Received your email and answered.
and problem solved. thank you very much for your fast support! increased donation amount
Topic: [ANN] [LTC] [PPS] [OTP 2FA] [Stratum only] LTCMine PPS mining pool (3.3%) - page 49. (Read 227601 times)
April 30, 2013, 03:40:36 AM
and problem solved. thank you very much for your fast support! increased donation amount
April 30, 2013, 03:07:27 AM
JAuth GUI for Windows link added.
April 30, 2013, 02:30:04 AM
Received your email and answered.
April 30, 2013, 01:07:55 AM
seems as if my account got compromised. I am no longer able to log in. good thing we cannot change payout addresses 
@balthazar, I emailed you the details
@rest: I strongly recommend using 2fa
@balthazar, I emailed you the details
@rest: I strongly recommend using 2fa
April 29, 2013, 04:28:57 PM
Secret key regenerate option added, now users able to reset their keys if they want.
April 29, 2013, 10:57:45 AM
Or maybe it's web app bug...
April 29, 2013, 10:41:26 AM
I've received 6 emails about "incorrect code" message, and the all of them resolved by time synchronization.
Connection shouldn't affect this because the totp code is generated locally. With obvious exception for cases like very slow connection, which could result with codes expiration during submit process.
Connection shouldn't affect this because the totp code is generated locally. With obvious exception for cases like very slow connection, which could result with codes expiration during submit process.
April 29, 2013, 10:26:48 AM
...okay. And now it just works like a charm again. 
Still sure beats me what just happened, once again I changed absolutely nothing in between. This really isn't good for my paranoia but happy to be logged in too.
Could it have something to do with switching between two HSPA+ links as I am now mobile and connecting through such? Well at least my laptop is gonna get cleaned and swiped real tidy and it's gonna enjoy many scans tonight, that I am certain of.
Still sure beats me what just happened, once again I changed absolutely nothing in between. This really isn't good for my paranoia but happy to be logged in too.
Could it have something to do with switching between two HSPA+ links as I am now mobile and connecting through such? Well at least my laptop is gonna get cleaned and swiped real tidy and it's gonna enjoy many scans tonight, that I am certain of.
April 29, 2013, 10:08:09 AM
What should I do in order to keep reject ratio lower? I'm constantly getting about 3% which is quite a lot from what I read here...
Ping to ltcmine.ru from my miner is about 28-30ms which is really nice, so that shouldn't be a problem. What else can keep my reject ratio that high?
Which type of rejects do you get? Is it "unknown-work" or something another?Ping to ltcmine.ru from my miner is about 28-30ms which is really nice, so that shouldn't be a problem. What else can keep my reject ratio that high?
Hey and what do to minimize stales when they are 'prev-hash' type of stales? getting around 2.5% now...
April 29, 2013, 10:07:39 AM
Weirdness, the TOTP code inquiry gives me "Incorrect code" every time. Doing everything the same as i did after using it last time and at that time it worked fine. I'm clueless of what to try. Ideas?
EDIT: I'm on the road now and didn't have time to setup the method in the howtogeek-article. So been using the webapp... http://gauth.apps.gbraad.nl/
...which worked just fine before.
Hm... Time synchronization, maybe?EDIT: I'm on the road now and didn't have time to setup the method in the howtogeek-article. So been using the webapp... http://gauth.apps.gbraad.nl/
...which worked just fine before.
It isn't all that urgent at the moment, as i was only going to check out stats for fun on my spear time. But It's weird enough that i thought to ask is there anything strange going on that you could see. Will report how it goes with jAuth or some other alternative when i get my hands on one. For now being my home server is down atm because i got too greedy mining with it OC'd. lulz
April 29, 2013, 10:03:10 AM
What should I do in order to keep reject ratio lower? I'm constantly getting about 3% which is quite a lot from what I read here...
Ping to ltcmine.ru from my miner is about 28-30ms which is really nice, so that shouldn't be a problem. What else can keep my reject ratio that high?
Which type of rejects do you get? Is it "unknown-work" or something another?Ping to ltcmine.ru from my miner is about 28-30ms which is really nice, so that shouldn't be a problem. What else can keep my reject ratio that high?
Hey and what do to minimize stales when they are 'prev-hash' type of stales? getting around 2.5% now...
April 29, 2013, 10:02:14 AM
Weirdness, the TOTP code inquiry gives me "Incorrect code" every time. Doing everything the same as i did after using it last time and at that time it worked fine. I'm clueless of what to try. Ideas?
EDIT: I'm on the road now and didn't have time to setup the method in the howtogeek-article. So been using the webapp... http://gauth.apps.gbraad.nl/
...which worked just fine before.
Hm... Time synchronization, maybe?EDIT: I'm on the road now and didn't have time to setup the method in the howtogeek-article. So been using the webapp... http://gauth.apps.gbraad.nl/
...which worked just fine before.
It isn't all that urgent at the moment, as i was only going to check out stats for fun on my spear time. But It's weird enough that i thought to ask is there anything strange going on that you could see. Will report how it goes with jAuth or some other alternative when i get my hands on one. For now being my home server is down because i got too greedy mining with it OC'd. lulz
April 29, 2013, 09:49:07 AM
Weirdness, the TOTP code inquiry gives me "Incorrect code" every time. Doing everything the same as i did after using it last time and at that time it worked fine. I'm clueless of what to try. Ideas?
EDIT: I'm on the road now and didn't have time to setup the method in the howtogeek-article. So been using the webapp... http://gauth.apps.gbraad.nl/
...which worked just fine before.
Hm... Did you tried to perform time synchronization? EDIT: I'm on the road now and didn't have time to setup the method in the howtogeek-article. So been using the webapp... http://gauth.apps.gbraad.nl/
...which worked just fine before.
April 29, 2013, 09:18:42 AM
Weirdness, the TOTP code inquiry gives me "Incorrect code" every time. Doing everything the same as i did after using it last time and at that time it worked fine. I'm clueless of what to try. Ideas?
EDIT: I'm on the road now and didn't have time to setup the method in the howtogeek-article. So been using the webapp... http://gauth.apps.gbraad.nl/
...which worked just fine before.
EDIT: I'm on the road now and didn't have time to setup the method in the howtogeek-article. So been using the webapp... http://gauth.apps.gbraad.nl/
...which worked just fine before.
April 28, 2013, 08:06:55 PM
I am unable to set my email address. There error message is "The form is not filled correctly."
Could it be because you are not allowing addresses with a "+" character in the user name?
I use this regexp:Could it be because you are not allowing addresses with a "+" character in the user name?
Code:
^[_a-z0-9-]+(\.[_a-z0-9-]+)*@[a-z0-9-]+(\.[a-z0-9-]+)*(\.[a-z]{2,3})$
for email address sanity checking.
Yeah, that won't allow valid addresses like [email protected].
There's a good Stackoverflow question about validating e-mail with regex:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/201323/using-a-regular-expression-to-validate-an-email-address
Anyway, no problem. I can work around it. Thanks.
April 28, 2013, 07:57:40 PM
Just looked into the Event Viewer...
At round 1.08.00 am I have "a request to disable windows desktop manager" followed by "faulty application name cgminer.exe..module amdocl.dll" and to top things off "amdkmdap driver crashed and successfully recovered" 1 sec after that...few hours later fragmentation process starts, finishes and the pc "shuts down ". Have in mind cards fans were working...Anyone
At round 1.08.00 am I have "a request to disable windows desktop manager" followed by "faulty application name cgminer.exe..module amdocl.dll" and to top things off "amdkmdap driver crashed and successfully recovered" 1 sec after that...few hours later fragmentation process starts, finishes and the pc "shuts down ". Have in mind cards fans were working...Anyone
EDIT: One worker stopped soon after the upper mentioned findings the other 3 hours after that..
Sorry for the late reply, been away for the day...
It seems like the drivers are crashing which is causing cgminer to crash as well... When this happens and you're infront of the PC you'll notice the screens will turn off then back on and a bubble will pop out saying that the driver has crashed and recovered.
If you're not on version 13.3, update to that version it's more stable, check the OC if you're OCing the card, keep in mind that for scrypt mining the best ratio should be 0.68 e.g: CPU 1000 mem 1,470 if you're OCing the card unofficially through MSIAfterburner.conf, don't add the line manually, it cause my card to crash, just replace the 0 with 1 next to unofficialunlock= 0; this will give you a warning the1st time you launch afterburner, then it will fix itself.
Other things to look at is the intensity and the thread concurrency, lowering them will give you a more stable yet a bit slower mining.
Hope this helps
April 28, 2013, 07:42:15 PM
Thanks for keeping such a close eye on the pool and helping me reset my password. This pool is amazing!
April 28, 2013, 05:12:53 PM
I am unable to set my email address. There error message is "The form is not filled correctly."
Could it be because you are not allowing addresses with a "+" character in the user name?
I use this regexp:Could it be because you are not allowing addresses with a "+" character in the user name?
Code:
^[_a-z0-9-]+(\.[_a-z0-9-]+)*@[a-z0-9-]+(\.[a-z0-9-]+)*(\.[a-z]{2,3})$
for email address sanity checking.
April 28, 2013, 05:07:39 PM
Stats recalculated for 927 users. Other 130 users will be handled later.
April 28, 2013, 04:48:56 PM
I am unable to set my email address. There error message is "The form is not filled correctly."
Could it be because you are not allowing addresses with a "+" character in the user name?
Could it be because you are not allowing addresses with a "+" character in the user name?
Jump to: