Topic: [ANN] NeosCoin Official BCT Thread. Details, news and other information. - page 32. (Read 308642 times)

To address your questions:

1.  I'm involved in all aspects of crypto,  just as most here are.
2.  We had a crowdsale over 2 years ago - is this what you're referring to?
3.  "Other than used for a trading fund" - I have my own funds and crowdsale funds were used for plenty of expenses, without leaving any room for additional gambles
4.  If you read the announcement, you would have known that there are several developers involved, unless you overlooked that.
5.  What hype?  What crowdsale?  The one from 2 years ago?

Addressing being quiet and "cheating investors".  Cheating investors and our existing supporters would be creating hype out of thin or lying about progress and features.  We're quiet because we're actually busy coding what we've laid out and promised.  I've always done good by our supporters/investors and the best that I can.  Many, many hours have been put into Neos over the years and we continue to progress development-wise.  As far as antshares, I suppose you've read my comments on their thread and honestly - a few months later and where are they?  Announcing that they have a block explorer coming.  What did they sell the people on?  Interchain operations and communication among other features.  How much BTC did they bring in during their ICO? 6069.22 BTC (Not to mention that was ICO #2 for them) How much did our crowdsale bring in 2+ years ago and we're still here supporting and coding?  125 - 5 of which went towards the fee for the ICO being hosted.  The difference?  Everything we've promised throughout the years has come to fruition.  One constant throughout all of this - we remained generally quiet while we worked to do that and spoke up when had something of substance to say.

In closing, whatever your intentions were for this post - I hope I've cleared up any confusion or misinformation.

i noticed you have been focused on trading lately. do you have a breakdown of where crowdsale dunds have ben alocated? other than used for a trading fund? have you hired additional developers, i noted alot of hype before crowdsale, to quiet down now is kind of cheating investors, you may feel similar about antshares. do good by your investors and you will build a reputation for being genuine.

If there's anything I'm the worst with - it's timelines.  If I gave you an ETA, it wouldn't really have any significant meaning other than just something to respond with and that's pretty much what you'll mostly see floating around this space to maintain hype/interest.  I take more of a straightforward type of approach.  One of the most important pieces of the puzzle to what we're releasing just finished last night.  It still requires testing and integration with other moving parts, and then some more testing.  What I can say about the proposed/promised upcoming features is that we've actually gone beyond them and the list is too long to go into here, but will be made available in documentation during the release announcement and media.  The upcoming release as of right now, wouldn't have any place with the aforementioned partners but will have a place with some others perhaps.  It's a matter of how well the final product works and how much traction it can gain.  I'll be keeping updates here as they come in, but until then it's back to the console.

Hi Devs

When will be the release of these new implementations? Any date?

I'm waiting for news with a group of friends (traders). We have great interest in your project, and we intend to invest heavy.

A tip: why not sign partnerships with companies that are in recovery (aka AMD, Nvidia, Intel, Samsung (...)?

No problem at all!  I'm glad it's all situated.  I just had some serious dental work done, so forgive me for not spotting the conversion whereas normally I would have.  Thanks a lot Stoner for chiming in.  If you have any other questions, please don't hesitate to contact us.

yeah unfortunately (reduced supply) I am sure it is me.. maybe even I imported priv key already! and forgot all about it

anyways doing: ./neoscoind -reindex -rescan takei from there

congrats on the swap, as well as master nodes architecture.. in my opinion it is a solid win, cheers

ok I know precisely what happened.. I sold the coins on poloniex.. so sorry about.. things move so fast, yes abs coin chain is very solid,I reshuffle my portfolio in various places... hence

NewGMvyE6k2DEFgmSCu6A1SgCjH9JfzJ2B

Keep in mind that the swap reduced the supply by about 79%.

Your balance on the old chain of 15773.50855539 * 21% = 3312.43679663
Staked 1 time, then was sent to Poloniex. See here:https://chainz.cryptoid.info/neos/address.dws?Nfz2zqAgtGVdZA6Tnsasa6oCTTXxoCHCKU.htm.

Follow the transactions. Looks like it was all correct and no issues on the NEOS chain whatsoever.

A snapshot was taken several months ago of the chain when the swap was being handled.  Anything after that snapshot, was not accounted for (as we warned folks not to transfer and/or use the old client during that specified period).  We did post several warnings through various methods of communication to the community.  If after the snapshot date you sent Neos to your address, they would not have been credited after the swap.  This was in effort to ensure a consistent and reliable swap over and prevent fraudulent claims.  Looking at https://chainz.cryptoid.info/neos/address.dws?Nfz2zqAgtGVdZA6Tnsasa6oCTTXxoCHCKU.htm this address first appeared on the chain in August, on the 21st.  This announcement was made on the 16th  - http://forum.neoscoin.com/t/neos-swap-in-progress-news-details-and-other-information/638.  That being said, it was clearly active and imported on the new chain after the snapshot and there doesn't seem to be any indication of the balance posted above being owed or ever on this address.

Again, anything taken from the snapshot would have been applied on the new chain.  Anything sent after, would not have been.  What you could try doing is the following:

./neoscoind -reindex -rescan

I suggest that to be sure that all possible data relative to your wallet and the chain is in-sync and as accurate as possible.  My curiosity lies in the fact that this address mentioned was used after the swap date, but several months later now a claim is being made that it's short from the swap.  Sounds a bit off to me, honestly.

dear admin,

i used the old (classic) chain wallet to export priv key

./neoscoind dumpprivkey Nfz2zqAgtGVdZA6Tnsasa6oCTTXxoCHCKU   

and then using new core neos wallet I have imported key to new wallet

./neoscoind importprivkey rescan=true

unfortunately my old balance of 15773.50855539 has NOT been transferred

/neoscoind getinfo
{
    "version" : 1020102,
    "protocolversion" : 90002,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 15773.50855539,
    "blocks" : 213777,
    "timeoffset" : 0,
    "connections" : 1,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 8827738.66366921,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1432157603,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "errors" : ""
}

please let know, looking forward to run master node! with new neos chain

appreciate much!

for the low total coinage (3m),
for the masterchief syntaks and his vision,
for the team of devs around Neos,
and for what's coming up (http://www.neoscoin.com/images/q1q4-rc2.png) ....   

NEOS under 10k satoshis == an excellent opportunity!

@Mrboot : I don't understand what you meant by the "top 10 wallets heavily loaded" 
you can clearly see that the first largest -guesstimated- wallet belongs to Poloniex. (https://chainz.cryptoid.info/neos/#!wallets)
and I don't see any problem with the other top wallets : at the current price, it's fairly easy for any investors to still build themselves an enjoyable position on Neos (and you know it's not that easy for the majority of other established alts, most of them having a top 10 wallets way more "heavily loaded")

Neos went with a force 

Yea the rebrand i ment will mostly be to just create a bigger noise on new release, and to promote there are more dev. around and people joining. and yes its not only about that but it does help in crypto.
People look around for coins but cant read the updates of every coin and if this release is massive and the functions did change a lot compared to the (old) Neoscoin multi-algo pow. I dont see it can really hurt beside the work needed for it ofc.  Many people dont even know Neoscoin is working on updates.

With Pr i ment someone who keeps things active, website, roadmap, blogs, news etc. Things that shows how hard you and the other devs are working on it. This will bring trust and attention back to Neoscoin, it would be ashame if the updates are massive and people just dont find out.

I'm not so sure that a re-brand would do much for the release ahead, other than generate some noise for various reasons - one of them being to conjure up some "hype" because it's a new name.  We'll be doing our part in terms of marketing and PR this time around and working with folks within the community that have different abilities to offer and bring resources to the table.  They've come forward and offered their assistance and we're glad the synergy is there.  Neos has been around for a few years now and in my opinion it's stronger to show continued development than attempt to bring some hype into this already-saturated atmosphere with the intention being to attract new investors by way of deceit that it's a brand new project.  The features and this release are considerably massive in comparison to earlier releases and with the proper marketing we'll be able to attract significant attention organically.

Bear in mind that the top 10 wallets reflect balances of those owned by exchanges in large part.  Exchanges don't always have one wallet address and this is pretty standard.  If every project were to "reboot" due to too many people holding large amounts of the currency, we would have an even bigger mess on our hands than we already do with people coming up with "new" ideas daily as it is and an even more ridiculous market.  Regarding thread removal, I believe last I looked there wasn't an option to delete the thread - you need to contact the section mod.  I'll go ahead and take another look in between coding but I agree that's something that needs to be done.  Thanks for the kind words as well.

Also bring some bad statistics, the top 10 wallets are heavly loaded, this is bad for investment point of view.
This coin might do great with some nice PR and maybe a rebrand, a fresh start with a one on one swap.
Remove all the old Neoscoin btc threads so its easier to find. Get some nice usage for the coin.

The developer is a good developer and Neoscoin deserve better.

I am in the same predicament, and all my spare change is going into the R&D for an invention I have been working on. At least my wallet has been staking very well, so I got that going!

I know man !! unfortunelty i dont have any bitcoin left ... so  icant buy any more neos !! :-(((

   lol only 3 millions Neoscoins... and that price!
Thanks to those that sold, it's an awesome Christmas gift!

Thank you 

24h volume on Polo is more than 3 BTC; on Bittrex it is 0.2 BTC.

I don't know why people prefer Polo so much, personally Bittrex has always been the most reliable exchange for me. I would request the community to move some of their trades on Bittrex so that we're not presented with de-listing threats.

I know, I've reached out to them as per their instructions also.  For some reason the majority of folks trade Neos over at polo.

Bittrex says NEOS is in danger of de-listing.
https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-NEOS