looks like wildshark has yet another ban. some info for him when he returns if he’s serious about not getting another.
1 - dont ask suchmoon or myself for merits. merit begging is against rules.
2 - dont repost a deleted post. doesnt matter if you think you are right. if your post is removed by a mod dont copy paste it. if it was deleted first time it’ll be deleted again and it makes you ignorant, stupid and a slow learner.
3 - its not your forum so abide by the listed rules regardless of if you think you are right. you are a guest here and have no rights much like a visitor to your house. im not right if i come to your house and piss in your fishtank because i think you are keeping a fish hostage. your house your rules.
4 - stop spamming. if your post has substance it will be read. removing your previous post contents and moving your contents to the front continually is spam. we saw it once. no need to move it to the front to make us read it again and again.
5 - make new content not recycle the same broken record post.
Overall wildshark id say with your temp ban counts you are getting close to a perma ban. post like a normal person not a crazy stalker ex girlfriend/boyfriend.
i get it your investments suck but be constructive not like a sore loser. maybe you could convert it all to btc before the halving and get back 1/5 of your ion expenditures.
or maybe hold it and utilise all the ground breaking services korvas believes in.
Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 9. (Read 473073 times)
December 29, 2019, 05:14:21 AM
December 23, 2019, 08:42:50 AM
wildshark stop spamming your same shit post after someone comments to keep it at end. we get it about your ideas. cut the shit out before you get yet another ban
Hilariously I think he actually believes that by tacking his crazy posts on the end so they're always the most recent post, he's getting more people to read his bullcrap. Most people probably have him on ignore by this point anyway, and there's probably not many that actually read this topic any more regardless. Basically all his effort (if you can call it that) is going into a void where literally no one cares or has any desire to engage with him.
December 23, 2019, 08:23:42 AM
wildshark stop spamming your same shit post after someone comments to keep it at end. we get it about your ideas. cut the shit out before you get yet another ban
December 23, 2019, 06:02:06 AM
I said this when ION was $0.04. A year later ION peeked at $8.18.
1,000 ION at $.04 = $40 - Jan 2017
1,000 ION at $8.18 = $8,180 Jan 2018
Had you bought $40 of ion when you read my post and sold on the high you would own around 5oz of gold which is about the size of a nugget
It's fine to disagree but to call me delusional is just being infantile.
Merry Christmas !!!!
1,000 ION at $.04 = $40 - Jan 2017
1,000 ION at $8.18 = $8,180 Jan 2018
Had you bought $40 of ion when you read my post and sold on the high you would own around 5oz of gold which is about the size of a nugget
It's fine to disagree but to call me delusional is just being infantile.
Merry Christmas !!!!
Oy, again with the disingenuous arguments about price?
The quote was about the success of Gravity. How did that go? How’s it going now? How many players has the project got across its three titles? How much revenue are those players bringing in? You claimed a couple of pages back that this was a market leading project. Explain how they’re leading and dominating the market in crypto gaming, please.
Anything else, about price and hypothetical scenarios in which you might have benefitted from a purely coincidental rise in crypto value across the board, are not relevant to this discussion, which is about the success of Ionomy as a project so far in it’s core mission - crypto integrated gaming.
Merry Christmas to you too, by the way - as much as you wind me up on here sometimes, I wish you the best.
December 23, 2019, 05:30:21 AM
Actually you've been saying this now for almost 4 years. 
Yes. I literally said I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again. It doesn’t make what I said less accurate.
Perhaps you’d instead like to refute what I said by pointing me towards some statistics to show how many users ionomy’s games have and what their growth has been like over the last year - you know, the things that actually matter if this project is to be regarded as a success? I’m sure it’ll be easy for you to demonstrate using actual evidence that they’re leading the market in the crypto gaming space, right?
By the way, you’re a bit of a stuck record yourself. Your post history is full of nuggets of delusional gold. Let’s remind ourselves of this little gem, where you came oh so close to being self aware but you seem to have somehow disregarded your own prognosis:
Your competing at a content level not at a game developer level, Gravity is going to be free to play so if the games crap people won't play.
Anyway, on to removing the spin from their latest mail shot:
Here are
* Atomic Token Protocol (ATP) for immutable, permissionless tokens on the ION blockchain - which no one uses yet, and likely no one actually cares about beyond a few guys in an isolated discord channel.
* Dark Matter presale established ingenious price discovery procedure - which almost no one was even aware of or cares about, let alone took part in.
* IIP6 voted on to begin a new era of deflation for the ION supply - by all of 90 people at the absolute most.
* POTX verification protocol developed to act as a deflationary driver for ION - which again, no one outside of the ionomy team and their most invested followers seem to care about.
* ionosphere newsletter launched - seriously, they wrote a newsletter? Is including this how desperate they are to show they’ve been doing stuff? I notice they didn’t mention the embarrassingly cringy ionomy podcast, which went about as well as you’d expect.
* GameGrid was created and tested with final deployment just around the corner - and their so called ‘premium partner’ for this venture was no where to be seen since April.
* The original ionomy Studios title Crypto Gravity returned! And no one cared.
* ION listed on Bittrex Global - big whoop.
* ION trading was added to the STEX exchange - big whoop.
* ION markets at STEX, Bittrex and CREX24 exchanges are now tracked on Coinmarketcap - big whoop.
* ION markets at STEX, Bittrex, Upbit Korea, and Upbit Indonesia exchanges were added to Coingecko - big whoop.
* ION trading was added to CREX24 - we get it, you finagled your way on to some exchanges. Doesn't seem to be getting you much volume though, does it? Could it be that... no one cares?
It's been a
One has to wonder where all of that money has came from(and the ethics involved), which they're burning so rapidly(and so casually)...
The old saying holds strong here - if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
The old saying holds strong here - if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
I haven't really been following the Wagerr thing that closely, but it seems like (from what I've read) their so called 'premium partner' in the bizarrely silent 'Lucky Tap Games' is likely a result of Matlack and co's involvement in Wagerr as well as all the other supposedly slightly shady stuff that might have gone on. I would say, however, that in this case Ionomy doesn't really even sound too good to be true - it's always mostly been airy fairy stuff that's always been destined to struggle.
HoHoHo Thanks for the reminder
By the way, you’re a bit of a stuck record yourself. Your post history is full of nuggets of delusional gold. Let’s remind ourselves of this little gem, where you came oh so close to being self aware but you seem to have somehow disregarded your own prognosis:
I said this when ION was $0.04. A year later ION peeked at $8.18.Your competing at a content level not at a game developer level, Gravity is going to be free to play so if the games crap people won't play.
1,000 ION at $.04 = $40 - Jan 2017
1,000 ION at $8.18 = $8,180 Jan 2018
Had you bought $40 of ion when you read my post and sold on the high you would own around 5oz of gold which is about the size of a nugget
It's fine to disagree but to call me delusional is just being infantile.
Merry Christmas !!!!
December 23, 2019, 04:02:00 AM
Still can't keep up several new assets with no value or how they work, this shit seems doomed to fail
December 22, 2019, 08:38:56 AM
Actually you've been saying this now for almost 4 years.
Yes. I literally said I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again. It doesn’t make what I said less accurate.
Perhaps you’d instead like to refute what I said by pointing me towards some statistics to show how many users ionomy’s games have and what their growth has been like over the last year - you know, the things that actually matter if this project is to be regarded as a success? I’m sure it’ll be easy for you to demonstrate using actual evidence that they’re leading the market in the crypto gaming space, right?
By the way, you’re a bit of a stuck record yourself. Your post history is full of nuggets of delusional gold. Let’s remind ourselves of this little gem, where you came oh so close to being self aware but you seem to have somehow disregarded your own prognosis:
Your competing at a content level not at a game developer level, Gravity is going to be free to play so if the games crap people won't play.
Anyway, on to removing the spin from their latest mail shot:
Here are
* Atomic Token Protocol (ATP) for immutable, permissionless tokens on the ION blockchain - which no one uses yet, and likely no one actually cares about beyond a few guys in an isolated discord channel.
* Dark Matter presale established ingenious price discovery procedure - which almost no one was even aware of or cares about, let alone took part in.
* IIP6 voted on to begin a new era of deflation for the ION supply - by all of 90 people at the absolute most.
* POTX verification protocol developed to act as a deflationary driver for ION - which again, no one outside of the ionomy team and their most invested followers seem to care about.
* ionosphere newsletter launched - seriously, they wrote a newsletter? Is including this how desperate they are to show they’ve been doing stuff? I notice they didn’t mention the embarrassingly cringy ionomy podcast, which went about as well as you’d expect.
* GameGrid was created and tested with final deployment just around the corner - and their so called ‘premium partner’ for this venture was no where to be seen since April.
* The original ionomy Studios title Crypto Gravity returned! And no one cared.
* ION listed on Bittrex Global - big whoop.
* ION trading was added to the STEX exchange - big whoop.
* ION markets at STEX, Bittrex and CREX24 exchanges are now tracked on Coinmarketcap - big whoop.
* ION markets at STEX, Bittrex, Upbit Korea, and Upbit Indonesia exchanges were added to Coingecko - big whoop.
* ION trading was added to CREX24 - we get it, you finagled your way on to some exchanges. Doesn't seem to be getting you much volume though, does it? Could it be that... no one cares?
It's been a
One has to wonder where all of that money has came from(and the ethics involved), which they're burning so rapidly(and so casually)...
The old saying holds strong here - if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
The old saying holds strong here - if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
I haven't really been following the Wagerr thing that closely, but it seems like (from what I've read) their so called 'premium partner' in the bizarrely silent 'Lucky Tap Games' is likely a result of Matlack and co's involvement in Wagerr as well as all the other supposedly slightly shady stuff that might have gone on. I would say, however, that in this case Ionomy doesn't really even sound too good to be true - it's always mostly been airy fairy stuff that's always been destined to struggle.
December 21, 2019, 11:50:39 AM
I think they expect that whatever nonsense they come up with, it will be magically successful without marketing. And when they do marketing it's cringy AF too - remember stickers on race cars and the Off Road Heat game that's now dead like, well, everything they've done over the years.
This, a million times over. Every single thing this team have ever done that’s been designed for mass consumption outside of their little crypto niche has flopped, even when they’ve supposedly spent loads of money on promoting it (see: stickers on race cars). Obviously the problem isn’t just the marketing (or lack of). It’s that the ideas themselves aren’t great.
At some point, that has to sink in, right?
One has to wonder where all of that money has came from(and the ethics involved), which they're burning so rapidly(and so casually)...
The old saying holds strong here - if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
December 19, 2019, 12:57:42 PM
December 19, 2019, 12:41:12 PM
TL;DR:
Matlack: We’ve made mistakes in over promising and under delivering before. This time it will totally be different.
Also Matlack: Our new token system will drive value within weeks of going live.
This, right here, is an example of why I struggle to take this team seriously. Matlack consistently just tells people what they want to hear, and that’s a real problem. It may not be 'hype' in as overt a way as Garza used to spew out, but every single one of their hangouts or times when he speaks publicly has examples of him either saying something will happen (x will launch by y date - a good example of this is GameDock, which was this massive thing that was supposedly launching in June, but seems to have dropped off the map) or using massively over enthusiastic language to describe their progress ('we're really excited, we've had loads of interest and we're in contracts with 6 different companies', for example, which is paraphrased from a hangout earlier in the year). Broadly, these are either never delivered on time or at all in some cases, or end up being extremely underwhelming if they ever do happen. This goes all the way back to xpy.io, where they used to speak in grandiose language about how they'd make xpy great again by adding features to their little platform. This is a serious problem that he needs to improve on in the future, because anyone who does any amount of serious research into their history will be put off by this.
Ultimately it doesn’t really matter in ion's case because he’s speaking to an audience of tens at most at this point, and it’s pretty obvious by now that that is unlikely to change, probably ever - but it’s irritating that people don’t call him out on this more often.
The other thing that bugs me is the fact that they and their most ardent followers put far too much emphasis on this idea that they are somehow a ‘success’ by default simply because they haven’t pulled the old crypto vanishing act. Outside of crypto, this is a ludicrous notion - the idea that you’re successful and worthy of investment on the basis of just still being there after 4 years, treading water. They’ve shown almost no growth or wide ranging success for any of their product launches so far, which is what investors should really be focusing on.
I’ve said it before, and I’ll likely say it again: there is nothing in this team’s track record that suggests they possess the skills required to make this a success. This AMA did nothing to change that.
Matlack: We’ve made mistakes in over promising and under delivering before. This time it will totally be different.
Also Matlack: Our new token system will drive value within weeks of going live.
This, right here, is an example of why I struggle to take this team seriously. Matlack consistently just tells people what they want to hear, and that’s a real problem. It may not be 'hype' in as overt a way as Garza used to spew out, but every single one of their hangouts or times when he speaks publicly has examples of him either saying something will happen (x will launch by y date - a good example of this is GameDock, which was this massive thing that was supposedly launching in June, but seems to have dropped off the map) or using massively over enthusiastic language to describe their progress ('we're really excited, we've had loads of interest and we're in contracts with 6 different companies', for example, which is paraphrased from a hangout earlier in the year). Broadly, these are either never delivered on time or at all in some cases, or end up being extremely underwhelming if they ever do happen. This goes all the way back to xpy.io, where they used to speak in grandiose language about how they'd make xpy great again by adding features to their little platform. This is a serious problem that he needs to improve on in the future, because anyone who does any amount of serious research into their history will be put off by this.
Ultimately it doesn’t really matter in ion's case because he’s speaking to an audience of tens at most at this point, and it’s pretty obvious by now that that is unlikely to change, probably ever - but it’s irritating that people don’t call him out on this more often.
The other thing that bugs me is the fact that they and their most ardent followers put far too much emphasis on this idea that they are somehow a ‘success’ by default simply because they haven’t pulled the old crypto vanishing act. Outside of crypto, this is a ludicrous notion - the idea that you’re successful and worthy of investment on the basis of just still being there after 4 years, treading water. They’ve shown almost no growth or wide ranging success for any of their product launches so far, which is what investors should really be focusing on.
I’ve said it before, and I’ll likely say it again: there is nothing in this team’s track record that suggests they possess the skills required to make this a success. This AMA did nothing to change that.
Some things never change
Quote
I’ve said it before, and I’ll likely say it again: there is nothing in this team’s track record that suggests they possess the skills required to make this a success. This AMA did nothing to change that.
Actually you've been saying this now for almost 4 years.
Still not dead in the water
December 18, 2019, 02:55:00 PM
December 18, 2019, 02:17:53 PM
TL;DR:
Matlack: We’ve made mistakes in over promising and under delivering before. This time it will totally be different.
Also Matlack: Our new token system will drive value within weeks of going live.
This, right here, is an example of why I struggle to take this team seriously. Matlack consistently just tells people what they want to hear, and that’s a real problem. It may not be 'hype' in as overt a way as Garza used to spew out, but every single one of their hangouts or times when he speaks publicly has examples of him either saying something will happen (x will launch by y date - a good example of this is GameDock, which was this massive thing that was supposedly launching in June, but seems to have dropped off the map) or using massively over enthusiastic language to describe their progress ('we're really excited, we've had loads of interest and we're in contracts with 6 different companies', for example, which is paraphrased from a hangout earlier in the year). Broadly, these are either never delivered on time or at all in some cases, or end up being extremely underwhelming if they ever do happen. This goes all the way back to xpy.io, where they used to speak in grandiose language about how they'd make xpy great again by adding features to their little platform. This is a serious problem that he needs to improve on in the future, because anyone who does any amount of serious research into their history will be put off by this.
Ultimately it doesn’t really matter in ion's case because he’s speaking to an audience of tens at most at this point, and it’s pretty obvious by now that that is unlikely to change, probably ever - but it’s irritating that people don’t call him out on this more often.
The other thing that bugs me is the fact that they and their most ardent followers put far too much emphasis on this idea that they are somehow a ‘success’ by default simply because they haven’t pulled the old crypto vanishing act. Outside of crypto, this is a ludicrous notion - the idea that you’re successful and worthy of investment on the basis of just still being there after 4 years, treading water. They’ve shown almost no growth or wide ranging success for any of their product launches so far, which is what investors should really be focusing on.
I’ve said it before, and I’ll likely say it again: there is nothing in this team’s track record that suggests they possess the skills required to make this a success. This AMA did nothing to change that.
Matlack: We’ve made mistakes in over promising and under delivering before. This time it will totally be different.
Also Matlack: Our new token system will drive value within weeks of going live.
This, right here, is an example of why I struggle to take this team seriously. Matlack consistently just tells people what they want to hear, and that’s a real problem. It may not be 'hype' in as overt a way as Garza used to spew out, but every single one of their hangouts or times when he speaks publicly has examples of him either saying something will happen (x will launch by y date - a good example of this is GameDock, which was this massive thing that was supposedly launching in June, but seems to have dropped off the map) or using massively over enthusiastic language to describe their progress ('we're really excited, we've had loads of interest and we're in contracts with 6 different companies', for example, which is paraphrased from a hangout earlier in the year). Broadly, these are either never delivered on time or at all in some cases, or end up being extremely underwhelming if they ever do happen. This goes all the way back to xpy.io, where they used to speak in grandiose language about how they'd make xpy great again by adding features to their little platform. This is a serious problem that he needs to improve on in the future, because anyone who does any amount of serious research into their history will be put off by this.
Ultimately it doesn’t really matter in ion's case because he’s speaking to an audience of tens at most at this point, and it’s pretty obvious by now that that is unlikely to change, probably ever - but it’s irritating that people don’t call him out on this more often.
The other thing that bugs me is the fact that they and their most ardent followers put far too much emphasis on this idea that they are somehow a ‘success’ by default simply because they haven’t pulled the old crypto vanishing act. Outside of crypto, this is a ludicrous notion - the idea that you’re successful and worthy of investment on the basis of just still being there after 4 years, treading water. They’ve shown almost no growth or wide ranging success for any of their product launches so far, which is what investors should really be focusing on.
I’ve said it before, and I’ll likely say it again: there is nothing in this team’s track record that suggests they possess the skills required to make this a success. This AMA did nothing to change that.
December 13, 2019, 11:50:15 AM
WildShark your ramblings are incoherent and make little sense.
Additionally if you want to be taken seriously why is your avatar in those images a pic of you naked in a jeep. KNOT professional and shows just how unstable you are in the head.
Mr. Legendary o0o0,THANK YOU for your constructive criticism. I will add this GOOD defect to the WIN design & ADVERTISEMENT Additionally if you want to be taken seriously why is your avatar in those images a pic of you naked in a jeep. KNOT professional and shows just how unstable you are in the head.
Mr. OnION is well known to be a nudist that had a problem with his mother trying to keeping a pair of shorts on him when he was kid My Bitcon talk post 9863 identifies the lack of ION information defect in ION Community forum
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53336116
HINT: The revised ION block reward schedule for 2020 thru 2025 & current ION coin NEWS should majestically appear in ION Community forum to complete the system design for the 4.1.1 Ionomy Q3 2020 wallet product
Matlack's impossible accomplishment WITHOUT System Requirements for ION coin & ionomy 2020 platform
Matlack's ionomy ONLY 2020 MILESTONE/GOAL product for ION Community
UNANSWER Matlack's ionomy System Design 4.1.0
LACK of Quality Assurance for ION 4.1 wallet product delivery
The members of my Cyrpto, Ionomy & ION teams take me very serious when I recommend that the ION & Cyrpto communities can avoid the downfall of Ionomy 2020 vision by NOT USING/SWITCHING to the ionomy 4.1.0 Q1 2020 wallet product.
I can sum up the answer to the deflationary and CURB INFLATION IIP 6 design:
The Ionomy investors wisdom joke does NOT believe in need for deflationary ionomy wallet product
INFORM Mr. Matlack to only include rebase to DASH and the Wild's Depot Hot Fix 4.1.1 design to change the block reward to 12 coins in the Q3 2020 ION "NEWTRON" wallet. The current ION 4.0 has inflation controlled by the wallet and has the block reward schedule FROZEN for the next four years.
@everyone ION HARD FORK on Q3 2020 with Ionomy 4.1.1 wallet defect-free product
December 13, 2019, 11:12:01 AM
wildshark your ramblings are incoherent and make little sense.
Additionally if you want to be taken seriously why is your avatar in those images a pic of you naked in a jeep. Not professional and shows just how unstable you are in the head.
Additionally if you want to be taken seriously why is your avatar in those images a pic of you naked in a jeep. Not professional and shows just how unstable you are in the head.
December 13, 2019, 08:38:12 AM
I just can't keep up with this shit, there seems to be no direction 101 votes and a brexit. What the fuck is with this asset
Good luck with trying to decipher Wilds posts
....
I'm thinking those that missed out on the ION price rise from $.2 to $6 now get a second chance
... a blockchain based on utility NiceION FORK into the deflationary fall of IONOMY 2020 Vision
...The Ionomy investors wisdom joke does NOT believe in need for deflationary ionomy wallet product
Could ionomy please publish the revised block schedule for the benefit of the ION & cyrpto investor communities? I find it hard to believe that the ION & Cyrpto communities will be pr swayed to change their minds about the deflationary tactics being forced upon them. I am urging the crypto community to NOT switch to the Q1 2020 wallet until chief strategist Mr. Matlack release the revised block reward schedule! If the community will stand together and NOT switch to the deflationary wallet, the forced HARD FORK will NOT HAPPEN
STAND UP for your ION investor rights to be paid a decent reward for owning an ION masternode or ION sharenode and resist the force to have your hard earned ION BURNT 
INFORM Mr. Matlack to only include rebase to DASH and the Wild's Depot Hot Fix 4.1.1 design to change the block reward to 12 coins in the Q1 2020 ION "NEWTRON" wallet
Wild Onion Last Tuesday at 1:00 PM
@huey Give Mr. Korvas an IONsx[10K asset] for his OUTSTANDING post 9858 in Bitcon talk :wildy:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53312544
Wild Onion Last Tuesday at 3:34 PM
@huey fork out a $550 award/bounty (10K IONsx asset) for the GOOD of IONomy to encourage trading Ionomy collateral resouces
Wild Onion Last Tuesday at 6:36 PM
@huey When are you going to acknowledge the 2020 Ionomy effort and start contributing some funding resources to it? Air-drops or IONsx BOUNTY rewards
Why have Mr. Matalack NOT POSTED the revised 2020 thru 2025 ION block reward schedule to the Cyrpto world?
Mr. Korvas, Why have you NOT POSTED the revised 2020 thru 2025 ION block reward schedule to the Cyrpto world? Do you even have current access to that SECRET document
Build a HEALTHY ecosystem thru controlled SOLID GROWTH solutions
lol ION is on FIRE at 5 cent value
https://ion.community/category/3/ion-news
https://ion.community/topic/2355/proposal-to-increase-ion-supply-and-change-inflation-rates/9
https://ion.community/topic/2355/proposal-to-increase-ion-supply-and-change-inflation-rates
Ionomy Investor Note
A SPAM definition from the Ionomy Leadership court or Dr. Wild OnION NEW with IONomy news.
December 13, 2019, 06:49:53 AM
I just can't keep up with this shit, there seems to be no direction 101 votes and a brexit. What the fuck is with this asset
Good luck with trying to decipher Wilds posts
Ionomy is not Brexit, the direction is clear. Here is a roadmap update that was shared on an AMA call earlier this week
Transcript of AMA
AMA then moves to voice call.................
I'm thinking those that missed out on the ION price rise from $.2 to $6 now get a second chance
... a blockchain based on utility Nice December 13, 2019, 03:06:51 AM
I just can't keep up with this shit, there seems to be no direction 101 votes and a brexit. What the fuck is with this asset
December 11, 2019, 05:50:21 PM
The WIN project is a major player in supporting the ION coin from Wild's Depot members and the Ionomy community. This project has been kept secret according to the LAWS set-forth by the ionomy management team. If you take a glance at this ION announcement thread, starting since the 1st of April the project has started to ADVERTISE the WIN concept and has drawn a lot of ATTENTION to the 2019 thru 2025 ION vision. The WIN project has accomplished a Test of Concept experiment using the IONsx and Atom assets. The research and development team has also produced a System Test report uncovering the horrors found in the 2019 Ionomy ecosystem.
THANK YOU all of my Ionomy TEAM in the CRYPTO COMMUNITY
community design/patch to increase block reward for 2020 wallets
ionomy V3 platform
MNP business
ION & Ionomy businesses
SMART NODES in 2021 ION network
Ionomy 2020 Electron App interface to 4.1.1 wallet
alt coin community
NEW secure network protocol
2019 Ionomy with Atomic Token Protocol
2022 Ionomy platform
Crypto/Bitcoin community
Wild ION Network ownership
Ionomy 2019 with DarkMatter & Atoms
Ionomy 2020 with Ionomy collateral resources
Ionomy 2022 with multiple Ionomy assets on blockchain
2020 Ionomy white paper
Gathering ION system requirements for 2020 advanced wallet & network
In hands of Ionomy leaders & management with DEPRESSING economical model
Here's a look at the changing project milestones that keep getting deleted with very nice possible rewards for Q1 2020 for NEW ION Masternode & Sharenode investors. I can not understand why the ionomy cult would appreciate the growth with more of the crypto community purchasing ION and IONsx. What is wrong with 12 block reward split 3 ways randomly to ION members every minute
Create 2020 ION White Paper and register Ionomy collateral resources by end of Q1 2020 using Plan 8
Mr. Matlack TRANSFER 9 Smart ION Nodes (4.5K Atoms or 200K IONs) to Wild's Depot for BOUNTY reward (WiN concept, System Testing and 2020 ION White Paper)
WILD Innovative ION Network ownership in IONomy 2019 with (8 + 4 + Txid) 12 IONs Block reward (current ION Masternode owners get 8 coins) Txid fees being burnt
DEFECTIVE- FREE ION "NEWTRON" 4.1.0 wallet DASH rebase & "Hot Fix" design patch in Q3 2020 with 6 months system testing on ION NETWORK
ION Master Node[10K IONsx] + ION Smart Node[500 Atoms] + All ION Staking Wallets with (4 + 4 + 4) 12 Block Reward in IONomy 2021
(6 + 6 + 6) 18 IONs Block Reward for IONomy 2022 with Smart ION Nodes using multiple Ionomy collateral assets
No News (Q1 thru Q4 approach) is good news about ION coin schedule and events on ION Community Forum for future ION wallets
IONsx is the next Ionomy collateral resource (native token) to be added to the ION Blockchain
Mr. Matlack & Pfeiffer DEFLATIONARY IIP 6 (POTx ION network) a status of NOT LEGAL or WANTED by the ION community & general public
VOTE from Ionomy community on ION improvement proposals 7 thru 14 & 66 for public acceptance/comment of IIP
Trade at ionomy market (V3 platform)
https://ionomy.com/en/markets/ion-ionsx
Ionomy Investor Note
A SPAM definition from the Ionomy Leadership court or Dr. Wild OnION NEW with IONomy news.
THANK YOU all of my Ionomy TEAM in the CRYPTO COMMUNITY
15 December 2019
Project WIN Goals
Crypto Community Effort (Q4 2019)
Crypto Community Effort (Q4 2019)
community design/patch to increase block reward for 2020 wallets
ionomy V3 platform MNP business ION & Ionomy businessesSMART NODES in 2021 ION network
Ionomy 2020 Electron App interface to 4.1.1 wallet alt coin communityNEW secure network protocol
2019 Ionomy with Atomic Token Protocol 2022 Ionomy platform Crypto/Bitcoin communityWild ION Network ownership
Ionomy 2019 with DarkMatter & Atoms Ionomy 2020 with Ionomy collateral resources Ionomy 2022 with multiple Ionomy assets on blockchain2020 Ionomy white paper
Gathering ION system requirements for 2020 advanced wallet & network In hands of Ionomy leaders & management with DEPRESSING economical modelHere's a look at the changing project milestones that keep getting deleted with very nice possible rewards for Q1 2020 for NEW ION Masternode & Sharenode investors. I can not understand why the ionomy cult would appreciate the growth with more of the crypto community purchasing ION and IONsx. What is wrong with 12 block reward split 3 ways randomly to ION members every minute
IONomy GOAL - WiN 2019-2022 Milestones
December 2019 In-Progress Status
December 2019 In-Progress Status
Create 2020 ION White Paper and register Ionomy collateral resources by end of Q1 2020 using Plan 8
Mr. Matlack TRANSFER 9 Smart ION Nodes (4.5K Atoms or 200K IONs) to Wild's Depot for BOUNTY reward (WiN concept, System Testing and 2020 ION White Paper)
WILD Innovative ION Network ownership in IONomy 2019 with (8 + 4 + Txid) 12 IONs Block reward (current ION Masternode owners get 8 coins) Txid fees being burnt
DEFECTIVE- FREE ION "NEWTRON" 4.1.0 wallet DASH rebase & "Hot Fix" design patch in Q3 2020 with 6 months system testing on ION NETWORK
ION Master Node[10K IONsx] + ION Smart Node[500 Atoms] + All ION Staking Wallets with (4 + 4 + 4) 12 Block Reward in IONomy 2021
(6 + 6 + 6) 18 IONs Block Reward for IONomy 2022 with Smart ION Nodes using multiple Ionomy collateral assets
IONsx is the next Ionomy collateral resource (native token) to be added to the ION Blockchain
Mr. Matlack & Pfeiffer DEFLATIONARY IIP 6 (POTx ION network) a status of NOT LEGAL or WANTED by the ION community & general public
VOTE from Ionomy community on ION improvement proposals 7 thru 14 & 66 for public acceptance/comment of IIP
Support 2020 thru 2025 Network Ownership
BUY/SELL
IONomy holdateral resources
ION, DarkMatter, IONsx, PIT, and Atoms
BUY/SELL
IONomy holdateral resources
ION, DarkMatter, IONsx, PIT, and Atoms
Trade at ionomy market (V3 platform)
https://ionomy.com/en/markets/ion-ionsx
Ionomy Investor Note
A SPAM definition from the Ionomy Leadership court or Dr. Wild OnION NEW with IONomy news.
December 10, 2019, 04:37:18 PM
Matlack's AMA FLOPS with NOT SHOWING the REAL World status of Ionomy 2020
...Yes, trading is a vital part of any healthy vibrant crypto ecosystem
1 MILLION+ ION Market Cap
Support 2020 thru 2025 Network Ownership
BUY/SELL
IONomy holdateral resources
ION, DarkMatter, IONsx, PIT, and Atoms
BUY/SELL
IONomy holdateral resources
ION, DarkMatter, IONsx, PIT, and Atoms
December 10, 2019, 02:42:07 PM
Jump to: