[ANN] PayPie - Blockchain-Powered Risk Assessment - page 105.

Islapdonkey

sr. member

Activity: 882

Merit: 277

If i had a dollar for every "had i known"

Quote from: Dorky on October 02, 2017, 01:08:36 PM

This ICO is so hyped up, I bet it will be sold out within hours if not minutes.
And a majority of you guys may not even get in.

Oh trust me, am getting in on this one. Even, if I have to get Vitalik to personally send in my bid

alay1388

member

Activity: 86

Merit: 10

Regarding Korea I heard that only korean based ICOs will be banned, so I can safely says that koreans can invest in PayPie...what do you think?

Dorky

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Best IoT Platform Based on Blockchain

This ICO is so hyped up, I bet it will be sold out within hours if not minutes.
And a majority of you guys may not even get in.

Edit:
Sorry, was meant to say... "And a majority of you guys may not even able to get in."

Islapdonkey

sr. member

Activity: 882

Merit: 277

If i had a dollar for every "had i known"

Quote from: bitjet on October 02, 2017, 12:21:56 PM

Quote from: Islapdonkey on October 02, 2017, 11:50:28 AM

Quote from: pynetx on October 01, 2017, 11:44:22 PM

Quote from: kraterion on October 01, 2017, 05:32:10 AM

Quote from: pynetx on October 01, 2017, 03:32:34 AM

I heard as per new rules it is mandatory to have a working platform before the ico to show the tokens can be spendable. Would this applies to paypie also or is it out the new rule sets because of its jurisdiction area?

Are you talking about Korea based ICOs or ICOs in general? Or China based maybe? PayPie isn't based in Korea or China, I see no problems at all

Yeah, I'm talking about China and Korea. But, it's a good thing thing and it should be applied worldwide.

How I wish this law is implemented by every country. That will put a stop to the numerous scam ICOs and really speed up the adoption rate of blockchain technology.

ya it's good but sometime founder will need many time to get accept from government - 1 month or 2 month will make all plan failed

The idea is to have a working platform prior to asking ppl for millions of dollars. The time needed to gain approval shouldn't affect any ICO in such a situation cos the platform is already viable. Thus it will lead to better trust in blockchain communities.

FIEX

sr. member

Activity: 630

Merit: 276

Quote from: lvsca on October 02, 2017, 11:26:57 AM

Quote from: robocop3 on October 02, 2017, 11:16:36 AM

Quote from: magisterr on October 02, 2017, 09:47:39 AM

So, how much companies will be pay for using platform? Who can answer me? It will be depend - which company (small or big) ?

I think now no people can answer you this question

It is uncertain!

to much companies using slickpie as their accounting platform, i've try slickpie platform and maybe paypie will adopt slickpie platform

Indeed, it will be based on the idea of slickpie
I also tested slickpie for my company and its a great platform. I only did if for testing to understand more about whats paypie is doing and it convienced me. You should check it out.

https://www.slickpie.com/

haxllega

full member

Activity: 392

Merit: 100

Quote from: datguyian on October 02, 2017, 11:29:23 AM

Quote from: Frank37 on October 02, 2017, 11:22:54 AM

Quote from: Heimer on October 02, 2017, 09:19:54 AM

Quote from: batako on October 02, 2017, 05:43:08 AM

Quote from: pynetx on October 02, 2017, 03:07:46 AM

Quote from: the_donald on October 02, 2017, 01:48:26 AM

Quote from: pynetx on October 02, 2017, 01:43:27 AM

Quote from: Voltaje on October 02, 2017, 01:39:51 AM

Quote from: itradecurrency on October 02, 2017, 01:15:11 AM

For such popular and strong projects as paypie, it would be nice to have a whitelist or an individual cap like in icon so everyone can participate

Perhaps an individual cap, that will ensure nobody holds too many coins, but a whitelist is not necessary, they already decided that there will be a pre-ico, with a minimum investment size, so there is no need for more, the project is already good as it is.

Yes, a maximum cap per individual is must. This way price can not be controlled by a small group of whales.

I disagree, though is seems good at first ,you have to take into account the possibility that they may not get enough investors. that's when wales step in and compensate.

If a project has great vision then people will invest in it and they don't have to whales.
Cindicator set an example how ico should work. That was most closed ico ever and still they reached the hard cap before end date.
Less spread is always harmful.

Even though a project has a great vision, doesn't mean it will attract more investors. Without whales, almost impossible for a project to run as expected.

What are you talking about? Many project succeded befor without any whale (or at least no one was pointed out as a whale). It doesn't matter if ICO raise $20m from 2 whales or if ICO raise $20m from 2000 small investors

It is often better if the coin is distributed to 2000 investors than to 2 whales, because with many investors the risk of a big dump is not so high.

It depends. If the whales have good economic intentions, then two whales can be really helpful.

Yes but only if they don't sell. I think the best solution is a combination of whales and smaller investors.

bitjet

hero member

Activity: 696

Merit: 500

Quote from: Islapdonkey on October 02, 2017, 11:50:28 AM

Quote from: pynetx on October 01, 2017, 11:44:22 PM

Quote from: kraterion on October 01, 2017, 05:32:10 AM

Quote from: pynetx on October 01, 2017, 03:32:34 AM

I heard as per new rules it is mandatory to have a working platform before the ico to show the tokens can be spendable. Would this applies to paypie also or is it out the new rule sets because of its jurisdiction area?

Are you talking about Korea based ICOs or ICOs in general? Or China based maybe? PayPie isn't based in Korea or China, I see no problems at all

Yeah, I'm talking about China and Korea. But, it's a good thing thing and it should be applied worldwide.

How I wish this law is implemented by every country. That will put a stop to the numerous scam ICOs and really speed up the adoption rate of blockchain technology.

ya it's good but sometime founder will need many time to get accept from government - 1 month or 2 month will make all plan failed

Islapdonkey

sr. member

Activity: 882

Merit: 277

If i had a dollar for every "had i known"

Quote from: batako on October 02, 2017, 05:43:08 AM

Quote from: pynetx on October 02, 2017, 03:07:46 AM

Quote from: the_donald on October 02, 2017, 01:48:26 AM

Quote from: pynetx on October 02, 2017, 01:43:27 AM

Quote from: Voltaje on October 02, 2017, 01:39:51 AM

Quote from: itradecurrency on October 02, 2017, 01:15:11 AM

For such popular and strong projects as paypie, it would be nice to have a whitelist or an individual cap like in icon so everyone can participate

Perhaps an individual cap, that will ensure nobody holds too many coins, but a whitelist is not necessary, they already decided that there will be a pre-ico, with a minimum investment size, so there is no need for more, the project is already good as it is.

Yes, a maximum cap per individual is must. This way price can not be controlled by a small group of whales.

I disagree, though is seems good at first ,you have to take into account the possibility that they may not get enough investors. that's when wales step in and compensate.

If a project has great vision then people will invest in it and they don't have to whales.
Cindicator set an example how ico should work. That was most closed ico ever and still they reached the hard cap before end date.
Less spread is always harmful.

Even though a project has a great vision, doesn't mean it will attract more investors. Without whales, almost impossible for a project to run as expected.

The amount raised is not indicative of the efficiency of the service offered. Sure it's great to hit the hard cap but sometimes a lot of money can be counterproductive cos it hinders the opportunity to grow. So what am saying is presence or absence of whales is not a factor in determining the growth of a project

brendan6498011

full member

Activity: 370

Merit: 100

Quote from: Voltaje on October 02, 2017, 11:31:47 AM

Quote from: robocop3 on October 02, 2017, 11:16:36 AM

Quote from: magisterr on October 02, 2017, 09:47:39 AM

So, how much companies will be pay for using platform? Who can answer me? It will be depend - which company (small or big) ?

I think now no people can answer you this question

It is uncertain!

PayPie hasn't announced or confirmed any company that is interested in the platform, companies may be waiting for some beta release for they to know how good the platform could meet their needs, or they already have some companies already for partnership, but hasn't said anything, let's see after ICO what will happen.

there are many companies may use this platform,but after the ico ended,we can see how many companies will use the platform, i sure it must be very large!

viljy

hero member

Activity: 1736

Merit: 857

Quote from: magisterr on October 02, 2017, 09:47:39 AM

So, how much companies will be pay for using platform? Who can answer me? It will be depend - which company (small or big) ?

I also asked a similar question. That is, I asked where they would get the initial financial statements. It is assumed that the organizations themselves will contact Paypie and provide them with financial documents for analysis. So whether it will be in fact unknown. It remains only to wait, how events will develop after the ICO. Perhaps Paypie already has some arrangements and contacts with interested organizations.

Islapdonkey

sr. member

Activity: 882

Merit: 277

If i had a dollar for every "had i known"

Quote from: pynetx on October 01, 2017, 11:44:22 PM

Quote from: kraterion on October 01, 2017, 05:32:10 AM

Quote from: pynetx on October 01, 2017, 03:32:34 AM

I heard as per new rules it is mandatory to have a working platform before the ico to show the tokens can be spendable. Would this applies to paypie also or is it out the new rule sets because of its jurisdiction area?

Are you talking about Korea based ICOs or ICOs in general? Or China based maybe? PayPie isn't based in Korea or China, I see no problems at all

Yeah, I'm talking about China and Korea. But, it's a good thing thing and it should be applied worldwide.

How I wish this law is implemented by every country. That will put a stop to the numerous scam ICOs and really speed up the adoption rate of blockchain technology.

Jay2408

full member

Activity: 518

Merit: 101

🚀🚀 ATHERO.IO 🚀🚀

Quote from: Sozialtourist on October 02, 2017, 11:33:12 AM

Quote from: robocop3 on October 02, 2017, 11:16:36 AM

Quote from: magisterr on October 02, 2017, 09:47:39 AM

So, how much companies will be pay for using platform? Who can answer me? It will be depend - which company (small or big) ?

I think now no people can answer you this question

It is uncertain!

PayPie is targeting small and medium-sized enterprises (SME). Of course no one can tell you now how many companies will use PayPie in the end. But the list of different kind of companies that could use PayPie is huge: Small businesses for lending money to each other, banks or other financial institution because of the credit risk score PayPie provides, insurance companies or companies, that do invoice factoring.

I read somewhere, probably telegram, that Slickpie has around 15k customers, maybe a lot of them want to use Paypie platform when it is launched.

Sozialtourist

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 101

Quote from: robocop3 on October 02, 2017, 11:16:36 AM

Quote from: magisterr on October 02, 2017, 09:47:39 AM

So, how much companies will be pay for using platform? Who can answer me? It will be depend - which company (small or big) ?

I think now no people can answer you this question

It is uncertain!

PayPie is targeting small and medium-sized enterprises (SME). Of course no one can tell you now how many companies will use PayPie in the end. But the list of different kind of companies that could use PayPie is huge: Small businesses for lending money to each other, banks or other financial institution because of the credit risk score PayPie provides, insurance companies or companies, that do invoice factoring.

Voltaje

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Quote from: robocop3 on October 02, 2017, 11:16:36 AM

Quote from: magisterr on October 02, 2017, 09:47:39 AM

So, how much companies will be pay for using platform? Who can answer me? It will be depend - which company (small or big) ?

I think now no people can answer you this question

It is uncertain!

PayPie hasn't announced or confirmed any company that is interested in the platform, companies may be waiting for some beta release for they to know how good the platform could meet their needs, or they already have some companies already for partnership, but hasn't said anything, let's see after ICO what will happen.

datguyian

sr. member

Activity: 840

Merit: 251