Author

Topic: [ANN] microCoin MRC - alcurEX - Scrypt-Jane - nFactor - page 208. (Read 374705 times)

full member
Activity: 120
Merit: 100
And we're back.

Phew! how to scale a pool from 0 to 1.7GHs in a couple of hours!  Shocked

Enjoy chaps and chappets.

I can be wrong but I 'm affraid its forked, look at http://mcr.blocksolved.com nethashrate Roll Eyes

This is a glitch of displaying Net hashrate for scryptjane, it just shows local pool hashrate. I think on all scrypt jane pools I've seen Net hashrate exactly matches pool hashrate.
Both pools are on the same block height.
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 251
who can give me some useful nodes to the correct block chain,thx!
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
My 7950 ... but I am solo so maybe that's helping ?? Dunno ... I had bad sessions, reboot usually solved it!





coins still coming nice ...





All that from solo mining?!?
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 251
My 7950 ... but I am solo so maybe that's helping ?? Dunno ... I had bad sessions, reboot usually solved it!





coins still coming nice ...





Wow, 2 mils!
How do you solomine? What you put instead of pool address into config? Never did it  Roll Eyes

Anyway.. maybe problem is, that my 7950 are put together? Yours is alone..

yours alone is actually giving as much as my 3 in rig together Cheesy

Could be that its single!  All my configs start with this:

microCoinminer.exe -o 192.168.1.50:44444 -u user -p x

that is the ip of my machine on my network ... if you have one then put 127.0.0.1

Okay.. so I must put IP of machine where wallet is running? What if that machine would turn off? When then coins go? Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Hi Miners,

first let me say sorry. I will further explain here what happend and how to get your coins.

What happend?

1. The initial wallet sync was very slow and the wallet was running unstable. This was while Testblocks where going on with 0.0001 reward.
We fixed the wallet issue and things looked fine for a while.

2. We started a cron payout to get rid of the already about 800 blocks we had to payout, things becam slow,we expected tha because of the numer of shares and the database load, eventually a bit more rejects, but remmber, still Test blocks. Cron finished sucesfully, pool turned to normal.

3. No other pool came online for a long time and more and more hasrate has been thrown add us and as we hitted the first real blocks even bigger guns have been thrown out, giving up soloing. Same time the real block time still was about 1-2 secs while target is 32 and the database began to puke really, counting all theses shares, still no other pool.

4. At this point we decided to put saftety in favor of profit and stopped the stratum. We (actually the owner does all this as i translate only and support him).
We dumped the (partially corrupt) db, repaired it, wrote a script to get total number of shares, diff, and how many blocks we got an what was inside them and so on.

5. We transfered your coins to your accounts using a manual written script based on the information we took from the db dump. This was the reason it took a long time since my last post. We have been busy and it was hard work.

Get your coins

6. You can login here again: http://micro.minersbest.com/ and create a manual payout request.

7. Login with same account here if you want: http://mrc.minersbest.com/ and mine.

We redirect the stratum from the old pool to the new to take care of those that are not at there miners and use automatic failovers.

If you can, anyway plese use the new stratum.


8. If you feel you have further lost anything please dont hesitate to contact me (pm here), and please provide details if possible, i cant look all logs myself, have to speak to the owner.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
And we're back.

Phew! how to scale a pool from 0 to 1.7GHs in a couple of hours!  Shocked

Enjoy chaps and chappets.

I can be wrong but I 'm affraid its forked, look at http://mcr.blocksolved.com nethashrate Roll Eyes

Im leaning towards mrblocksolve has something wrong in his config.
They are both on same block, same diff. but the network shown on mrblocksolve doesnt make sense vs the diff on coin.

my getinfo corresponds with nut2pools at least.
{
"version" : "v1.1.1.0-gunit-beta",
"protocolversion" : 70000,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 144694.93712000,
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 14233,
"moneysupply" : 51301261.99075000,
"connections" : 8,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "x,
"difficulty" : 4.19088520,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1389373621,
"keypoolsize" : 102,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}

Yes, i noticed that... Anyways plz try to ask people to go to the other pool. No sense on risking a fork, the hashrate is going up like nuts on nuts pool, and people fail to understand also that the reward will be much less because of the freaking cows that are sucking the juice with 20mh/s rigs!!!
So, please some miners join http://mcr.blocksolved.com and get more out of it!!!

The bolded bit isn't technically correct. the per block rewards will be less but we find MANY more blocks. All works out in the end. Wink

legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1006
And we're back.

Phew! how to scale a pool from 0 to 1.7GHs in a couple of hours!  Shocked

Enjoy chaps and chappets.

I can be wrong but I 'm affraid its forked, look at http://mcr.blocksolved.com nethashrate Roll Eyes

What does that mean in a very technical manner Smiley
They have same block count than nutpool.
It is not forked.
member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
My 7950 ... but I am solo so maybe that's helping ?? Dunno ... I had bad sessions, reboot usually solved it!





coins still coming nice ...





Wow, 2 mils!
How do you solomine? What you put instead of pool address into config? Never did it  Roll Eyes

Anyway.. maybe problem is, that my 7950 are put together? Yours is alone..

yours alone is actually giving as much as my 3 in rig together Cheesy

Could be that its single!  All my configs start with this:

microCoinminer.exe -o 192.168.1.50:44444 -u user -p x

that is the ip of my machine on my network ... if you have one then put 127.0.0.1
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
Bcnex - The Ultimate Blockchain Trading Platform
And we're back.

Phew! how to scale a pool from 0 to 1.7GHs in a couple of hours!  Shocked

Enjoy chaps and chappets.

I can be wrong but I 'm affraid its forked, look at http://mcr.blocksolved.com nethashrate Roll Eyes

Im leaning towards mrblocksolve has something wrong in his config.
They are both on same block, same diff. but the network shown on mrblocksolve doesnt make sense vs the diff on coin.

my getinfo corresponds with nut2pools at least.
{
"version" : "v1.1.1.0-gunit-beta",
"protocolversion" : 70000,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 144694.93712000,
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 14233,
"moneysupply" : 51301261.99075000,
"connections" : 8,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "x,
"difficulty" : 4.19088520,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1389373621,
"keypoolsize" : 102,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}

Yes, i noticed that... Anyways plz try to ask people to go to the other pool. No sense on risking a fork, the hashrate is going up like nuts on nuts pool, and people fail to understand also that the reward will be much less because of the freaking cows that are sucking the juice with 20mh/s rigs!!!
So, please some miners join http://mcr.blocksolved.com and get more out of it!!!
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
I'm still kinda new to this, only started 2 months ago.  Can Nut pool having over 51% of the hash rate cause a fork?  SHould 1/2 the people from Nut go to Minersbest (or others) to balance it out?   Huh

Yes it can cause a fork and it did!!! Tongue

There's no fork.

blocksolved and nut2pools are on the same block. The hashrate is screwy though. Doesn;t seem to calculate the entire network. only the local pool.

To tired to work it out now but will look in the morning.



Nut
member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
Mine from a few moments ago:

01:20:11

{
"version" : "v1.1.1.0-gunit-beta",
"protocolversion" : 70000,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 2223208.03780000,
"newmint" : 56845.00000000,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 14270,
"moneysupply" : 51828585.99047000,
"connections" : 8,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "",
"difficulty" : 4.28418321,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1389374930,
"keypoolsize" : 102,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 251
My 7950 ... but I am solo so maybe that's helping ?? Dunno ... I had bad sessions, reboot usually solved it!





coins still coming nice ...





Wow, 2 mils!
How do you solomine? What you put instead of pool address into config? Never did it  Roll Eyes

Anyway.. maybe problem is, that my 7950 are put together? Yours is alone..

yours alone is actually giving as much as my 3 in rig together Cheesy
member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
My 7950 ... but I am solo so maybe that's helping ?? Dunno ... I had bad sessions, reboot usually solved it!





coins still coming nice ...



sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
And we're back.

Phew! how to scale a pool from 0 to 1.7GHs in a couple of hours!  Shocked

Enjoy chaps and chappets.

I can be wrong but I 'm affraid its forked, look at http://mcr.blocksolved.com nethashrate Roll Eyes

Im leaning towards mrblocksolve has something wrong in his config.
They are both on same block, same diff. but the network shown on mrblocksolve doesnt make sense vs the diff on coin.

my getinfo corresponds with nut2pools at least.
{
"version" : "v1.1.1.0-gunit-beta",
"protocolversion" : 70000,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 144694.93712000,
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 14233,
"moneysupply" : 51301261.99075000,
"connections" : 8,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "x,
"difficulty" : 4.19088520,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1389373621,
"keypoolsize" : 102,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 251
I'm still kinda new to this, only started 2 months ago.  Can Nut pool having over 51% of the hash rate cause a fork?  SHould 1/2 the people from Nut go to Minersbest (or others) to balance it out?   Huh

how about solo miners?
morrisminer alone has 70+ MHs which is like 5% of pool HR.. and probably there are more such big hashers solo.. so probably no fork then? dunno either
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
Bcnex - The Ultimate Blockchain Trading Platform
I'm still kinda new to this, only started 2 months ago.  Can Nut pool having over 51% of the hash rate cause a fork?  SHould 1/2 the people from Nut go to Minersbest (or others) to balance it out?   Huh

Yes it can cause a fork and it did!!! Tongue
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
I'm still kinda new to this, only started 2 months ago.  Can Nut pool having over 51% of the hash rate cause a fork?  SHould 1/2 the people from Nut go to Minersbest (or others) to balance it out?   Huh
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
And we're back.

Phew! how to scale a pool from 0 to 1.7GHs in a couple of hours!  Shocked

Enjoy chaps and chappets.

I can be wrong but I 'm affraid its forked, look at http://mcr.blocksolved.com nethashrate Roll Eyes

What does that mean in a very technical manner Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 251
7950 : -g 1 -I 20 -v 1 -w 256 --shaders 1792 --thread-concurrency 21712 --gpu-powertune 20 --gpu-engine 1000 --gpu-memclock 1450 --auto-fan --gpu-fan 20-100 --temp-target 80 --no-submit-stale
 
280x :  --intensity 13 -g 2 --thread-concurrency 11200 --worksize 256 --no-submit-stale --intensity 13 -g 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 --worksize 256 --auto-fan --gpu-engine 1030 --gpu-memclock 1500 --temp-target 85 --temp-overheat 90 --gpu-powertune 20
 
R9 290 : -I 19 -g 1 -w 512 --thread-concurrency 32765 --no-submit-stale --gpu-engine 1000 --gpu-memclock 1500
 
7990 : --intensity 15 -g 2 --thread-concurrency 11200 --worksize 256
 

got a few coins so working well!


edit: spot the typo in the config lol! Gonna fix em now ,,

Wow, nice hash factory.. thanks for the settings, I actually had almost same for 7950, only bit higher TC and did not have that -v parametter and that --no-submit-stale (what is it good for?)
and still got only 1756 MH/s Sad( pretty disappointing..
I have them 3 in rig, all cgminer looks like this:

microCoinminer.exe --scrypt --Nfmin 4 --Nfmax 30 --StartT 1389028879 --queue 0 --scan-time 2 --expiry 4 -o stratum+tcp://mrceu.nut2pools.com:6000 -u blacklig.214 -p x -o stratum+tcp://mcr.blocksolved.com:3310 -u blacklig.214 -p x --gpu-fan 100,100,100 -I 20,20,20 -g 1 -v 1,1,1 -w 256,256,256 --shaders 1792,1792,1792 --thread-concurrency 21712,21712,21712 --gpu-engine 1000,1000,1000 --gpu-memclock 1450,1450,1450 --gpu-vddc 1.2,1.2,1.2 --gpu-powertune -10,10,10 --no-submit-stale

do you see any obvious mistake? How can I push it harder?

post a screen shot of the miner running ... to see the stats

Don't know if it world for micro miner but the stale thing stops out of date results being set to the server I think, which saves a bit of time

like this:


Have you tried lower I values ? I have a 7970 that hates anything above -I 13 but the 7950s and 280x are fine with -I 20

tried just 19,18,17 and no difference..
right now I tried to start it with -g 2 and I 13 and it kinda killed machine Cheesy Hope I wont have to go there with screwdriver to restart it Cheesy
My 280x also hates I>13 but here on Jane its OK with 20..
member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
7950 : -g 1 -I 20 -v 1 -w 256 --shaders 1792 --thread-concurrency 21712 --gpu-powertune 20 --gpu-engine 1000 --gpu-memclock 1450 --auto-fan --gpu-fan 20-100 --temp-target 80 --no-submit-stale
 
280x :  --intensity 13 -g 2 --thread-concurrency 11200 --worksize 256 --no-submit-stale --intensity 13 -g 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 --worksize 256 --auto-fan --gpu-engine 1030 --gpu-memclock 1500 --temp-target 85 --temp-overheat 90 --gpu-powertune 20
 
R9 290 : -I 19 -g 1 -w 512 --thread-concurrency 32765 --no-submit-stale --gpu-engine 1000 --gpu-memclock 1500
 
7990 : --intensity 15 -g 2 --thread-concurrency 11200 --worksize 256
 

got a few coins so working well!


edit: spot the typo in the config lol! Gonna fix em now ,,

Wow, nice hash factory.. thanks for the settings, I actually had almost same for 7950, only bit higher TC and did not have that -v parametter and that --no-submit-stale (what is it good for?)
and still got only 1756 MH/s Sad( pretty disappointing..
I have them 3 in rig, all cgminer looks like this:

microCoinminer.exe --scrypt --Nfmin 4 --Nfmax 30 --StartT 1389028879 --queue 0 --scan-time 2 --expiry 4 -o stratum+tcp://mrceu.nut2pools.com:6000 -u blacklig.214 -p x -o stratum+tcp://mcr.blocksolved.com:3310 -u blacklig.214 -p x --gpu-fan 100,100,100 -I 20,20,20 -g 1 -v 1,1,1 -w 256,256,256 --shaders 1792,1792,1792 --thread-concurrency 21712,21712,21712 --gpu-engine 1000,1000,1000 --gpu-memclock 1450,1450,1450 --gpu-vddc 1.2,1.2,1.2 --gpu-powertune -10,10,10 --no-submit-stale

do you see any obvious mistake? How can I push it harder?

post a screen shot of the miner running ... to see the stats

Don't know if it world for micro miner but the stale thing stops out of date results being set to the server I think, which saves a bit of time

like this:


Have you tried lower I values ? I have a 7970 that hates anything above -I 13 but the 7950s and 280x are fine with -I 20

And - how much RAM in your rig?
Jump to: