[ANN] INTENSE COIN - Blockchain backed decentralized VPN - Hybrid PoW - page 67.

Dogedicer

jr. member

Activity: 52

Merit: 2

Quote from: nikolasgr on March 06, 2018, 03:23:31 PM

It goes without saying that we mean VALID Participants. A participation which does not follow the requirements/rules is not a participation anyway.... So with what they did they accepted that they had more than 1000 participants but they paid only 565 of them. No sense at all.......

I agree with you. They should use common sense but they did not specify it in the airdrop rules if I am not wrong so you can not say that he is lying. It is just playing with words as you said before. It seems there is no chance to admit that ITNS did something wrong.

larsbalzak

jr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 1

Quote from: nikolasgr on March 06, 2018, 03:23:31 PM

Quote from: Dogedicer on March 06, 2018, 03:09:48 PM

Quote from: nikolasgr on March 06, 2018, 03:00:54 PM

Quote from: ThePigwee on March 06, 2018, 02:36:42 PM

Quote from: nikolasgr on March 06, 2018, 02:23:21 PM

Quote from: Dogedicer on March 06, 2018, 01:34:15 PM

Quote from: nikolasgr on March 06, 2018, 11:49:49 AM

Quote from: lncm on March 05, 2018, 10:43:36 AM

I barely met the minimum requirements and I got 4400 ITNS on the airdrop.

Sometimes people screw up and they simply can't admit it and go rage the internetz...

Well, indeed I agree with you. The IntenseCoin team screwed up and they can not admit this.

According to Slack support team, the usernames have been replaced by the display names. This has happened since September 2017 and those who have signed up in Slack after that date do not have any Slack username but they have a Slack display name (which is what was formerly known as username). I can provide evidence about it. Officially coming from Slack.

The IntenseCoin team have disqualified a lot of people since they do not accept this official principal!! Cheesy

They believe that the username in Slack is something different. According to the IntenseCoin team, my Slack username was my email ID (the email that Iused to sign up in Slack). This is totally incorrect. Therefore, I inserted the correct information in the form but the team disqualified me (and many others) since they believe that the username is something different (which is not!).

I don't know if they took this action by scope or not however the way they have handled all this and the ignorance they have shown is very bad and shows much of unseriousness.

If you still do not understand what I am saying, I am sorry. I have also contacted the Slack support team and I know very well the story inside-out and I do not care about the coins. But my IQ has falled down to zero with the excuses I hear from these people.

And that´s the answer I wanted to hear from devs! Thanks a lot for your effort and explanation. This search should for sure ITNS team did and not you. I gave up my fight because I don´t like to repeat same things again and again if there is zero chance to get real answer. Shame on me that I gave up Cheesy

I think they didn´t want to tell the truth because they screwed up it with SLACK and a they also screwed up rewards. Correct me if I am wrong please, because I really don´t remember it precisely but didn´t they say 1000 for everyone who will meet the conditions in airdrop? So why they sent higher amounts to people who met the conditions? Yes, It is nice from them and they have 2/3 of happy airdropers but it was not necessary and they would have now coins for people with SLACK problem. Problem would be solved as fast as arised and everybody would be happy. People would get their coins, bitcointalk would be full of positive messages how great devs are because they solved it and devs would save some coins for future.

So devs are in trouble now I guess. They don´t have coins which were intended for airdrop and they don´t want to send their own coins.

But after all my messages I would say they will just ignore it or ThePigwee will say something what will look like the answer. It will be not real answer but someone will say to you just shut up we do not want to listen it anymore . Case is closed Cheesy

The payment amount was the second mistake that they did. They said they will distribute 1 million up to 1,000 participants and 2.50 million coins if participants were higher than 1,000 and up to 2,500. So what they did? Total participants were 1227, from them the team says that the 53% were invalid participants and the valid were 565. However, they pay the amount basis 1227 participants. They brought a total mess in a simple airdrop and can not see what was the scope out of it.

Just so you have a better understanding, up to 1000 participants means the number of people that entered is less than or equal to 1000. Greater than 1000 participants bumps the payout amount. Participants =/= valid submissions.

If you continue like this i will believe it is just a matter of IQ all this. So you paid 565 people with the amount which you should have paid if participants were higher than 1000. This way I could send 2000 fake forms and those few people who are valid to earn even higher amount if this is based on all participants even valid or invalid. Are you playing with the words or is there anything else behind this BS?

Thumbs up again because ThePigwee is good with playing with words. I guess that´s why he was chosen as community manager Cheesy

But it really was in the conditions of airdrop. Another thing is that common sense should say to them something else.

It goes without saying that we mean VALID Participants. A participation which does not follow the requirements/rules is not a participation anyway.... So with what they did they accepted that they had more than 1000 participants but they paid only 565 of them. No sense at all.......

You can complain all you want but in the end you got to suck their dick.

korm

member

Activity: 280

Merit: 10

this is not for the average IQ Grin

nikolasgr

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0