Author

Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 221. (Read 473154 times)

legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
You said the ION post 'clearing the air' was Bullshit

What part of the ION POST clearing the air do you think is Bullshit all of it, some of it..... what do you mean ?

I believe that none of the post is bullshit so would like to understand why you think this ?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ion-ionomy-worthy-successor-to-xpy-100-premined-garza-would-be-proud-1673001
hero member
Activity: 1248
Merit: 583
Thanks for the clarification, you are circumventing the rules because people like me complain about you directly linking ION to XPY which is a forum rule break Smiley People like me respect and follow the rules

No, you're only "respecting" the rules when they favor you and you're clearly not following them now. You keep bringing up XPY (off topic - you're supposed to use the thread in my signature to discuss ION relationship with XPY) and now you're veering into meta discussion about rules etc (you should start a thread in Meta for that).

I'm not circumventing any rules. I have created a separate thread as advised by the mod. The problem is that you and your shillwhale buddies can't grasp such a simple concept.

A couple of days ago ION posted a just to be clear message on their news section in which your response was it's bullshit. I'm lost which part of the post is bullshit all or some.... below is a cut n paste of the post  

You shouldn't have bothered... the whole excuse "we're completely different from XPY" is bullshit and also off topic here by your "respected" rules. I have made my opinion known in the other thread. Will you finally man up and let it go?

Now click on your BTC rules link and read rule No.3

Please stop trolling and circumventing the rules to fit your narrative and maybe just maybe if you wish engage in a proper discussion.  Smiley

Report my posts. Create a whiny thread in Meta. There is no point to complain here. Me calling "bullshit" on something ION-related is quite on topic but mods have the last word anyway.


You said the ION post 'clearing the air' was Bullshit

What part of the ION POST clearing the air do you think is Bullshit all of it, some of it..... what do you mean ?

I believe that none of the post is bullshit so would like to understand why you think this ?
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Thanks for the clarification, you are circumventing the rules because people like me complain about you directly linking ION to XPY which is a forum rule break Smiley People like me respect and follow the rules

No, you're only "respecting" the rules when they favor you and you're clearly not following them now. You keep bringing up XPY (off topic - you're supposed to use the thread in my signature to discuss ION relationship with XPY) and now you're veering into meta discussion about rules etc (you should start a thread in Meta for that).

I'm not circumventing any rules. I have created a separate thread as advised by the mod. The problem is that you and your shillwhale buddies can't grasp such a simple concept.

A couple of days ago ION posted a just to be clear message on their news section in which your response was it's bullshit. I'm lost which part of the post is bullshit all or some.... below is a cut n paste of the post  

You shouldn't have bothered... the whole excuse "we're completely different from XPY" is bullshit and also off topic here by your "respected" rules. I have made my opinion known in the other thread. Will you finally man up and let it go?

Now click on your BTC rules link and read rule No.3

Please stop trolling and circumventing the rules to fit your narrative and maybe just maybe if you wish engage in a proper discussion.  Smiley

Report my posts. Create a whiny thread in Meta. There is no point to complain here. Me calling "bullshit" on something ION-related is quite on topic but mods have the last word anyway.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
I guess shilling hardcore for GAW, telling people how awesome and hardworking the GAW team was, is considered respectable and honest and trustworthy. Ignore the fact of how many people got further "invested" in this debacle because of the shilling words of a few.

Seeing that copyright on the one WildShill post as being 2014 makes me think. Did Matlack purposefully shill back then to get more people locked into XPY, while all the while knowing full well he was going to be creating the IOn coin? Speculation on my part. But still wondering where that ION copyright of 2014 came from? ION was thought about during the beginning of XPY? Something is fishy here.
hero member
Activity: 1248
Merit: 583
What's mind bloggling is after all these months you still try to link XPY to ION..... your footnote 

Read this .... https://news.ionomy.com/just-to-be-clear/

[ bullshit skipped ]

Please could you either speak with some facts to justify your footnote or change it to better reflect reality  Smiley

What are you on about? My signature? Where it says "XPY successor" and links to a thread that was created BECAUSE SHILLS LIKE YOURSELF COMPLAINED TO MODS ABOUT XPY BEING DISCUSSED HERE?

You can't have it both ways. You didn't want links between ION and XPY to be exposed here so I had to create a separate thread but you can't help yourself and keep bringing it up all the time.

Don't forget to report this post and all your own posts that bring up XPY and are therefore off topic.

And "XPY successor" is the mildest possible characterization of the relationship between the two coins. Ionomy aka xpy.io exchanged (and promised to burn but that's another story) most paycoins into ION, and all xpybits to atoms, so to deny that there was a "swap" is disingenuous at best. Really it's just a blatant lie.

So our scam finally made it to trex huh ?
i'm slight impressed tbh

Bittrex is a pay-to-play exchange. Pay 5 BTC or whatever the price is now and your coin will be listed as long at it passes code review and some other very loose requirements. Even an obvious post-XPY scam like Bitstone was able to get on Bittrex.

Thanks for the clarification, you are circumventing the rules because people like me complain about you directly linking ION to XPY which is a forum rule break Smiley People like me respect and follow the rules

A couple of days ago ION posted a just to be clear message on their news section in which your response was it's bullshit. I'm lost which part of the post is bullshit all or some.... below is a cut n paste of the post  

Some of the people who have contributed their labor to the ionomy project, including the development of ION, were customers of G.A.W. As customers, ALL were on the victim side of the fraud.


Is this bit bullshit

None of the participants in the ionomy project were ever involved in the perpetration of the G.A.W. fraud.

How about this bit is this bullshit

It was only after G.A.W. collapsed that any members of our team attempted to help salvage the development of XPY.

Or that the bullshit

Was anybody on the ION Team Employed by G.A.W.?
No. At no time was any member of the ION or the ionomy team employed by G.A.W. Miners or Homero Josh Garza, nor were any involved in the creation and launch of Paycoin.

Maybe this is the bullshit your refering too

Is ION the same thing as XPY?
No. ION is a coin that is wholly independent from Paycoin. Paycoin still exists as its own coin and blockchain. ION was not a coin swap, hard fork, or rebrand in any way, shape, or form.
During the Initial Coin Offering, some ION was sold for BTC, and some ION was traded for XPY, ETH, DOGE, and LTC at fair market value. Over 335 BTC was raised during the ION ICO.


Running out of post am I at the bullshit yet ?

The bullshit has got to be somewhere right...... oh yeah it's swap

Initial Staker Offering details:

XPY will have a fixed value of 8 to 1.
Customers who hold XPY will be able to purchase ION stakers at a ratio of 8 XPY to 1 ION. XPY.io customers can use XPY to purchase ION stakers of three different term-lengths: 6, 9, and 12 months. The longer the term, the higher the base rate. ionomy.com will accept no more than 10 million XPY toward the purchase of ION stakers and reserves the right to set reasonable limits to protect the business model and its userbase.

By your definition Today I went to a store and swapped 8 coins for a newspaper..... ridiculous

And lets not forget Bits

BiTS in the ION economy.
Customers will be credited 8 ION for each BiT they hold. Those ION will be held in 3 month Stakers at a base interest rate. BiTS remain held by the customer.
BiTS will be the exclusive producer of “Electrons,” a valuable asset in the ION ecosystem.

Bits as you know became ATOMS

Now click on your BTC rules link and read rule No.3

Please stop trolling and circumventing the rules to fit your narrative and maybe just maybe if you wish engage in a proper discussion.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
why is yobit on coinmarketcap.com out?

i can not WITHDRAWAL on yobit at days.

what is the problem?

Must be yobits fault. ION has had a perfectly functioning wallet for the past 9 month now. The wallet worked so well the team had to rebase to make it not work as well. Yobit's wallet must not breathe well enough for the new network.
hero member
Activity: 797
Merit: 506
why is yobit on coinmarketcap.com out?

i can not WITHDRAWAL on yobit at days.

what is the problem?
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 500
hope this dont let me down
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 500
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Loading...
Edited 2020-11-29 to fix a broken image

Of course slackers don't see anything wrong with this "let's do something stupid at the last minute cuz we're brilliant at fucking things up" attitude.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
Latest Version of the ION Wallet



What happened to the 2014 Copyright?

And this is no longer a portion of a DASH clone?

And shouldn't you put the ION devs last on the list as they did the absolute least on the whole project?😜
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 500
Latest Version of the ION Wallet

legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Alright this scam coin has picked back up! It was looking rather boring in the past week.
Looks like the 17yo dev stabilized the wallet(s) long enough for Bittrex to accept the pay-to-play donation for its listing.
 Grin  Grin  Grin
The ION team was able to get a new mailing address - Global Gateway 8 Rue de la Perle, Providence, Mahe Seychelles.
I hope the ION team doesn't get confused with all the other scams that use the 'Global Gateway 8 Rue de la Perle' location as well.
The ION should stand out as a unique digital hole to throw your valued assets away.
 Roll Eyes  Roll Eyes  Roll Eyes
Alright, we even the korvas shill account pushing a new script of a new/old narrative.
I love how this account now speaks much better english and doesn't ramble in blocks of text now.
 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Ohmahgawd @SuchMoon did you see the new game tease on the ionomy page?
To the Moon...  Cheesy
Other edits were done!

I did enjoy how the buttons to download GRAVITY, doesn't work at all, but activates the cursor change.  Cheesy
The evolving garbage is slightly amusing now once more.

The new site is quite pathetic.

They have this "promo" header with only one item on it (wallet download) but it still slides sideways every few seconds for no reason.

Game links don't work as you mentioned.

"Edgey" is still there despite having been ridiculed for months.

And even though the website redesign was supposedly dependent on Bittrex listing there is no link to Bittrex or mention of it on the site. They do mention it a few clicks away on the news blog but that doesn't link to the actual ION market page either. It's almost as if the whole Bittrex-website-countdown-Gravity "plan" was a load of bullshit.

Gawsome.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Alright this scam coin has picked back up! It was looking rather boring in the past week.
Looks like the 17yo dev stabilized the wallet(s) long enough for Bittrex to accept the pay-to-play donation for its listing.
 Grin  Grin  Grin
The ION team was able to get a new mailing address - Global Gateway 8 Rue de la Perle, Providence, Mahe Seychelles.
I hope the ION team doesn't get confused with all the other scams that use the 'Global Gateway 8 Rue de la Perle' location as well.
The ION should stand out as a unique digital hole to throw your valued assets away.
 Roll Eyes  Roll Eyes  Roll Eyes
Alright, we even the korvas shill account pushing a new script of a new/old narrative.
I love how this account now speaks much better english and doesn't ramble in blocks of text now.
 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Ohmahgawd @SuchMoon did you see the new game tease on the ionomy page?
To the Moon...  Cheesy
Other edits were done!

I did enjoy how the buttons to download GRAVITY, doesn't work at all, but activates the cursor change.  Cheesy
The evolving garbage is slightly amusing now once more.

legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org


Or you could just post the link instead of spamming a bunch of empty lines:

https://news.ionomy.com/introducing-ion-2-0/

Looks like the new website is up but there is no countdown timer as far as I can see. Gravity is shown as "Beta", and one other game is shown as "Nearing Alpha", which in ionomy world means "we may start working on it if you give us more money and the stars align favorably".

https://ionomy.com/games
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 500

 
 


 
 
 


 
 

 

ION 2.0 — Great performance now; great bones for the future

 ionomy proudly presents ION 2.0. The coin dev team radically redesigned ION for two reasons. First, we needed a better performing wallet. Second, we’re integrating ionomy.com platform features such as digital assets into the blockchain. We completely rewrote the code for ION. The result is a wallet that is lightweight, fast, and powerful as a foundation for future development. The new features are awesome: •Proof of Stake 4.0 
•InstantX: small transactions confirm immediately via masternode network
•Simultaneous staking and masternode operation from the same address and wallet
•Delta retargeting to smooth out difficulty spikes, averaging 70 second blocks
•Stealth addresses
•Automatic wallet backups
The transition from ION classic to ION 2.0 went according to plan. We recorded a snapshot of the old blockchain and started the ION 2.0 chain. All balances at the time of the snapshot were distributed to the identical addresses on the new chain. Users imported their wallet backups and/or private keys into the update app and picked up exactly where they left off.
   
ION v2.1.2 – A TESTAMENT TO THE COMMUNITY

 When we opened the new 2.0 wallet to a wider audience, we noticed some problems that were not evident on a smaller scale.

 The issues galvanized the community. It brought out the best in many members, who came together to scour the code for errors, narrow down the source of the problems, and test solutions. We were reminded yet again why we’re really here – for the community.

 The joint efforts of the ionomy coin dev team and the community are already paying off: the wallets are stable and “just work.” Wallets discover connections to the network quickly. Transactions broadcast across the network instantly and confirm in 1 block. Masternodes run reliably. CPU and memory usage is light.

 To take advantage of these fixes, update your wallet to the latest version. It not only improves performance and stability, but accelerates transactions for everyone.

 Updated Windows, Mac, and Linux QT wallets (v2.1.2 ION) are available for download.

Source code has been updated to:
 Version: v2.1.2 
 Protocol: 95605

 We appreciate your patience and support during the update. Should you have any issues with your wallet update you can request technical assistance by emailing ionomy support or posting on the slack channel for #help_and_support. For bug report and wallet feature requests please use the ION github issues page.
   
Trade ION on Bittrex
 
   


   
 

 

ION is now trading on Bittrex!

 For the first time, ION is listed on a major exchange. After reviewing the ION 2.0 code and wallet performance, Bittrex gave the listing of ION the green light.

 All of us here at ionomy are excited about the recent developments and what they mean for the future. The foundation has been set. Now let’s build the ION economy.

 We thank all our supporters, families, and the community for making this adventure possible — and a lot of fun.

 Regards,

 The ionomy Team 
   
 




 


 
 
 
   


 
 
 
   


 
 
 
   
 
 
 


 
 

 
Copyright © 2017 ionomy, All rights reserved.
 all site users that signed up

Our mailing address is:

ionomy

Global Gateway 8 Rue de la Perle,
Providence, Mahe 
Seychelles

 
 
 
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
What's mind bloggling is after all these months you still try to link XPY to ION..... your footnote 

Read this .... https://news.ionomy.com/just-to-be-clear/

[ bullshit skipped ]

Please could you either speak with some facts to justify your footnote or change it to better reflect reality  Smiley

What are you on about? My signature? Where it says "XPY successor" and links to a thread that was created BECAUSE SHILLS LIKE YOURSELF COMPLAINED TO MODS ABOUT XPY BEING DISCUSSED HERE?

You can't have it both ways. You didn't want links between ION and XPY to be exposed here so I had to create a separate thread but you can't help yourself and keep bringing it up all the time.

Don't forget to report this post and all your own posts that bring up XPY and are therefore off topic.

And "XPY successor" is the mildest possible characterization of the relationship between the two coins. Ionomy aka xpy.io exchanged (and promised to burn but that's another story) most paycoins into ION, and all xpybits to atoms, so to deny that there was a "swap" is disingenuous at best. Really it's just a blatant lie.

So our scam finally made it to trex huh ?
i'm slight impressed tbh

Bittrex is a pay-to-play exchange. Pay 5 BTC or whatever the price is now and your coin will be listed as long at it passes code review and some other very loose requirements. Even an obvious post-XPY scam like Bitstone was able to get on Bittrex.
hero member
Activity: 1248
Merit: 583
Your mixing 2 separate entities together Mattlack was responsible for XPY.io only

Again totally different http://paycoinfoundation.org/ the fruits of their labor..... Ethereum wallet Huh

I guess the link will show that Adam Mattlack was head of the Paycoin Foundation which I'm aware of.

Ok, fine. I suspect my opinion of the value that XPY.io brought differs to yours, but that's fair enough. I'm sure you can appreciate why I was under the impression you were unaware based on the above, though?

Ah I was right with the link No probs  Smiley I can appreciate why you were under that impression so no offence taken.
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1004
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
i agree korvas that those things they stated are facts but it makes no difference. lets be generous and ignore matlacks personal shilling that lead to people loosing money. they were the devs after the scam and not just customers. they promised things for money. are you saying they take no responsibility for stuff they did and promised?

they took in money and did not complete most of their road-map... beating this dead horse is useless. more pertinent is the question: what makes ion different when the management is the same. we have seen what they have done in a whole year for ion  Roll Eyes  Roll Eyes  Roll Eyes and before that for paycoin (not delivering). pure incompetence at every corner. going as far as dumping the old ion shitcoin clone Grin



Quote
PayCoin Foundation Takes Leadership of Coin Development
March 12, 2015
Houston, TX
The PayCoin Foundation would like to formally announce that it has taken responsibility of the development of PayCoin. All future updates of the source code for PayCoin will be released via the Paycoin Foundation Github.
PayCoin has multiple tools at its disposal to help with market growth, stability, security and inflation control. It is very important that these tools are implemented correctly through coin development with flexibility to adapt as the coin grows.
Coin development and paycoin.com are supported by Team PayCoin, a volunteer group formed from within the PayCoin community. In addition to Team PayCoin, the foundation is also actively seeking potential partners to aid in coin development.
Though we are not currently disclosing development plans, we want to make it clear that a fix to the checkpoint error in the current wallet as well as a fix to the blockchain synchronization issue that stalls the updating of the wallet will be our first release.
The PayCoin Foundation has a roadmap for coin development however we feel it is important to hear from the community prior to finalizing any plans. There are multiple items that were discussed with the community through the white paper produced by GAW Miners, LLC. This has formed the understanding of how the community expected PayCoin to work. If this is going to be a community coin, we need to hear from the community. So we are leaving this discussion open for response. Share your thoughts with us at talk.paycoin.com


ps: i remember reading gaws offshore/domestic structuring document prepared by empire legal pllc where paycoin foundation was mentioned but that could be  benign

pps: "Though we are not currently disclosing development plan", kind of like the secret whale plan of ion  Grin

Your mixing 2 separate entities together Mattlack was responsible for XPY.io only, You outline one of the reasons why XPY.io dropped XPY..... no control over a coin that was fundamental to the development of the XPY.io platform. Obviously being the only player that actually tried to work with XPY he had some input into direction, but that's all it was input...... input with no control, the control of the coin was 100% with the XPY dev team.

Your right XPY.io took the money and did not complete the roadmap this is why you had the option to exit with a profit if you owned XBITS or transition your XPY across to ION.  

pps: "Though we are not currently disclosing development plan", kind of like the secret whale plan of ion  Grin

Again totally different http://paycoinfoundation.org/ the fruits of their labor..... Ethereum wallet Huh


Respectfully, Korvas, you are wrong. While you are correct that XPY Dev was (apparently) a separate entity, the Paycoin Foundation was led by Adam Matlack:

http://www.buzzfile.com/business/Paycoin-Foundation,-Inc.-832-545-7786

I believe XPY.io was developed in tandem by Matlack et al under the Paycoin Foundation umbrella, and obviously eventually span off into Ionomy. I'm not accusing XPY.io/Ionomy of being Garza in disguise, but nevertheless it's important that the facts are straight as this confusing previous structure is where a hell of a lot of rumour and heresay has sprung up from. As an aside, its curious that you as one of the whales in the Ionomy ecosystem, and a previously large investor in XPY.io apparently weren't aware of the ins and outs of the old structure.

Your link is access denied so I can't see what you want me too  Sad

I guess the link will show that Adam Mattlack was head of the Paycoin Foundation which I'm aware of.

Just my opinion the collapse of XPY was as we all know a total mess which when you consider what happened is understandable. The only gem in all of this steaming pile of Sh*t Garza left us with was XPY.io.

XPY.io tried to save XPY (a broken coin). Don't forget they tried to work with the XPY dev team for months before the ION announcement but with little to no success.......... the only plus I can think of is scrape address's..... nice but not really a big deal

BTW. I wasn't that big an investor in XPY.io I increased my investment when the transition to ION occurred as I liked the direction ION were headed and was happy with the XPY.io team.



ION will never get rid of the Paycoin stench, no matter how often you "rebase" it, rename it and shill for it.
Jump to: