[ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 7.

WildShark

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 500

@ionomy What's NEW with ION
Here's a couple of links to the strong IONomy 2020 effort for your reading pleasure. The ionomy has been doing a piss poor job of informing the ION & cyrpto community with current NEWS and developments in the growth of the Ionomy 2020 vision.

https://ion.community/category/1/announcements

Cool

Build a HEALTHY ecosystem thru controlled SOLID GROWTH solutions
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53075751

Embarrassed

Wild's Depot R & D team discovers 26 DEFECTS in IIP 6 design and standards
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52958751

Lips sealed

HEAVY use of "KNOT" theory on ION community by ionomy "WHALE" investor
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53148578

Wink

ION Proposal 8 ION NEW standards for Deflationary
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53149849

Grin

OPEN COMMUNICATION using Wild's Depot PROFESSIONAL Discord adult R & D channel
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53131076

Shocked

🔥🔥🔥 Hot Winter Preview
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53087021

Embarrassed

ionomy pivots project without a VALID ION improvement proposal
- ION Core Developers slinging code at Mr. Matlack & Pfeiffer's current depressing economic model/dream
- STEALS/uses Mr. Onion's WIN & IIP concept giving no ION BOUNTY reward to really talented System Engineers & DEVs
- Matlack's GOAL by deleting and REMOVING competitively competing WORK EFFORT
- Ionomy unfairness to listen or CONSIDER other ION Improvement Proposals
- IIP 2 CLOSED with status of "REJECTED - NOT in accordance with IIP 1 standards"
- IIP 6 REJECTED with status of "Not Legal or Acceptable" to encourage a "Bait & Swap" product scam to Ionomy investors
- ION community needs to VOTE for public acceptance of IIP 8 Add-Developer-Assets-to-ION-Blockchain (ION 2020 White Paper)
- NOT an ION proposal in place to support DarkMatter design, development and useful purpose to ION community

Ionomy Investor Note
A SPAM definition from the Ionomy Kangaroo court or Dr. Wild OnION NEW with IONomy news.

altheshort

full member

Activity: 214

Merit: 113

Quote from: korvas128 on February 02, 2020, 05:58:38 PM

Let's put you in perspective

. You were sniping here for over a year until June 2017. Disappeared coming back October last year after (so you say) a 2-year lurking vacation to carry on exactly where you left off Grin

Such a shame you weren't around to comment during what was a very profitable ion period pre ALTcoin collapse.

The reason you came back

Quote from: altheshort on October 05, 2019, 08:19:15 AM

Quote

Obviously I haven’t posted here for a long time, but I still follow this thread because I take some perverse enjoyment in reading deluded nutters of all stripes posting about altcoin nonsense.

Korvas and Sharkie are two such nutters, though the delusion differs between them.

That does make me feel a little uncomfortable but not much

The really funny thing is and it really is amusing is that with such a colorful past you expect me to take you seriously Grin

expecting me to answer all your questions Grin

Hope you're having an enjoyable weekend Grin

Heard a really good quote today

Yes, again, I’m totally aware of what I’ve written in the past. I genuinely do think you and Shark, and most if not all altcoin investors are absolutely off your respective rockers. I do think some of the things you and him write are pant wettingly funny at times. I’m happy to own that label, even if it makes me an asshole, since I’m entitled to an opinion. As are you.

However, I’m also entitled to ask questions. If you’re too wrapped up in your little package of altcoin cultism to be able to differentiate between a valid question and the dreaded ‘FUD’, that honestly only makes these interactions more amusing in my eyes.

I’m assuming the fact that you haven’t answered my questions and been able to show evidence is because there isn’t any, which is what any reasonable person would conclude from your constant desire to reframe everything in a way that suits your happy clappy, ion will prevail agenda.

By the way - you must have forgotten again - that ‘very profitable’ ion period was purely coincidental and had nothing to do with ion at all. Just to make that clear.

Have a good week, Korvas.

korvas128

hero member

Activity: 1248

Merit: 583

Quote from: altheshort on February 02, 2020, 03:41:48 AM

Quote from: korvas128 on February 01, 2020, 04:09:47 PM

What you see is your very first post that sets a trend. It's been almost 4 years now of this passive-aggressive FUD rubbish, aren't you bored yet.

Thanks. As it happens, though, I’m quite familiar with what I’ve written in the past.

Anyway, it’s good that we’ve moved back to this - is this where you’re going to finally address this and refute, with evidence, the points I’ve raised? Can you show me data to prove that Ionomy’s games were/are thriving, for example?

To be clear, this isn’t ‘FUD’. This is a valid discussion. It might make you uncomfortable, but it’s valid nonetheless.

Let's put you in perspective

. You were sniping here for over a year until June 2017. Disappeared coming back October last year after (so you say) a 2-year lurking vacation to carry on exactly where you left off Grin

Such a shame you weren't around to comment during what was a very profitable ion period pre ALTcoin collapse.

The reason you came back

Quote from: altheshort on October 05, 2019, 08:19:15 AM

Quote

Obviously I haven’t posted here for a long time, but I still follow this thread because I take some perverse enjoyment in reading deluded nutters of all stripes posting about altcoin nonsense.

Korvas and Sharkie are two such nutters, though the delusion differs between them.

That does make me feel a little uncomfortable but not much

The really funny thing is and it really is amusing is that with such a colorful past you expect me to take you seriously Grin

expecting me to answer all your questions Grin

Hope you're having an enjoyable weekend Grin

Heard a really good quote today

Quote

A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.

Enjoy

altheshort

full member

Activity: 214

Merit: 113

Quote from: korvas128 on February 01, 2020, 04:09:47 PM

What you see is your very first post that sets a trend. It's been almost 4 years now of this passive-aggressive FUD rubbish, aren't you bored yet.

Thanks. As it happens, though, I’m quite familiar with what I’ve written in the past.

Anyway, it’s good that we’ve moved back to this - is this where you’re going to finally address this and refute, with evidence, the points I’ve raised? Can you show me data to prove that Ionomy’s games were/are thriving, for example?

To be clear, this isn’t ‘FUD’. This is a valid discussion. It might make you uncomfortable, but it’s valid nonetheless.

WildShark

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 500

Quote from: suchmoon on February 01, 2020, 04:53:36 PM

Quote from: korvas128 on February 01, 2020, 04:09:47 PM

What you see is your very first post that sets a trend. It's been almost 4 years now of this passive-aggressive FUD rubbish, aren't you bored yet.

And here we are 4 years later and how many pivots have we had since then, from one harebrained idea to another?

It's not FUD if it's factual. ION is a niche shitcoin like thousands of others.

Mr Matlack has a very hard time of hitting always moving product window

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: korvas128 on February 01, 2020, 04:09:47 PM

What you see is your very first post that sets a trend. It's been almost 4 years now of this passive-aggressive FUD rubbish, aren't you bored yet.

And here we are 4 years later and how many pivots have we had since then, from one harebrained idea to another?

It's not FUD if it's factual. ION is a niche shitcoin like thousands of others.

korvas128

hero member

Activity: 1248

Merit: 583

Quote from: altheshort on February 01, 2020, 01:36:59 PM

Quote from: korvas128 on February 01, 2020, 08:31:03 AM

Maybe 4 years isn't long enough to call this a witchhunt

What I said was

Quote from: korvas128 on January 27, 2020, 05:57:54 PM

Quote

I can't properly remember but I think what you're referring to was in 2017, It was a Korean exchange that helped ION hit a high of $8
with a daily trading volume in the $millions. An un-forecasted opportunity that proved to be quite a lucrative one.

You then posted the conversation you lifted from discord confirming I was right. I suggest next time you post the evidence at the same time as your observations, that will facilitate a more efficient discussion.

BTW. I know exactly the point your making and it's a lame one.

No.

What you actually said after that was:

Quote from: korvas128 on January 30, 2020, 11:37:25 AM

You understood wrong, If you want to discuss please share your posts.

Look, I understand that the way this played out in reality doesn’t fit the shiny happy everybody clapping hands and making millions of $s narrative that you want to spin this with, but the reality is:

- Ionomy asked for donations
- Ionomy took donations
- Ionomy sent donations to Korean exchange
- Exchange went bust, taking the donations with them
- Some of those who donated weren’t happy

You’re mistaking raising valid points, based on facts and observations of Ionomy over 3+ years, as being a ‘witch hunt’. I don’t expect you to understand this, but there is a difference.

This is fun Grin

What you see is your very first post that sets a trend. It's been almost 4 years now of this passive-aggressive FUD rubbish, aren't you bored yet.

altheshort

full member

Activity: 214

Merit: 113

Quote from: korvas128 on February 01, 2020, 08:31:03 AM

Maybe 4 years isn't long enough to call this a witchhunt

What I said was

Quote from: korvas128 on January 27, 2020, 05:57:54 PM

Quote

I can't properly remember but I think what you're referring to was in 2017, It was a Korean exchange that helped ION hit a high of $8
with a daily trading volume in the $millions. An un-forecasted opportunity that proved to be quite a lucrative one.

You then posted the conversation you lifted from discord confirming I was right. I suggest next time you post the evidence at the same time as your observations, that will facilitate a more efficient discussion.

BTW. I know exactly the point your making and it's a lame one.

No.

What you actually said after that was:

Quote from: korvas128 on January 30, 2020, 11:37:25 AM

You understood wrong, If you want to discuss please share your posts.

Look, I understand that the way this played out in reality doesn’t fit the shiny happy everybody clapping hands and making millions of $s narrative that you want to spin this with, but the reality is:

- Ionomy asked for donations
- Ionomy took donations
- Ionomy sent donations to Korean exchange
- Exchange went bust, taking the donations with them
- Some of those who donated weren’t happy

You’re mistaking raising valid points, based on facts and observations of Ionomy over 3+ years, as being a ‘witch hunt’. I don’t expect you to understand this, but there is a difference.

WildShark

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 500

Support 2020 thru 2025 Network Ownership
BUY/SELL
IONomy holdateral resources

ION, DarkMatter, IONsx, PIT, and Atoms

Trade at ionomy Exchange (V3 platform)
https://ionomy.com/en/markets/ion-ionsx
Cool

korvas128

hero member

Activity: 1248

Merit: 583

Quote from: altheshort on February 01, 2020, 07:40:51 AM

Quote from: korvas128 on February 01, 2020, 07:02:54 AM

Wow you really are on a witchhunt

Yes, it was Trebit an opportunity to get listed on a big Korean exchange. Ionomy asked for a contribution. I like PC miner donated 0.5 BTC to help make this happen. It's a shame Trebit went bankrupt as it helped ION get to a price of $8 with $millions traded daily. Even though they shut down I made more than I donated plus I helped the community as everyone was able to reap the rewards. Grin

Win/Win for all and also ancient history

You have an extremely low bar for a witch hunt. I’m simply using evidence to present questions about something that actually happened. It’s funny how you suddenly remember it now despite telling me I had entirely misunderstood in your reply before, isn’t it?

You’re clearly not interested in addressing the actual points here though, so there’s no point in continuing this discussion - anyone can clearly see that you’re avoiding the underlying issues I’ve raised because they’re awkward for you and don’t present ready opportunities for you to whitewash everything with your all time high rubbish.

Maybe 4 years isn't long enough to call this a witchhunt

What I said was

Quote from: korvas128 on January 27, 2020, 05:57:54 PM

Quote

I can't properly remember but I think what you're referring to was in 2017, It was a Korean exchange that helped ION hit a high of $8
with a daily trading volume in the $millions. An un-forecasted opportunity that proved to be quite a lucrative one.

You then posted the conversation you lifted from discord confirming I was right. I suggest next time you post the evidence at the same time as your observations, that will facilitate a more efficient discussion.

BTW. I know exactly the point your making and it's a lame one.

altheshort

full member

Activity: 214

Merit: 113

Quote from: korvas128 on February 01, 2020, 07:02:54 AM

Wow you really are on a witchhunt

Yes, it was Trebit an opportunity to get listed on a big Korean exchange. Ionomy asked for a contribution. I like PC miner donated 0.5 BTC to help make this happen. It's a shame Trebit went bankrupt as it helped ION get to a price of $8 with $millions traded daily. Even though they shut down I made more than I donated plus I helped the community as everyone was able to reap the rewards. Grin

Win/Win for all and also ancient history

You have an extremely low bar for a witch hunt. I’m simply using evidence to present questions about something that actually happened. It’s funny how you suddenly remember it now despite telling me I had entirely misunderstood in your reply before, isn’t it?

You’re clearly not interested in addressing the actual points here though, so there’s no point in continuing this discussion - anyone can clearly see that you’re avoiding the underlying issues I’ve raised because they’re awkward for you and don’t present ready opportunities for you to whitewash everything with your all time high rubbish.

korvas128

hero member

Activity: 1248

Merit: 583

Quote from: altheshort on February 01, 2020, 05:09:50 AM

Quote

If you can’t work out why it might potentially be more of a concern now than when they had all their fresh ICO funds in 2017 and they’ve still yet to produce anything successful, I don’t know what to say.

Wow you really are on a witchhunt

Yes, it was Trebit an opportunity to get listed on a big Korean exchange. Ionomy asked for a contribution. I like PC miner donated 0.5 BTC to help make this happen. It's a shame Trebit went bankrupt as it helped ION get to a price of $8 with $millions traded daily. Even though they shut down I made more than I donated plus I helped the community as everyone was able to reap the rewards. Grin

Win/Win for all and also ancient history

Quote from: altheshort on February 01, 2020, 05:09:50 AM

Quote

Also, if you could avoid wall quoting Wild’s crazy bull crap that’d be great.

Sorry,I will

Quote from: altheshort on February 01, 2020, 05:09:50 AM

Quote

By the way, what happened to this:

Yep got delayed a couple of weeks, during the DASH rebase a couple of opportunities were identified to enhance the code which pushed the release of GameGrid out a little

Check this out https://news.ionomy.com/ionosphere-1-31/ or listen to https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ionomics-community-podcast/id1465142627#episodeGuid=http%3A%2F%2Fmpomy.com%2Fionomypod%2F%3Fp%3D53

- Revolutionary POW/POS hybrid consensus
- Enhanced security
- Deflationary factors
- Token mining

This is just the start. Literally years of learning/experience/work coming to fruition Grin

altheshort

full member

Activity: 214

Merit: 113

Quote from: korvas128 on January 30, 2020, 11:37:25 AM

You understood wrong, If you want to discuss please share your posts.

Concerning business longevity, I obviously can't say 100% if Ionomy is going to be around for the next 5 years but I believe they will be. If this is such a concern why didn't you flag it in 2017,2018 or 2019? why 2020?

No, I didn’t understand wrong. That’s exactly what happened:

If you can’t work out why it might potentially be more of a concern now than when they had all their fresh ICO funds in 2017 and they’ve still yet to produce anything successful, I don’t know what to say.

Also, if you could avoid wall quoting Wild’s crazy bull crap that’d be great.

By the way, what happened to this:

korvas128

hero member

Activity: 1248

Merit: 583

korvas128

hero member

Activity: 1248

Merit: 583

Quote from: altheshort on January 28, 2020, 03:02:09 PM

Quote from: korvas128 on January 27, 2020, 05:57:54 PM

I can't properly remember but I think what you're referring to was in 2017, It was a Korean exchange that helped ION hit a high of $8
with a daily trading volume in the $millions. An un-forecasted opportunity that proved to be quite a lucrative one.

From what I understood from posts I've seen, it may have been a Korean exchange but it was closed down soon after the donations were taken. Besides, you're missing the point - I suspect deliberately - which was that it appears that they had to ask for money to fund that from their community. As I said before, you can't with any confidence say that you fully know the financial situation of the team as they never discuss it.

Quote from: korvas128 on January 27, 2020, 05:57:54 PM

What you've described actually is the signature of a focused agile team. Ionomy is not perfect but who is when it comes to real-world implementation. Although I did make a perfect telephone call a few months ago Grin

it was perfect.

Right, so the fact that they've so far produced nothing in 4 years of work that's ever appealed to more than what, 50 or 60 people at the absolute peak is a sign of success in your eyes? And from this you conclude that they'll somehow now pull a magic rabbit out of their hat and start producing something that'll bring in 1 million users?

You understood wrong, If you want to discuss please share your posts.

Concerning business longevity, I obviously can't say 100% if Ionomy is going to be around for the next 5 years but I believe they will be. If this is such a concern why didn't you flag it in 2017,2018 or 2019? why 2020?

Believe what you want. If your still around let's have a recap Jan 2021

For me, Ionomy has been a very profitable venture and still will be, it's why I still post. You'll know when I think times have changed as I'll stop responding to bullshit posts. Grin

o0o0

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1021

here we go again.

WildShark

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 500

Quote from: o0o0 on December 13, 2019, 11:12:01 AM

WildShark your ramblings are incoherent and make little sense.

Additionally if you want to be taken seriously why is your avatar in those images a pic of you naked in a jeep. KNOT professional and shows just how unstable you are in the head.

Mr. Legendary o0o0,THANK YOU for your constructive criticism. I will add this GOOD defect to the WIN design & ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. OnION is well known to be a nudist that had a problem with his mother trying to keeping a pair of shorts on him when he was kid Cool

My Bitcon talk post 9863 identifies the lack of ION information defect in ION Community forum
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53336116

HINT: The revised ION block reward schedule for 2020 thru 2025 & current ION coin NEWS should majestically appear in ION Community forum to complete the system design for the 4.1.1 Ionomy Q3 2020 wallet product

Matlack's impossible accomplishment WITHOUT System Requirements for ION coin & ionomy 2020 platform

Matlack's ionomy ONLY 2020 MILESTONE/GOAL product for ION Community

UNANSWER Matlack's ionomy System Design 4.1.0

LACK of Quality Assurance for ION 4.1 wallet product delivery

The members of my Cyrpto, Ionomy & ION teams take me very serious when I recommend that the ION & Cyrpto communities can avoid the downfall of Ionomy 2020 vision by NOT USING/SWITCHING to the ionomy 4.1.0 Q1 2020 wallet product.

I can sum up the answer to the deflationary and CURB INFLATION IIP 6 design:
The Ionomy investors wisdom joke does NOT believe in need for deflationary ionomy wallet product Roll Eyes

INFORM Mr. Matlack to only include rebase to DASH and the Wild's Depot Hot Fix 4.1.1 design to change the block reward to 12 coins in the Q3 2020 ION "NEWTRON" wallet. The current ION 4.0 has inflation controlled by the wallet and has the block reward schedule FROZEN for the next four years.

@everyone ION HARD FORK on Q3 2020 with Ionomy 4.1.1 wallet defect-free product

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: altheshort on January 28, 2020, 03:02:09 PM

Right, so the fact that they've so far produced nothing in 4 years of work that's ever appealed to more than what, 50 or 60 people at the absolute peak is a sign of success in your eyes? And from this you conclude that they'll somehow now pull a magic rabbit out of their hat and start producing something that'll bring in 1 million users?

I think a picture of a cute rabbit would attract more eyeballs than any of their abysmal games or PNGs or the grid-something-or-other nonsense.

altheshort

full member

Activity: 214

Merit: 113

Quote from: korvas128 on January 27, 2020, 05:57:54 PM

I can't properly remember but I think what you're referring to was in 2017, It was a Korean exchange that helped ION hit a high of $8
with a daily trading volume in the $millions. An un-forecasted opportunity that proved to be quite a lucrative one.

From what I understood from posts I've seen, it may have been a Korean exchange but it was closed down soon after the donations were taken. Besides, you're missing the point - I suspect deliberately - which was that it appears that they had to ask for money to fund that from their community. As I said before, you can't with any confidence say that you fully know the financial situation of the team as they never discuss it.

Quote from: korvas128 on January 27, 2020, 05:57:54 PM

What you've described actually is the signature of a focused agile team. Ionomy is not perfect but who is when it comes to real-world implementation. Although I did make a perfect telephone call a few months ago Grin

it was perfect.

Right, so the fact that they've so far produced nothing in 4 years of work that's ever appealed to more than what, 50 or 60 people at the absolute peak is a sign of success in your eyes? And from this you conclude that they'll somehow now pull a magic rabbit out of their hat and start producing something that'll bring in 1 million users?

korvas128

hero member

Activity: 1248

Merit: 583

Quote from: altheshort on January 27, 2020, 03:39:46 PM

Quote from: korvas128 on January 27, 2020, 10:44:29 AM

Goalposts changing is such a simplistic definition. The vision is still the same. Strategy/Tactics/Resource have changed due to a) how the crypto market has evolved since 2016 and b) Having a better understanding of developer/end-user propositions.

The agile survive hence the reason why they are still going strong.... also helps to have a properly funded business

Would this be the same 'fully funded' Ionomy that at some point in 2018 asked some of it's community members to donate 0.5 BTC each to get Ion listed on an exchange? The truth is that you likely have no real idea of their financial situation because they don't talk about that stuff beyond vague 'we have enough money' noises occasionally.

I could understand the agility argument if it was backed up by any wider success in the past at all, but it's not. Going all the way back to it's inception with XPY.io, this team has so far delivered nothing that has appealed to an audience bigger than a small subsection of a subsection of the alt coin community, and has had to keep revising and redesigning it's core offering as it uncovers flaws and missteps in it's delivery. This is not the signature of a focused, agile team. This is the signature of a team who have to keep changing their goals and project aims because they consistently underestimate both the true scope of their work and the skills needed to deliver it to a standard that actually appeals to people.

Quote from: altheshort on January 27, 2020, 03:39:46 PM

Quote

Would this be the same 'fully funded' Ionomy that at some point in 2018 asked some of it's community members to donate 0.5 BTC each to get Ion listed on an exchange? The truth is that you likely have no real idea of their financial situation because they don't talk about that stuff beyond vague 'we have enough money' noises occasionally.

I can't properly remember but I think what you're referring to was in 2017, It was a Korean exchange that helped ION hit a high of $8
with a daily trading volume in the $millions. An un-forecasted opportunity that proved to be quite a lucrative one.

Quote from: altheshort on January 27, 2020, 03:39:46 PM

Quote

I could understand the agility argument if it was backed up by any wider success in the past at all, but it's not. Going all the way back to it's inception with XPY.io, this team has so far delivered nothing that has appealed to an audience bigger than a small subsection of a subsection of the alt coin community, and has had to keep revising and redesigning it's core offering as it uncovers flaws and missteps in it's delivery. This is not the signature of a focused, agile team. This is the signature of a team who have to keep changing their goals and project aims because they consistently underestimate both the true scope of their work and the skills needed to deliver it to a standard that actually appeals to people.

What you've described actually is the signature of a focused agile team. Ionomy is not perfect but who is when it comes to real-world implementation. Although I did make a perfect telephone call a few months ago Grin

it was perfect.

Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 7. (Read 473073 times)