Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade - page 8. (Read 1031025 times)

sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Interesting, want to start this Quark but the device is not there .. fortune has not come to me,  Embarrassed
full member
Activity: 229
Merit: 100
full member
Activity: 229
Merit: 100
Thats funny, all my kids have those things, they love them.
pm'd
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 251
Quark logo looks like fidget spinner lol.

legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG



I mean that I said i thought bcx was right when he said to baritus it looks like he just dumped them and said he got hacked. Then he dumped the project. So why would i say that if i am somehow in cahoots with baritus or benefitted from his actions in anyway. I lost if you talking financial terms like all the other people that mined or invested fairly.
I didnt dump mine because one I dont have many and i want to collect as near to 1% of each alt that i can. The old pow coins not these new ico ones. Of course the popular ones that is unrealistic
and two if everyone dumps then the project dies and the people who scammed have won. They essentially used their unfair advantage to extract the value from everyone else. If you stick together and maintain the projects value it can be possible to attract a new dev team and the only loser will be the scammer who dumped and got far less for his coins than they are worth after a successful take over. That didnt happen but I don't mind I still have my tokens locked down for my collection. I tend to day trade and make profits to get more alt tokens i have enough fiat money now for me anyway and my real life expenses are tiny also i have a few btc but mostly I collect alts not btc...sometimes i change my mind and switch to getting a few more btc then back again since news alts come out i want to collect and didnt mine a lot of my cards the fans stopped working so i am only a small miner now and there are not many new pow coins released that look interesting for all that hassle it is better to collect them from exchanges. If this is the start of a new form of money It will one day be a collectors dream all of these early alts. Anyway i collect all kinds of stuff that was once valuable and now since i held it not so much. Other stuff was not and now is. Some people just like collecting things. Perhaps an illness because when moving house it is very problematic. Alts dont suffer this issue because they dont require much physical space.

I am not involved with all 150 since a lot are now dead and their thread are static for now. Some i am trying to breath life back into but since I cant code I can not revive them alone.

Re baritus. If he did sell all his own coins and was not hacked then he treated the fair miners and investors badly. I say it looks bad on him. If he wants to return again preventing him only harms those miners and investors that fairly accumulated his coins. If he will provide tech to improve their situation then I will not stand in his way because what other option do those miners and investors have nobody else stepped in and took over those projects. Some have great names. I like digital coin and secure coin. I like netcoin too another dead one. If they wish to exit his projects and move to other projects after he releases new tech then they will have that choice, some will not trust him and perhaps they are wise who knows for sure. For me if he revives them. I will retain half for my cold wallets collection and sell half to invest in other alts that I am currently finding interesting. I have only posted a few posts on his threads. They are not projects that I will invest much time into since they were not major interests of mine to start with like quark was. The quark community was far far far better than those communities.The inventiveness of the quark foundation was 2nd only to doge at its peak. It is terrible a few bad eggs reduced quark community to dust.

Everyone looks at things in their own way. I like collecting things and now i like to see if i can predict things since being in crypto, it is very addictive, more so that collecting even. some probably call this gambling . Perhaps it is selfish but in the end they will be distributed to others. You only retain things for your lifespan after that your interests are not shared by others around you they will dispose of them in a way that best suits themselves.

I wonder which projects here do interest you then if quark no longer does.



Well it is obvious that we have a complete different view at cryptos.
You look at the names, I look at their potential/characteristics.
If it seems that a coin is surrounded by scammers then alarm bells are ringing and I will avoid them. You will mine and buy.

I was taught: "The best prediction of future behavior is past behavior"

So if Max or Baritus or Hazard or whoever comes back to his old coin then I tell people please be careful!



 



Well...

I like names of coins and of course i do look at potential progressive and useful technology. I simply said i think digitalcoin and netcoin are good names. That does not mean I do not invest more time and effort into projects that I predict have potential to exceed in areas others are lacking.
The coin i have accumulated the most of actually are those I think have such potential.

I mine and buy ALL coins not specifically hunt down to accumulate only those that could be run by potential scammers. On this board 80% of coins do have some scam accusations or some shady past issues. Name 10 coins that do not. This entire arena could have one big scam tag from exchanges to devs to miners ddosing pools...etc etc the list is endless.


Your advise of course sensible. Caution is needed in this entire arena. Your telling others to be careful is a good thing.

Let's be sensible and not quote each other out of context and distort deliberately what the other is saying.

hero member
Activity: 487
Merit: 500



I mean that I said i thought bcx was right when he said to baritus it looks like he just dumped them and said he got hacked. Then he dumped the project. So why would i say that if i am somehow in cahoots with baritus or benefitted from his actions in anyway. I lost if you talking financial terms like all the other people that mined or invested fairly.
I didnt dump mine because one I dont have many and i want to collect as near to 1% of each alt that i can. The old pow coins not these new ico ones. Of course the popular ones that is unrealistic
and two if everyone dumps then the project dies and the people who scammed have won. They essentially used their unfair advantage to extract the value from everyone else. If you stick together and maintain the projects value it can be possible to attract a new dev team and the only loser will be the scammer who dumped and got far less for his coins than they are worth after a successful take over. That didnt happen but I don't mind I still have my tokens locked down for my collection. I tend to day trade and make profits to get more alt tokens i have enough fiat money now for me anyway and my real life expenses are tiny also i have a few btc but mostly I collect alts not btc...sometimes i change my mind and switch to getting a few more btc then back again since news alts come out i want to collect and didnt mine a lot of my cards the fans stopped working so i am only a small miner now and there are not many new pow coins released that look interesting for all that hassle it is better to collect them from exchanges. If this is the start of a new form of money It will one day be a collectors dream all of these early alts. Anyway i collect all kinds of stuff that was once valuable and now since i held it not so much. Other stuff was not and now is. Some people just like collecting things. Perhaps an illness because when moving house it is very problematic. Alts dont suffer this issue because they dont require much physical space.

I am not involved with all 150 since a lot are now dead and their thread are static for now. Some i am trying to breath life back into but since I cant code I can not revive them alone.

Re baritus. If he did sell all his own coins and was not hacked then he treated the fair miners and investors badly. I say it looks bad on him. If he wants to return again preventing him only harms those miners and investors that fairly accumulated his coins. If he will provide tech to improve their situation then I will not stand in his way because what other option do those miners and investors have nobody else stepped in and took over those projects. Some have great names. I like digital coin and secure coin. I like netcoin too another dead one. If they wish to exit his projects and move to other projects after he releases new tech then they will have that choice, some will not trust him and perhaps they are wise who knows for sure. For me if he revives them. I will retain half for my cold wallets collection and sell half to invest in other alts that I am currently finding interesting. I have only posted a few posts on his threads. They are not projects that I will invest much time into since they were not major interests of mine to start with like quark was. The quark community was far far far better than those communities.The inventiveness of the quark foundation was 2nd only to doge at its peak. It is terrible a few bad eggs reduced quark community to dust.

Everyone looks at things in their own way. I like collecting things and now i like to see if i can predict things since being in crypto, it is very addictive, more so that collecting even. some probably call this gambling . Perhaps it is selfish but in the end they will be distributed to others. You only retain things for your lifespan after that your interests are not shared by others around you they will dispose of them in a way that best suits themselves.

I wonder which projects here do interest you then if quark no longer does.



Well it is obvious that we have a complete different view at cryptos.
You look at the names, I look at their potential/characteristics.
If it seems that a coin is surrounded by scammers then alarm bells are ringing and I will avoid them. You will mine and buy.

I was taught: "The best prediction of future behavior is past behavior"

So if Max or Baritus or Hazard or whoever comes back to his old coin then I tell people please be careful!



 

legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


Baritus? ask your question clearly? I have mined every single coin on the last wave wdc, qrk, dgc, scr some of those are baritus coins. I agreed with bcx on that thread if you can research it that it looked very bad him getting hacked and all his coins dumped. Looked very shady.  I don't understand what you are getting at.


You agreed with BCX? why not directly dump all your coins at that time? Then you knew that that coin was finished. Who would take DGC/baritus ever serious after that debacle? It must be a joke that he returned. At least I thought it was one big joke, until I bumped into your post and you took him serious and pointed him towards the correct thread.

I always thought you were a miner. And what I know from miners is that most miners mine and dump their coins at exchanges regardless the price. Their only focus is to get as many btc as possible, they are mostly not interested in the (potentials of the) altcoins they mine.
You are the first miner I met, who also consider his mined coins as a collection item, day trade, and now apparently is involved with projects with all of his 150 different mined coins.



I take on board some of your points but so far you accuse me of:

1. having some more dark motive than profiteering from effort of research and mining fairly.
2. in league with some dev I have never even send a pm too baritus and my last comment to him was he should be focusing on dgc not scr because it had a larger community and more people would benefit from that returning. (i have a greater% of scr than dgc fyi.
3. never having tried to help quark in the past only interested in benefitting off of others work here. Again i say that is incorrect and have said why. I put lots of effort hours and hours trying to help push through quarkfx ideas previously, and some of my own.


I have never accused you of anything as far as I know. I express my concerns. The ones I have accused in this thread are Max and DI as already proven scam artists on this forum.


what did i say to you

1. I understand you disappointment with quark
2. you seem an okay person.
3. I am personally glad you are here on this thread


I can understand you are glad with me here, because I bumped this thread already more than I intended to do.








I mean that I said i thought bcx was right when he said to baritus it looks like he just dumped them and said he got hacked. Then he dumped the project. So why would i say that if i am somehow in cahoots with baritus or benefitted from his actions in anyway. I lost if you talking financial terms like all the other people that mined or invested fairly.
I didnt dump mine because one I dont have many and i want to collect as near to 1% of each alt that i can. The old pow coins not these new ico ones. Of course the popular ones that is unrealistic
and two if everyone dumps then the project dies and the people who scammed have won. They essentially used their unfair advantage to extract the value from everyone else. If you stick together and maintain the projects value it can be possible to attract a new dev team and the only loser will be the scammer who dumped and got far less for his coins than they are worth after a successful take over. That didnt happen but I don't mind I still have my tokens locked down for my collection. I tend to day trade and make profits to get more alt tokens i have enough fiat money now for me anyway and my real life expenses are tiny also i have a few btc but mostly I collect alts not btc...sometimes i change my mind and switch to getting a few more btc then back again since news alts come out i want to collect and didnt mine a lot of my cards the fans stopped working so i am only a small miner now and there are not many new pow coins released that look interesting for all that hassle it is better to collect them from exchanges. If this is the start of a new form of money It will one day be a collectors dream all of these early alts. Anyway i collect all kinds of stuff that was once valuable and now since i held it not so much. Other stuff was not and now is. Some people just like collecting things. Perhaps an illness because when moving house it is very problematic. Alts dont suffer this issue because they dont require much physical space.

I am not involved with all 150 since a lot are now dead and their thread are static for now. Some i am trying to breath life back into but since I cant code I can not revive them alone.

Re baritus. If he did sell all his own coins and was not hacked then he treated the fair miners and investors badly. I say it looks bad on him. If he wants to return again preventing him only harms those miners and investors that fairly accumulated his coins. If he will provide tech to improve their situation then I will not stand in his way because what other option do those miners and investors have nobody else stepped in and took over those projects. Some have great names. I like digital coin and secure coin. I like netcoin too another dead one. If they wish to exit his projects and move to other projects after he releases new tech then they will have that choice, some will not trust him and perhaps they are wise who knows for sure. For me if he revives them. I will retain half for my cold wallets collection and sell half to invest in other alts that I am currently finding interesting. I have only posted a few posts on his threads. They are not projects that I will invest much time into since they were not major interests of mine to start with like quark was. The quark community was far far far better than those communities.The inventiveness of the quark foundation was 2nd only to doge at its peak. It is terrible a few bad eggs reduced quark community to dust.

Everyone looks at things in their own way. I like collecting things and now i like to see if i can predict things since being in crypto, it is very addictive, more so that collecting even. some probably call this gambling . Perhaps it is selfish but in the end they will be distributed to others. You only retain things for your lifespan after that your interests are not shared by others around you they will dispose of them in a way that best suits themselves.

I wonder which projects here do interest you then if quark no longer does.

hero member
Activity: 487
Merit: 500


Baritus? ask your question clearly? I have mined every single coin on the last wave wdc, qrk, dgc, scr some of those are baritus coins. I agreed with bcx on that thread if you can research it that it looked very bad him getting hacked and all his coins dumped. Looked very shady.  I don't understand what you are getting at.


You agreed with BCX? why not directly dump all your coins at that time? Then you knew that that coin was finished. Who would take DGC/baritus ever serious after that debacle? It must be a joke that he returned. At least I thought it was one big joke, until I bumped into your post and you took him serious and guided him towards the correct thread.

I always thought you were a miner. And what I know from miners is that most miners mine and dump their coins at exchanges regardless the price. Their only focus is to get as many btc as possible, they are mostly not interested in the (potentials of the) altcoins they mine.
You are the first miner I met, who also consider his mined coins as a collection item, day trade, and now apparently is involved with projects and believe in the potentials of all of his 150 different mined coins.



I take on board some of your points but so far you accuse me of:

1. having some more dark motive than profiteering from effort of research and mining fairly.
2. in league with some dev I have never even send a pm too baritus and my last comment to him was he should be focusing on dgc not scr because it had a larger community and more people would benefit from that returning. (i have a greater% of scr than dgc fyi.
3. never having tried to help quark in the past only interested in benefitting off of others work here. Again i say that is incorrect and have said why. I put lots of effort hours and hours trying to help push through quarkfx ideas previously, and some of my own.


I have not accused you of anything as far as I know. I express my concerns. The ones I have accused in this thread are Max and DI as already proven scam artists on this forum.


what did i say to you

1. I understand you disappointment with quark
2. you seem an okay person.
3. I am personally glad you are here on this thread


I can understand you are glad with me here, because I bumped this thread already more than I intended to do.





legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG

{...}

If you guys sticking around this thread keep people from investing until there is proven tech here with quark that is fine by me and if you can stop what you suspect is a pump and dump in the making that is good. Please stick around I have no personal issues with either of you or what you have said really after reviewing it all.


Well, how kind of you...You own this thread or something? You decide who may post here and who not?

Sure quark has been disappointing in the past considering what i thought it would be but I am hoping for better this time around. Why am I hoping that yes my motive is to make money and make profits. When you say i will never reveal my true intentions i don't see how I can be any more open. There is nothing wrong with putting effort in and making money if you don't get unfair advantage over others.


Hm you don't see how you could be more open... and meanwhile you ignore my question about your connection with baritus again Wink Maybe I ask in the wrong thread.

I am hopeful, only time will tell which of us will be correct. If it is you then no hard feelings. I just hold my bag of worthless quark tokens as a memory of my first BIG coin.

How sentimental, you almost make me cry  Roll Eyes



Not saying I can decide anything. Just saying personally i don't have any problem with it regardless of it being in my power to prevent you or not.

Baritus? ask your question clearly? I have mined every single coin on the last wave wdc, qrk, dgc, scr some of those are baritus coins. I agreed with bcx on that thread if you can research it that it looked very bad him getting hacked and all his coins dumped. Looked very shady.  I don't understand what you are getting at.

Most may think you were being sarcastic with your final remark. But i know that you probably mean it really.

Come on don't be this way. I understand qrk disappointed you and a lot of others including myself the first time around but there is no need to act in this fashion toward other honest miners who mined in fair manner. Or have you some other personal reason to be so hostile toward myself?

Since we are all here why not try to get along?

I take on board some of your points but so far you accuse me of.

1. having some more dark motive than profiteering from effort of research and mining fairly.
2. in league with some dev I have never even send a pm too baritus and my last comment to him was he should be focusing on dgc not scr because it had a larger community and more people would benefit from that returning. (i have a greater% of scr than dgc fyi)
3. never having tried to help quark in the past only interested in benefitting off of others work here. Again i say that is incorrect and have said why. I put lots of effort hours and hours trying to help push through quarkfx ideas previously, and some of my own.



what did i say to you

1. I understand you disappointment with quark
2. you seem an okay person.
3. I am personally glad you are here on this thread


i don't have any personal issue with you or what in general you are saying but you are incorrect in some of your assumptions.
member
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
the coin's price should be raise with the wallet upgrade Grin
hero member
Activity: 487
Merit: 500

{...}

If you guys sticking around this thread keep people from investing until there is proven tech here with quark that is fine by me and if you can stop what you suspect is a pump and dump in the making that is good. Please stick around I have no personal issues with either of you or what you have said really after reviewing it all.


Well, how kind of you...You own this thread or something? You decide who may post here and who not?

Sure quark has been disappointing in the past considering what i thought it would be but I am hoping for better this time around. Why am I hoping that yes my motive is to make money and make profits. When you say i will never reveal my true intentions i don't see how I can be any more open. There is nothing wrong with putting effort in and making money if you don't get unfair advantage over others.


Hm you don't see how you could be more open... and meanwhile you ignore my question about your connection with baritus again Wink Maybe I ask in the wrong thread.

I am hopeful, only time will tell which of us will be correct. If it is you then no hard feelings. I just hold my bag of worthless quark tokens as a memory of my first BIG coin.

How sentimental, you almost make me cry  Roll Eyes

full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
There's a QWARK coin out there which likely to steal our QUARK brand, as well as the Logo.

https://coinmarketcap.com/assets/qwark
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
@ Silvermetal. "Better to educate and point people to coins which have really potential instead of pump and dump coins with no future whatsoever".
  Come on then crypto genius, what coins are they then ?.

Lol, I already expected you would ask this question. I edited my post.

Thank god I can point you to another genius here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/cryptohunter-is-a-genius-1874679

He can help you further

Would he also have recommended badenglishtea to invest in Quark, I haven't seem him yet...  Roll Eyes

I have not advised anyone to invest in quark at this stage. I do not ever actually say for people to invest I say please research for yourselves then make up your own mind. I have actually had several persons tell me that following my suggestion they are actually now millionaires.

I am pleased for them and although I don't know if I am actually a milionaire perhaps I am at this stage even though they made a lot more than myself on my own tips that's cool for them. I am not so greedy as you say.

If people ask me about quark (which none have as yet actually) i will tell them await and see then go in when they are ready. If tech arrives then act as you consider it to be appropriate. Quark is a fantastic name and it does have a lot of fame in the crypto world. You can say negative fame if you want but even though not selling at peak was an obvious financial mistake I still like this project and the old community was the first one i really joined and got involved with. The first one you never really forget. I will willing hold my tokens until then end even if they have zero worth and should they reach 1000 dollars per token I would not sell them all. I am as much of a collector and profiteer.

I don't actually think you and thule are that bad after reading all your posts.

If you guys sticking around this thread keep people from investing until there is proven tech here with quark that is fine by me and if you can stop what you suspect is a pump and dump in the making that is good. Please stick around I have no personal issues with either of you or what you have said really after reviewing it all.

Sure quark has been disappointing in the past considering what i thought it would be but I am hoping for better this time around. Why am I hoping that yes my motive is to make money and make profits. When you say i will never reveal my true intentions i don't see how I can be any more open. There is nothing wrong with putting effort in and making money if you don't get unfair advantage over others.

I am hopeful, only time will tell which of us will be correct. If it is you then no hard feelings. I just hold my bag of worthless quark tokens as a memory of my first BIG coin.



hero member
Activity: 487
Merit: 500
@ Silvermetal. "Better to educate and point people to coins which have really potential instead of pump and dump coins with no future whatsoever".
  Come on then crypto genius, what coins are they then ?.

Lol, I already expected you would ask this question. I edited my post.

Thank god I can point you to another genius here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/cryptohunter-is-a-genius-1874679

He can help you further

Would he also have recommended badenglishtea to invest in Quark, I haven't seem him yet...  Roll Eyes
full member
Activity: 217
Merit: 109
 @ Silvermetal. "Better to educate and point people to coins which have really potential instead of pump and dump coins with no future whatsoever".
  Come on then crypto genius, what coins are they then ?.
hero member
Activity: 487
Merit: 500


I have no issue with the rest of your post .... your view is your own.

But this part is a lie

Quark had a very nice team with hard working people who believed in the potentials of Quark. I noticed you, but you didn't do anything. You were not on trello, not on reddit and you haven't donated one single Quark while you had bags full of it (you admit yourself). The only people who pledged their Quark were the hard working people, while the early miners like you were selling their Quark at exchanges for btc and dollars...and now you regret you had not sold more...shame on you! You should regret that you didn't pledge more to the projects. That's why I have my thoughts about your true intentions.

ERR this part is wrong. I gave 20k quark to a couple of projects actually. You have to trace me entire quark postings to find it. I am sure one of the old foundation members will be able to confirm it somewhere.


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6322221
the other 19K will be in the thread as well somewhere I guess. Ok not very accurate from me. I was not aware that donations were also done in this thread, I followed reddit more.

My true intentions? i just told you my intentions is the same as everyone else here. It is to make money. I'm not hiding that fact. If you tell me yours is any different then I will have to tell you to be more real with yourself.

HOWEVER i believe it is possible for us to create great projects and make money. You do not have to pump and dump on people and use sneaky insider knowledge and manipulation.

There is nothing wrong with wanting to make a profit. Those that say there is something wrong with it are simply either lying to you or to themselves.


I skip this part, as I am not interested in your true intentions (well, that's not completely true but I am aware that you will never be completely open to me). You may or may not tell the true here. That is for everybody to judge for themselves.

Also I must have contributed more on line time to the quark thread here suggesting things, thinking of roi projects trying to get the community together than anyone else. I would expect my word count on this thread is double anyone elses.

I dont give a shit about trello, slack all this hidden secret discussions. Everything and i mean everything should be discussed in the open on this thread for everyone to see. Had enough of alll the oh wait you didnt know because it was on trello, slack, some other hidden place.
This board is where all talk should be so everyone has access to the same information.


That is your opinion. A hidden place, as you call it, works as long as there is a good and integer communication line to the open. Sometimes it is not good to discuss premature projects in the open. It can give wrong expectations.


I care nothing about your opinion of me. Why should I. If i am happy with how I act and what I want then that is all i need. I don't require validation from strangers on the internet with faux moral codes about not wanting to make a profit for efforts given.


Very healthy of you! You are the one who have to face yourself in the mirror every day.

All the other coins you mention I was mining? that is every single coin that was practically released you realise? why would i not mine them? I'll mine what I want so long as I do it with no unfair advantage over anyone else. If you have issue with it that is your own problem.


Whatever you want, but don't whine if the coins are still not a success after 3-4 years. Or didn't provide you the btc/dollars you expected. Sometimes you have to take your losses instead of trying to revive worthless coins. Quark had its chance three years ago, but the creator and his team failed hard.
By the way, why did you need to tell "baritus" he was in the wrong thread? What is your connection with him anyway?


Anyway I never even heard of you before with regards to qrk so I very much doubt you put more effort in to it than myself.



Indeed I haven't and I will never do Wink I have some morale Smiley Better to educate and point people to coins which have really potential instead of pump and dump coins with no future whatsoever. And to be honest...At the moment I would not point people to one special coin, The alt coin scene is one big gamble and a wildwest. The big bagholders are able to manipulate the market.
full member
Activity: 217
Merit: 109
Hey people. Does QWARK has slack channel and github? Why nothing on their website?
QUARK info at website http://www.qrknet.info/
member
Activity: 229
Merit: 12
Hey people. Does QWARK has slack channel and github? Why nothing on their website?
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19279488

@cryptohunter , Why do you admit "not selling much Quark" is a mistake of yours?
Is there something more valuable than Quark Wink

Somebody who promotes Quark regrets he still owns Quark....for me the intentions would be clear..





Your point is lost on me. Any long term miner or holder of quark would not have the same view?? are you looking at the world in a different angle to those that employ logic and reason?

Probably yes (at least different than you). it is not logic, that you still hold your Quark after all you have experienced (Kolin, absence of dev, fall down of the foundation, dump of the bagholders, no development, the rise of more sophisticated / promising coins, and I can tell you 100 more reasons.....)


Of course it is a mistake. Why would not selling at 30,000 sats and now it is 300 sats not be a mistake? I mean i could have if i loved quark increased my position x100. Would anyone claim not selling something for x100 more is not a mistake? Let me hear any long term holder of quark say not selling at 30k sats now was not a mistake?


You have read it correct. Your mistake is not that you didn't sell on time, but that you mined the wrong coins. Why would you mine coins from developers you don't know/anonymous or are known scam developers in that time like Max and Hazard (eg DGC, SRC which you seem to want to revive as well.... and WDC).

Yes i held MOST of it but sold ENOUGH to become well off by my standards.


Good for you


However, I would like to see all the coins i have (over 150 ) become successful if they can. Why not.

Sigh. I thought I was naive.

Are you implying people have other intentions to see projects to become successful that they do NOT own? let's be serious. Show me some people who are fighting for projects here to succeed that do not hold those tokens. Why would they not support it by investing if they believed it offered something of use or they liked something about the developer or community.


Most coins created by Max are scammed by infamous scammers. For instance I met Kolin, Hilux and the UNO scammers. Not very nice people Wink

Although I can tell you quark is less than 1% of my crypto interests but I like the name and loved the old community that formed around it at one point. Hence the hint of why i did not sell my much of my quark because i like those people that were involved with it.

Same with doge I like the community and I still hold doge. Qrk was at one time 2nd only to doge in terms of community.

I mean there is never a reason to ask WHY someone wants to see a project succeed is there?

Quark had a very nice team with hard working people who believed in the potentials of Quark. I noticed you, but you didn't do anything. You were not on trello, not on reddit and you haven't donated one single Quark while you had bags full of it (you admit yourself). The only people who pledged their Quark were the hard working people, while the early miners like you were selling their Quark at exchanges for btc and dollars...and now you regret you had not sold more...shame on you! You should regret that you didn't pledge more to the projects. That's why I have my thoughts about your true intentions.

I am more interested in WHY people want to see it not succeed. I mean specifically see quark not succeed when every criticism i hear leveled at quark is applicable to many more coins in a far more serious manner?? that is actually a question that answer is not already a given is it not?

What is their motivation?  I mean even if they bought high and sold low it would have been hard for them to sell lower than it is right now. So if they are so worried about it making a comeback and missing out why not just buy back in cheap now. How can you lose? or is there some other reason?

I know DI wanted to destroy qrk at the end. So who are these accounts now that are so against it?


tjee....is there ever coming an end to this post.....

Are there projects better than quark right now you ask? Is that even a serious question? of course quark right now is below average because it was not well thought out in terms of emission schedule and it has had not updates (serious updates) in 3 years. It was at the time quite a revolutionary coin in some respects and was copied by many other coins due to the interesting random algos which for a long time made it asic proof and to this date i am not sure there are quark asics.

Check my post history. I am all over so many threads. My interests here are very varied. I would like to see the old quark foundation brought back but no DI. They tried and achieved some remarkable things and many were remarkable people.

What is your anti quark history?

Anti Quark history? You missed my post? for your convenience:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18814451
I see it more as to provide people some background information about Quark because you won't tell them Wink

As to quark we will wait and see. I would like to see the old foundation back and a larger development team start working on it. The name quark is excellent. It is strange because in my post history you will see i name a project atom years ago but I even prefer quark to that really.

I see on bittrex people are no longer happy with cloning quarks algo they now try to copy the name qwark lol.

Quark will never die in crypto it is a legend of coins.

You may speculate I want a return of quark purely for financial reasons. You would be right in part but I own far greater % of mintings than I do of quark and you will not see me sticking up for them as much as i have for quark. So that is food for thought for you.



Yes I made it  (to the end of this post) Grin


I have no issue with the rest of your post .... your view is your own.

But this part is a lie

Quark had a very nice team with hard working people who believed in the potentials of Quark. I noticed you, but you didn't do anything. You were not on trello, not on reddit and you haven't donated one single Quark while you had bags full of it (you admit yourself). The only people who pledged their Quark were the hard working people, while the early miners like you were selling their Quark at exchanges for btc and dollars...and now you regret you had not sold more...shame on you! You should regret that you didn't pledge more to the projects. That's why I have my thoughts about your true intentions.

ERR this part is wrong. I gave 20k quark to a couple of projects actually. You have to trace me entire quark postings to find it. I am sure one of the old foundation members will be able to confirm it somewhere.

My true intentions? i just told you my intentions is the same as everyone else here. It is to make money. I'm not hiding that fact. If you tell me yours is any different then I will have to tell you to be more real with yourself.

HOWEVER i believe it is possible for us to create great projects and make money. You do not have to pump and dump on people and use sneaky insider knowledge and manipulation.

There is nothing wrong with wanting to make a profit. Those that say there is something wrong with it are simply either lying to you or to themselves.

Also I must have contributed more on line time to the quark thread here suggesting things, thinking of roi projects trying to get the community together than anyone else. I would expect my word count on this thread is double anyone elses.

I dont give a shit about trello, slack all this hidden secret discussions. Everything and i mean everything should be discussed in the open on this thread for everyone to see. Had enough of alll the oh wait you didnt know because it was on trello, slack, some other hidden place.
This board is where all talk should be so everyone has access to the same information.

I care nothing about your opinion of me. Why should I. If i am happy with how I act and what I want then that is all i need. I don't require validation from strangers on the internet with faux moral codes about not wanting to make a profit for efforts given.

All the other coins you mention I was mining? that is every single coin that was practically released you realise? why would i not mine them? I'll mine what I want so long as I do it with no unfair advantage over anyone else. If you have issue with it that is your own problem.

Anyway I never even heard of you before with regards to qrk so I very much doubt you put more effort in to it than myself.

full member
Activity: 217
Merit: 109
you can instantly see its a pump going on Smiley


With your magic glasses?, we don't need you to 'save us'. Roll Eyes
Pages:
Jump to: