Eliovp, Wolf0, why you share bins, but not share kernel?
I don`t understand. Please, explain.
Topic: [ANN] sgminer v5 - optimized X11/X13/NeoScrypt/Lyra2RE/etc. kernel-switch miner - page 53. (Read 877859 times)
July 20, 2015, 02:55:38 PM
July 20, 2015, 12:55:15 PM
kachur's quark and qubit bins work only with his own modified sgminer.
His x11 bin works with git-compiled sgminer-master 5.1.1 (32bit, my own compile just for fun) without a problem.
His x11 bin works with git-compiled sgminer-master 5.1.1 (32bit, my own compile just for fun) without a problem.
July 20, 2015, 10:42:21 AM
I don't think so, no.
Is it ok for x11 on amd 7950?
Struggling to get anywhere near this speed for a 7950, and i'm using an 280X. How?
we get about that for a 280x also ...
#crysx
MSI R7950 TF3 is 6.25M steady. at 1050/1250
XFX 7950 is 5.75 at 950/1250
280Xes are 7 to 7.5 depending on brand/clocks
On Wolfs bins I only get 6.5Mhs for a 280X(1100/1500), so the bin you're using are definitely faster. Although the bins are Linux versions?
thats what i meant ...
we get that same speed using wolfs bins on gigabyte 280x / 7970 oc cards - with the same oc clocks ... any higher and the cards become unstable ...
and yes - they are under linux - fedora 19 x64 ... with compiled sgminer-dev 5.1.1-17-g6666 ...
this is why i would be interested to see how those 'other' bins work under linux - and how much of a hashrate increase ( if any ) in linux ...
#crysx
I'll check back here if you've tested, although my rig is set up in windows 7, so hopefully there can be some bin for that eventually.
The bins do work on windows 7. The same bins can work on linux or windows. Reference Wolf0's instructions here. https://www.reddit.com/r/DRKCoin/comments/2o1yoz/rewritten_x11_binaries/ There is no place where it says if you are under linux do this and if you are under windows do this..
From that link you would download wolf0's I8 bins and rename them to your system which may be is probably I4 or I8. Wolf0 used to make a 64bit version of sgminer for windows and I'm pretty sure those would produce I8 bins.
Wolf his bins work on both platforms. That's a fact.
I haven't tried the russian ones. I'm not going to because they're compiled on a windows system. And if there's anything else modded besided the .cl files, it won't work on your sgminer version.
Wolf his will work because there are no modifications done outside the .cl files.
Good point. iirc when I was following the russian thread I think the dev (kachur?) mentioned that he modified other files. I was only paying attention to quark at that time.
July 20, 2015, 10:36:19 AM
I don't think so, no.
Is it ok for x11 on amd 7950?
Struggling to get anywhere near this speed for a 7950, and i'm using an 280X. How?
we get about that for a 280x also ...
#crysx
MSI R7950 TF3 is 6.25M steady. at 1050/1250
XFX 7950 is 5.75 at 950/1250
280Xes are 7 to 7.5 depending on brand/clocks
On Wolfs bins I only get 6.5Mhs for a 280X(1100/1500), so the bin you're using are definitely faster. Although the bins are Linux versions?
thats what i meant ...
we get that same speed using wolfs bins on gigabyte 280x / 7970 oc cards - with the same oc clocks ... any higher and the cards become unstable ...
and yes - they are under linux - fedora 19 x64 ... with compiled sgminer-dev 5.1.1-17-g6666 ...
this is why i would be interested to see how those 'other' bins work under linux - and how much of a hashrate increase ( if any ) in linux ...
#crysx
I'll check back here if you've tested, although my rig is set up in windows 7, so hopefully there can be some bin for that eventually.
The bins do work on windows 7. The same bins can work on linux or windows. Reference Wolf0's instructions here. https://www.reddit.com/r/DRKCoin/comments/2o1yoz/rewritten_x11_binaries/ There is no place where it says if you are under linux do this and if you are under windows do this..
From that link you would download wolf0's I8 bins and rename them to your system which may be is probably I4 or I8. Wolf0 used to make a 64bit version of sgminer for windows and I'm pretty sure those would produce I8 bins.
Wolf his bins work on both platforms. That's a fact.
I haven't tried the russian ones. I'm not going to because they're compiled on a windows system. And if there's anything else modded besided the .cl files, it won't work on your sgminer version.
Wolf his will work because there are no modifications done outside the .cl files.
July 20, 2015, 10:31:42 AM
I don't think so, no.
Is it ok for x11 on amd 7950?
Struggling to get anywhere near this speed for a 7950, and i'm using an 280X. How?
we get about that for a 280x also ...
#crysx
MSI R7950 TF3 is 6.25M steady. at 1050/1250
XFX 7950 is 5.75 at 950/1250
280Xes are 7 to 7.5 depending on brand/clocks
On Wolfs bins I only get 6.5Mhs for a 280X(1100/1500), so the bin you're using are definitely faster. Although the bins are Linux versions?
thats what i meant ...
we get that same speed using wolfs bins on gigabyte 280x / 7970 oc cards - with the same oc clocks ... any higher and the cards become unstable ...
and yes - they are under linux - fedora 19 x64 ... with compiled sgminer-dev 5.1.1-17-g6666 ...
this is why i would be interested to see how those 'other' bins work under linux - and how much of a hashrate increase ( if any ) in linux ...
#crysx
I'll check back here if you've tested, although my rig is set up in windows 7, so hopefully there can be some bin for that eventually.
The bins do work on windows 7. The same bins can work on linux or windows. Reference Wolf0's instructions here. https://www.reddit.com/r/DRKCoin/comments/2o1yoz/rewritten_x11_binaries/ There is no place where it says if you are under linux do this and if you are under windows do this..
From that link you would download wolf0's I8 bins and rename them to your system which may be is probably I4. Wolf0 used to make a 64bit version of sgminer for windows and I'm pretty sure those would produce I8 bins.
July 20, 2015, 10:25:59 AM
For those with Fury cards, i have compiled a Fiji bin for X11 doing 11+Mhz,
post regarding this can be found here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11880191
Stock speed when compiling with the stock kernel is around 6.5 Mhz
When renaming the Hawaii binary from wolf you'll hit around 8.5 Mhz.
So this is a good improvement for now
link to bin.
http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=00265615109400492534
This is my own mod, not as fast as the russian one or Wolf his mod.
When compiling on a 290x i hit 7.7 Mhz, on wolf his binaries i hit 9.5 Mhz
But there aren't any Fiji binaries out there so that's why i'm sharing
Greetings
post regarding this can be found here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11880191
Stock speed when compiling with the stock kernel is around 6.5 Mhz
When renaming the Hawaii binary from wolf you'll hit around 8.5 Mhz.
So this is a good improvement for now
link to bin.
http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=00265615109400492534
This is my own mod, not as fast as the russian one or Wolf his mod.
When compiling on a 290x i hit 7.7 Mhz, on wolf his binaries i hit 9.5 Mhz
But there aren't any Fiji binaries out there so that's why i'm sharing
Greetings
July 20, 2015, 10:21:12 AM
coinmine.pl -30% hashrate on new bins
Also R9 290 get HW on 14.9 driver
Also R9 290 get HW on 14.9 driver
is that NEGATIVE 30% or dash (-)30%?
July 20, 2015, 10:18:18 AM
I don't think so, no.
Is it ok for x11 on amd 7950?
Struggling to get anywhere near this speed for a 7950, and i'm using an 280X. How?
we get about that for a 280x also ...
#crysx
MSI R7950 TF3 is 6.25M steady. at 1050/1250
XFX 7950 is 5.75 at 950/1250
280Xes are 7 to 7.5 depending on brand/clocks
On Wolfs bins I only get 6.5Mhs for a 280X(1100/1500), so the bin you're using are definitely faster. Although the bins are Linux versions?
thats what i meant ...
we get that same speed using wolfs bins on gigabyte 280x / 7970 oc cards - with the same oc clocks ... any higher and the cards become unstable ...
and yes - they are under linux - fedora 19 x64 ... with compiled sgminer-dev 5.1.1-17-g6666 ...
this is why i would be interested to see how those 'other' bins work under linux - and how much of a hashrate increase ( if any ) in linux ...
#crysx
I'll check back here if you've tested, although my rig is set up in windows 7, so hopefully there can be some bin for that eventually.
July 20, 2015, 09:26:01 AM
coinmine.pl -30% hashrate on new bins
Also R9 290 get HW on 14.9 driver
Also R9 290 get HW on 14.9 driver
July 20, 2015, 08:38:32 AM
Linux with 14.9 drivers - renaming worked
July 20, 2015, 08:29:59 AM
You need the latest drivers though.. I tried to rename a tahiti bin to hawaii with 14.6 rc3 and it didn't work.
But with the latest driver 15.6 (beta) it worked. I think AMD has added a fix so it will recompile the bin files to the correct architecture if wrong. but I am not sure..
But with the latest driver 15.6 (beta) it worked. I think AMD has added a fix so it will recompile the bin files to the correct architecture if wrong. but I am not sure..
July 20, 2015, 08:27:27 AM
I don't think so, no.
Is it ok for x11 on amd 7950?
Struggling to get anywhere near this speed for a 7950, and i'm using an 280X. How?
we get about that for a 280x also ...
#crysx
MSI R7950 TF3 is 6.25M steady. at 1050/1250
XFX 7950 is 5.75 at 950/1250
280Xes are 7 to 7.5 depending on brand/clocks
On Wolfs bins I only get 6.5Mhs for a 280X(1100/1500), so the bin you're using are definitely faster. Although the bins are Linux versions?
AFAIK it (might) matter if the bins are for x64 or x32. It shouldn't make difference for linux/win.
Also the sgminer version should be close enough (I guess). 5.1.1 should be alright.
I am not a coder and you shouldn't take what I wrote for granted. I've used my experience as a knowledge base.
July 20, 2015, 06:51:51 AM
I don't think so, no.
Is it ok for x11 on amd 7950?
Struggling to get anywhere near this speed for a 7950, and i'm using an 280X. How?
we get about that for a 280x also ...
#crysx
MSI R7950 TF3 is 6.25M steady. at 1050/1250
XFX 7950 is 5.75 at 950/1250
280Xes are 7 to 7.5 depending on brand/clocks
On Wolfs bins I only get 6.5Mhs for a 280X(1100/1500), so the bin you're using are definitely faster. Although the bins are Linux versions?
thats what i meant ...
we get that same speed using wolfs bins on gigabyte 280x / 7970 oc cards - with the same oc clocks ... any higher and the cards become unstable ...
and yes - they are under linux - fedora 19 x64 ... with compiled sgminer-dev 5.1.1-17-g6666 ...
this is why i would be interested to see how those 'other' bins work under linux - and how much of a hashrate increase ( if any ) in linux ...
#crysx
July 20, 2015, 05:49:46 AM
I don't think so, no.
Is it ok for x11 on amd 7950?
Struggling to get anywhere near this speed for a 7950, and i'm using an 280X. How?
we get about that for a 280x also ...
#crysx
MSI R7950 TF3 is 6.25M steady. at 1050/1250
XFX 7950 is 5.75 at 950/1250
280Xes are 7 to 7.5 depending on brand/clocks
On Wolfs bins I only get 6.5Mhs for a 280X(1100/1500), so the bin you're using are definitely faster. Although the bins are Linux versions?
July 20, 2015, 04:23:09 AM
here:
https://yadi.sk/d/cIOfdT7UghKAZ
Note that I haven't tried it myself. (not sure if it's safe)
This x11 bin is 1.6Mbyte big, while the wolf0 bin is around 0.920kb
https://yadi.sk/d/cIOfdT7UghKAZ
Note that I haven't tried it myself. (not sure if it's safe)
This x11 bin is 1.6Mbyte big, while the wolf0 bin is around 0.920kb
tanx sp ...
ill get to it tomorrow ...
ill run it on the test machine when i get into the office tomorrow - which is secured ...
tanx ...
#crysx
July 20, 2015, 04:11:30 AM
here:
https://yadi.sk/d/cIOfdT7UghKAZ
Note that I haven't tried it myself. (not sure if it's safe)
This x11 bin is 1.6Mbyte big, while the wolf0 bin is around 0.920kb
https://yadi.sk/d/cIOfdT7UghKAZ
Note that I haven't tried it myself. (not sure if it's safe)
This x11 bin is 1.6Mbyte big, while the wolf0 bin is around 0.920kb
July 20, 2015, 03:08:11 AM
wolf0's bins do work on 64 bit linux even though they are "l4".
i have wolfs bins run under x64 linux ... thats not the issue pallas ...
the issue is where i can get my hands on the x11 bins for the russian miner for linux ...
rednow has posted the bins that are slightly faster than wolfs ( apparently - by 10% or more ) but they are not working under linux with the current incarnation of the sgminer compile ...
any ideas? ...
i am not in the office either - wont be till tomorrow night ... so i cant test it out other than a vm here at home - which is not practical ...
#crysx
July 20, 2015, 02:28:41 AM
wolf0's bins do work on 64 bit linux even though they are "l4".
July 20, 2015, 02:02:23 AM
This x11 bins are from original "kachur" sgminer 5.1.1 package. When cryptomining-blog leaked this miner they only supplied with quark and qubit but miss x11 ... )))
im guessing no one has the linux version of the bins - do they? ...
they are the ones that would have the '8' notation to them ( darkcoin-modTahitigw64l4ku0.bin is windows - darkcoin-modTahitigw64l8ku0.bin is linux ) ...
if so - i would like to try them out also ...
#crysx
I don't think the 8 means they are for linux. I've been told this l4 for 32-bit, l8 for 64-bit I think you get the 8 if you compile a bin with a 64bit version of sgminer and a 4 with a 32bit version. I don't use linux but I don't think bins are platform specific. You should be able to rename the optimized bins with the names of the bins produced on your system regardless of 4 or 8.
that doesnt work ...
tried erlier - and they just refuse to work ( mine ) giving errors all over ...
i am pretty sure that the 8 denotes the linux versions ...
i would just like to test on the linux compiled sgminer with those bins - if anyone actually does have them of course ...
the 'standard' linux bins that get created are actually denoted by an 8 - i can see within the directory ...
not sure why they do this - but that seems to be the way to tell the difference between them ... the ones with a '4' - which seems to denote windows - does work at all in linux ...
so if anyone has a copy of the bins / miner for linux - we would be very appreciative if we could test it on the 280x cards ...
#crysx
The bins work just fine (I4) on 32 bit linux. I8 is the 64 bit one. If you have 64 bit linux I'm pretty sure I4 won't work.
yup - thats it then ...
tanx for clarifying that ...
it is 64bit linux ...
would you ( or anyone ) know where i can get my hands on the x64 ( I8 ) ones? ...
#crysx
July 20, 2015, 12:54:46 AM
This x11 bins are from original "kachur" sgminer 5.1.1 package. When cryptomining-blog leaked this miner they only supplied with quark and qubit but miss x11 ... )))
im guessing no one has the linux version of the bins - do they? ...
they are the ones that would have the '8' notation to them ( darkcoin-modTahitigw64l4ku0.bin is windows - darkcoin-modTahitigw64l8ku0.bin is linux ) ...
if so - i would like to try them out also ...
#crysx
I don't think the 8 means they are for linux. I've been told this l4 for 32-bit, l8 for 64-bit I think you get the 8 if you compile a bin with a 64bit version of sgminer and a 4 with a 32bit version. I don't use linux but I don't think bins are platform specific. You should be able to rename the optimized bins with the names of the bins produced on your system regardless of 4 or 8.
that doesnt work ...
tried erlier - and they just refuse to work ( mine ) giving errors all over ...
i am pretty sure that the 8 denotes the linux versions ...
i would just like to test on the linux compiled sgminer with those bins - if anyone actually does have them of course ...
the 'standard' linux bins that get created are actually denoted by an 8 - i can see within the directory ...
not sure why they do this - but that seems to be the way to tell the difference between them ... the ones with a '4' - which seems to denote windows - does work at all in linux ...
so if anyone has a copy of the bins / miner for linux - we would be very appreciative if we could test it on the 280x cards ...
#crysx
The bins work just fine (I4) on 32 bit linux. I8 is the 64 bit one. If you have 64 bit linux I'm pretty sure I4 won't work.
Jump to: