One question for the community. Would you rather have the coin stand as is ascending reawrd to 160k/block and then descend to block 310k- reward 1000/block, or would you rather see the rewards ascend to block 160k, and at block 161k the reward drops to 1000/block? As it stands I think we'll mint 30billion in the 1st year and I was thinking that's kind of a lot, and I'd rather not get compaired to dogecoin or infinitcoin just because we've minted 30% of the money supply in the 1st year.
Personally I would love the current option, but as you are saying the Doge comparisons will come :/ I'll support the decision regardless of what you guys come up with.s
I'm not part of the dev team but I just wanted to see ppl's opinions. I just think this coin is superior to doge and infinit and I don't want critics to unfairly compare us with those rubishcoins because we minted 30% in the first year. I want this to be the peercoin of Scrypt which took about a year to hit $7 the, difference is that they have only minted 21M compared to our 30B 1st year.
I think if some one hit the market after one year, there is no matter is that coin made in one year or three.
Only matter is how fair was mining, i mean is there some backholders holding free coins? And we all know there is no any insta or premined µ coin.
Most important is coins are spread fair for all who ever want to hold it.
If some one dont mine or buy it now, when it's cheap... well, then they can buy it higer
edit: And I believe most of coins are change owner many times after on year.
