Topic: [ANN] [LTC] [PPS] [OTP 2FA] [Stratum only] LTCMine PPS mining pool (3.3%) - page 48. (Read 227601 times)
May 03, 2013, 07:24:54 PM
Any updates on stratum on port 80, 8080 or 443?
May 02, 2013, 08:07:29 PM
Done.
May 02, 2013, 07:13:02 PM
Less than 1 hour remaining...
May 02, 2013, 05:46:11 PM
Difficulty adjustment interval will be increased to 300 seconds instead of current 100 seconds. This will require service restart. There is no downtime expected, but current connections will be dropped (you will see "Stratum connection interrupted" message). Current mining software usually able to reconnect automatically.
ETA is 5:00 (GMT+4, server time).
ETA is 5:00 (GMT+4, server time).
May 02, 2013, 08:18:49 AM
As always, thanks for all your hard work Balth
May 02, 2013, 07:40:00 AM
Thinking about next level of paranoia 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4226
HOTP is very similar to TOTP, but it's counter-based, not time-based.
Or currently implemented TOTP is enough?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6238
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4226
HOTP is very similar to TOTP, but it's counter-based, not time-based.
Or currently implemented TOTP is enough?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6238
May 01, 2013, 03:46:17 PM
Transaction now complete guys. Thank you! I will just crawl back under my shell now :-)
May 01, 2013, 03:42:56 PM
Usually it appears when block found. But sometimes user lucky enough to see transaction as unconfirmed.
May 01, 2013, 03:36:56 PM
Ok my mistake then :-). Maybe I was lucky for all my other withdrawals. Every time I have taken a withdrawal it has arrived in my wallet within 5 minutes.
Maybe just Luck :-)
Would the withdrawal appear as unconfirmed in litecoin wallet? Or only when a block is found?
##edit -- I would also like to thank you for implementing TOTP. This is a nice security feature. I wish more websites would implement this!
Maybe just Luck :-)
Would the withdrawal appear as unconfirmed in litecoin wallet? Or only when a block is found?
##edit -- I would also like to thank you for implementing TOTP. This is a nice security feature. I wish more websites would implement this!
May 01, 2013, 03:35:46 PM
It's normal because pool handles own transactions. Pool should find a block before transaction will be visible in the network.
This allows us to send coins without fee.
This allows us to send coins without fee.
May 01, 2013, 03:33:17 PM
Hey Balthazar
I just tried to withdraw a small amount of litecoins.
The withdrawal hasn't worked and the transaction is listed under Outgoing Transactions however when you click on the hyperlink it says "Transaction not found."
The money never arrived in my wallet.
Appreciate if you can help me here. This is very strange, maybe a bug.
I just tried to withdraw a small amount of litecoins.
The withdrawal hasn't worked and the transaction is listed under Outgoing Transactions however when you click on the hyperlink it says "Transaction not found."
The money never arrived in my wallet.
Appreciate if you can help me here. This is very strange, maybe a bug.
Not sure if you know but the LTC are only sent after the pool has found a block.
This confused me the first time I withdrew some LTC.
Give it an hour or so and the pool will have found the next block and the LTC will be all yours!
May 01, 2013, 03:22:15 PM
Hey Balthazar
I just tried to withdraw a small amount of litecoins.
The withdrawal hasn't worked and the transaction is listed under Outgoing Transactions however when you click on the hyperlink it says "Transaction not found."
The money never arrived in my wallet.
Appreciate if you can help me here. This is very strange, maybe a bug.
I just tried to withdraw a small amount of litecoins.
The withdrawal hasn't worked and the transaction is listed under Outgoing Transactions however when you click on the hyperlink it says "Transaction not found."
The money never arrived in my wallet.
Appreciate if you can help me here. This is very strange, maybe a bug.
May 01, 2013, 02:36:22 PM
They usually use botnets. Fail2Ban creates massive ban list in such cases
May 01, 2013, 01:23:30 PM
Warning for qq.com users: btc-e dev notified me about massive bruteforce attempts against accounts with *@qq.com emails specified. Some of them was successful.
I really wonder how brute force attacks on a website can actually work nowadays... if you have the parts of the data base with the hashes passwords and you try offline, sure. But actually brute forcing using the website's own login mechanism? That should be too easily prevented by allowing only so-and-so many attempts before adding captchas, delays, blocking IPs etc. Or was that using a distributed botnet attack from many IPs?
May 01, 2013, 12:11:52 PM
2GH/s threshold reached
May 01, 2013, 04:24:22 AM
Warning for qq.com users: btc-e dev notified me about massive bruteforce attempts against accounts with *@qq.com emails specified. Some of them was successful.
April 30, 2013, 05:38:50 PM
Blocks list update issue fixed.
April 30, 2013, 02:41:08 PM
Done. Stats is not realtime anymore, update performed once per 60 seconds.
April 30, 2013, 08:26:43 AM
Some reorganization planned in next few hours. It should make system faster and more reliable. But unfortunately, it will require daemons restart.
ETA is 20:00 - 21:00 (server time).
ETA is 20:00 - 21:00 (server time).
April 30, 2013, 08:20:58 AM
Sorry for a little downtime, it was logs parsing process...
Jump to: