also people if u want to create demand you have to lower the supply! TAKE DOWN YOUR SELL ORDERS!! keep the sell side very thin...
Kind of hard when some people don't even read the thread
The price will reflect the product. No need to rush it.
Topic: [ANN] NeosCoin [NEOS] - with Arbitrush, Multi-Algo, In-wallet trading & More - page 35. (Read 94526 times)
August 21, 2014, 12:38:41 AM
Kind of hard when some people don't even read the thread
The price will reflect the product. No need to rush it.
August 21, 2014, 12:37:00 AM
also people if u want to create demand you have to lower the supply! TAKE DOWN YOUR SELL ORDERS!! keep the sell side very thin...
August 21, 2014, 12:35:08 AM
Any plans doing a mobile wallet in the future?
Absolutely would be something great.
August 21, 2014, 12:27:12 AM
Any plans doing a mobile wallet in the future?
Absolutely would be something great.
August 21, 2014, 12:21:11 AM
other coin ICO fail? 
August 21, 2014, 12:20:09 AM
Any plans doing a mobile wallet in the future?
August 21, 2014, 12:12:18 AM
Keep your coins, do not sell cheap or you Balls weigh nothing? 
August 21, 2014, 12:09:59 AM
Yessir that's correct.
Are any steps taken to help obfuscate the final TX? Example: Bob sends Alice 166.32 NEOS via Arbitrush. Given timing and the unique amount sent. It would be trivial to discover Bob was the origin of the transaction if Alice receives 166.32 NEOS in a single output.
As of right now the only obfuscation would be the timestamp as it purposely doesn't send it right away through to prevent matching up a certain send time/amount with another masked tx's. With PoT enabled it returns the one tx, but what I can do is modify it so that the amount sent is split up into fragments and just return an array of txids.
Regards,
syntaks
I think that would help. Also, if you want to get fancy, I would consider further obfuscation. Like random amounts of uneven divisions sent at slightly differing times from different exit nodes if possible.
That's exactly what came to mind when I was reading. It's literally now in my to-do. Thanks for the input
Regards,
syntaks
August 21, 2014, 12:08:35 AM
Looking at the list
http://cryptoasian.com/coin-list/
POD has generally helped the coins that seem to have the most to offer. In other words, it seems to do the most good for the coins that seem to bring the most to the table from the start, before the POD.
http://cryptoasian.com/coin-list/
POD has generally helped the coins that seem to have the most to offer. In other words, it seems to do the most good for the coins that seem to bring the most to the table from the start, before the POD.
POD isn't magic pixie dust. In theory it could be manipulated to some degree. There is no guarantee there isn't another person(s) hiding behind a real life sock puppet dev(s). That could be on their N'th shitcoin. It's nice to see someone trying to do some verification. But, at some point bad eggs will make it through the process.
He's exactly right and CryptoAsian actually acknowledged that today when we had a video call. I had told him when I first was prompted to do this, I thought "Who deemed him the source?". However the same goes with that as with anything - once you have a known trusted party you can refer to them for validation.
Regards,
syntaks
Turtle your just the man ! lol A+
August 21, 2014, 12:05:13 AM
Yessir that's correct.
Are any steps taken to help obfuscate the final TX? Example: Bob sends Alice 166.32 NEOS via Arbitrush. Given timing and the unique amount sent. It would be trivial to discover Bob was the origin of the transaction if Alice receives 166.32 NEOS in a single output.
As of right now the only obfuscation would be the timestamp as it purposely doesn't send it right away through to prevent matching up a certain send time/amount with another masked tx's. With PoT enabled it returns the one tx, but what I can do is modify it so that the amount sent is split up into fragments and just return an array of txids.
Regards,
syntaks
I think that would help. Also, if you want to get fancy, I would consider further obfuscation. Like random amounts of uneven divisions sent at slightly differing times from different exit nodes if possible.
That's exactly what came to mind when I was reading. It's literally now in my to-do. Thanks for the input
Regards,
syntaks
August 21, 2014, 12:04:23 AM
Looking at the list
http://cryptoasian.com/coin-list/
POD has generally helped the coins that seem to have the most to offer. In other words, it seems to do the most good for the coins that seem to bring the most to the table from the start, before the POD.
http://cryptoasian.com/coin-list/
POD has generally helped the coins that seem to have the most to offer. In other words, it seems to do the most good for the coins that seem to bring the most to the table from the start, before the POD.
POD isn't magic pixie dust. In theory it could be manipulated to some degree. There is no guarantee there isn't another person(s) hiding behind a real life sock puppet dev(s). That could be on their N'th shitcoin. It's nice to see someone trying to do some verification. But, at some point bad eggs will make it through the process.
He's exactly right and CryptoAsian actually acknowledged that today when we had a video call. I had told him when I first was prompted to do this, I thought "Who deemed him the source?". However the same goes with that as with anything - once you have a known trusted party you can refer to them for validation.
Regards,
syntaks
August 20, 2014, 11:59:20 PM
Yessir that's correct.
Are any steps taken to help obfuscate the final TX? Example: Bob sends Alice 166.32 NEOS via Arbitrush. Given timing and the unique amount sent. It would be trivial to discover Bob was the origin of the transaction if Alice receives 166.32 NEOS in a single output.
As of right now the only obfuscation would be the timestamp as it purposely doesn't send it right away through to prevent matching up a certain send time/amount with another masked tx's. With PoT enabled it returns the one tx, but what I can do is modify it so that the amount sent is split up into fragments and just return an array of txids.
Regards,
syntaks
I think that would help. Also, if you want to get fancy, I would consider further obfuscation. Like random amounts of uneven divisions sent at slightly differing times from different exit nodes if possible.
August 20, 2014, 11:51:14 PM
Looking at the list
http://cryptoasian.com/coin-list/
POD has generally helped the coins that seem to have the most to offer. In other words, it seems to do the most good for the coins that seem to bring the most to the table from the start, before the POD.
http://cryptoasian.com/coin-list/
POD has generally helped the coins that seem to have the most to offer. In other words, it seems to do the most good for the coins that seem to bring the most to the table from the start, before the POD.
POD isn't magic pixie dust. In theory it could be manipulated to some degree. There is no guarantee there isn't another person(s) hiding behind a real life sock puppet dev(s). That could be on their N'th shitcoin. It's nice to see someone trying to do some verification. But, at some point bad eggs will make it through the process.
August 20, 2014, 11:50:10 PM
POD means nothing Boomcoin dev is tied to Carsen Klock and i'm quite sure he just got a 5 star rating, those types of ratings mean nothing. Welcome to crypto where you need to dyor on everything and try to draw a conclusion, and you will be wrong more than right.
Looking at the list
http://cryptoasian.com/coin-list/
POD has generally helped the coins that seem to have the most to offer. In other words, it seems to do the most good for the coins that seem to bring the most to the table from the start, before the POD.
You do realize cryptoasian is just some guy off twitter that happens to mine a lot of coins and has been around awhile right? It's not like we are dealing with the judge of cryptoland, hes just some random dude, I could do the same thing...
August 20, 2014, 11:46:59 PM
Yessir that's correct.
Are any steps taken to help obfuscate the final TX? Example: Bob sends Alice 166.32 NEOS via Arbitrush. Given timing and the unique amount sent. It would be trivial to discover Bob was the origin of the transaction if Alice receives 166.32 NEOS in a single output.
As of right now the only obfuscation would be the timestamp as it purposely doesn't send it right away through to prevent matching up a certain send time/amount with another masked tx's. With PoT enabled it returns the one tx, but what I can do is modify it so that the amount sent is split up into fragments and just return an array of txids.
Regards,
syntaks
August 20, 2014, 11:43:32 PM
POD means nothing Boomcoin dev is tied to Carsen Klock and i'm quite sure he just got a 5 star rating, those types of ratings mean nothing. Welcome to crypto where you need to dyor on everything and try to draw a conclusion, and you will be wrong more than right.
Looking at the list
http://cryptoasian.com/coin-list/
POD has generally helped the coins that seem to have the most to offer. In other words, it seems to do the most good for the coins that seem to bring the most to the table from the start, before the POD.
August 20, 2014, 11:42:05 PM
Don't believe I can buy this coin at such a cheap price.
August 20, 2014, 11:40:12 PM
Yessir that's correct.
Are any steps taken to help obfuscate the final TX? Example: Bob sends Alice 166.32 NEOS via Arbitrush. Given timing and the unique amount sent. It would be trivial to discover Bob was the origin of the transaction if Alice receives 166.32 NEOS in a single output.
August 20, 2014, 11:39:54 PM
Would appreciate it if you could briefly summarise:
1) the strengths of this coin?
2) the weaknesses of this coin?
3) promises made? kept? any FUD?
Specifically to the dev(s), what will be the key original code/feature(s) in this coin?
And will you be providing "Proof of Developer"? http://cryptoasian.com/coin-list/
1) the strengths of this coin?
2) the weaknesses of this coin?
3) promises made? kept? any FUD?
Specifically to the dev(s), what will be the key original code/feature(s) in this coin?
And will you be providing "Proof of Developer"? http://cryptoasian.com/coin-list/
Sure not a problem at all.
1) The strengths of this project and coin I would have to summarize as the team behind it. We all love what we do and we keep pushing to see what more we can achieve and integrate.
2) I'll update this response when I think of any
3) All promises made thus far have been kept. There hasn't been any FUD to my knowledge.
The key features I would spotlight I believe are the way Arbitrush handles transactions as well as the in-wallet trading. Have you by chance seen the youtube video of the screencast I shared earlier?
Much earlier this morning I reached out to CryptoAsian and submitted my PoD. If you have any questions or if I didn't answer everything clearly please don't hesitate to let me know.
Best regards,
syntaks
Really appreciated the responses - reflects well on the coin. The youtube video looked good.
Looking forward to the POD - assume that will give even more positive exposure to the coin and significantly boost the price. Your OP #1 is pretty convincing and, unlike many others, actually worth reading.
POD means nothing Boomcoin dev is tied to Carsen Klock and i'm quite sure he just got a 5 star rating, those types of ratings mean nothing. Welcome to crypto where you need to dyor on everything and try to draw a conclusion, and you will be wrong more than right.
August 20, 2014, 11:39:27 PM
god ,this is such a good coin. should be on the sky ,now It's best time to get on the rocket
Jump to: