issue. We have a technical problem at the moment as the system sees such documents as duplicates. It will be fixed on Monday and we will send you new invitations.
Thank you for addressing this issue. We have a technical problem at the moment as the system sees such documents as duplicates. It will be fixed on Monday and we will send you new invitations.
Hi,
This will be a bit random. I'm co-founder of Open Collectors Network. I passed the requested KYC for the project and then I have created a personal account and wanted to apply for an expert role, so I had to do the KYC process again, but got a 'duplicate' error.
Can you help me with this ?
Thanks and sorry for intruding
This will be a bit random. I'm co-founder of Open Collectors Network. I passed the requested KYC for the project and then I have created a personal account and wanted to apply for an expert role, so I had to do the KYC process again, but got a 'duplicate' error.
Can you help me with this ?
Thanks and sorry for intruding
Hi. It seems that was solved, but starting from 2 weeks ago, I get this message: "KYC passed successfully. Your profile will be updated shortly."
March 28, 2018, 07:52:05 AM
Hello,
We have heard all your suggestions and we think the time has come for the experts to leave only the ratings accompanied with the written reviews. The changes will be deployed soon.
We have heard all your suggestions and we think the time has come for the experts to leave only the ratings accompanied with the written reviews. The changes will be deployed soon.
I don't like one thing in ICObench - rating. There are several of so-called "experts" who have no idea about the tech behind blockchain and ICO. They are reviewing projects and making grades for each project, but some of them are obviously don't know what project is about.
As for me every "Expert" who is giving ratings on ICObench should be forced to describe his grades and leave a comment, so people can research and follow opinions not just the figures.
Now this rating system is ridiculous, some decent projects has 3.5-3.8 rankings
I hope team will improve voting system in future.
As for me every "Expert" who is giving ratings on ICObench should be forced to describe his grades and leave a comment, so people can research and follow opinions not just the figures.
Now this rating system is ridiculous, some decent projects has 3.5-3.8 rankings
I hope team will improve voting system in future.
March 25, 2018, 06:03:07 PM
I don't like one thing in ICObench - rating. There are several of so-called "experts" who have no idea about the tech behind blockchain and ICO. They are reviewing projects and making grades for each project, but some of them are obviously don't know what project is about.
As for me every "Expert" who is giving ratings on ICObench should be forced to describe his grades and leave a comment, so people can research and follow opinions not just the figures.
Now this rating system is ridiculous, some decent projects has 3.5-3.8 rankings
I hope team will improve voting system in future.
As for me every "Expert" who is giving ratings on ICObench should be forced to describe his grades and leave a comment, so people can research and follow opinions not just the figures.
Now this rating system is ridiculous, some decent projects has 3.5-3.8 rankings
I hope team will improve voting system in future.
March 25, 2018, 05:36:07 AM
In project theories, they are actually interesting, leaving the postmoderns to practice. It is a great deal of greatness.
March 23, 2018, 12:51:54 PM
The link to the site is best highlighted on the background of the rest)
In my opinion
In my opinion
March 23, 2018, 04:00:21 AM
Hello,
We tried to answer your email, but it was never delivered. Please PM us and we will give you a link to your KYC form.
We tried to answer your email, but it was never delivered. Please PM us and we will give you a link to your KYC form.
Hello, I'd like to report a bug on ICO Bench, involving the KYC procedure. I tried using the ICO Bench contact form several times but no one takes any steps to resolve my problem. I am running an ICO called Vernam. Two KYC were requested for my team - for Roman Angelov and Ivan Georgiev. They passed KYC succesfully, but now I want to pass KYC myself in order to apply for an expert. However, when I click "Apply" I get this link: https://icobench.com/kyc/5aabe3960a975a7d0eb9d09d. KYC application
for Roman Angelov
Your KYC form is no longer available.
This KYC is mine and it shouldn't be linked to Romans's. please investigate that issue and possibly fix it because I want to apply for expert.
Thank you in advance!
for Roman Angelov
Your KYC form is no longer available.
This KYC is mine and it shouldn't be linked to Romans's. please investigate that issue and possibly fix it because I want to apply for expert.
Thank you in advance!
Thank you very much! I tried PM, but you haven't allowed PMs from Newbies, please edit your profile, so that I can PM you. Thank you guys
March 22, 2018, 05:10:47 PM
Unfortunately, I'm afraid it wasn't updated.
Here's a picture showing my profile not being eligible due to the KYC process: https://imgur.com/2dx4Csw
Here's a picture showing my profile not being eligible due to the KYC process: https://imgur.com/2dx4Csw
Hello,
Your form was updated 2 weeks ago and you can see it on the site.
Hi. It seems that was solved, but starting from 2 weeks ago, I get this message: "KYC passed successfully. Your profile will be updated shortly."
Your form was updated 2 weeks ago and you can see it on the site.
Hello,
Thank you for addressing this issue. We have a technical problem at the moment as the system sees such documents as duplicates. It will be fixed on Monday and we will send you new invitations.
Thank you for addressing this issue. We have a technical problem at the moment as the system sees such documents as duplicates. It will be fixed on Monday and we will send you new invitations.
Hi,
This will be a bit random. I'm co-founder of Open Collectors Network. I passed the requested KYC for the project and then I have created a personal account and wanted to apply for an expert role, so I had to do the KYC process again, but got a 'duplicate' error.
Can you help me with this ?
Thanks and sorry for intruding
This will be a bit random. I'm co-founder of Open Collectors Network. I passed the requested KYC for the project and then I have created a personal account and wanted to apply for an expert role, so I had to do the KYC process again, but got a 'duplicate' error.
Can you help me with this ?
Thanks and sorry for intruding
Hi. It seems that was solved, but starting from 2 weeks ago, I get this message: "KYC passed successfully. Your profile will be updated shortly."
March 22, 2018, 10:29:46 AM
Hello,
We tried to answer your email, but it was never delivered. Please PM us and we will give you a link to your KYC form.
We tried to answer your email, but it was never delivered. Please PM us and we will give you a link to your KYC form.
Hello, I'd like to report a bug on ICO Bench, involving the KYC procedure. I tried using the ICO Bench contact form several times but no one takes any steps to resolve my problem. I am running an ICO called Vernam. Two KYC were requested for my team - for Roman Angelov and Ivan Georgiev. They passed KYC succesfully, but now I want to pass KYC myself in order to apply for an expert. However, when I click "Apply" I get this link: https://icobench.com/kyc/5aabe3960a975a7d0eb9d09d. KYC application
for Roman Angelov
Your KYC form is no longer available.
This KYC is mine and it shouldn't be linked to Romans's. please investigate that issue and possibly fix it because I want to apply for expert.
Thank you in advance!
for Roman Angelov
Your KYC form is no longer available.
This KYC is mine and it shouldn't be linked to Romans's. please investigate that issue and possibly fix it because I want to apply for expert.
Thank you in advance!
March 22, 2018, 06:55:44 AM
Hello, I'd like to report a bug on ICO Bench, involving the KYC procedure. I tried using the ICO Bench contact form several times but no one takes any steps to resolve my problem. I am running an ICO called Vernam. Two KYC were requested for my team - for Roman Angelov and Ivan Georgiev. They passed KYC succesfully, but now I want to pass KYC myself in order to apply for an expert. However, when I click "Apply" I get this link: https://icobench.com/kyc/5aabe3960a975a7d0eb9d09d. KYC application
for Roman Angelov
Your KYC form is no longer available.
This KYC is mine and it shouldn't be linked to Romans's. please investigate that issue and possibly fix it because I want to apply for expert.
Thank you in advance!
for Roman Angelov
Your KYC form is no longer available.
This KYC is mine and it shouldn't be linked to Romans's. please investigate that issue and possibly fix it because I want to apply for expert.
Thank you in advance!
March 22, 2018, 06:11:01 AM
Hello,
Your form was updated 2 weeks ago and you can see it on the site.
Hi. It seems that was solved, but starting from 2 weeks ago, I get this message: "KYC passed successfully. Your profile will be updated shortly."
Your form was updated 2 weeks ago and you can see it on the site.
Hello,
Thank you for addressing this issue. We have a technical problem at the moment as the system sees such documents as duplicates. It will be fixed on Monday and we will send you new invitations.
Thank you for addressing this issue. We have a technical problem at the moment as the system sees such documents as duplicates. It will be fixed on Monday and we will send you new invitations.
Hi,
This will be a bit random. I'm co-founder of Open Collectors Network. I passed the requested KYC for the project and then I have created a personal account and wanted to apply for an expert role, so I had to do the KYC process again, but got a 'duplicate' error.
Can you help me with this ?
Thanks and sorry for intruding
This will be a bit random. I'm co-founder of Open Collectors Network. I passed the requested KYC for the project and then I have created a personal account and wanted to apply for an expert role, so I had to do the KYC process again, but got a 'duplicate' error.
Can you help me with this ?
Thanks and sorry for intruding
Hi. It seems that was solved, but starting from 2 weeks ago, I get this message: "KYC passed successfully. Your profile will be updated shortly."
March 22, 2018, 05:34:05 AM
Hello,
Thank you for addressing this issue. We have a technical problem at the moment as the system sees such documents as duplicates. It will be fixed on Monday and we will send you new invitations.
Thank you for addressing this issue. We have a technical problem at the moment as the system sees such documents as duplicates. It will be fixed on Monday and we will send you new invitations.
Hi,
This will be a bit random. I'm co-founder of Open Collectors Network. I passed the requested KYC for the project and then I have created a personal account and wanted to apply for an expert role, so I had to do the KYC process again, but got a 'duplicate' error.
Can you help me with this ?
Thanks and sorry for intruding
This will be a bit random. I'm co-founder of Open Collectors Network. I passed the requested KYC for the project and then I have created a personal account and wanted to apply for an expert role, so I had to do the KYC process again, but got a 'duplicate' error.
Can you help me with this ?
Thanks and sorry for intruding
Hi. It seems that was solved, but starting from 2 weeks ago, I get this message: "KYC passed successfully. Your profile will be updated shortly."
March 21, 2018, 11:35:56 PM
Potential project, professional team. Hope the project will succeed and get more tokens
March 20, 2018, 07:13:44 AM
I think this is a good point - voting without giving a written review takes too little effort.
A comment would be fine.
Hey guys,
you've misunderstood my question. The problem IS that you allow experts to post text-less reviews, just ratings-only.
This seems fishy as the expert is NOT required to provide any textual information to explain his ratings, which means - they can rate ICOs without any effort, just by selecting random numbers that seem fit.
A review is worth nothing if it has no text. Look at Amazon products' reviews, etc.
Are you going to force the ICO reviews to have at least 200 character requirement to make sure "exports" don't cheat?
A comment would be fine.
Hello,
The written reviews are quite a recent option and their number is growing at the moment, soon it will reach half of the overall number of ratings. We do not guarantee fast answers from the experts, but usually if you reach them via the social networks, links to those most of experts have on their profiles, they react to the changes faster. We want to also remind you that noone would change their rating for a better one if they see threats and swears coming from ICOs teams.
If you have any proof of an expert taking money or providing services in exchange for rating or review, please send it to [email protected]
Thank you.
The written reviews are quite a recent option and their number is growing at the moment, soon it will reach half of the overall number of ratings. We do not guarantee fast answers from the experts, but usually if you reach them via the social networks, links to those most of experts have on their profiles, they react to the changes faster. We want to also remind you that noone would change their rating for a better one if they see threats and swears coming from ICOs teams.
If you have any proof of an expert taking money or providing services in exchange for rating or review, please send it to [email protected]
Thank you.
The project seems very nice, but I have a problem:
you allow your network of experts to rate the ICOs without providing any kind of textual information.
You do realize that having no minimum characters limit and having no audit for the quality of some of these experts' reviews raises a lot of doubt about the quality of your ratings?
Some "experts" write their reviews and, when asked by the ICO to update it because the ICO has updated their team, etc, they ignore them.
This is also problematic as it could suggest that the experts' review could've been paid by an ICO competitor, fighting for funding with a similar idea, etc.
Now, thanks to you guys not caring about the quality of those expert reviews, these "experts" can manipulate ratings for various kinds of purposes: personal, monetary, etc.
I really dislike this and I find ICOBench rather suspicious as there's no review quality audit and a reviewer isn't required to reassess his rating after an ICO asks him to for good reasons.
you allow your network of experts to rate the ICOs without providing any kind of textual information.
You do realize that having no minimum characters limit and having no audit for the quality of some of these experts' reviews raises a lot of doubt about the quality of your ratings?
Some "experts" write their reviews and, when asked by the ICO to update it because the ICO has updated their team, etc, they ignore them.
This is also problematic as it could suggest that the experts' review could've been paid by an ICO competitor, fighting for funding with a similar idea, etc.
Now, thanks to you guys not caring about the quality of those expert reviews, these "experts" can manipulate ratings for various kinds of purposes: personal, monetary, etc.
I really dislike this and I find ICOBench rather suspicious as there's no review quality audit and a reviewer isn't required to reassess his rating after an ICO asks him to for good reasons.
Hey guys,
you've misunderstood my question. The problem IS that you allow experts to post text-less reviews, just ratings-only.
This seems fishy as the expert is NOT required to provide any textual information to explain his ratings, which means - they can rate ICOs without any effort, just by selecting random numbers that seem fit.
A review is worth nothing if it has no text. Look at Amazon products' reviews, etc.
Are you going to force the ICO reviews to have at least 200 character requirement to make sure "exports" don't cheat?
March 20, 2018, 06:16:05 AM
Hello,
The written reviews are quite a recent option and their number is growing at the moment, soon it will reach half of the overall number of ratings. We do not guarantee fast answers from the experts, but usually if you reach them via the social networks, links to those most of experts have on their profiles, they react to the changes faster. We want to also remind you that noone would change their rating for a better one if they see threats and swears coming from ICOs teams.
If you have any proof of an expert taking money or providing services in exchange for rating or review, please send it to [email protected]
Thank you.
The written reviews are quite a recent option and their number is growing at the moment, soon it will reach half of the overall number of ratings. We do not guarantee fast answers from the experts, but usually if you reach them via the social networks, links to those most of experts have on their profiles, they react to the changes faster. We want to also remind you that noone would change their rating for a better one if they see threats and swears coming from ICOs teams.
If you have any proof of an expert taking money or providing services in exchange for rating or review, please send it to [email protected]
Thank you.
The project seems very nice, but I have a problem:
you allow your network of experts to rate the ICOs without providing any kind of textual information.
You do realize that having no minimum characters limit and having no audit for the quality of some of these experts' reviews raises a lot of doubt about the quality of your ratings?
Some "experts" write their reviews and, when asked by the ICO to update it because the ICO has updated their team, etc, they ignore them.
This is also problematic as it could suggest that the experts' review could've been paid by an ICO competitor, fighting for funding with a similar idea, etc.
Now, thanks to you guys not caring about the quality of those expert reviews, these "experts" can manipulate ratings for various kinds of purposes: personal, monetary, etc.
I really dislike this and I find ICOBench rather suspicious as there's no review quality audit and a reviewer isn't required to reassess his rating after an ICO asks him to for good reasons.
you allow your network of experts to rate the ICOs without providing any kind of textual information.
You do realize that having no minimum characters limit and having no audit for the quality of some of these experts' reviews raises a lot of doubt about the quality of your ratings?
Some "experts" write their reviews and, when asked by the ICO to update it because the ICO has updated their team, etc, they ignore them.
This is also problematic as it could suggest that the experts' review could've been paid by an ICO competitor, fighting for funding with a similar idea, etc.
Now, thanks to you guys not caring about the quality of those expert reviews, these "experts" can manipulate ratings for various kinds of purposes: personal, monetary, etc.
I really dislike this and I find ICOBench rather suspicious as there's no review quality audit and a reviewer isn't required to reassess his rating after an ICO asks him to for good reasons.
Hey guys,
you've misunderstood my question. The problem IS that you allow experts to post text-less reviews, just ratings-only.
This seems fishy as the expert is NOT required to provide any textual information to explain his ratings, which means - they can rate ICOs without any effort, just by selecting random numbers that seem fit.
A review is worth nothing if it has no text. Look at Amazon products' reviews, etc.
Are you going to force the ICO reviews to have at least 200 character requirement to make sure "experts" don't cheat?
March 20, 2018, 06:08:51 AM
Hello ICOBench,
I just want to something because on what basis you are giving the rating if the rating can we start investing in those project without any problems.
Lastly, i have seen you have given 4.7 / 5 for Adsigma company, can we start investing in it?
I just want to something because on what basis you are giving the rating if the rating can we start investing in those project without any problems.
Lastly, i have seen you have given 4.7 / 5 for Adsigma company, can we start investing in it?
March 20, 2018, 05:29:21 AM
Hello,
The written reviews are quite a recent option and their number is growing at the moment, soon it will reach half of the overall number of ratings. We do not guarantee fast answers from the experts, but usually if you reach them via the social networks, links to those most of experts have on their profiles, they react to the changes faster. We want to also remind you that noone would change their rating for a better one if they see threats and swears coming from ICOs teams.
If you have any proof of an expert taking money or providing services in exchange for rating or review, please send it to [email protected]
Thank you.
The written reviews are quite a recent option and their number is growing at the moment, soon it will reach half of the overall number of ratings. We do not guarantee fast answers from the experts, but usually if you reach them via the social networks, links to those most of experts have on their profiles, they react to the changes faster. We want to also remind you that noone would change their rating for a better one if they see threats and swears coming from ICOs teams.
If you have any proof of an expert taking money or providing services in exchange for rating or review, please send it to [email protected]
Thank you.
The project seems very nice, but I have a problem:
you allow your network of experts to rate the ICOs without providing any kind of textual information.
You do realize that having no minimum characters limit and having no audit for the quality of some of these experts' reviews raises a lot of doubt about the quality of your ratings?
Some "experts" write their reviews and, when asked by the ICO to update it because the ICO has updated their team, etc, they ignore them.
This is also problematic as it could suggest that the experts' review could've been paid by an ICO competitor, fighting for funding with a similar idea, etc.
Now, thanks to you guys not caring about the quality of those expert reviews, these "experts" can manipulate ratings for various kinds of purposes: personal, monetary, etc.
I really dislike this and I find ICOBench rather suspicious as there's no review quality audit and a reviewer isn't required to reassess his rating after an ICO asks him to for good reasons.
you allow your network of experts to rate the ICOs without providing any kind of textual information.
You do realize that having no minimum characters limit and having no audit for the quality of some of these experts' reviews raises a lot of doubt about the quality of your ratings?
Some "experts" write their reviews and, when asked by the ICO to update it because the ICO has updated their team, etc, they ignore them.
This is also problematic as it could suggest that the experts' review could've been paid by an ICO competitor, fighting for funding with a similar idea, etc.
Now, thanks to you guys not caring about the quality of those expert reviews, these "experts" can manipulate ratings for various kinds of purposes: personal, monetary, etc.
I really dislike this and I find ICOBench rather suspicious as there's no review quality audit and a reviewer isn't required to reassess his rating after an ICO asks him to for good reasons.
March 20, 2018, 12:09:01 AM
The project seems very nice, but I have a problem:
you allow your network of experts to rate the ICOs without providing any kind of textual information.
You do realize that having no minimum characters limit and having no audit for the quality of some of these experts' reviews raises a lot of doubt about the quality of your ratings?
Some "experts" write their reviews and, when asked by the ICO to update it because the ICO has updated their team, etc, they ignore them.
This is also problematic as it could suggest that the experts' review could've been paid by an ICO competitor, fighting for funding with a similar idea, etc.
Now, thanks to you guys not caring about the quality of those expert reviews, these "experts" can manipulate ratings for various kinds of purposes: personal, monetary, etc.
I really dislike this and I find ICOBench rather suspicious as there's no review quality audit and a reviewer isn't required to reassess his rating after an ICO asks him to for good reasons.
you allow your network of experts to rate the ICOs without providing any kind of textual information.
You do realize that having no minimum characters limit and having no audit for the quality of some of these experts' reviews raises a lot of doubt about the quality of your ratings?
Some "experts" write their reviews and, when asked by the ICO to update it because the ICO has updated their team, etc, they ignore them.
This is also problematic as it could suggest that the experts' review could've been paid by an ICO competitor, fighting for funding with a similar idea, etc.
Now, thanks to you guys not caring about the quality of those expert reviews, these "experts" can manipulate ratings for various kinds of purposes: personal, monetary, etc.
I really dislike this and I find ICOBench rather suspicious as there's no review quality audit and a reviewer isn't required to reassess his rating after an ICO asks him to for good reasons.
Jump to: