I think something like this is more what he had in mind.
12-Port Power Over the NET™ (PDU) - http://tinyurl.com/ptpz76u
That is fucking sexy!
;-)
Add a KVM over IP to that and you have complete control over remote PCs.
Topic: [ANN] QQCoin- Scrypt Jane, ASIC Resistant, N-Factor, Multipool Resistant - page 26. (Read 187229 times)
February 10, 2014, 02:01:31 AM
I think something like this is more what he had in mind.
12-Port Power Over the NET™ (PDU) - http://tinyurl.com/ptpz76u
That is fucking sexy!
;-)
Add a KVM over IP to that and you have complete control over remote PCs.
February 10, 2014, 01:12:47 AM
I think something like this is more what he had in mind.
12-Port Power Over the NET™ (PDU) - http://tinyurl.com/ptpz76u
That is fucking sexy!
February 10, 2014, 12:56:40 AM
Well, I am trying to use the same settings as in the cards that are getting 300 kh/sec or 350 kh/sec. It is practically the same model of card, same brand. I have to go down with the settings until I reach only 150 Kh/sec otherwise it will crash !
I will wait until someone will be near the computers (as I am 10 000 kilometers away from my farm) and then try more settings as if I crash the computers no one can reset it.
I am thinking to make a device to remotely control the farm's computer's reset and power buttons, I am wondering if anyone would be interested to buy such a device here.. then I might go ahead with the project..
Most Motherboards have that function now anyway.
WAKEONLAN i think it is called
I think something like this is more what he had in mind.
12-Port Power Over the NET™ (PDU) - http://tinyurl.com/ptpz76u
February 10, 2014, 12:54:36 AM
Can you post a sample of what settings are you using now to mine if you please?
These are my settings...
qqcoinminer -o stratum+tcp://stratum.cipherpool.com:8842 -u user.worker -p passw --scrypt --Nfmin 4 --Nfmax 30 --StartT 1387769316 -I 16 -w 512 -g 2 --auto-fan --thread-concurrency 8192 --scan-time 5 --lookup-gap 2
i get 1% HW errors with this.
I basically had to adjust these settings to get it working
-w 512 (i previously had it at 256)
-g 2 (i previously did not have this)
--lookup-gap 2 (i previously did not have this)
-i 16 (i had to play around with this a few times... it ranged from 11 to 17 depending on what other settings i used)
February 10, 2014, 12:41:02 AM
Well, I am trying to use the same settings as in the cards that are getting 300 kh/sec or 350 kh/sec. It is practically the same model of card, same brand. I have to go down with the settings until I reach only 150 Kh/sec otherwise it will crash !
I will wait until someone will be near the computers (as I am 10 000 kilometers away from my farm) and then try more settings as if I crash the computers no one can reset it.
I am thinking to make a device to remotely control the farm's computer's reset and power buttons, I am wondering if anyone would be interested to buy such a device here.. then I might go ahead with the project..
Most Motherboards have that function now anyway.
WAKEONLAN i think it is called
February 10, 2014, 12:25:37 AM
Not on all cards. Some of my 30+ cards (most of it R9 290) are not making it even to 200 kh/sec, from up to 650-690 kh/sec. I don't know why and I need to look more into it. Some I have at 320 kh/sec which is fine.
The earnings might be lesser, as soon as the change happened the difficulty changed to more than half of previous difficulty thus meaning that some part of the network (CPU's) are more efficient thus leaving a little less part of network for the videocards that are less efficient.
The N-factor starts to be felt I think and the efficiency of videocards is decreasing. We will see what happens at the next N-factor in 12 more days.
I had to adjust nearly all my settings to get the best efficiency again.
Thread Concurrency, Worksize, Lookup gap, Intensity, GPU threads etc...
If i left it at the previous setting and just adjusted the Intensity till i stopped getting Errors, then it was half the KH/s of what i am getting now.
Redo your settings completely, see how you go.
And yes you are correct about the CPU maintaining efficiency
Well, I am trying to use the same settings as in the cards that are getting 300 kh/sec or 350 kh/sec. It is practically the same model of card, same brand. I have to go down with the settings until I reach only 150 Kh/sec otherwise it will crash !
I will wait until someone will be near the computers (as I am 10 000 kilometers away from my farm) and then try more settings as if I crash the computers no one can reset it.
I am thinking to make a device to remotely control the farm's computer's reset and power buttons, I am wondering if anyone would be interested to buy such a device here.. then I might go ahead with the project..
February 10, 2014, 12:25:22 AM
ASIC PROOF - BOTH SHA256 AND SCRYPT ASIC PROOF
let's highlight some of qqcoins great points
no premine
fastest coin out there
asic proof
great name...
seems we are hiding qqc good points up for some reason.
let's highlight some of qqcoins great points
no premine
fastest coin out there
asic proof
great name...
seems we are hiding qqc good points up for some reason.
agree!
make this in a new post and start a new topic out there could be better, AAN the promotions recelty in the mean time, add some guide to mine、exchange、store、games……also.
my point is that there should be a new topic to show up the progress and advantage of QQC
February 09, 2014, 11:15:49 PM
Not on all cards. Some of my 30+ cards (most of it R9 290) are not making it even to 200 kh/sec, from up to 650-690 kh/sec. I don't know why and I need to look more into it. Some I have at 320 kh/sec which is fine.
The earnings might be lesser, as soon as the change happened the difficulty changed to more than half of previous difficulty thus meaning that some part of the network (CPU's) are more efficient thus leaving a little less part of network for the videocards that are less efficient.
The N-factor starts to be felt I think and the efficiency of videocards is decreasing. We will see what happens at the next N-factor in 12 more days.
I had to adjust nearly all my settings to get the best efficiency again.
Thread Concurrency, Worksize, Lookup gap, Intensity, GPU threads etc...
If i left it at the previous setting and just adjusted the Intensity till i stopped getting Errors, then it was half the KH/s of what i am getting now.
Redo your settings completely, see how you go.
And yes you are correct about the CPU maintaining efficiency
Can you post a sample of what settings are you using now to mine if you please?
February 09, 2014, 11:12:03 PM
Not on all cards. Some of my 30+ cards (most of it R9 290) are not making it even to 200 kh/sec, from up to 650-690 kh/sec. I don't know why and I need to look more into it. Some I have at 320 kh/sec which is fine.
The earnings might be lesser, as soon as the change happened the difficulty changed to more than half of previous difficulty thus meaning that some part of the network (CPU's) are more efficient thus leaving a little less part of network for the videocards that are less efficient.
The N-factor starts to be felt I think and the efficiency of videocards is decreasing. We will see what happens at the next N-factor in 12 more days.
I had to adjust nearly all my settings to get the best efficiency again.
Thread Concurrency, Worksize, Lookup gap, Intensity, GPU threads etc...
If i left it at the previous setting and just adjusted the Intensity till i stopped getting Errors, then it was half the KH/s of what i am getting now.
Redo your settings completely, see how you go.
And yes you are correct about the CPU maintaining efficiency
February 09, 2014, 10:15:01 PM
Unfortunately I can not please everybody. As a developer you get used to it.
February 09, 2014, 09:43:54 PM
ASIC PROOF - BOTH SHA256 AND SCRYPT ASIC PROOF
let's highlight some of qqcoins great points
no premine
fastest coin out there
asic proof
great name...
seems we are hiding qqc good points up for some reason.
let's highlight some of qqcoins great points
no premine
fastest coin out there
asic proof
great name...
seems we are hiding qqc good points up for some reason.
This is marketing 101. There are so many new coins out there. So what is different with this coin? Sure, the 20s confirmation time. I can't think of something other...
btw: I don't like the qqco.in site. It's so full and dirty. Look at a site like this. Clean and nice: http://www.q2c.cc/
February 09, 2014, 08:22:36 PM
So we will have now 2 times less hashrate? On hd7950 I had ~500khash now I have ~250khash
Yes but ALL GPU's will have the lower Hashrate
So your Hashrate as a Percentage to the total will still stay the same.
So you will still be mining the same number of coins
Not on all cards. Some of my 30+ cards (most of it R9 290) are not making it even to 200 kh/sec, from up to 650-690 kh/sec. I don't know why and I need to look more into it. Some I have at 320 kh/sec which is fine.
The earnings might be lesser, as soon as the change happened the difficulty changed to more than half of previous difficulty thus meaning that some part of the network (CPU's) are more efficient thus leaving a little less part of network for the videocards that are less efficient.
The N-factor starts to be felt I think and the efficiency of videocards is decreasing. We will see what happens at the next N-factor in 12 more days.
February 09, 2014, 06:53:09 PM
So we will have now 2 times less hashrate? On hd7950 I had ~500khash now I have ~250khash
Yes but ALL GPU's will have the lower Hashrate
So your Hashrate as a Percentage to the total will still stay the same.
So you will still be mining the same number of coins
February 09, 2014, 05:11:55 PM
So we will have now 2 times less hashrate? On hd7950 I had ~500khash now I have ~250khash
February 09, 2014, 05:03:57 PM
What is going on with mining QQcoin at pooljunkie?
My miner just started to give me HW error and it is not accepting shares with the following settings:
qqcoinminer -o stratum+tcp://qqc.pooljunkie.nl:3333 -u username -p xxxx --scrypt --Nfmin 4 --Nfmax 30 --StartT 1387769316 -I 17
Any ideas?
My miner just started to give me HW error and it is not accepting shares with the following settings:
qqcoinminer -o stratum+tcp://qqc.pooljunkie.nl:3333 -u username -p xxxx --scrypt --Nfmin 4 --Nfmax 30 --StartT 1387769316 -I 17
Any ideas?
The N-factor changed to 10, now N is 2048 and memory needed is 256 Kb (as in 128 Kb before). You need to lower your intensity or increase lookup gap.
Good luck
February 09, 2014, 04:31:40 PM
What is going on with mining QQcoin at pooljunkie?
My miner just started to give me HW error and it is not accepting shares with the following settings:
qqcoinminer -o stratum+tcp://qqc.pooljunkie.nl:3333 -u username -p xxxx --scrypt --Nfmin 4 --Nfmax 30 --StartT 1387769316 -I 17
Any ideas?
My miner just started to give me HW error and it is not accepting shares with the following settings:
qqcoinminer -o stratum+tcp://qqc.pooljunkie.nl:3333 -u username -p xxxx --scrypt --Nfmin 4 --Nfmax 30 --StartT 1387769316 -I 17
Any ideas?
February 09, 2014, 03:34:35 PM
ASIC PROOF - BOTH SHA256 AND SCRYPT ASIC PROOF
let's highlight some of qqcoins great points
no premine
fastest coin out there
asic proof
great name...
seems we are hiding qqc good points up for some reason.
let's highlight some of qqcoins great points
no premine
fastest coin out there
asic proof
great name...
seems we are hiding qqc good points up for some reason.
February 09, 2014, 03:28:41 PM
@jayguar
Is it possible to automate the deposit process? It's kind of annoying to first search the deposit address within a forum and then having to wait a couple of hours to get the points. That's not very "Web 2.0-ish"
Sorry for my moaning, I just try to give constructive feedback.
Its in the works. I hope it gets completed in a week.
February 09, 2014, 03:04:54 PM
The new site looks very pretty! But as suggested by others I would like to see that it's asic proof by using scrypt-jane (this term isn't even on the frontpage!) much more prominent than now. It needs to jump in your face when you look at the site 
edit: another issue of the site is that the active trail of the current menu item is not highlighted. A fix would help for easier navigation.
@jayguar
Is it possible to automate the deposit process? It's kind of annoying to first search the deposit address within a forum and then having to wait a couple of hours to get the points. That's not very "Web 2.0-ish"
Sorry for my moaning, I just try to give constructive feedback.
edit: another issue of the site is that the active trail of the current menu item is not highlighted. A fix would help for easier navigation.
@jayguar
Is it possible to automate the deposit process? It's kind of annoying to first search the deposit address within a forum and then having to wait a couple of hours to get the points. That's not very "Web 2.0-ish"
Sorry for my moaning, I just try to give constructive feedback.
February 09, 2014, 02:52:46 PM
QQC contests extended to another 24 hours at Just An Arcade.
Jump to: