Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [KEY] KeyCoin | Fair Launch | Daily Updates | 8/9 Status Update - page 64. (Read 188824 times)

full member
Activity: 155
Merit: 102
Daily Dev Update - 7/31/2014

Just checking in. Work on KeyOS is going well and we will have a beta for the community to test in Virtualbox soon.

In the meantime we are compiling Mac OS and Debian/Ubuntu Linux wallets with the anon feature built in. I expect release tomorrow at latest.

Regarding the "de-anon" FUD - it is exactly that, FUD. Multiple members of the dev team have tested it and it doesn't de-anon anything, it merely gives a mixer address as output.

The program's output string even says "Mixer Address (Your wallet sent coins to this mixer)" - it doesn't even attempt to de-anon the entire transaction, and can't.

Decentralized anon is also a longer term goal we are working on.


The KeyCoin promo video is on target for Saturday release.

We are currently working with CoinsSource and Bittrex to be one of the first "vetted safe" coins, hopefully soon enough for it to be featured in our "Sponsored" bittrex banner.

Thanks all for support, fuel up those engines Smiley



Look at this :

https://twitter.com/vangainvest/status/494978517625753600



This is a great update. Thanks!
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Why the hell would I do the work for someone else?

I've done my work, now you do yours.

I don't understand your answer. Has anybody asked you to do any work? What work should I do?

newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0

Many people have proved that it does work, and you haven't given one piece of evidence that it doesn't.


Really? Can you post links to articles with rigorous mathematical proofs that can be reviewed by independent experts? Whitepapers of course don't fit into this category.

If the security (anonymity) of some technology isn't proved, then you must assume that it isn't secure (anonymous).



Bet you're the life and soul of a party mate .Your actually becoming tedious and a tad boring to be honest .You seem obsessed with this coin like a few others,I wonder why . It really doesn't wash any more,So there's a good boy and  go play on another thread.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10

Many people have proved that it does work, and you haven't given one piece of evidence that it doesn't.


Really? Can you post links to articles with rigorous mathematical proofs that can be reviewed by independent experts? Whitepapers of course don't fit into this category.

If the security (anonymity) of some technology isn't proved, then you must assume that it isn't secure (anonymous).


Why the hell would I do the work for someone else? Get off your own ass like you have been saying you will for the last week.
But oh, that's right, you're too busy with real life to do some actual work, except of course to post here for hours on end.
I'm a software developer in the bank trading industry with a degree in applied mathematics and economics.
I've done my work, now you do yours.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0

Many people have proved that it does work, and you haven't given one piece of evidence that it doesn't.


Really? Can you post links to articles with rigorous mathematical proofs that can be reviewed by independent experts? Whitepapers of course don't fit into this category.

If the security (anonymity) of some technology isn't proved, then you must assume that it isn't secure (anonymous).

legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.
I just quoted you on your XC comment, so thats what I am inquiring about now.  Dan Metcalf is highly competent.  Why haven't you gone into the XC thread asking similar questions?  

Which questions?



No. Nobody has proved that xc anonymity actually works (and it is very likely that it doesn't).


Your "anonymity" questions
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.




Yes, I'm mostly only interested in the anonymity.


I find it interesting that you have avoided

Cloak
XC
Super

Even in the earlier days when development was still going on. 

Sorry, I can't be familiar with every crapcoin out there. I registered on bitcointalk not long ago.


Ah so you envisage all of them as crapcoin's, now your base standpoint becomes clearer.
You will still hammer on like a 80 y/o prostitute who doesn't know she is past her sell-buy date

If no one is capable of proving that the anonymity actually works, then these coins are worthless from the anonymity standpoint.


Many people have proved that it does work, and you haven't given one piece of evidence that it doesn't.
So quoting you back, these coins are worth it from the anonymity standpoint.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Thanks Dev we needed something from this terrible dump. When will you be dumping again and spreading more shit to keep it up? Keycoin is dead and has no potential.

Just read

http://bitcoinist.net/keycoin-anonymity-reviewed-by-dan-metclaf/
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
I just quoted you on your XC comment, so thats what I am inquiring about now.  Dan Metcalf is highly competent.  Why haven't you gone into the XC thread asking similar questions?  

Which questions?

The same questions you are failing miserably with here
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
I just quoted you on your XC comment, so thats what I am inquiring about now.  Dan Metcalf is highly competent.  Why haven't you gone into the XC thread asking similar questions?  

Which questions?
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.
I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.





Hmm he's xc buddy?! Hgrrrr

No. Nobody has proved that xc anonymity actually works (and it is very likely that it doesn't).


Ok...
If your that fixated on anonymity and it's obvious you feel it doesn't work then why haven't you gone into there thread asking your usual questions?  It's obvious you like to challenge the developers am I not right?

Which threads?

In most of the threads there are not many competent people that are capable of answering technical questions.

See this KeyCoin thread for example.

Challenge the developers? By asking questions? 

I personally think that the anonymity is extremely important thing and that it shouldn't be abused (for example, for pump&dumps because of anonymity features that in reality don't provide any anonymity).



I just quoted you on your XC comment, so thats what I am inquiring about now.  Dan Metcalf is highly competent.  Why haven't you gone into the XC thread asking similar questions? 
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.




Yes, I'm mostly only interested in the anonymity.


I find it interesting that you have avoided

Cloak
XC
Super

Even in the earlier days when development was still going on. 

Sorry, I can't be familiar with every crapcoin out there. I registered on bitcointalk not long ago.


Ah so you envisage all of them as crapcoin's, now your base standpoint becomes clearer.
You will still hammer on like a 80 y/o prostitute who doesn't know she is past her sell-buy date

If no one is capable of proving that the anonymity actually works, then these coins are worthless from the anonymity standpoint.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.





Hmm he's xc buddy?! Hgrrrr

No. Nobody has proved that xc anonymity actually works (and it is very likely that it doesn't).


Ok...
If your that fixated on anonymity and it's obvious you feel it doesn't work then why haven't you gone into there thread asking your usual questions?  It's obvious you like to challenge the developers am I not right?

Which threads?

In most of the threads there are not many competent people that are capable of answering technical questions.

See this KeyCoin thread for example.

Challenge the developers? By asking questions? 

I personally think that the anonymity is extremely important thing and that it shouldn't be abused (for example, for pump&dumps because of anonymity features that in reality don't provide any anonymity).

member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.




Yes, I'm mostly only interested in the anonymity.


I find it interesting that you have avoided

Cloak
XC
Super

Even in the earlier days when development was still going on. 

Sorry, I can't be familiar with every crapcoin out there. I registered on bitcointalk not long ago.


Ah so you envisage all of them as crapcoin's, now your base standpoint becomes clearer.
You will still hammer on like a 80 y/o prostitute who doesn't know she is past her sell-buy date
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.
I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.





Hmm he's xc buddy?! Hgrrrr

No. Nobody has proved that xc anonymity actually works (and it is very likely that it doesn't).


Ok...
If your that fixated on anonymity and it's obvious you feel it doesn't work then why haven't you gone into there thread asking your usual questions?  It's obvious you like to challenge the developers am I not right?
full member
Activity: 159
Merit: 100
I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.




Yes, I'm mostly only interested in the anonymity.


I find it interesting that you have avoided

Cloak
XC
Super

Even in the earlier days when development was still going on. 

Sorry, I can't be familiar with every crapcoin out there. I registered on bitcointalk not long ago.



Do you work for NSA, GCHQ ? Why the big obsession?
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.




Yes, I'm mostly only interested in the anonymity.


I find it interesting that you have avoided

Cloak
XC
Super

Even in the earlier days when development was still going on. 

Sorry, I can't be familiar with every crapcoin out there. I registered on bitcointalk not long ago.

member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.


Yes, I'm mostly only interested in the anonymity.


Unfortunately interested is about as far as you can go, taking the leap into understanding seems to be out of reach.
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.
I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.




Yes, I'm mostly only interested in the anonymity.


I find it interesting that you have avoided

Cloak
XC
Super

Even in the earlier days when development was still going on. 
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.





Hmm he's xc buddy?! Hgrrrr

No. Nobody has proved that xc anonymity actually works (and it is very likely that it doesn't).
Pages:
Jump to: