Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] Signatum 2.0 - page 41. (Read 102089 times)

full member
Activity: 308
Merit: 111
October 30, 2017, 08:34:23 AM
I vote for 1st option.
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
October 30, 2017, 08:14:32 AM
I can not vote, but I choose the first option
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 115
October 30, 2017, 08:09:34 AM
The max. supply is already decided to be about 150 million. Choosing 1:20 seems the obvious choice for existing holders.

However, there still needs to be a balanced reward to incentivize mining the new coin. Considering the reward scheme and block time have yet to be determined and are probably dependent on the path taken, the choice between 1:4 or 1:20 may turn out to be moot.

There is a trust issue with option 1. If holders send coins to a burn address, how can they be sure the swap and burn actually takes place? How can they be sure this is not a scheme to have holder send their coins to be sold by the recipient?

The arguments are that Signatum coins are almost worthless, there are barely buyers, there is no development. In other words what do you have to lose?

But then one could retort, why bother burning them?

We do not believe it is conscionable that some benefit at the expense of others when such significant information asymmetries exist.

There is also such a thing as due diligence.

It almost looks like a false dichotomy.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
October 30, 2017, 08:08:29 AM
First option please
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
October 30, 2017, 08:07:43 AM
1st option!
hero member
Activity: 2548
Merit: 769
October 30, 2017, 08:00:51 AM
both choices are bad. and after these choices looks likes we cann`t trust devs. add coins 1 v1 to 10 v2 or change 1v1 to 1 v2 may be right.
no one knows how good or bad will be v2.
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 261
October 30, 2017, 07:53:00 AM
what exchanges are planned for SIGT 2.0 ?
full member
Activity: 253
Merit: 100
SafeCoin-SAFE
October 30, 2017, 07:51:51 AM
POW Algo for new coin is good..  Grin Grin Back to mining .. And Option 1 for swap is great.. Burn that old SIGT coins.. !!!
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
October 30, 2017, 07:38:31 AM
The first option for the upcoming swap sounds better. I like the 1st one. Please vote for the swap.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
October 30, 2017, 07:34:21 AM
Please make sure, that everyone here can vote. If it is not possible here, switch to another online vote tool. It's unfair for people who not posting a lot here and just read. Maybe they are more active on other channels.
full member
Activity: 448
Merit: 170
October 30, 2017, 07:33:04 AM
i can't vote, but 1st option for me , swap and burn!
full member
Activity: 209
Merit: 100
Join Cashbery Coin!
October 30, 2017, 07:19:41 AM
Obviously the first option

Sigt V1 = no team working on it
Sigt V2 = team working hard with transparency

Pretty easy choice, not sure why people would want to retain a coin at 20:1 that is essentially dead when 4:1 is an option.

As more details about the re-brand and swap come out, V1 price will rebound a bit for people wanting in on the swap.

If things stay on track for Sigt V2 I believe it can be a very successful project.

P.S. On a side note, NovaExchange is closing until it's re-opened by a new owner.  Shouldn't really make a difference as most of the Sigt volume comes from YoBit.  Move your coins somewhere other than Nova just to be safe.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
October 30, 2017, 07:09:52 AM
1st option! Grin
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 261
October 30, 2017, 07:05:19 AM
1st option too
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
October 30, 2017, 07:03:33 AM
1st option!
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
October 30, 2017, 07:02:39 AM
+1 for 1st option!
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
October 30, 2017, 06:50:46 AM
1st option!
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
October 30, 2017, 06:46:11 AM
Yes, I also choose the 1st option.
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 261
October 30, 2017, 06:45:42 AM
woaw, very nice , 1 SIGT2.0  for 4 SIGT1.0 ... Is it a joke ??
sr. member
Activity: 426
Merit: 250
October 30, 2017, 06:43:22 AM
Pages:
Jump to: