Topic: [ANN] *PXL COIN* Mandatory Client Update / now supports Kimoto Gravity Well! - page 35. (Read 67826 times)

Lol I know right.

really?... its pretty obvious isnt it  

Target is 100 seconds per block, changing every 2016 blocks.  The last 2016 blocks was 4 difficulty and we were still way below target.  

My guess is now miners may drop out and next round difficulty will drop.  We shall see but we generated 400,000 coins in 48 hours which is much much more than we anticipated.  A slow down right now is good to be honest.

Miners will set the difficulty.

Read the first page. It's a reincarnation of the million dollar homepage for the cryptocurrency community. Smart idea IMO, but 16 diff? Really!??!?

What exactly is the point of this...?

16 difficulty 1 day after the launch? How does this make sense? Will it drop or continue to rise?

You can request it be added to Cryptsy here: https://cryptsy.freshdesk.com/support/discussions/topics/72797/page/last#post-189361

Here is our official policy on reselling of space.

You may change any image that is 256 pixels (16x16) or higher.  The first change is free. Subsequent changes can be made for a 10% fee (10% of the image dimensions at the current per-pixel rate). The fee is capped at a maximum 100 PXL (even if the 10% is more than 100 PXL).  All changes must be made via email from email address on file.  Transfer of email address on file for an image also may be done so at a 10% fee. Placing of images that say "this space for rent" or similar are not allowed.  PXLCoin.com does not endorse the purchase of pixel space from any third party. Do so at your own risk as we are no way responsible for any transactions made outside of our site. This policy may be tweaked or changed based upon market conditions in the future.

I would like to buy PXL, please give me best offer.
I may buy 2000-5000 PXL.

when do u guys reckon it will hit an exchange? i know its v early days yet, but this has value already.

Anyone interested in 2900 PXL?

Pm me offers please

Will not send first unless to a trusted escrow, dont need to be scammed again...

I can do chunks, but again, won't send first.

20K PXLs. Wow. So hash power. I didn't start too long after release at 6 MH/s and all I've managed to get so far is 3350 PXLs. Difficulty is now 16 and that's 200 PXLs per day for me.

 

How many PXL do you have!? 20k is a fuckload

WTS 20k PXL.

Please pm me.

well im happy to report everyone who already has PXLs is damn convinced they are worth a fortune, no one is accepting my lowball offers.

It's interesting but remember the transition to HD?.,.. well it was crazy expensive and then now dirt cheap. Take a look at the resolution of an image from SD tv.. (480)

In 5 years 4k will be standard, but look for sales you may be surprised, prices coming down fast

anyway back to the salt mines    18 blocks until difficulty adjustment

^ This is why I'm hesitating to actually use my PXL to put up an image yet.

The idea of 1-2% for the first one or two changes in a certain time frame, say 3 months seems reasonable, and then increasing costs to prevent misuse.  Larger fees for one time services, like making a space changeable, transferring ownership, etc seems straightforward enough.

Have to say, really like where pxl is going.

to continue flooding the thread with mostly useful questions and comments,

I think it would be great if the structure of image changing cost was such that the first change / x (time) was at a drastically reduced cost, say 1-2% of the pixel count, then it went up to a higher cost to prevent tons of changing.

eg

for any image space, 1 change / month is very cheap, or 1-2 changes per new account owner is very cheap. account transfer or frequent changes could be more expensive, like the 10% quoted.

the reasoning why I bring this up and think its a good idea is that it should actually help drive the market.

there is no reason the cost of changing an image to an updated version should be another 10% for a new client of the service, it puts unnecessary stress on the users to produce a final quality image immediately since the relative cost to update it could be extremely expensive when viewed as an investment.

eg, at going rates, for a brand new user who registers a space, updating a 100x40 banner ad would cost 400PXL (10% of 4000px) to update your image, or approximately $150-$200.

that's in addition to the original fee of 10% to be able to change the image. I see no problem with this though, just the expense of the changes once this option has been purchased.

if anyone can explain why $200 + dollars (imagine if values increase?_) should die to approve an image change, plz do. I see no reason to punish reasonable use of the system or new account owners in this way, for someone treating it as advertising space it really puts you in a position where you must rush to get your image right as your stuck between lost revenues from waiting and lost revenues from releasing a lower quality image.

so basically, I endorse packaging 1-2 changes at free or low % with each new account or account transfer. the new account creation fee of additional 10% for a changeable ad space seems reasonable, as does a 10% transfer fee, this is a premium service after all, and that fee should account for the extra work required to approve a couple image changes.



this would make the client experience more user-friendly and reduce the stress on everyone rushing to get images completely finalized before releasing them on the site, or being hit with a big charge for a typo or a change of spec. this proposed model is used by some services which offer similar features for the same reasons stated.

I think its cool, I assume they are crazy expensive, but it seems that we will probably eventually adopt this standard. I know if this gets even anywhere near affordable for a monitor I will be getting one.