Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] Kryptohash | Brand new PoW algo | 320bit hash | ed25519 | PID algo for dif - page 19. (Read 149437 times)

sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
The current transaction fee is half of 1 percent or, 5 KHCs for every 1,000 KHCs you want to send.

In your opinion, What would be the appropriate transaction fee?  

As a miner, how about 5%   Grin

I'm a miner too so, I agree with you.

Anybody has a different % number in mind? I want to hear.

5% crazy  nobody ever use coin transaction fee 5%  is you joking?

0.1% 1 for 1000 KHC  is most fee should be  that still to much  .01% better

miner get paid solving block


At .01% dev would have to reduce the level of security in the coin to make it less expensive to mine, or good luck finding anyone to mine it and process your transaction.

Why people stop mining?  people mine to solve block?  are not transaction in block?  block is not enough reward to mine?  other coins not as much fee and  people still mining

maybe i not understand all things

not making trouble  just what i think  possibly i am wrong

 

This coin is in early development, but with great potential based on Dev's foresight involving encryption standards and problems involving use of an ASIC by miners that have proven they will dominate the market.  Lack of will involving takeover of every aspect of a transaction is a total bonus.  It is what it is, it is BTC 2.0 and all credit granted to BTC for pioneering digital currency, no dark market to promote illegal activity, room for growth and an open mind to the community and coding ability proven to me to be worth his salt.  I know he can write transaction gateways for POS systems integration based on what I've seen so far.  KHC is going through a major overhaul involving the encryption algo all without reset of the blockchain, so that might raise question for some on if it will survive, so yes the coin is not going to have a high network hash rate at the moment.  To me, it has the needed qualities to be a success.  The rest is community and further adoption.  Ideally it should be anonymous as cash to replace it while killing off counterfeit currency.  DRK is there, but is based on X11 and already victim to ASIC.  As far as FEDCOIN is concerned, I do not think there is a lot of trust from a currency created by those folks.  What we all need is currency that will survive mistakes and ramifications created by all of our previous generations.  This one is a good candidate.

I agree with things you say

The topic with 5% transaction fee crazy  .1% can be good  need to change lower

At present the coin is too expensive to mine to attract miners to process transactions at that rate (.01%).  You need to try and mine it for a while, then make a call.  My response of 5% was designed to be irrational based on the cost of mining the coin at present.  As long as it remains ASIC resistant, there won't be a miner takeover like with BTC and a lot of other coins.  My worry is that they can beat it and I think that a modular encryption engine that can be updated live by master nodes can provide further defense.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 10
The current transaction fee is half of 1 percent or, 5 KHCs for every 1,000 KHCs you want to send.

In your opinion, What would be the appropriate transaction fee?  

As a miner, how about 5%   Grin

I'm a miner too so, I agree with you.

Anybody has a different % number in mind? I want to hear.

5% crazy  nobody ever use coin transaction fee 5%  is you joking?

0.1% 1 for 1000 KHC  is most fee should be  that still to much  .01% better

miner get paid solving block


At .01% dev would have to reduce the level of security in the coin to make it less expensive to mine, or good luck finding anyone to mine it and process your transaction.

Why people stop mining?  people mine to solve block?  are not transaction in block?  block is not enough reward to mine?  other coins not as much fee and  people still mining

maybe i not understand all things

not making trouble  just what i think  possibly i am wrong

 

This coin is in early development, but with great potential based on Dev's foresight involving encryption standards and problems involving use of an ASIC by miners that have proven they will dominate the market.  Lack of will involving takeover of every aspect of a transaction is a total bonus.  It is what it is, it is BTC 2.0 and all credit granted to BTC for pioneering digital currency, no dark market to promote illegal activity, room for growth and an open mind to the community and coding ability proven to me to be worth his salt.  I know he can write transaction gateways for POS systems integration based on what I've seen so far.  KHC is going through a major overhaul involving the encryption algo all without reset of the blockchain, so that might raise question for some on if it will survive, so yes the coin is not going to have a high network hash rate at the moment.  To me, it has the needed qualities to be a success.  The rest is community and further adoption.  Ideally it should be anonymous as cash to replace it while killing off counterfeit currency.  DRK is there, but is based on X11 and already victim to ASIC.  As far as FEDCOIN is concerned, I do not think there is a lot of trust from a currency created by those folks.  What we all need is currency that will survive mistakes and ramifications created by all of our previous generations.  This one is a good candidate.

I agree with things you say

The topic with 5% transaction fee crazy  .1% can be good  need to change lower
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
The current transaction fee is half of 1 percent or, 5 KHCs for every 1,000 KHCs you want to send.

In your opinion, What would be the appropriate transaction fee?  

As a miner, how about 5%   Grin

I'm a miner too so, I agree with you.

Anybody has a different % number in mind? I want to hear.

5% crazy  nobody ever use coin transaction fee 5%  is you joking?

0.1% 1 for 1000 KHC  is most fee should be  that still to much  .01% better

miner get paid solving block


At .01% dev would have to reduce the level of security in the coin to make it less expensive to mine, or good luck finding anyone to mine it and process your transaction.

Why people stop mining?  people mine to solve block?  are not transaction in block?  block is not enough reward to mine?  other coins not as much fee and  people still mining

maybe i not understand all things

not making trouble  just what i think  possibly i am wrong

 

This coin is in early development, but with great potential based on Dev's foresight involving encryption standards and problems involving use of an ASIC by miners that have proven they will dominate the market.  Lack of will involving takeover of every aspect of a transaction is a total bonus.  It is what it is, it is BTC 2.0 and all credit granted to BTC for pioneering digital currency, no dark market to promote illegal activity, room for growth and an open mind to the community and coding ability proven to me to be worth his salt.  I know he can write transaction gateways for POS systems integration based on what I've seen so far.  KHC is going through a major overhaul involving the encryption algo all without reset of the blockchain, so that might raise question for some on if it will survive, so yes the coin is not going to have a high network hash rate at the moment.  To me, it has the needed qualities to be a success.  The rest is community and further adoption.  Ideally it should be anonymous as cash to replace it while killing off counterfeit currency.  DRK is there, but is based on X11 and already victim to ASIC.  As far as FEDCOIN is concerned, I do not think there is a lot of trust from a currency created by those folks.  What we all need is currency that will survive mistakes and ramifications created by all of our previous generations.  This one is a good candidate.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 10
The current transaction fee is half of 1 percent or, 5 KHCs for every 1,000 KHCs you want to send.

In your opinion, What would be the appropriate transaction fee?  

As a miner, how about 5%   Grin

I'm a miner too so, I agree with you.

Anybody has a different % number in mind? I want to hear.

5% crazy  nobody ever use coin transaction fee 5%  is you joking?

0.1% 1 for 1000 KHC  is most fee should be  that still to much  .01% better

miner get paid solving block


At .01% dev would have to reduce the level of security in the coin to make it less expensive to mine, or good luck finding anyone to mine it and process your transaction.

Why people stop mining?  people mine to solve block?  are not transaction in block?  block is not enough reward to mine?  other coins not as much fee and  people still mining

maybe i not understand all things

not making trouble  just what i think  possibly i am wrong

 
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Look at the coinbase transactions

TX[0] = Rewards + Fees
I am not a coder.  Sad
Is there some other way to verify it ?
sr. member
Activity: 329
Merit: 250
Look at the coinbase transactions

TX[0] = Rewards + Fees
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
How can it be proved that the transaction fee are mined by miners ?  Huh Huh
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
The current transaction fee is half of 1 percent or, 5 KHCs for every 1,000 KHCs you want to send.

In your opinion, What would be the appropriate transaction fee?  

As a miner, how about 5%   Grin

I'm a miner too so, I agree with you.

Anybody has a different % number in mind? I want to hear.
10 KHC for each transaction.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
The current transaction fee is half of 1 percent or, 5 KHCs for every 1,000 KHCs you want to send.

In your opinion, What would be the appropriate transaction fee?  

As a miner, how about 5%   Grin

I'm a miner too so, I agree with you.

Anybody has a different % number in mind? I want to hear.

5% crazy  nobody ever use coin transaction fee 5%  is you joking?

0.1% 1 for 1000 KHC  is most fee should be  that still to much  .01% better

miner get paid solving block


At .01% dev would have to reduce the level of security in the coin to make it less expensive to mine, or good luck finding anyone to mine it and process your transaction.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 10
The current transaction fee is half of 1 percent or, 5 KHCs for every 1,000 KHCs you want to send.

In your opinion, What would be the appropriate transaction fee?  

As a miner, how about 5%   Grin

I'm a miner too so, I agree with you.

Anybody has a different % number in mind? I want to hear.

5% crazy  nobody ever use coin transaction fee 5%  is you joking?

0.1% 1 for 1000 KHC  is most fee should be  that still to much  .01% better

miner get paid solving block
sr. member
Activity: 329
Merit: 250
The current transaction fee is half of 1 percent or, 5 KHCs for every 1,000 KHCs you want to send.

In your opinion, What would be the appropriate transaction fee?  

As a miner, how about 5%   Grin

I'm a miner too so, I agree with you.

Anybody has a different % number in mind? I want to hear.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
The current transaction fee is half of 1 percent or, 5 KHCs for every 1,000 KHCs you want to send.

In your opinion, What would be the appropriate transaction fee?  

As a miner, how about 5%   Grin
sr. member
Activity: 329
Merit: 250
The current transaction fee is half of 1 percent or, 5 KHCs for every 1,000 KHCs you want to send.

In your opinion, What would be the appropriate transaction fee?  
hero member
Activity: 690
Merit: 500
If there is no incentive to mine the coin, then no one will.

Is there no block reward? Did I miss something?
member
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
Dev,could you reduce or remove the transaction fee please ?  Huh

Um, as a miner?  No.  I think this was covered earlier in the thread.  To send 10K KHC requires 50 KHC as a fee, not really that bad compared to sending cash, and the miner that solves the block gets the fee.
what if the price is thousands of satoshi ? High transaction fee inhibits the liquidity.

If there is no incentive to mine the coin, then no one will.  I'd say that would inhibit liquidity in a way that will impact the coin far worse.  The fee doesn't apply to trades on exchanges, just from wallet to wallet.
Are you sure there is no fee from wallet to wallet?
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Dev,could you reduce or remove the transaction fee please ?  Huh

Um, as a miner?  No.  I think this was covered earlier in the thread.  To send 10K KHC requires 50 KHC as a fee, not really that bad compared to sending cash, and the miner that solves the block gets the fee.
what if the price is thousands of satoshi ? High transaction fee inhibits the liquidity.

If there is no incentive to mine the coin, then no one will.  I'd say that would inhibit liquidity in a way that will impact the coin far worse.  The fee doesn't apply to trades on exchanges, just from wallet to wallet.
member
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
Dev,could you reduce or remove the transaction fee please ?  Huh

Um, as a miner?  No.  I think this was covered earlier in the thread.  To send 10K KHC requires 50 KHC as a fee, not really that bad compared to sending cash, and the miner that solves the block gets the fee.
what if the price is thousands of satoshi ? High transaction fee inhibits the liquidity.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Dev,could you reduce or remove the transaction fee please ?  Huh

Um, as a miner?  No.  I think this was covered earlier in the thread.  To send 10K KHC requires 50 KHC as a fee, not really that bad compared to sending cash, and the miner that solves the block gets the fee.
member
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
Dev,could you reduce or remove the transaction fee please ?  Huh
member
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
When will the region1 ,region2,... be used?  Huh
Pages:
Jump to: