Quark was top 5 coin based on what ?On fake market cap ?
What made Quark Top 5 ?The leak of the infratsructur ?No Dev Team ?Or maybe Kolin with his bought hype and bribe to bill still ?
Explain to me what made Quark top 5 and why only for a few weeks ?
You guys don't even have an own messageboard........all these fuckers with the big wallets where is your participation ?
Asking Max for an update thats all you can do ?
Thats the exect same scenario like years ago.The small investors doing the main job where the big wallet holders do a fuck just dump their coins.
This coin is the biggest shit and the big wallet owners are parasites and nothing more
What made Quark Top 5 ?The leak of the infratsructur ?No Dev Team ?Or maybe Kolin with his bought hype and bribe to bill still ?
Explain to me what made Quark top 5 and why only for a few weeks ?
You guys don't even have an own messageboard........all these fuckers with the big wallets where is your participation ?
Asking Max for an update thats all you can do ?
Thats the exect same scenario like years ago.The small investors doing the main job where the big wallet holders do a fuck just dump their coins.
This coin is the biggest shit and the big wallet owners are parasites and nothing more
I suspect all those with the largest wallets are not even crypto enthusiasts and are investors that were brought in by bill and have grabbed qrk sitting on it for years awaiting good roi.
I do not think having a separate message board is a good idea. I say this to every community that suggests it.
MC is MC i agree its a dangerous tool to base any real judgement on it but then that can be said for all coins.
Your points are quite invalid in that they are pointed at quark but could be pointed at any project on here.
More tech more development = more interest and more accumulation. It just is that simple.
Most of your previous points have been disproven and we still await the proof you claim to have and evidence of your previous accusations.
I am interested only in discussing facts with you nothing more. Bring evidence or how can we take you seriously.
We'll await new developments. Some will buy prior for less taking more risk, some will by after for far more and take less risk.
The future for any crypto is uncertain.
I am yet to hear your personal gripe with quark? you bought at the top and sold for nothing or what happened to you?
lol there are no large buyers and the audience didnt buyed many coins since the price was arround $0.2 per coin .
The fact is that the majority of coins are still in the hands of a few people who did nothing just mined at the beginning.
You are a good example for it even you are a small fish.
1.000.000 coins for what ?Mining in the first month with 2 or 3 comps ? This gives you the right to hold 1/250 of all coins ?
Lets assume price will go back up to $0.1 so explain to me what did you do that would justify you holding coins for $100.000 which were at peak time even $350.000 ?
And like i said you are a small fish the big parasites have even way more
Show me at any other successfull coin where people could mine this amount of coins with 2-3 comps which would reach such a big value in such an early stage ?
You call Quark a currency ?A currency which majority is being hold by 10-50 people ?Wow that would be a currency for the smallest community in the world.
1. If they mined fairly there is no problem. Also just because you chose not to mine is not anyone elses problem. There were many other coins with far shorter emission periods.
2. no you're wrong anyway since they were for sale for 80 sats for months Im sure that is an indication many other not the miners bought them.
3. Any currency that is launched and everyone has equal chance to mine is fair. I mean how can you even single out quark when there are icos sold out in 5 mins and nobody had a chance to buy them.
4. where did i mention 2-3 computers in 1 or 2 weeks? but even so if true imagine everyone else on this board ? why didnt they point their cpus at quark?
5. I imagine many of the top currencies including eth, golem, gns, dash have the top 50 wallets dominating the minting
6. The key thing you are missing here and this final point needs to sink in. Quark was a fair POW release. If something is a fair release and nobody chooses to mine it then that is not unfair that the few that choose to mine it will accumulate all of the coins. It is that simple.
You have many many top currencies where there was no fair pow release and a tiny % of the holders own the vast bulk of the coins.
Quark gave you not 1 but 2 fair chances.
a - mine fairly
b - buy very cheaply from those that mined fairly.
the distribution of quark is not for questioning in the context of other cryptos. Why are you not on blackcoin? whitecoin, mintcoin, ANY other short emission pow coins thread?
If it short emission coins you do not like then that is fine there are probably 50 with shorter pow emission periods than quark. So go tell them about it too.
However, I ask you again. What is special to you about quark? did you buy at the top and sell after the dump?
Yes I am sorry but that is how POW works if there are few miners then they do take all of the coins. There was months to mine and months to buy for nothing cheaper even than mining. That is a fact.
However I do believe this is a weakness of quark and the emission was flawed because although it allowed the miners who mined at the start and kept mining to get a lot of coins nobody else was interested for months and they ended up having to dump them because they seemed worthless.
There has been nothing you have said with regards to quark that can not be said far worse of MANY other projects. There seems no reason to single out quark here unless there is something we do not know about you personally. The fact you have a tiny post count here makes me think more than likely you are indeed Digital Industry returned under another guise to try and harm this project.
Else if you are not explain your personal gripe with quark. Because surely it is not the emission curve nor the fact it was for sale for nothing for months.
1.Other coins has been bashed because of that short mining.Show me one with success ?AAnd it was not fair mined as they used orphans and ONLY announced this coin on this board and nothing more.No advertisng no nothing.So you can say it was closed to a small group
2.That coins were for sale for 80 Sats mean shit.Everycoin starts small but it doesnt say anything about the amount of coins people bought before the price went up.At Quark i can tell you that price went quickly up since there were not much coins you could buy for 80 Sats
3.Orphans isnt an equal chance and holding quark to the public secret just to start promoting it after 6 months of release just shows that the main intention was first to mine all coins and after that start the promotion to find buyers.
4.You did before,and people didnt mined quark since only a few people (basicly members from bitcointalk) knew about that coin as it wasnt advertised anywhere else expect here
5.Your imagination is wrong expecially about golem
6.To have a choice to mine or not you first need to know about that coin.How does it come that all successfull coins where promoted before the offical mining start ?Only Max coins never has been promoted.They always start promoting after 6 months.
Keep defending your shitty 1.000.000 which you are trying to exchange for real money however i will warn people about the quark scam if you like it or not.
You are btw a poor looser who tries anything to the price goes up .....your poor startegy to descredit me won't work the same with your opinion that there are scam coins.
First of your coin is a scam coin and i keep informing people about it
Lets take it slowly since you obviously need to be spoon fed facts even then there is probably little hope for you to accept them
I will take each of your replies and answer them for you to mull over.
1.Other coins has been bashed because of that short mining.Show me one with success ?AAnd it was not fair mined as they used orphans and ONLY announced this coin on this board and nothing more.No advertisng no nothing.So you can say it was closed to a small group
Blackcoin had a shorter mining period. But there are many many POW coins. I mean all ico coins are far worse of course in terms of initial distribution. Especially insta icos which are bought out in minutes like your shit golem scam coin. These are far worse than huge premine or instamine coins. Neither of which quark falls into in the context of all POW releases. No you can not say it was a closed small group. Why was it closed if anyone could choose to mine it. It was not like the ANN section today there were hardly any coins released then you could not have missed it. Like icos that run for a few mins are not closed to a short group. Is there something wrong with your ability to read and comprehend facts i present you relating to observable real world events?
2.That coins were for sale for 80 Sats mean shit.Everycoin starts small but it doesnt say anything about the amount of coins people bought before the price went up.At Quark i can tell you that price went quickly up since there were not much coins you could buy for 80 Sats
You can tell me what you want but it is factual that it ranged from 80-200 sats for many months. There were tons for sale. So again you are incorrect.
3.Orphans isnt an equal chance and holding quark to the public secret just to start promoting it after 6 months of release just shows that the main intention was first to mine all coins and after that start the promotion to find buyers.
Blah blah orphans ... I was able to mine on ordinary cpus just fine. I am an experience miner so I know when something mines just fine. Quark did. You had a few cpus you could mine some. Your logic is a total fail. I thought they scammed the mining so they had all the coins?? which they did not unless you believe stephen lamb was in on it. LOL. Why then put them all on the market for 80 sats? very strange.
4.You did before,and people didnt mined quark since only a few people (basicly members from bitcointalk) knew about that coin as it wasnt advertised anywhere else expect here
LOL like that doesnt apply to every pow coin released at that time. What not advertised on tv ?? that's outrageous thule.
5.Your imagination is wrong expecially about golem
No that is an insta Ico scam coin like any capped ico sold out in moments to a few whales and insiders. You claim then quarks initial distribution was poor LOL you are thule the fool. Please entertain me further.
6.To have a choice to mine or not you first need to know about that coin.How does it come that all successfull coins where promoted before the offical mining start ?Only Max coins never has been promoted.They always start promoting after 6 months.
Yeah of course thule every other POW launch at that time advertised the launch ahead of time.... NOT that fair launch protocol was introduced way after quarks time. Even then just search ninja and you may find a few others
Keep defending your shitty 1.000.000 which you are trying to exchange for real money however i will warn people about the quark scam if you like it or not.
Who says I have that many now. Perhaps I have less but perhaps I have more. I can inform you though that quark makes up less than 1% of my crypto portfolio so make of that what you may
You are btw a poor looser who tries anything to the price goes up .....your poor startegy to descredit me won't work the same with your opinion that there are scam coins.
You discred yourself. YOu come here at the start and shout all about btc38 wallet being in collusion with other large quark wallets. Making yourself look silly and foolish from the offset. Then spout all the other points I have disproven and still you blame others for you being discredited? what credit should I bestow upon you. You have got more things wrong about quark than any person on this board in history has about any other project. there you have your rightful credit now.
First of your coin is a scam coin and i keep informing people about it
You are informing people of how foolish you are only in persisting to spout nonsense that is provably incorrect.
You are forgetting
1. people can research the price history of quark
2. people can research the blockchain to see how many mined quark and how easy it was for anyone to mine for months
these 2 points alone discredit everything you have said.
I mean if anyone can mine and anyone can buy (of course they have to know about crypto and be aware of this board but that goes for everyone coin of that time) then your entire argument collapses like your skull will akin to a rotten pumpkin when it dawns on you that you are wrong and the facts are the facts.
Bring facts not fiction.
In the context of coins that were released at the time and after quark was no worse than many in any respect.
I think it best to ignore you until you bring some FACTS
LOL your poor attemtion to discredit me isnt working.You are comparing Quark to other looser and scam coins ?LOL why don't you compare Quark to a successfull coin ?
People who actually have money are smart enough to check my claims.Its enough to read the first 20 pages of that thread and everyone can see there were orphans reported by multiple users.
You call a coin which had no promotion but could mined by everyone a fair distribution ?You are pathetic.
Its like somebody opens his unknown website and publish there about the start of a new coin ,mine everyting himself and claim after 6 months it was a fair distribution since it was public on a domain nobody knew.
You know you call Quark a currency.Do you even know what a currency is ?Coins hold by 50-100 people you call a currency ?
The other guy claming about the work .......which work is he talking about ?What has Quark ?Nothing is working no infrastructur nothing only big wallets.
Your effords are quark really making a top coin.
POOR SCAM ATTEMPT and nothing more.
I warned people the first time that they will loose the money where i got bashed by coin holders and what happened everyone left the sinking ship giving a fuck about quark and people who lost their money.
You are a PARASITE and nothing more.
You are repeating nonsense that has already been answered and debunked. You need something more else you need to realise every remark you level at quark can be leveled at so many other POW coins.
Blackcoin is successful-ish.
Also golem was bought in minutes so are other insta icos - that is minutes not months and months.
If you call qrk a scam on the basis of initial distribution you can right off 50% of coins on this forum.
I'll agree with you on one point only and that is quark was pumped and dumped which is a scam thing to do. But if you look at quarks chart so many coins charts look indentical and in that exact time frame it was a big pump and dump of all coins.
That does not mean the initial release was at all bad compared to many other POW coins of that time.
The problem is who pumped and dumped it. I do not believe it was max since why did he not do any development or even hardly appear in the thread after the launch. I am sure he got very few coins himself and left it to die since no financial interest. I think kolin must have got his hands on a lot of them and dumped because after he sold out he tried to destroy qrk. He probably purchased them also for 80-200 sats.
Could pow launch be better. Yes. But again any pow release where anyone can mine is better than an ico or insta ico.
Remember if max had wanted he could have had a 5% premine. Premines were all the rage back with pow releases of that time.
There have been way fairer launches and way worse launches of coins which is why it is weird you focus only on qrk. What is this reason??
BRING FACTS NOT REPEATING YOUR SAME DISPROVEN NONSENSE
the fact is anything you say about quark can be said and worse about 50% or greater of the coins here based on initial distribution. FACT.
Explain this too.
If quark does come through with its road map and provides a high tech (compared to its peers) solution then how can it be a scam?
It costs nothing now anyone can buy it cheap.
So again another easy chance to get quark for everyone for cheap.
Then if they create something exciting and it gains interest and becomes expensive later that is how things work here. Sorry that is not a scam
Devs always have an advantage in that reviving a dead coin they will accumulate tokens first hence their reward. This happens on every revival i have ever seen. So every revival must be a scam right?
