Topic: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - V3 Hardfork on block 210000 - page 151. (Read 990744 times)
March 14, 2017, 02:12:36 AM
Looking to bulk buy PASA. Please PM if interested.
March 14, 2017, 01:56:37 AM
How I can Set up my own private pascal pool ?
You can't. All the pascal pool software is closed source.
March 14, 2017, 01:49:01 AM
How I can Set up my own private pascal pool ?
March 13, 2017, 05:33:48 PM
get $pasa listed on polo, then pasc will move to top 10
PASA is a blackhole bring loyalty to pasc
PASA is a blackhole bring loyalty to pasc
Your words are very convincing, but it was like a joke
March 13, 2017, 05:29:02 PM
get $pasa listed on polo, then pasc will move to top 10
PASA is a blackhole bring loyalty to pasc
PASA is a blackhole bring loyalty to pasc
Agreed, the market is slowly but surely growing for accounts.
Interesting times ahead~
March 13, 2017, 04:37:31 PM
get $pasa listed on polo, then pasc will move to top 10
PASA is a blackhole bring loyalty to pasc
PASA is a blackhole bring loyalty to pasc
March 13, 2017, 04:36:13 PM
PascalCoin's team have investigated reports of an exploit and after extensive analysis, have concluded there is no known exploit. The discrepancies found in Nanopool's block timestamps have been accounted for and were caused by worker's not rolling the timestamp during mining and no transactions on the network (thus work with new timestamp was not updated). This was not an exploit and not due to PascalCoin's daemon. It has since been resolved by issuing a miner notification every 30 seconds. Nanopool were not gaining any advantage with these timestamps.
There is a bounty of 0.5 BTC to anyone who can document an exploit with current PoW consensus rules (details available in Slack).
Thank you for the clearyfication.
Looking @Polo the offloading seem 2 have started - do the maths.
@PascalCoin: THX 4 your ignorance - but as you said - just a hobby project (with good ideas).
btc was also some theoretical idea, and it was nothing 5 years ago, almost same hobby project ) (in first releases of btc wallet was bug making money transfer without owner confirmation)
imagine that hack in nowdays)
polo is polo, we have xmr this is just like pasc favorite coin for this exch, and they can set any price if they want )
March 13, 2017, 02:59:51 PM
@PascalCoin: THX 4 your ignorance - but as you said - just a hobby project (with good ideas).
Oops. Sorry. I didn't know that you were waiting for a response.
great coin anyway.
but why u made 5 (not 10 or 100) accounts per mined block?
March 13, 2017, 02:48:44 PM
@PascalCoin: THX 4 your ignorance - but as you said - just a hobby project (with good ideas).
Oops. Sorry. I didn't know that you were waiting for a response.
March 12, 2017, 07:59:31 AM
PascalCoin's team have investigated reports of an exploit and after extensive analysis, have concluded there is no known exploit. The discrepancies found in Nanopool's block timestamps have been accounted for and were caused by worker's not rolling the timestamp during mining and no transactions on the network (thus work with new timestamp was not updated). This was not an exploit and not due to PascalCoin's daemon. It has since been resolved by issuing a miner notification every 30 seconds. Nanopool were not gaining any advantage with these timestamps.
There is a bounty of 0.5 BTC to anyone who can document an exploit with current PoW consensus rules (details available in Slack).
Thank you for the clearyfication.
Looking @Polo the offloading seem 2 have started - do the maths.
@PascalCoin: THX 4 your ignorance - but as you said - just a hobby project (with good ideas).
March 12, 2017, 04:14:55 AM
Looks like a good trading is coming up for PASC. Great risk/reward
March 11, 2017, 10:20:22 PM
DON'T USE NANOPOOL! THEY ARE STEALING ALL THE HASHRATE.
Use https://www.coinotron.com/coinotron/AccountServlet?action=home
... that´s not quit right, they have the hashrate they have,
BUT THEY ARE STILL CHEATING THE BLOCKS OFF THE HONEST
PascalCoin's team have investigated reports of an exploit and after extensive analysis, have concluded there is no known exploit. The discrepancies found in Nanopool's block timestamps have been accounted for and were caused by worker's not rolling the timestamp during mining and no transactions on the network (thus work with new timestamp was not updated). This was not an exploit and not due to PascalCoin's daemon. It has since been resolved by issuing a miner notification every 30 seconds. Nanopool were not gaining any advantage with these timestamps.
There is a bounty of 0.5 BTC to anyone who can document an exploit with current PoW consensus rules (details available in Slack).
March 11, 2017, 04:06:54 PM
DON'T USE NANOPOOL! THEY ARE STEALING ALL THE HASHRATE.
Use https://www.coinotron.com/coinotron/AccountServlet?action=home
... that´s not quit right, they have the hashrate they have,
BUT THEY ARE STILL CHEATING THE BLOCKS OFF THE HONEST
March 11, 2017, 04:06:30 PM
DON'T USE NANOPOOL! THEY ARE STEALING ALL THE HASHRATE.
Use https://www.coinotron.com/coinotron/AccountServlet?action=home
but allmost all blocks are created by nano.
why is nano so popular if it is stealing from users?
March 11, 2017, 03:58:06 PM
DON'T USE NANOPOOL! THEY ARE STEALING ALL THE HASHRATE.
Use https://www.coinotron.com/coinotron/AccountServlet?action=home
March 11, 2017, 01:16:45 PM
March 11, 2017, 12:38:15 PM
how to start mining pascalcoin?
March 11, 2017, 07:02:32 AM
Dev has let us know there may be a way to work around the issue on our end, if we can remove the need to manually credit deposits with encrypted payload ids then there is no reason to delist PASC.
March 11, 2017, 05:32:30 AM
Something needs to be done about Poloniex encrypting payload ids, they're wasting insane amounts of our time for an unnecessary issue they're creating that is entirely outside of our control.
I've had to manually credit more than 20 PASC deposits from Poloniex with encrypted payload ids just today.
Users aren't willing to install the wallet themselves so they can ensure they deposit with the correct unencrypted payload id, and expect us to repeatedly manually intervene to credit their deposits from Poloniex that they KNOW wont be picked up by the deposit service because of their previous support tickets.
We can't justify continuing to spend so many of our already limited support hours on an issue another exchange is creating, so either Poloniex stops encrypting payload ids or Cryptopia delists PASC.
I've had to manually credit more than 20 PASC deposits from Poloniex with encrypted payload ids just today.
Users aren't willing to install the wallet themselves so they can ensure they deposit with the correct unencrypted payload id, and expect us to repeatedly manually intervene to credit their deposits from Poloniex that they KNOW wont be picked up by the deposit service because of their previous support tickets.
We can't justify continuing to spend so many of our already limited support hours on an issue another exchange is creating, so either Poloniex stops encrypting payload ids or Cryptopia delists PASC.
March 10, 2017, 08:39:00 PM
Parece que a força compradora volta a ativa na Poloniex ! Excelente Pump ! BTC em queda e Pascal em alta.. 
we will hope and wait.
Jump to: