What would prevent such an attack?
Your Programmer may see some other options that the community is more agreeable too.
But my best guess would be dropping to your final 5% rate 2 years early.
Your 20 days min POS is stronger than apexcoin 24hr min POS, but your interest rate is 15% which is higher than apex's 10% .
Interest rate has nothing to do with its security. Mintcoin is more secure than most pos coins in that it takes 20 days to mint and 50 confirmations for minted blocks. We could increase the confirmations if needed. I'm not worried. As long as people keep their wallets online it improves the network and security. I keep my wallet online at all times because I want to help the network. 20 days is a good amount of time considering mintcoins block speed. It means its even better than peercoin in a relativistic stand point. That's why I think if people just understood pos better they would be buying mintcoin rather than all these other shitcoins. People think of MINT like its just some arbitrary random shitcoin when its not. It actually has innovative properties.
The interest rate does affect security in the type of attack that guy used against apexcoin, a lower rate would mean he would need more of your coins to make the attempt. Also as your coin price drops , it would be easier for him to get the number of coins needed for the attempt.
I gave my best guess for a quick fix , but your programmer may have a solution the community is more likely to agree too.
Or you can just ignore it, if you are 100% sure mint is bulletproof.
That doesn't make sense to me. How does a higher interest rate (higher reward for staking) mean he would need less coins? What affects the security of POS is not the interest rate of the reward, but the % of the coins held for minting and staking vs the rest of the network. So, if he was like the only person staking and nobody on the network was trying to stake. Mintcoin has a maximum coin weight buildup of 40 days to help prevent against this. This is why PoS coins that do not have a limit on coin age/weight are not secure, because an attacker can just wait until enough time has passed for their coins to overpower the entire network completely, basically indefinitely. This cannot happen with Mintcoin because of the 40 day limit. Because Mintcoin has a higher interest rate, means it is actually probably MORE SECURE because it motivates more people to hold their coins in their wallet for staking, thus increasing the staking participation rate. Security all has to do with the number of people on the network with their wallets online and attempting to stake. This is why Mintcoin has chosen a higher interest rate in these early years, as it is an additional boost to motivation to help keep more people minting and active on the network; and this increases the security of the coin. So I would argue that a higher block reward rate actually can help to increase security. For example: take Blackcoin for example...it already has 0 reward...so there is absolutely no motivation for you to try to stake your coins on that network, except to help secure the network. Mintcoin gives you a 15% annual reward right now to help secure its network. So I bet Mintcoin actually has a better staking participation rate than Blackcoin (thus Mintcoin more secure than Blackcoin, even though Blackcoin has lower interest rate). Since the 15% rate is equal for everyone, any increase in coin accumulation due to that, is equal for everyone on a % basis so that arguement is really all awash anyway..