Stay tuned
Topic: [ANN] Kryptohash | Brand new PoW algo | 320bit hash | ed25519 | PID algo for dif - page 41. (Read 149437 times)
December 18, 2014, 10:42:50 PM
Actually, I'm testing a new version of cgminer-khc
Stay tuned
Stay tuned
December 18, 2014, 10:18:04 PM
Dev,what's status of your developmnet of the sgminer that supports 6 cards?? 
Pretty sure it is not done yet, but you can read through the pages in this thread to get an idea maybe when.
December 18, 2014, 10:10:23 PM
Dev,what's status of your developmnet of the sgminer that supports 6 cards??
December 18, 2014, 04:18:35 PM
all the "cool" coins are now X something, xmr, xpy...
so should we start calling this one xhc and xryptohash
so should we start calling this one xhc and xryptohash
This is not a scrypt or standardized x[y] scrypt coin. It is a new algo that can be modified to combat the idea of the asic, and with pid to control diff, it is in a class by itself, beyond that it complies with new standards. It does not need an 'X' to be 'cool', it has that all on it's own.
This is why I decided to bring my GPUs out of retirement.
It looks like someone has bought up quite a few sells on lazycoins.
Yeah, it does look like we are not the only folks that see potential in this, as soon as I saw it is actually something new I was on it. Bang up job wr104! SYS is below 100 sats again after 500 sat IPO sale, not sure if those folks missed the boat, or just flat jumped off. KHC trading at 900 sats and hasen't even been really introduced yet, wait until it hits the larger exchanges.
Get'm while the getting is hot, but is it my browser or is the trade history not updating over there?
December 18, 2014, 03:45:38 PM
KHC reminds me of Spreadcoin,low price in the beginning but rising steady.
December 18, 2014, 03:44:24 PM
all the "cool" coins are now X something, xmr, xpy...
so should we start calling this one xhc and xryptohash
so should we start calling this one xhc and xryptohash
This is not a scrypt or standardized x[y] scrypt coin. It is a new algo that can be modified to combat the idea of the asic, and with pid to control diff, it is in a class by itself, beyond that it complies with new standards. It does not need an 'X' to be 'cool', it has that all on it's own.
This is why I decided to bring my GPUs out of retirement.
It looks like someone has bought up quite a few sells on lazycoins.
Yeah, it does look like we are not the only folks that see potential in this, as soon as I saw it is actually something new I was on it. Bang up job wr104! SYS is below 100 sats again after 500 sat IPO sale, not sure if those folks missed the boat, or just flat jumped off. KHC trading at 900 sats and hasen't even been really introduced yet, wait until it hits the larger exchanges.
December 18, 2014, 01:38:13 PM
Anyone test the power consumption of the algo versus X11 and other algos? Just curious about the results...
Full config with one 6950@6970 :
x11 = 195w
khc = 240w
stop killing your gpus!!! running full voltage???
280x
x11 6.5mhs 144W
khc 151khs 137W
Neoscrypt 325khs 157W
Lol.
You have values with your hardware, i have values with mine.
On MY config with 1 6950 with shaders unlocked, I have :
x11 : @850/1300, ~1.9MHs, ~190w
khc : @825/1200, ~110kHs, ~240w
neoscrypt : @875/1300, ~6khs, ~165w
Compare what it can be !
EDIT : on idle, full config is at ~90w ...
December 18, 2014, 01:24:08 AM
all the "cool" coins are now X something, xmr, xpy...
so should we start calling this one xhc and xryptohash
so should we start calling this one xhc and xryptohash
This is not a scrypt or standardized x[y] scrypt coin. It is a new algo that can be modified to combat the idea of the asic, and with pid to control diff, it is in a class by itself, beyond that it complies with new standards. It does not need an 'X' to be 'cool', it has that all on it's own.
This is why I decided to bring my GPUs out of retirement.
It looks like someone has bought up quite a few sells on lazycoins.
Yeah, it does look like we are not the only folks that see potential in this, as soon as I saw it is actually something new I was on it. Bang up job wr104! SYS is below 100 sats again after 500 sat IPO sale, not sure if those folks missed the boat, or just flat jumped off. KHC trading at 900 sats and hasen't even been really introduced yet, wait until it hits the larger exchanges.
December 18, 2014, 12:41:25 AM
I'm working on the sgminer fork 
A new algorithm of time what to do?Lol, it's going to take some time.
December 18, 2014, 12:26:55 AM
I'm working on the sgminer fork
A new algorithm of time what to do? December 18, 2014, 12:25:55 AM
I'm working on the sgminer fork
December 18, 2014, 12:21:21 AM
all the "cool" coins are now X something, xmr, xpy...
so should we start calling this one xhc and xryptohash
so should we start calling this one xhc and xryptohash
xLOL
December 18, 2014, 12:19:56 AM
all the "cool" coins are now X something, xmr, xpy...
so should we start calling this one xhc and xryptohash
so should we start calling this one xhc and xryptohash
xLOL
December 18, 2014, 12:01:18 AM
all the "cool" coins are now X something, xmr, xpy...
so should we start calling this one xhc and xryptohash
so should we start calling this one xhc and xryptohash
This is not a scrypt or standardized x[y] scrypt coin. It is a new algo that can be modified to combat the idea of the asic, and with pid to control diff, it is in a class by itself, beyond that it complies with new standards. It does not need an 'X' to be 'cool', it has that all on it's own.
This is why I decided to bring my GPUs out of retirement.
It looks like someone has bought up quite a few sells on lazycoins.
December 17, 2014, 10:48:06 PM
all the "cool" coins are now X something, xmr, xpy...
so should we start calling this one xhc and xryptohash
so should we start calling this one xhc and xryptohash
This is not a scrypt or standardized x[y] scrypt coin. It is a new algo that can be modified to combat the idea of the asic, and with pid to control diff, it is in a class by itself, beyond that it complies with new standards. It does not need an 'X' to be 'cool', it has that all on it's own.
December 17, 2014, 09:14:21 PM
Anyone test the power consumption of the algo versus X11 and other algos? Just curious about the results...
Full config with one 6950@6970 :
x11 = 195w
khc = 240w
I'd bet this could be improved upon. Unlike BTC wallet, KHC does not generate 'dummy work' when there is none so that is a big bonus for solo miners but while pointing at the pool I have yet to see my miner go idle when there is no work available, aside from that KHC is quite new being a 320bit hash so the miner kernel could potentially be optimized quite a bit more than it is. Took a while before a DRK (x11) optimized kernel was released with sgminer, and it was improved upon further recently.
The GPU does go idle while waiting for the next work, as the pool is running we generate a tx when the mempool is empty, keeping your miners running nearly 100% of the time, you would see the same result if you was to solo mine right now as well.
December 17, 2014, 08:46:49 PM
Anyone test the power consumption of the algo versus X11 and other algos? Just curious about the results...
Full config with one 6950@6970 :
x11 = 195w
khc = 240w
I'd bet this could be improved upon. Unlike BTC wallet, KHC does not generate 'dummy work' when there is none so that is a big bonus for solo miners but while pointing at the pool I have yet to see my miner go idle when there is no work available, aside from that KHC is quite new being a 320bit hash so the miner kernel could potentially be optimized quite a bit more than it is. Took a while before a DRK (x11) optimized kernel was released with sgminer, and it was improved upon further recently.
The GPU does go idle while waiting for the next work, as the pool is running we generate a tx when the mempool is empty, keeping your miners running nearly 100% of the time, you would see the same result if you was to solo mine right now as well.
December 17, 2014, 07:52:13 PM
Anyone test the power consumption of the algo versus X11 and other algos? Just curious about the results...
Full config with one 6950@6970 :
x11 = 195w
khc = 240w
I'd bet this could be improved upon. Unlike BTC wallet, KHC does not generate 'dummy work' when there is none so that is a big bonus for solo miners but while pointing at the pool I have yet to see my miner go idle when there is no work available, aside from that KHC is quite new being a 320bit hash so the miner kernel could potentially be optimized quite a bit more than it is. Took a while before a DRK (x11) optimized kernel was released with sgminer, and it was improved upon further recently.
December 17, 2014, 05:21:21 PM
All i see is Blocks should i be surprised, no explosion or implosion yet, whats wrong dev? 
I'll spare dev your beckoning of him for a response: You were and most probably always will be; wrong, -that is all.
You are not a funny man, i saw lots of Blocks being solved fast and wanted to encourage new Miners.
Well, bummer. No future as a comedian, but then again I'd probably have to be interested in that. Blocks have been flying by, block 10k came and went, as long has the diff algo adheres to dev's design nothing is wrong, at least with the wallet allegedly exploding or imploding.
December 17, 2014, 05:17:38 PM
Anyone test the power consumption of the algo versus X11 and other algos? Just curious about the results...
Full config with one 6950@6970 :
x11 = 195w
khc = 240w
I'd bet this could be improved upon. Unlike BTC wallet, KHC does not generate 'dummy work' when there is none so that is a big bonus for solo miners but while pointing at the pool I have yet to see my miner go idle when there is no work available, aside from that KHC is quite new being a 320bit hash so the miner kernel could potentially be optimized quite a bit more than it is. Took a while before a DRK (x11) optimized kernel was released with sgminer, and it was improved upon further recently.
Jump to: