[ANN] QIBUCK COIN - X13 - POS/POBH - 1st Proof of Baghold - page 97.

candlesticks

sr. member

Activity: 345

Merit: 250

Quote from: qiwoman2 on October 26, 2014, 10:36:57 AM

Quote from: candlesticks on October 26, 2014, 09:33:52 AM

Just to clarify my stance. I agree with the decision that has been made, to require coins to be held in wallets longer than the previous 8-10 snapshot/payout period. I have always felt that way. My wallet balance has never gone below my original ICO purchase, although I've traded with coins I purchased after.

If the founders voted on this, then whatever the outcome is fine, I'll go with it. However if a decision of this magnitude wasn't voted on, then I'm curious of the point of being a founder is.

Was this voted by the founders, or is this an executive decision?

This was an Executive decision taken by the whole QBK Team to make a better long term coin for Everyone. There was too much manipulating and dumping of the coin that wasn't the intention of this coin at all. Naturally it will be traded on the exchanges but we realized that for the efforts our Team is putting in to create and generate bagholder revenues AND trying to grow the assets of the coin wasn't being appreciated by such short term holding. This coin needs supporters who hold the same vision as us, to create a long term and profitable income stream for all holders. Yes there is a little room for day traders but to be honest there are a plethora of coins to just day trade on, our coin primarily has a purpose for more solid long term asset holding. Thank you for your support.

PLEASE NOTE THAT THE 25 FOUNDERS still will receive their extra gift every 90 days as promised from the offset that doesn't change. This should happen next month.

Qibuck Founder Perks

Free gifts for every 90 days a QiBuck Founder holds 10k or more QBK an offline wallet. These gifts include bullion, iPads, free travel, etc…
Special board status in the QiBuck Forum
More clout in general QiBuck decision-making
Access to whale trader areas of the QiBuck Forum that are only open to QiBuck Founders
Other perks to be announced

qibuck.com/qibuck-founders/

That is why I asked the question I did

So has founder's position given them any clout in general Qibuck decision-making, or is this a feature for the future? Just looking for clarity, Thanks.

qiwoman2

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1023

Oikos.cash | Decentralized Finance on Tron

Quote from: kingpin69 on October 26, 2014, 11:42:06 AM

Is there an updated link to the assets that QBK currently holds?

I'm concerned this is not being made a priority to make sure this is updated and accurately each and every week?

If you honestly expect people to hold coins for 3 whole months on the hope that QBK can turn a profit to enable a bagholder payout at the end of that term then at the very least you need to be transparent enough to show full breakdown of assets held.

LordzS is in charge of the asset sheet now. I will get him to sort that out asap.

kingpin69

member

Activity: 100

Merit: 10

Is there an updated link to the assets that QBK currently holds?

I'm concerned this is not being made a priority to make sure this is updated and accurately each and every week?

If you honestly expect people to hold coins for 3 whole months on the hope that QBK can turn a profit to enable a bagholder payout at the end of that term then at the very least you need to be transparent enough to show full breakdown of assets held.

qiwoman2

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1023

Oikos.cash | Decentralized Finance on Tron

Quote from: chilly2k on October 26, 2014, 11:26:04 AM

Quote from: Fromage on October 26, 2014, 11:22:17 AM

Quote from: qiwoman2 on October 26, 2014, 10:36:57 AM

Quote from: candlesticks on October 26, 2014, 09:33:52 AM

Just to clarify my stance. I agree with the decision that has been made, to require coins to be held in wallets longer than the previous 8-10 snapshot/payout period. I have always felt that way. My wallet balance has never gone below my original ICO purchase, although I've traded with coins I purchased after.

If the founders voted on this, then whatever the outcome is fine, I'll go with it. However if a decision of this magnitude wasn't voted on, then I'm curious of the point of being a founder is.

Was this voted by the founders, or is this an executive decision?

This was an Executive decision taken by the whole QBK Team to make a better long term coin for Everyone. There was too much manipulating and dumping of the coin that wasn't the intention of this coin at all. Naturally it will be traded on the exchanges but we realized that for the efforts our Team is putting in to create and generate bagholder revenues AND trying to grow the assets of the coin wasn't being appreciated by such short term holding. This coin needs supporters who hold the same vision as us, to create a long term and profitable income stream for all holders. Yes there is a little room for day traders but to be honest there are a plethora of coins to just day trade on, our coin primarily has a purpose for more solid long term asset holding. Thank you for your support.

PLEASE NOTE THAT THE 25 FOUNDERS still will receive their extra gift every 90 days as promised from the offset that doesn't change. This should happen next month.

That is also a question I had and now answered thank you

I had the same question.

Plus currently there are only 22 address with over 10,000 QBK. And several are exchanges. How do we still have 25 founders?

Some addresses are split in the listunspent..like there are two or three addies but in the same wallet. I know only of one founder so far that has sold their coins due to family needs but we will do the audit for founders before we give the gifts next month.

qiwoman2

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1023

Oikos.cash | Decentralized Finance on Tron

Quote from: Fromage on October 26, 2014, 11:18:31 AM

Quote from: candlesticks on October 26, 2014, 09:33:52 AM

Just to clarify my stance. I agree with the decision that has been made, to require coins to be held in wallets longer than the previous 8-10 snapshot/payout period. I have always felt that way. My wallet balance has never gone below my original ICO purchase, although I've traded with coins I purchased after.

If the founders voted on this, then whatever the outcome is fine, I'll go with it. However if a decision of this magnitude wasn't voted on, then I'm curious of the point of being a founder is.

Was this voted by the founders, or is this an executive decision?

We are two active founders on QBK and we have talked about it to the team at QBK on Skype and We would like to see a button in our wallet that could mention the promos involved in QBK to send QBK to and lock them in. ie: bagholding.

Until then, We are in favour of quarterly so the buying QBK before snapshot time and selling afterwards is reduced. Full three month term.

Our position was to always keep our 10k founder no matter what the price was cause we know over time we would earn through PoBH will be higher than initial investment.

Keep up the good work QBK. Your active founders are always watching

\

Thank you so much for your kind support always. We really like your idea. That is very thoughtful.

chilly2k

legendary

Activity: 1007

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Fromage on October 26, 2014, 11:22:17 AM

Quote from: qiwoman2 on October 26, 2014, 10:36:57 AM

Quote from: candlesticks on October 26, 2014, 09:33:52 AM

Just to clarify my stance. I agree with the decision that has been made, to require coins to be held in wallets longer than the previous 8-10 snapshot/payout period. I have always felt that way. My wallet balance has never gone below my original ICO purchase, although I've traded with coins I purchased after.

If the founders voted on this, then whatever the outcome is fine, I'll go with it. However if a decision of this magnitude wasn't voted on, then I'm curious of the point of being a founder is.

Was this voted by the founders, or is this an executive decision?

This was an Executive decision taken by the whole QBK Team to make a better long term coin for Everyone. There was too much manipulating and dumping of the coin that wasn't the intention of this coin at all. Naturally it will be traded on the exchanges but we realized that for the efforts our Team is putting in to create and generate bagholder revenues AND trying to grow the assets of the coin wasn't being appreciated by such short term holding. This coin needs supporters who hold the same vision as us, to create a long term and profitable income stream for all holders. Yes there is a little room for day traders but to be honest there are a plethora of coins to just day trade on, our coin primarily has a purpose for more solid long term asset holding. Thank you for your support.

PLEASE NOTE THAT THE 25 FOUNDERS still will receive their extra gift every 90 days as promised from the offset that doesn't change. This should happen next month.

That is also a question I had and now answered thank you

I had the same question.

Plus currently there are only 22 address with over 10,000 QBK. And several are exchanges. How do we still have 25 founders?

Fromage

sr. member

Activity: 338

Merit: 250

Quote from: qiwoman2 on October 26, 2014, 10:36:57 AM

Quote from: candlesticks on October 26, 2014, 09:33:52 AM

Just to clarify my stance. I agree with the decision that has been made, to require coins to be held in wallets longer than the previous 8-10 snapshot/payout period. I have always felt that way. My wallet balance has never gone below my original ICO purchase, although I've traded with coins I purchased after.

If the founders voted on this, then whatever the outcome is fine, I'll go with it. However if a decision of this magnitude wasn't voted on, then I'm curious of the point of being a founder is.

Was this voted by the founders, or is this an executive decision?

This was an Executive decision taken by the whole QBK Team to make a better long term coin for Everyone. There was too much manipulating and dumping of the coin that wasn't the intention of this coin at all. Naturally it will be traded on the exchanges but we realized that for the efforts our Team is putting in to create and generate bagholder revenues AND trying to grow the assets of the coin wasn't being appreciated by such short term holding. This coin needs supporters who hold the same vision as us, to create a long term and profitable income stream for all holders. Yes there is a little room for day traders but to be honest there are a plethora of coins to just day trade on, our coin primarily has a purpose for more solid long term asset holding. Thank you for your support.

PLEASE NOTE THAT THE 25 FOUNDERS still will receive their extra gift every 90 days as promised from the offset that doesn't change. This should happen next month.

That is also a question I had and now answered thank you

Fromage

sr. member

Activity: 338

Merit: 250

Quote from: candlesticks on October 26, 2014, 09:33:52 AM

Just to clarify my stance. I agree with the decision that has been made, to require coins to be held in wallets longer than the previous 8-10 snapshot/payout period. I have always felt that way. My wallet balance has never gone below my original ICO purchase, although I've traded with coins I purchased after.

If the founders voted on this, then whatever the outcome is fine, I'll go with it. However if a decision of this magnitude wasn't voted on, then I'm curious of the point of being a founder is.

Was this voted by the founders, or is this an executive decision?

We are two active founders on QBK and we have talked about it to the team at QBK on Skype and We would like to see a button in our wallet that could mention the promos involved in QBK to send QBK to and lock them in. ie: bagholding.

Until then, We are in favour of quarterly so the buying QBK before snapshot time and selling afterwards is reduced. Full three month term.

Our position was to always keep our 10k founder no matter what the price was cause we know over time we would earn through PoBH will be higher than initial investment.

Keep up the good work QBK. Your active founders are always watching

qiwoman2

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1023

Oikos.cash | Decentralized Finance on Tron

Quote from: candlesticks on October 26, 2014, 09:33:52 AM

Just to clarify my stance. I agree with the decision that has been made, to require coins to be held in wallets longer than the previous 8-10 snapshot/payout period. I have always felt that way. My wallet balance has never gone below my original ICO purchase, although I've traded with coins I purchased after.

If the founders voted on this, then whatever the outcome is fine, I'll go with it. However if a decision of this magnitude wasn't voted on, then I'm curious of the point of being a founder is.

Was this voted by the founders, or is this an executive decision?

This was an Executive decision taken by the whole QBK Team to make a better long term coin for Everyone. There was too much manipulating and dumping of the coin that wasn't the intention of this coin at all. Naturally it will be traded on the exchanges but we realized that for the efforts our Team is putting in to create and generate bagholder revenues AND trying to grow the assets of the coin wasn't being appreciated by such short term holding. This coin needs supporters who hold the same vision as us, to create a long term and profitable income stream for all holders. Yes there is a little room for day traders but to be honest there are a plethora of coins to just day trade on, our coin primarily has a purpose for more solid long term asset holding. Thank you for your support.

PLEASE NOTE THAT THE 25 FOUNDERS still will receive their extra gift every 90 days as promised from the offset that doesn't change. This should happen next month.

candlesticks

sr. member

Activity: 345

Merit: 250

Just to clarify my stance. I agree with the decision that has been made, to require coins to be held in wallets longer than the previous 8-10 snapshot/payout period. I have always felt that way. My wallet balance has never gone below my original ICO purchase, although I've traded with coins I purchased after.

If the founders voted on this, then whatever the outcome is fine, I'll go with it. However if a decision of this magnitude wasn't voted on, then I'm curious of the point of being a founder is.

Was this voted by the founders, or is this an executive decision?

qiwoman2

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1023

Oikos.cash | Decentralized Finance on Tron

Quote from: hobbyminer67 on October 26, 2014, 08:58:13 AM

Quote from: qiwoman2 on October 26, 2014, 08:35:57 AM

Quote from: chilly2k on October 26, 2014, 08:26:21 AM

I agree with everybody above. I think we're becoming ABC3. The monthly payout is what made QBK different. 3 months is a long time.

I can also see that making it every 3 months has it's advantages. Less time consuming on the team, and more time to compound the investments. It also will help to average out the earnings and absorb any extreme increases or decreases. Company's payout quarterly dividends. I feel that as long as the QBK team concentrates on increasing and protecting our assets the coin will grow over the long run. They should not be doing things to just increase the price of QBK. I already wortk for a company like that, it's not fun....

So, I think we need actual dates to go along with the latest announcement. When does/did the quarter start? Will there be a payout November 10th? What are the dates of the quarters? If your trying to aline the quarters with specific start dates, (IE Jan 1st, or Dec 1st. Or even Nov 1st). How will you handle the gap time? Like if your going to Say the quarter starts Nov 1st. Will there be a mini dividend then to cover 10/10 - 10/31? Or did/does the quarter run from 10/10 - 1/10? And so it will only cover those who held coins from the 10th of October? Your going to have unhappy people no matter how to do this. You just have to find a fair solution for all involved.

Personally I've been holding since 8/11, and I'm not really a big day trader, so it doesn't really effect me that much.

Thank you for the good feedback. We understand that the quarterly cash outs may not be favorable for many but we ARE looking at QBK as a long term option and especially for those who are NOT successful as day traders and who want to put their readies aside for consistent returns. Instead of say having all their money in the bank to earn them squat and see their fiat money also depreciate by 5-15% yearly because of the annual debts, the can earn a decent bonus just buying up some QBK and staking it away for lump sum bonuses.. We may fix the quarterly dates as opposed to making them fluid we will re discuss this with the team as many haven't yet registered their bags yet so as to make things a bit easier one everyone and not feel left out. The quarter would start from the 11th of the month after the last bagholder period. Talking of mini dividend bonuses is a good idea or random any time during that period bonuses. It's something we will look into to try and appease all our Bagholders. Our main aim is to be here in a year's time in a much stronger position than we started out at. Please bear with us as we grow.

Good points on both sides, maybe a middle ground of every other month for the payouts could be looked at?

Gives the team time to do their work and addresses "the 3 months is a long time in crpto" and "ABC3" points

Just an idea.

not a bad idea at all, will talk to the Team.

hobbyminer67

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

Quote from: qiwoman2 on October 26, 2014, 08:35:57 AM

Quote from: chilly2k on October 26, 2014, 08:26:21 AM

I agree with everybody above. I think we're becoming ABC3. The monthly payout is what made QBK different. 3 months is a long time.

I can also see that making it every 3 months has it's advantages. Less time consuming on the team, and more time to compound the investments. It also will help to average out the earnings and absorb any extreme increases or decreases. Company's payout quarterly dividends. I feel that as long as the QBK team concentrates on increasing and protecting our assets the coin will grow over the long run. They should not be doing things to just increase the price of QBK. I already wortk for a company like that, it's not fun....

So, I think we need actual dates to go along with the latest announcement. When does/did the quarter start? Will there be a payout November 10th? What are the dates of the quarters? If your trying to aline the quarters with specific start dates, (IE Jan 1st, or Dec 1st. Or even Nov 1st). How will you handle the gap time? Like if your going to Say the quarter starts Nov 1st. Will there be a mini dividend then to cover 10/10 - 10/31? Or did/does the quarter run from 10/10 - 1/10? And so it will only cover those who held coins from the 10th of October? Your going to have unhappy people no matter how to do this. You just have to find a fair solution for all involved.

Personally I've been holding since 8/11, and I'm not really a big day trader, so it doesn't really effect me that much.

Thank you for the good feedback. We understand that the quarterly cash outs may not be favorable for many but we ARE looking at QBK as a long term option and especially for those who are NOT successful as day traders and who want to put their readies aside for consistent returns. Instead of say having all their money in the bank to earn them squat and see their fiat money also depreciate by 5-15% yearly because of the annual debts, the can earn a decent bonus just buying up some QBK and staking it away for lump sum bonuses.. We may fix the quarterly dates as opposed to making them fluid we will re discuss this with the team as many haven't yet registered their bags yet so as to make things a bit easier one everyone and not feel left out. The quarter would start from the 11th of the month after the last bagholder period. Talking of mini dividend bonuses is a good idea or random any time during that period bonuses. It's something we will look into to try and appease all our Bagholders. Our main aim is to be here in a year's time in a much stronger position than we started out at. Please bear with us as we grow.

Good points on both sides, maybe a middle ground of every other month for the payouts could be looked at?

Gives the team time to do their work and addresses "the 3 months is a long time in crpto" and "ABC3" points

Just an idea.

qiwoman2

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1023

Oikos.cash | Decentralized Finance on Tron

Quote from: chilly2k on October 26, 2014, 08:26:21 AM

I agree with everybody above. I think we're becoming ABC3. The monthly payout is what made QBK different. 3 months is a long time.

I can also see that making it every 3 months has it's advantages. Less time consuming on the team, and more time to compound the investments. It also will help to average out the earnings and absorb any extreme increases or decreases. Company's payout quarterly dividends. I feel that as long as the QBK team concentrates on increasing and protecting our assets the coin will grow over the long run. They should not be doing things to just increase the price of QBK. I already wortk for a company like that, it's not fun....

So, I think we need actual dates to go along with the latest announcement. When does/did the quarter start? Will there be a payout November 10th? What are the dates of the quarters? If your trying to aline the quarters with specific start dates, (IE Jan 1st, or Dec 1st. Or even Nov 1st). How will you handle the gap time? Like if your going to Say the quarter starts Nov 1st. Will there be a mini dividend then to cover 10/10 - 10/31? Or did/does the quarter run from 10/10 - 1/10? And so it will only cover those who held coins from the 10th of October? Your going to have unhappy people no matter how to do this. You just have to find a fair solution for all involved.

Personally I've been holding since 8/11, and I'm not really a big day trader, so it doesn't really effect me that much.

Thank you for the good feedback. We understand that the quarterly cash outs may not be favorable for many but we ARE looking at QBK as a long term option and especially for those who are NOT successful as day traders and who want to put their readies aside for consistent returns. Instead of say having all their money in the bank to earn them squat and see their fiat money also depreciate by 5-15% yearly because of the annual debts, the can earn a decent bonus just buying up some QBK and staking it away for lump sum bonuses.. We may fix the quarterly dates as opposed to making them fluid we will re discuss this with the team as many haven't yet registered their bags yet so as to make things a bit easier one everyone and not feel left out. The quarter would start from the 11th of the month after the last bagholder period. Talking of mini dividend bonuses is a good idea or random any time during that period bonuses. It's something we will look into to try and appease all our Bagholders. Our main aim is to be here in a year's time in a much stronger position than we started out at. Please bear with us as we grow.

chilly2k

legendary

Activity: 1007

Merit: 1000

I agree with everybody above. I think we're becoming ABC3. The monthly payout is what made QBK different. 3 months is a long time.

I can also see that making it every 3 months has it's advantages. Less time consuming on the team, and more time to compound the investments. It also will help to average out the earnings and absorb any extreme increases or decreases. Company's payout quarterly dividends. I feel that as long as the QBK team concentrates on increasing and protecting our assets the coin will grow over the long run. They should not be doing things to just increase the price of QBK. I already wortk for a company like that, it's not fun....

So, I think we need actual dates to go along with the latest announcement. When does/did the quarter start? Will there be a payout November 10th? What are the dates of the quarters? If your trying to aline the quarters with specific start dates, (IE Jan 1st, or Dec 1st. Or even Nov 1st). How will you handle the gap time? Like if your going to Say the quarter starts Nov 1st. Will there be a mini dividend then to cover 10/10 - 10/31? Or did/does the quarter run from 10/10 - 1/10? And so it will only cover those who held coins from the 10th of October? Your going to have unhappy people no matter how to do this. You just have to find a fair solution for all involved.

Personally I've been holding since 8/11, and I'm not really a big day trader, so it doesn't really effect me that much.

qiwoman2

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1023

Oikos.cash | Decentralized Finance on Tron

Quote from: dan_and_shan on October 26, 2014, 04:42:02 AM

Quote from: candlesticks on October 25, 2014, 09:45:35 PM

Quote from: TheGer on October 25, 2014, 08:49:42 PM

I like the new terms but I do feel that it should still be monthly. I think protecting market value and stability, has to be balanced with flexibility for the end user as well.

A 3 month term I think will unnecessarily stagnate the market. Allowing people to be able to come and go on a monthly basis will help maintain viability to attract newcomers and keep markets flexible. There are not many people who will want to buy QBK knowing they have to wait 3 months for a payment. On top of that there are people who accumulate over time due to trading or investing at intervals that slowly build their bags and would not like such a long wait for returns.

3 month terms may hurt the goals you are hoping for long term in the following ways:

Investment interest from new people will waiver
People may exit not wanting to wait so long for bonuses
Potential short term increase in price, but long term decline as few people invest while less patient/otherwise obligated people sell(lowering the price because of fewer buyers)
Volume on markets will sink drastically potentially courting delisting due to no/low volumes

Monthly accounting does require a little extra work, but the benefits to end users are I think worth it. Also, people will personally want to be able to evaluate the performance of their investment monthly to ensure it is garnering returns they find acceptable. In 3 month periods people start to get antsy in crypto, and that in itself may cause a certain amount of selloff.

Please reconsider going back to monthly.

I agree with every point in this post.

3 months is a long time in crypto.

Well done to theQBK Team for C- Cex listing

I have to agree with you 3 mths is too long in crypto, all the current holders are holding on the premace that they will receive their monthly bonus, I think changing this now may not be the best decision,
I know my first thought, was not a good one Sad

But im in for the long haul anyway, But i like getting my BagBonuses Wink

Thank you for the feed back. Most people we are chatting to on skype are long term hoarders and are happy with the fact that if QBK grows bigger in assets, it benefits everyone all round and as other coins come and fastly go and we are still around 6 months later, a year later, proof of time will be on our side. I also invested my own btc to buy coins to baghold so I am also a holder.

dan_and_shan

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Quote from: candlesticks on October 25, 2014, 09:45:35 PM

Quote from: TheGer on October 25, 2014, 08:49:42 PM

I like the new terms but I do feel that it should still be monthly. I think protecting market value and stability, has to be balanced with flexibility for the end user as well.

A 3 month term I think will unnecessarily stagnate the market. Allowing people to be able to come and go on a monthly basis will help maintain viability to attract newcomers and keep markets flexible. There are not many people who will want to buy QBK knowing they have to wait 3 months for a payment. On top of that there are people who accumulate over time due to trading or investing at intervals that slowly build their bags and would not like such a long wait for returns.

3 month terms may hurt the goals you are hoping for long term in the following ways:

Investment interest from new people will waiver
People may exit not wanting to wait so long for bonuses
Potential short term increase in price, but long term decline as few people invest while less patient/otherwise obligated people sell(lowering the price because of fewer buyers)
Volume on markets will sink drastically potentially courting delisting due to no/low volumes

Monthly accounting does require a little extra work, but the benefits to end users are I think worth it. Also, people will personally want to be able to evaluate the performance of their investment monthly to ensure it is garnering returns they find acceptable. In 3 month periods people start to get antsy in crypto, and that in itself may cause a certain amount of selloff.

Please reconsider going back to monthly.

I agree with every point in this post.

3 months is a long time in crypto.

Well done to theQBK Team for C- Cex listing

I have to agree with you 3 mths is too long in crypto, all the current holders are holding on the premace that they will receive their monthly bonus, I think changing this now may not be the best decision,
I know my first thought, was not a good one Sad

But im in for the long haul anyway, But i like getting my BagBonuses Wink

TheGer

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

qiwoman2

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1023

Oikos.cash | Decentralized Finance on Tron

TheGer

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

Crypto being what it is, having a 3 month "wait and see" period can haven 2 possible outcomes.

1. Things continue to be profitable and the market is stable.
2. Things go as I predicted is possible in my earlier post and market presence declines substantioally.

A 1 month period can have 2 possible outcomes.

1. Things continue to be profitable and the market is stable.
2. Things continue to be profitable and the market is stable.

You see where I'm going with this.

The goose bumps and fuzzy tummies involved with getting a bigger bonus just because you waited longer doesn't quite counter the risks involved in potentially damaging QBK's public presence.

At the end of the day 1x3(quarterly) and 3x1(monthly) is the same thing as far as what's in your pocket. 1x3=3x1

There is no tangible advantage to a 3 month wait, but there are definitely tangible disadvantages.

I hope you reconsider this because people expect the risk to be in the investment decisions not in the operational decisions.

** as a side note I believe that monthly should be paid out this month as we are already in to it. For people that held this month so far expecting a monthly payout I think it is kind of a "rug pulled out from under them" situation. I think it is only fair.

Quote from: qiwoman2 on October 26, 2014, 12:57:39 AM

Guys we will think about the monthly avenue again but take in mind that we already had a POS staking coin that rewards peeps anyway, whether they have little or bigger coin bags..The primary target is to get QBK to a bigger asset level. Think about it, if every quarter you get a nice phat bag its something really to look forward to and also it educates people that Crypto is not just a wham bam thank you maam type of scenario. It doesn't HAVE to be like this for everyone. I was actually fed up of this rush rush type of mentality and this is the whole essence of why we wanted to create something different. Also in essence you don't have to lock up ALL your coins, you can always buy a stash to day trade as well. Also the coins are not locked up like you would have to lock in a bank and not be able to ever take out in an emergency. You can take your coins earlier only you won't earn the extra bonus. I would ask let's give the new system a try and if that isn't doing the job we intended we can go to the drawing board again. Also thank you C-CEX and Bitcoin -Mafia for helping to get us added and many others who wanted QBK on the Exchange which means more liquidity now.

ALSO GIVEAWAY COMMENCING ON C-CEX trollbox to celebrate QBK market.

silverkinguk

sr. member

Activity: 404

Merit: 250

Three month payouts are better for Qibuck,in order to maximise returns and therefore bonuses increase over time.Increasing rewards are better for Bagholders,also this change makes things easier for the team.
Qibuck isn't just an asset backed coin but a coin with a mission to better the world in charitable ways by helping the poor.Many initiatives require our hard focus on making things work so three months is fair.

Topic: [ANN] QIBUCK COIN - X13 - POS/POBH - 1st Proof of Baghold - page 97. (Read 379435 times)