Topic: [ANN] [QCN] QuazarCoin | Full privacy&data protection | Egalitarian PoW - page 15. (Read 186566 times)
September 02, 2014, 01:35:53 PM
Anyone else having trouble getting coins from minin.gs? Or just me? Emailed support and nothing
September 02, 2014, 07:31:41 AM
Devs, do you remember about a Quazarcoin? I would like to see some updates, which will indicates that the coin isn't dead
They recently developed a GUI wallet, which is a major thing. But they haven't changed their github pages for 2 months. People who go to github to see how active the developers are will get the impression that they aren't doing much. For that reason I think it's important to keep github up to date with he latest improvements. Unless there is a reason not to, the new wallet should be included on github. Even if it's currently at the alpha stage, it can be put on github and labelled alpha.
The GUI wallet was not "recently developed." It was released on June 6, and recently rereleased. There is no real development going on here. The lead developer pops in every once in a while and makes some posts, what he does the rest of the time I have no idea, but it has little to do with the coin.
The thread itself is kept alive by a series of one- or two-line posts that are almost always devoid of real content (usually some form of cheerleading or inane comment). I have no idea if these are deliberate sock puppets or bots that are mining post counts for sig campaigns. Almost certainly one or the other (or both).
You are witnessing a coin-mill clone coin in the caretaker phase. More info: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/blowing-the-lid-off-the-cryptonotebytecoin-scam-with-the-exception-of-monero-740112
are you not in the monero dev team and you have the need to make this post here?
i thought you are smooth and not ugly, but nice to know.
and to your link, its about the shady origin of bytecoin and has nothing to do with quazarcoin.
but the article is like propaganda against all other cryptonotes, of course with exception of monero (such a random).
and finally you say that here are only sockpuppets posting, lol whats wrong with you?
Monero looks from day to day more shady for me, the aggresive behaviour of the community, the whales which i think controlling the market nearly complete and im sure at one point they want to cash out or move to a better opportunity, leaving the small fishes alone, the extreme emission curve which is only nice for the very early miners and so on..
1. The link is relevant because it explained how QCN and a bunch of other coins are all run by the same shady CryptoNote people behind the bytecoin scam. Monero obviously is not, and this is not "random" since its developers are all well known in the community and some even go by their real identities. Which of the shady Cryptonote clone coins has developers using real identities?
2. The link is also directly relevant because the QCN developer posted on that thread explaining how the wallet was developed for QCN back in June (I mistakenly thought it was developed for XMR first, but that was wrong and I corrected that).
3. I see mostly sock puppets posting here. That is a fact.
4. If you enjoy QCN have fun with it, in fact you might as well take over developing it, because no one else is really doing much.
5. Why try to change the subject to (your opinion about) Monero? Did I mention Monero at all? Did I try to promote it? Answer: No to all of the above. I responded to a comment about the GUI and the amount of development happening here that I felt was misleading, and I explained my the background for my opinion by referring to rethink-your-strategy's research. Simple as that.
September 02, 2014, 07:20:47 AM
hitbtc started trading QuazarCoins
September 02, 2014, 06:39:48 AM
Devs, do you remember about a Quazarcoin? I would like to see some updates, which will indicates that the coin isn't dead
They recently developed a GUI wallet, which is a major thing. But they haven't changed their github pages for 2 months. People who go to github to see how active the developers are will get the impression that they aren't doing much. For that reason I think it's important to keep github up to date with he latest improvements. Unless there is a reason not to, the new wallet should be included on github. Even if it's currently at the alpha stage, it can be put on github and labelled alpha.
The GUI wallet was not "recently developed." It was released on June 6, and recently rereleased. There is no real development going on here. The lead developer pops in every once in a while and makes some posts, what he does the rest of the time I have no idea, but it has little to do with the coin.
The thread itself is kept alive by a series of one- or two-line posts that are almost always devoid of real content (usually some form of cheerleading or inane comment). I have no idea if these are deliberate sock puppets or bots that are mining post counts for sig campaigns. Almost certainly one or the other (or both).
You are witnessing a coin-mill clone coin in the caretaker phase. More info: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/blowing-the-lid-off-the-cryptonotebytecoin-scam-with-the-exception-of-monero-740112
are you not in the monero dev team and you have the need to make this post here?
i thought you are smooth and not ugly, but nice to know.
and to your link, its about the shady origin of bytecoin and has nothing to do with quazarcoin.
but the article is like propaganda against all other cryptonotes, of course with exception of monero (such a random).
and finally you say that here are only sockpuppets posting, lol whats wrong with you?
Monero looks from day to day more shady for me, the aggresive behaviour of the community, the whales which i think controlling the market nearly complete and im sure at one point they want to cash out or move to a better opportunity, leaving the small fishes alone, the extreme emission curve which is only nice for the very early miners and so on..
September 02, 2014, 05:38:11 AM
I have a strange question: why the coin's name is Quazarcoin?
Interesting question, I never even thought about it. I'll be glad to know the answer to it
September 02, 2014, 04:33:51 AM
I have a strange question: why the coin's name is Quazarcoin?
September 02, 2014, 03:21:33 AM
How people are not able to see the potential of Quazarcoin?
Looks like it is the most underrated thing in the whole cryptoworld, and the price of the coin confirms it.
Looks like it is the most underrated thing in the whole cryptoworld, and the price of the coin confirms it.
September 02, 2014, 01:06:15 AM
The GUI wallet was not "recently developed." It was released on June 6, and recently rereleased. There is no real development going on here. The lead developer pops in every once in a while and makes some posts, what he does the rest of the time I have no idea, but it has little to do with the coin.
The thread itself is kept alive by a series of one- or two-line posts that are almost always devoid of real content (usually some form of cheerleading or inane comment). I have no idea if these are deliberate sock puppets or bots that are mining post counts for sig campaigns. Almost certainly one or the other (or both).
You are witnessing a coin-mill clone coin in the caretaker phase. More info: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/blowing-the-lid-off-the-cryptonotebytecoin-scam-with-the-exception-of-monero-740112
I looked at the link of the June 6 "release" and what I saw was not an official release. The developer working on the wallet just mentioned that he made a wallet for the Macintosh and provided a link to it. It was news to the main developer, so it can't be called an official release? The recent release included Linux, Windows and Macintosh versions and there may have been a lot of work that has gone into it after June 6. If you are going by what github shows, well developers usually work on the software on their own machines and don't upload changes to github until they are confident about them. If you are going by github, that's not a reliable way to know whether the developers are doing any work.The thread itself is kept alive by a series of one- or two-line posts that are almost always devoid of real content (usually some form of cheerleading or inane comment). I have no idea if these are deliberate sock puppets or bots that are mining post counts for sig campaigns. Almost certainly one or the other (or both).
You are witnessing a coin-mill clone coin in the caretaker phase. More info: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/blowing-the-lid-off-the-cryptonotebytecoin-scam-with-the-exception-of-monero-740112
And saying that a coin is dead, what does that mean? I would say, a coin has no future if it has problems and no one is willing to fix them. But that is not the case with Quazarcoin.
Work may have gone into the GUI, that is true. How much I don't know. But it certainly wasn't "recently developed" it was "developed" at least to the point of usability back in June, and possibly improved later.
Nevertheless I stand by my opinion that not much is going on here. You may disagree, fair enough. I guess we'll see how it turns out.
September 02, 2014, 12:51:02 AM
The GUI wallet was not "recently developed." It was released on June 6, and recently rereleased. There is no real development going on here. The lead developer pops in every once in a while and makes some posts, what he does the rest of the time I have no idea, but it has little to do with the coin.
The thread itself is kept alive by a series of one- or two-line posts that are almost always devoid of real content (usually some form of cheerleading or inane comment). I have no idea if these are deliberate sock puppets or bots that are mining post counts for sig campaigns. Almost certainly one or the other (or both).
You are witnessing a coin-mill clone coin in the caretaker phase. More info: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/blowing-the-lid-off-the-cryptonotebytecoin-scam-with-the-exception-of-monero-740112
I looked at the link of the June 6 "release" and what I saw was not an official release. The developer working on the wallet just mentioned that he made a wallet for the Macintosh and provided a link to it. It was news to the main developer, so it can't be called an official release? The recent release included Linux, Windows and Macintosh versions and there may have been a lot of work that has gone into it after June 6. If you are going by what github shows, well developers usually work on the software on their own machines and don't upload changes to github until they are confident about them. If you are going by github, that's not a reliable way to know whether the developers are doing any work.The thread itself is kept alive by a series of one- or two-line posts that are almost always devoid of real content (usually some form of cheerleading or inane comment). I have no idea if these are deliberate sock puppets or bots that are mining post counts for sig campaigns. Almost certainly one or the other (or both).
You are witnessing a coin-mill clone coin in the caretaker phase. More info: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/blowing-the-lid-off-the-cryptonotebytecoin-scam-with-the-exception-of-monero-740112
And saying that a coin is dead, what does that mean? I would say, a coin has no future if it has problems and no one is willing to fix them. But that is not the case with Quazarcoin.
September 01, 2014, 06:07:25 PM
Devs, do you remember about a Quazarcoin? I would like to see some updates, which will indicates that the coin isn't dead
They recently developed a GUI wallet, which is a major thing. But they haven't changed their github pages for 2 months. People who go to github to see how active the developers are will get the impression that they aren't doing much. For that reason I think it's important to keep github up to date with he latest improvements. Unless there is a reason not to, the new wallet should be included on github. Even if it's currently at the alpha stage, it can be put on github and labelled alpha.
The GUI wallet was not "recently developed." It was released on June 6, and recently rereleased. There is no real development going on here. The lead developer pops in every once in a while and makes some posts, what he does the rest of the time I have no idea, but it has little to do with the coin.
The thread itself is kept alive by a series of one- or two-line posts that are almost always devoid of real content (usually some form of cheerleading or inane comment). I have no idea if these are deliberate sock puppets or bots that are mining post counts for sig campaigns. Almost certainly one or the other (or both).
You are witnessing a coin-mill clone coin in the caretaker phase. More info: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/blowing-the-lid-off-the-cryptonotebytecoin-scam-with-the-exception-of-monero-740112
September 01, 2014, 02:18:11 PM
Devs, do you remember about a Quazarcoin? I would like to see some updates, which will indicates that the coin isn't dead
How can you say the coin is dead? The system works and it develops. If you miss some updates, it doesn't mean that "the world stands on the site". It is your fault.
September 01, 2014, 12:01:20 PM
Devs, do you remember about a Quazarcoin? I would like to see some updates, which will indicates that the coin isn't dead
They recently developed a GUI wallet, which is a major thing. But they haven't changed their github pages for 2 months. People who go to github to see how active the developers are will get the impression that they aren't doing much. For that reason I think it's important to keep github up to date with he latest improvements. Unless there is a reason not to, the new wallet should be included on github. Even if it's currently at the alpha stage, it can be put on github and labelled alpha.
September 01, 2014, 11:33:57 AM
Devs, do you remember about a Quazarcoin? I would like to see some updates, which will indicates that the coin isn't dead
September 01, 2014, 10:33:14 AM
I have a few geeky questions about cryptonote.
Why are the incoming transaction amounts broken into multiple inputs. Like for example, 34.7 might show as
3 inputs: 30, 4 and 0.7
JSON incoming transaction lists look like this:
Is this done for anonymity? Is there any danger in summing these together to get the original transaction amount in the user's wallet?
What does the "global_index" property mean?
Why are the incoming transaction amounts broken into multiple inputs. Like for example, 34.7 might show as
3 inputs: 30, 4 and 0.7
JSON incoming transaction lists look like this:
Code:
[ { amount: 700000000000,
global_index: 55734,
spent: false,
tx_hash: '<2c96d15134c272bd03a7677eb48bef5f0c3a8de29f215c71f60b59e6a4a73baa>' },
{ amount: 4000000000000,
global_index: 25328,
spent: false,
tx_hash: '<2c96d15134c272bd03a7677eb48bef5f0c3a8de29f215c71f60b59e6a4a73baa>' },
{ amount: 30000000000000,
global_index: 745,
spent: false,
tx_hash: '<2c96d15134c272bd03a7677eb48bef5f0c3a8de29f215c71f60b59e6a4a73baa>' } ]
Is this done for anonymity? Is there any danger in summing these together to get the original transaction amount in the user's wallet?
What does the "global_index" property mean?
September 01, 2014, 08:46:16 AM
QCN is still possible to trade on www.alt2bit.com. Just this exchange some dead.
September 01, 2014, 06:31:38 AM
I don't understand why everyone is so concerned about the delisting. This won't affect the coin
I see it as you, good coins don't need a rush, sometimes they just a need a little bit time.
Where can I find out the price of the Quazarcoin and other alternative cryptocurrencies?
as example here:
https://www.swaphole.com/#!index/SHCNI
September 01, 2014, 03:06:39 AM
Where can I find out the price of the Quazarcoin and other alternative cryptocurrencies?
August 31, 2014, 01:54:06 PM
I don't understand why everyone is so concerned about the delisting. This won't affect the coin
August 31, 2014, 06:51:13 AM
Delisted or not, I'm still mining 
August 31, 2014, 06:37:57 AM
Does the Quazarcoin delisting indicate insolvency of the coin?
If by insolvency you mean that the coin won't survive, I don't think that we can reach that conclusion. There is technically nothing wrong with Quazarcoin that I can see, other than the fact that the trading volume is low. You see other coins that were abandoned by their developer, or that have been discovered to be scams and have come back. This is a new experience to me because the coins that are delisted are usually flawed in some way. I didn't realized that they would drop even a good coin if the trading volume is too low. It makes sense though, because they make more money with higher trading volumes. The fact that Quazarcoin has just developed--not copied--a new GUI wallet, I would expect it's price to be soaring right now. But as ontopicplease has said, people are selling their coins because they are forced to move them out of the exchange. If they don't want to or are unable to deal with wallets, there is no other option but sell.
I can't even say better! Delisting is not a problem, don't panic.
Jump to: