Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade - page 9. (Read 1031025 times)

I saw someone mention on Slack that Instant Confirmations would be good.  Is this going to be a feature of the updated Quark?
Also, when can we expect a roadmap?
Cheers

you can instantly see its a pump going on

http://www.btc38.com/trade_en.html?mk_type=btc&btc38_trade_coin_name=qrk

This is China Quark Market ?

I'm running v0.10.4.5

Is there a version more recent than that?

Edit:
The 3500 quarks from a week of mining is now at 1 quark (I believe the first quark I mined) so it must be correcting itself. Strange that it would mine for over a week on a bad fork. Where are most of the miners, china? I'm in California.

Reading your post i can confirm my post that you guys have no clue about crypto currencies.No wonder you guys have not created a single successfull coin in the past.Your post about communism is funny.I would recommend a dictionary and check the meaning of the word.Decentralised means that not a single or few people have the power to decide about the currencies price.Who cares if there are 100.000.000 wallets out when 70% is controlled by 5 people.You clearly have no economic understanding.
Next thing there is no such thing like a quark community.The only one who wanted to contact a dev to make an update was kolin and his friends.So this makes you instantly also as a suspicious person too.

And for your information Max is not the creator of Quark.The creator of Quark is a russian guy who started this coin under another name in russia which had no success.Max did only copy past and nothing more.

So yeah max is a great dev and surly will help Quark to become successfull.He didnt invested his personal time all he did was a copy past work and nothing more.

Quark is a clone of a russian coin and nothing more

51% attacks aren't as straight forward as you may think, big bag holders will probably sell off eventually as most do and the coin will become redistributed... Kinda a natural occurrence in the cryptosphere





Make sure you're on the latest wallet.




Wow, who pissed in your cereal this morning?

Seriously though let's think logically for a moment, when a coin goes dormant, some people will begin to collect large amounts of it in the hope that one day a cheap coin will become worth more. The coins themselves eventually redistribute unless the project completely dies which is obviously not happening with Quark.

Also a currency or even in this case a digital commodity is something that is traded for goods and services. Considering other coins/tokens are also considered as such Quark actually qualifies unlike what you've stated, perhaps it is you who needs to hit a dictionary

As for Quark having nothing... yeah the project looks like it went through a lul, that's probably why they reached out for assistance and albeit we haven't been very quick about working with the Quark dev on future updates we did agree to help and have things in the works.

Every project has it's ups and downs, saying it's "shit" because it doesn't have a fancy office building and someone you could send hate letters to is completely backwards.

As with any project you ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS RESEARCH BEFORE YOU INVEST. Doesn't make any more "scammy" than another project.







Okay so idk who this "Kolin" is lol but CryptoCoderz were asked to come on board and work with Max to get Quark updated and continue working on use for it.

As for the pump and dump thing, no clue however I'll state this again: Coins that lul or peter out a bit are usually bought up by a few people when it gets cheap, again fairly normal. Idk if I'd be screaming about it.








Okay cool your jets lol

Firstly putting aside all this PnD accusations for moment, when we were contacted by the Quark community to assist in development we were informed that "Max" the original developer was a very busy person and  as such that the community was looking for more stable development. Again, provided that we've been slow lately as we ourselves have a few projects that must each be tended to we're still working on things and from the occasional correspondence with Max he's been working on Quark as well for a while. You know personal lives usually do come before digital ones.

Now coming back to some of thie PnD accusations and stating that Quark isn't decentralized that's honestly laughable and here's why:
Decentralized blockchains does NOT mean equal distribution... pretty sure that's called communism... lol
People who have either faith in the project or are interested in picking up coins while they are cheap may acquire a large bag, again, fairly normal in the cryptosphere. What makes Quark and other BTC based coins decentralized is the fact that everyone has a copy of the blockchain and ledger as apposed to a single entity having this, NOT how many coins are distributed where.

Oh and something else you may want to note, usually people that have something to hide would split up their balances to make the distribution seem more even where as if Quark has a few people holding a lot that just means a few people thought "hey I'll buy a crapload while it's cheap"...








Anyway on those happy notes just wanted to mention that we will be stopping by more often, things have just been absolutely nuts on our end though we haven't forgotten about Quark at all
Oh and side note - If you guys don't know already Quark is now on Novaexchange.

Probably yes (at least different than you). it is not logic, that you still hold your Quark after all you have experienced (Kolin, absence of dev, fall down of the foundation, dump of the bagholders, no development, the rise of more sophisticated / promising coins, and I can tell you 100 more reasons.....)


You have read it correct. Your mistake is not that you didn't sell on time, but that you mined the wrong coins. Why would you mine coins from developers you don't know/anonymous or are known scam developers in that time like Max and Hazard (eg DGC, SRC which you seem to want to revive as well.... and WDC).


Good for you


Sigh. I thought I was naive.


Most coins created by Max are scammed by infamous scammers. For instance I met Kolin, Hilux and the UNO scammers. Not very nice people


Quark had a very nice team with hard working people who believed in the potentials of Quark. I noticed you, but you didn't do anything. You were not on trello, not on reddit and you haven't donated one single Quark while you had bags full of it (you admit yourself). The only people who pledged their Quark were the hard working people, while the early miners like you were selling their Quark at exchanges for btc and dollars...and now you regret you had not sold more...shame on you! You should regret that you didn't pledge more to the projects. That's why I have my thoughts about your true intentions.


tjee....is there ever coming an end to this post.....


Anti Quark history? You missed my post? for your convenience:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18814451
I see it more as to provide people some background information about Quark because you won't tell them


Yes I made it  (to the end of this post)

what?? the logo is brilliant it's one of the best of any crypto project I would say anyway of course the entire community may want a change but the current one looks awesome to me.

 
hi，dev！Can you change a new LOGO for Quark?A new LOGO will make people knows a new Quark coming!~~~

Way too cheap... starting a big bag now @ Cryptopia

@thule

4+5 are easy to answer.Max didnt worked much on Quark because he released several other coins on this board.He come to quark once kolin had majority of coins from quark.Max is/was a friend of Kolin coworking with him period.
If you own 100.000.000 coins you can't dump them for $0.3 thats impossible you would need have investors for $30.000.000 which was btw at that time the trading volume for bitcoin.
So when dumping even 30-40 million coins thats already a big amount of money you need first find investors for it.
You also claim that bill still audience are holding now the coins and are not selling.You wanna really tell me that the massiv amount of 1.000.000-2.000.000 wallets belong to bill still audience ?How much you think they invested each like $200k-600k ?Thats a bit unrealistic.If you check the blockchain these accounts have been splitted from 2 or 3 main wallets .No exchange no nothing.

Next that Bill Still received a bribe from Kolin has been proofed.His wallet was posted by him and Kolin where you could see on the blockchain that he received 2 times 500.000 coins .

Maybe ask Max why all of his coins on this board were a pump and dump ......its obvious that he coworked with max and that each of his coin had a 6 month mine timeframe and after that a pump and dump where after the dump max always left the coin going to the next one.

You call that a serious dev or somebody who wants to make quick money to scam people.
Why don't you ask Max for his real name and identity ?Start asking......who he is since once quark will fall again you won't see max anymore


1. can you provide evidence max and kolin are friends colluding together.
2. how can kolin have got the majority of the coins since i told you it is provable stephen took the vast bulk in the mining even I got 1 million so others with more rigs than me (small fish) must have got multiple millions.
3. THIS IS THE KEY POINT -
a- bills people started coming at 200 sats - they could have and did accumulate a lot on the way to 30,000 sats.
b- let's look at the block explorer because I wage a lot of these big wallets were purchased on the way up to the 30,000 sats pump and for sure at way higher prices that it is now. These are not dishonest scam pumpers these are investors that thought quark was going places.

4- bill still point is new to me I never knew it was proven that kolin gave him 1 million.
However i do remember a thread coming to think about it where kolin said every donation to bill that the community gave he will match it. So yes indeed at one point DI must have had quite a lot of quark.
This in itself is not really bad. I would pay celebrities or whoever to promote my coin and several other coins have tried it. Some may have an issue with paying people to promote a coin. I personally would have no issue with that.
Even if DI had a lot of quark though he MUST have mined it fairly or bought it fairly on the marketplace. There was no other way. I mean even say he had 20 rigs he could have mined millions and millions if he left them on their solidly. But then so could anyone else.
I turned against DI when he started trying to make that other quark rip off coin. You can check my post history on this thread calling it a scam coin.

5. I know you think 1m and 2m wallets is a huge wallet but in crypto those % of the minting are not unusual in any coin. Please verify that for yourself. I am part of many communities where people commonly try to accumulate 10% of the minting. Especially in small MC projects.

6. Max is not a developer that seems to stick to one project. This is HIS mistake in my opinion. I have met many developers like this. Some far worse than him who deliberately self destruct coins after they suck all the financial gain from them. Max could have made a fortune from quark since it has so much support here but if he chose to work on many other coins for short term small rewards that is his mistake. The most wealthy developers focus on one project and one project alone building them to a very successful and widely used product.
Quark was flawed from the start because you can not have short emission pow coins without moving to POS after I said this and campaigned here in 2014 for a shift to pos and a funding mechanism for another developer.. This was quarks error not doing so and also having a developer that never posts or shows interest will eventually lead to the death of your project even though quark has functioned flawlessly for years and has received vital updates to keep it secure so far.

I am hoping for better things from MAX and these new coders from now on. I am not looking for a quick pump and dump of quark but a continued and progressive project that will bring something needed and will bring nice returns to those that invest and support the project. This is all one can ask from any project.
Many devs disappoint although they can have great skill. Take CZ for example many coders acknowledge that he is a super skilled verging on genius developer. Some have suggested he is even satoshi and they have presented argument for such. However he is flaky and bbr looks like its on a death row whilst its competition is in the top 10.

I don't expect him to divulge his real id. No more than jl777 or cz or satoshi. I respect here anon is fine.

I am not saying to people dive in on the hopes of a road map. Let's wait and see what code is produced on quark and judge then. I do not care if the developer has accumulated a large bulk of the coins cheaply now it is almost dead. This incentive is human nature and they need incentive..

All devs here are in the great position of god like powers with powers to rise of crush a project due to what they do or do not produce.


silvermetal and thule - I ask again. What are your special motivations to be anti quark more than any other project that can have these identical criticisms levelled at them but in a far more serious and flagrant manner?

How do you both know so much about quark? are you old foundation members turned anti quark or what is this about?

It seems you ask a lot of questions of me and my motives and i told you here in plain open way although you 2 refuse to tell me your history with quark and how you know so much about the personal aspects of DI especially. Also what makes you believe i mean what evidence you have that DI has returned here? He must be kept away now he had his chance to be good with quark and he displayed he went totally anti quark so he should be prevented from more destructive influence.

Your point is lost on me. Any long term miner or holder of quark would not have the same view?? are you looking at the world in a different angle to those that employ logic and reason?

Of course it is a mistake. Why would not selling at 30,000 sats and now it is 300 sats not be a mistake? I mean i could have if i loved quark increased my position x100. Would anyone claim not selling something for x100 more is not a mistake? Let me hear any long term holder of quark say not selling at 30k sats now was not a mistake?

Yes i held MOST of it but sold ENOUGH to become well off by my standards.

However, I would like to see all the coins i have (over 150 ) become successful if they can. Why not.

Are you implying people have other intentions to see projects to become successful that they do NOT own? let's be serious. Show me some people who are fighting for projects here to succeed that do not hold those tokens. Why would they not support it by investing if they believed it offered something of use or they liked something about the developer or community.

Although I can tell you quark is less than 1% of my crypto interests but I like the name and loved the old community that formed around it at one point. Hence the hint of why i did not sell my much of my quark because i like those people that were involved with it.

Same with doge I like the community and I still hold doge. Qrk was at one time 2nd only to doge in terms of community.

I mean there is never a reason to ask WHY someone wants to see a project succeed is there?

I am more interested in WHY people want to see it not succeed. I mean specifically see quark not succeed when every criticism i hear leveled at quark is applicable to many more coins in a far more serious manner?? that is actually a question that answer is not already a given is it not?

What is their motivation?  I mean even if they bought high and sold low it would have been hard for them to sell lower than it is right now. So if they are so worried about it making a comeback and missing out why not just buy back in cheap now. How can you lose? or is there some other reason?

I know DI wanted to destroy qrk at the end. So who are these accounts now that are so against it?

Are there projects better than quark right now you ask? Is that even a serious question? of course quark right now is below average because it was not well thought out in terms of emission schedule and it has had not updates (serious updates) in 3 years. It was at the time quite a revolutionary coin in some respects and was copied by many other coins due to the interesting random algos which for a long time made it asic proof and to this date i am not sure there are quark asics.

Check my post history. I am all over so many threads. My interests here are very varied. I would like to see the old quark foundation brought back but no DI. They tried and achieved some remarkable things and many were remarkable people.

What is your anti quark history?

As to quark we will wait and see. I would like to see the old foundation back and a larger development team start working on it. The name quark is excellent. It is strange because in my post history you will see i name a project atom years ago but I even prefer quark to that really.

I see on bittrex people are no longer happy with cloning quarks algo they now try to copy the name qwark lol.

Quark will never die in crypto it is a legend of coins.

You may speculate I want a return of quark purely for financial reasons. You would be right in part but I own far greater % of mintings than I do of quark and you will not see me sticking up for them as much as i have for quark. So that is food for thought for you.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19279488

@cryptohunter , Why do you admit "not selling much Quark" is a mistake of yours?
Is there something more valuable than Quark 

Somebody who promotes Quark regrets he still owns Quark....for me the intentions would be clear..

Great news!! Thanks for your efforts!

4+5 are easy to answer.Max didnt worked much on Quark because he released several other coins on this board.He come to quark once kolin had majority of coins from quark.Max is/was a friend of Kolin coworking with him period.
If you own 100.000.000 coins you can't dump them for $0.3 thats impossible you would need have investors for $30.000.000 which was btw at that time the trading volume for bitcoin.
So when dumping even 30-40 million coins thats already a big amount of money you need first find investors for it.
You also claim that bill still audience are holding now the coins and are not selling.You wanna really tell me that the massiv amount of 1.000.000-2.000.000 wallets belong to bill still audience ?How much you think they invested each like $200k-600k ?Thats a bit unrealistic.If you check the blockchain these accounts have been splitted from 2 or 3 main wallets .No exchange no nothing.

Next that Bill Still received a bribe from Kolin has been proofed.His wallet was posted by him and Kolin where you could see on the blockchain that he received 2 times 500.000 coins .

Maybe ask Max why all of his coins on this board were a pump and dump ......its obvious that he coworked with max and that each of his coin had a 6 month mine timeframe and after that a pump and dump where after the dump max always left the coin going to the next one.

You call that a serious dev or somebody who wants to make quick money to scam people.
Why don't you ask Max for his real name and identity ?Start asking......who he is since once quark will fall again you won't see max anymore

The latest progress

BTC38 can deposits and withdrawals now！

I have no idea if you speak the truth or are just making it up. How do you know so much about DI and his family?

However all of these theories means nothing if

1. anyone could mine quark fairly
2. anyone could buy quark fairly for practically nothing for months.

both of which I have proven to you are true.

No this part

The 5% Premine is no solution since a 5% premine isnt usefull for a pump and dump.Only If all coins are already mined and controlled by a few people the pump and dump can work.

I already told you and there is proof on the block explorer that the launch was dominated by stephen a well known botnet or else huge private miner. He did this on lots of POW coins. No way anyone else got any amount like he did. However anyone could mine a lot with normal cpus just left on qrk whilst gpus mine other coins.

Then the months of dumping at 80-100 sats because no development.

Then and only then does you argument have some kind of footing. The pump. All coins pumped but qrk really pumped hard. This is because DI got bill to bring in lots of outside investors. I suspect then DI dumped out and after that when all coins dumped but qrk more than most he tried to sabotage the project.

Your logic about max though does not add up.

1. why not premine a lot
2. why not make it so only he could instamine a lot
3. why not give fake roadmaps or even do some development after launch to pump prices
4. so why just leave the project and it seems dead and it is worthless for months.

5. even the pump is not based off of development only bill and others me included thinking multi algo was a great impressive novel invention. I think bill was given coins like you say but i have no proof of it. However i think bill was sucked into thinking qrk was going to be a btc replacement.

Next you need to ask yourself who you are trying to fight here.

Anyone involved in the quark pump and dump (the insiders) will dumped for profit.

These large wallets you mention that have held for years then why did they not empty in the pump? Why did they hold on watching their value erode. I think some of these are bill still investors who bought for investment and will not sell until they get a profit or will never sell. Who else would hold from 30k sats to 100 sats.

My arguments make logical sense. I can not make sense of any of your statements other than there was probably an insider pump and dump at some point. But then all coin charts looks the same at that time and qrks just looks a magnification of those charts. I mean it cant be insider pump and dump on all coins.

So long as DI is gone that is the main thing for quark.
SO long as qrk does get real development and upgraded tech that is the important thing.

Quark is less than 1% of my holdings in crypto but I would still like to see quark updated and the emission changed it is not secure as it is. It is time to update to pos with voting and funding mechanism as I suggested over 2 years ago.

It does not matter to me who does the dev work only that it gets done.

The mining release was fairer than most POW coins of its time end of story. I mined on those too so I can compare this first hand. That part of your statement is 100% false. The short mining phase is not wise and that is why all other short pow phase coins went pos after a time.

It is fine to post anything you want but it must be factual and must be relevant today. Why is DI even relevant to quark right now. He is gone I see no evidence that he has returned. I have also been told in PM that many qrk people will refuse to work with him even if he does come back.

Unless you can prove he is back then the point is invalid.

I still ask you but you do not answer why your specific interest in quark only. All of your criticisms of qrk can be leveled at many other coins who are guilty of far more serious misconduct in those specific areas? what is your quark story? did you lose a lot in the pump and dump?

First of all Max coworked with Kolin or should i say Wetzl .
Max has a reason to not identify himself since he created many coins where each was a pump and dump and this guy is again reviving Quark where you clearly could read that Kolin and his family wanted to revive that coin using a Dev he knows.Who coworked with Kolin again?
Another issue the only guy Max heard to was Kolin,why ?Why did Max disappeared when Kolin left and why did Max came back exectly when Kolin wanted to revive Quark ?
There are these big wallets untouched for years where a single one could shoot Quark to the nirvana.
What does untouched big wallets mean for the price of quark ?It means that prices are going quickly up because there is not enough supply however should they start dumping their wallets after years the price will drop immedently.Thats a risk which other successfull coins dont have in such a big way.
The 5% Premine is no solution since a 5% premine isnt usefull for a pump and dump.Only If all coins are already mined and controlled by a few people the pump and dump can work.

Next step is the leak of interrest of the big wallet holders.Why are they not here ,rewarding good projects or pushing in any kind Quark ?Do they expect to come from alone ?
Max provides also no updates like always.So many bugs on Quark,no infrastructur,no real plan no nothing just waiting for a rise of price when Max will make the changes and nothing more.
Its like years ago where everyone waited for Max Kaiser to call the name Quark.At least during that time the community started projects about quark and really started getting people involved .....
What are you guys doing beside waiting ?

Oh an update is coming that will increase the value of quark by 10.000% because now it will be a real currency you can use everywhere

Maybe we should ask Max first how much he already gained from all the pump and dump his coins had ?Funny he is using multiple accounts .....for what reason ?
Maybe ask him first who he is since nobody knows it and you can trust me nobody will ever know it for a reason