Topic: [ANN] Signatum 2.0 - page 47. (Read 102049 times)
Will Signatum 2.0 be survived for a long time? Really hope that new developer team can help OldSignatum's owners get out of that mess which created by The Doc and SignatumD. Thanks
I don't understand how this coin cares for signatum owners. If the old owners won't be able to double dip, how can they be considered cared about?
The team has absolutely no obligation to even implement a swap.
And as of now, signatum 1.0 still has a 182 satoshi value to it, you can buy it, sell it, convert it to btc, eth whatever you want. So anyone without any prior signatum, can come now, and accumulate sigt at a very low price, at a fraction of what we believers and holders bought, and get the same 4:1 ratio conversion. This is no different than a premined coin sale, or an ICO.
It has been confirmed that ALL the original nodes (hard-coded into the wallet) are down. If the current team didn't add their own nodes, the chain would be dead right now, essentially. You couldn't even sync your wallet, let alone transfer funds to sell them. The definition of a dead coin.
It is unfortunate that the price is what it is, and as of yet we haven't seen many large buys. The overall sentiment on future outlook is still negative.
I fail to see any serious priority given to previous signatum owners. The only privilege we get is we don't have to open a new account at yobit to buy sigt for the swap, since we already have an account and sigts in our wallet.
What is the alternative? Let the chain die and everyone loses their entire investment? You are lamenting about things the community or the current devs had no control over. It is facetious, at best, to expect preferential treatment for being an 'old' holder. It is NOT fair, but there's nothing that could have been done differently.
The new sigt 2.0 dev team were also devs of 1.0. They have some form of responsibility for those who expected to see doc back, as it was stated officially that he would be back multiple times in the old discord. I know they were fooled aswell, but still, they do have and obviously feel some responsibility for it, as they state in their announcement for 2.0.
Given the amount of whining and incessant shrieking many in the community project to the team (which has been, may I remind you, paid $0 for their efforts thus far), it's a wonder they're doing this at all. They could just as easily have decided to drop the whole thing, and create a new coin, no swaps involved.
While this is a well thought-out and warm mutual feeling between us and them, they fail to prove that in their action. Because more CAN be done, let us keep 1.0. If you are true to your word, 1.0 has no chance to live while 2.0 exists, and maybe we can dump some of our 1.0's and make a little extra, a small gift for those who held for long.
Let me just repeat myself one more time, just to drive the point home.
This is a curated list of dead coins: http://deadcoins.com/
Dead coins have no value. They cannot be exchanged, transferred, traded in any meaningful way.
It's probably where sigt v1 might end up very soon. Why would you want to 'keep' your dead coins? Are you a hoarder?
You don't get to 'keep' anything. At that point it's dead as a parrot. To paraphrase the great Monty Python:
Quote
'E's not pinin'! 'E's passed on! This coin is no more! He has ceased to be! 'E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker! 'E's a stiff! Bereft of life, 'e rests in peace! If you hadn't nailed 'im to the perch 'e'd be pushing up the daisies! 'Is transactions processes are now 'istory! 'E's off the twig! 'E's kicked the bucket, 'e's shuffled off 'is mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin' choir invisible!! THIS IS AN EX-COIN!!
The ONLY ways you can get some value out of your dead coins is:
1. someone forks the chain
Why would they do that, though, when anyone can just start a new chain without whining and entitled holders feeling they have a right to decide everything about the direction of the project?
2. someone creates a new chain and allows you to swap
This is an act of pure altruism. Again, why give people free coins when you can just control the entire supply much easier starting from square 1? And no dealing with any holder BS?
It's not a wonder they are trying to implement this swap because they didn't get paid. Their names were on the dev list for a suspected scam coin. They might have incentive to clear their names of any doubt if attached.
Theoretically, could they keep the v1 nodes online and then let sigt v1 stay on yobit, then sell the acquired v1 during the swap for a gain? Not saying they might do it. I'm saying could they do it? Yes they could, if they were bad people.
I don't believe them to be scammers. I believe they tried to do their best with v1. But my opinion has no weight. Public must believe them. And for the public, and the trader who has no info about how blockchains might work, this swap might look suspicious after all.
To win back those who might be skeptical, wouldn't it be better for the devs to let people keep v1 during the swap, then kill the nodes. This would clear any doubt there might occur.
Whenever I bring this up, I'm told "if you don't like it, don't swap it."
So instead of clearing the doubts on this swap by letting people hold on to their worthless v1s, they choose to contend with criticism and "whining and incessant shrieking" from the community, as you put it. Why ?
And answering a question from the community by calling it offensive, unnecessary, whining, or saying "don't swap if you don't like it", instead of explaining what will be done with the acquired v1s, is inconsistent with the transparency principles promised on the v2 website.
One of the better posts ive seen from newbie account. You got some good points. But as the they are still working on the details we dont actually know if we will get to keep sigt V1. But they need to have control over the swap and one way to do that is if we send it in.
Id like to keep it, cause then i could sell it. But that would leave someone with a useless devless coin after i sold. So when we look at it like that it would be best if coins got burned.
At the same time, trust is not very high atm. So keeping the coins could be good for current holders. I will swap anyway as i want the coin with theese devs.
I don't understand how this coin cares for signatum owners. If the old owners won't be able to double dip, how can they be considered cared about?
The team has absolutely no obligation to even implement a swap.
And as of now, signatum 1.0 still has a 182 satoshi value to it, you can buy it, sell it, convert it to btc, eth whatever you want. So anyone without any prior signatum, can come now, and accumulate sigt at a very low price, at a fraction of what we believers and holders bought, and get the same 4:1 ratio conversion. This is no different than a premined coin sale, or an ICO.
It has been confirmed that ALL the original nodes (hard-coded into the wallet) are down. If the current team didn't add their own nodes, the chain would be dead right now, essentially. You couldn't even sync your wallet, let alone transfer funds to sell them. The definition of a dead coin.
It is unfortunate that the price is what it is, and as of yet we haven't seen many large buys. The overall sentiment on future outlook is still negative.
I fail to see any serious priority given to previous signatum owners. The only privilege we get is we don't have to open a new account at yobit to buy sigt for the swap, since we already have an account and sigts in our wallet.
What is the alternative? Let the chain die and everyone loses their entire investment? You are lamenting about things the community or the current devs had no control over. It is facetious, at best, to expect preferential treatment for being an 'old' holder. It is NOT fair, but there's nothing that could have been done differently.
The new sigt 2.0 dev team were also devs of 1.0. They have some form of responsibility for those who expected to see doc back, as it was stated officially that he would be back multiple times in the old discord. I know they were fooled aswell, but still, they do have and obviously feel some responsibility for it, as they state in their announcement for 2.0.
Given the amount of whining and incessant shrieking many in the community project to the team (which has been, may I remind you, paid $0 for their efforts thus far), it's a wonder they're doing this at all. They could just as easily have decided to drop the whole thing, and create a new coin, no swaps involved.
While this is a well thought-out and warm mutual feeling between us and them, they fail to prove that in their action. Because more CAN be done, let us keep 1.0. If you are true to your word, 1.0 has no chance to live while 2.0 exists, and maybe we can dump some of our 1.0's and make a little extra, a small gift for those who held for long.
Let me just repeat myself one more time, just to drive the point home.
This is a curated list of dead coins: http://deadcoins.com/
Dead coins have no value. They cannot be exchanged, transferred, traded in any meaningful way.
It's probably where sigt v1 might end up very soon. Why would you want to 'keep' your dead coins? Are you a hoarder?
You don't get to 'keep' anything. At that point it's dead as a parrot. To paraphrase the great Monty Python:
Quote
'E's not pinin'! 'E's passed on! This coin is no more! He has ceased to be! 'E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker! 'E's a stiff! Bereft of life, 'e rests in peace! If you hadn't nailed 'im to the perch 'e'd be pushing up the daisies! 'Is transactions processes are now 'istory! 'E's off the twig! 'E's kicked the bucket, 'e's shuffled off 'is mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin' choir invisible!! THIS IS AN EX-COIN!!
The ONLY ways you can get some value out of your dead coins is:
1. someone forks the chain
Why would they do that, though, when anyone can just start a new chain without whining and entitled holders feeling they have a right to decide everything about the direction of the project?
2. someone creates a new chain and allows you to swap
This is an act of pure altruism. Again, why give people free coins when you can just control the entire supply much easier starting from square 1? And no dealing with any holder BS?
It's not a wonder they are trying to implement this swap because they didn't get paid. Their names were on the dev list for a suspected scam coin. They might have incentive to clear their names of any doubt if attached.
Theoretically, could they keep the v1 nodes online and then let sigt v1 stay on yobit, then sell the acquired v1 during the swap for a gain? Not saying they might do it. I'm saying could they do it? Yes they could, if they were bad people.
I don't believe them to be scammers. I believe they tried to do their best with v1. But my opinion has no weight. Public must believe them. And for the public, and the trader who has no info about how blockchains might work, this swap might look suspicious after all.
To win back those who might be skeptical, wouldn't it be better for the devs to let people keep v1 during the swap, then kill the nodes. This would clear any doubt there might occur.
Whenever I bring this up, I'm told "if you don't like it, don't swap it."
So instead of clearing the doubts on this swap by letting people hold on to their worthless v1s, they choose to contend with criticism and "whining and incessant shrieking" from the community, as you put it. Why ?
And answering a question from the community by calling it offensive, unnecessary, whining, or saying "don't swap if you don't like it", instead of explaining what will be done with the acquired v1s, is inconsistent with the transparency principles promised on the v2 website.
I don't understand how this coin cares for signatum owners. If the old owners won't be able to double dip, how can they be considered cared about?
The team has absolutely no obligation to even implement a swap.
And as of now, signatum 1.0 still has a 182 satoshi value to it, you can buy it, sell it, convert it to btc, eth whatever you want. So anyone without any prior signatum, can come now, and accumulate sigt at a very low price, at a fraction of what we believers and holders bought, and get the same 4:1 ratio conversion. This is no different than a premined coin sale, or an ICO.
It has been confirmed that ALL the original nodes (hard-coded into the wallet) are down. If the current team didn't add their own nodes, the chain would be dead right now, essentially. You couldn't even sync your wallet, let alone transfer funds to sell them. The definition of a dead coin.
It is unfortunate that the price is what it is, and as of yet we haven't seen many large buys. The overall sentiment on future outlook is still negative.
I fail to see any serious priority given to previous signatum owners. The only privilege we get is we don't have to open a new account at yobit to buy sigt for the swap, since we already have an account and sigts in our wallet.
What is the alternative? Let the chain die and everyone loses their entire investment? You are lamenting about things the community or the current devs had no control over. It is facetious, at best, to expect preferential treatment for being an 'old' holder. It is NOT fair, but there's nothing that could have been done differently.
The new sigt 2.0 dev team were also devs of 1.0. They have some form of responsibility for those who expected to see doc back, as it was stated officially that he would be back multiple times in the old discord. I know they were fooled aswell, but still, they do have and obviously feel some responsibility for it, as they state in their announcement for 2.0.
Given the amount of whining and incessant shrieking many in the community project to the team (which has been, may I remind you, paid $0 for their efforts thus far), it's a wonder they're doing this at all. They could just as easily have decided to drop the whole thing, and create a new coin, no swaps involved.
While this is a well thought-out and warm mutual feeling between us and them, they fail to prove that in their action. Because more CAN be done, let us keep 1.0. If you are true to your word, 1.0 has no chance to live while 2.0 exists, and maybe we can dump some of our 1.0's and make a little extra, a small gift for those who held for long.
Let me just repeat myself one more time, just to drive the point home.
This is a curated list of dead coins: http://deadcoins.com/
Dead coins have no value. They cannot be exchanged, transferred, traded in any meaningful way.
It's probably where sigt v1 might end up very soon. Why would you want to 'keep' your dead coins? Are you a hoarder?
You don't get to 'keep' anything. At that point it's dead as a parrot. To paraphrase the great Monty Python:
Quote
'E's not pinin'! 'E's passed on! This coin is no more! He has ceased to be! 'E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker! 'E's a stiff! Bereft of life, 'e rests in peace! If you hadn't nailed 'im to the perch 'e'd be pushing up the daisies! 'Is transactions processes are now 'istory! 'E's off the twig! 'E's kicked the bucket, 'e's shuffled off 'is mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin' choir invisible!! THIS IS AN EX-COIN!!
The ONLY ways you can get some value out of your dead coins is:
1. someone forks the chain
Why would they do that, though, when anyone can just start a new chain without whining and entitled holders feeling they have a right to decide everything about the direction of the project?
2. someone creates a new chain and allows you to swap
This is an act of pure altruism. Again, why give people free coins when you can just control the entire supply much easier starting from square 1? And no dealing with any holder BS?
Any chance to swap old signatum coins to new signatum 2.0?
That will be the process of swapping.Not mandatory but suggested I guess. Unless you believe SIGT 1.0 will have value. When it is ready. Will be announced.
when this swap will be handled exactly? and on what exchange? cryptopia or novaexchange?
go to discord and ask the devs, but around 29 nov
that has been said
Is it okay here?
I download Wallet, but I can not synchronize.
Can I create a conf file? Where can I learn about nodes?
I download Wallet, but I can not synchronize.
Can I create a conf file? Where can I learn about nodes?
go to signatum.org and read the news the wallet is not syncing because the signatum 1.0 developer
is gone.
addnode=104.197.159.83
addnode=104.197.145.21
addnode=104.197.80.61
addnode=146.148.55.27
addnode=162.222.176.74
addnode=104.154.95.6
addnode=104.154.94.55
addnode=104.154.76.142
addnode=104.211.186.5
addnode=52.172.209.58
addnode=52.174.102.46
addnode=52.187.13.149
addnode=54.175.225.242
addnode=122.129.64.13
addnode=122.129.64.14
addnode=122.129.64.15
addnode=122.129.64.16
addnode=203.128.6.219
addnode=104.154.193.236
addnode=104.198.232.113
addnode=104.199.11.56
addnode=130.211.127.202
addnode=35.184.49.142
addnode=35.189.14.132
addnode=35.185.18.85
addnode=35.184.121.184
addnode=45.77.51.253
addnode=45.32.102.240
addnode=35.184.49.142
addnode=35.189.14.132
addnode=35.185.18.85
addnode=35.184.121.184
addnode=45.32.102.240
addnode=45.77.51.253
addnode=52.172.209.58
addnode=52.174.102.46
addnode=52.187.13.149
addnode=54.175.225.242
addnode=104.154.94.55
addnode=104.154.95.6
addnode=104.154.76.142
addnode=104.154.193.236
addnode=104.197.80.61
addnode=104.197.159.83
addnode=104.197.145.21
addnode=104.198.232.113
addnode=104.199.11.56
addnode=104.211.186.5
addnode=122.129.64.13
addnode=122.129.64.14
addnode=122.129.64.15
addnode=122.129.64.16
addnode=130.211.127.202
addnode=146.148.55.27
addnode=162.222.176.74
addnode=203.128.6.219
addnode=45.76.92.227
could someone add details here? what filename? where to put that file? which wallet to use now? i am using right now v1.0.0.0-g32a928e which seems to work. but that one downloaded from here https://signatum.org/download/original-qt-wallet/ does not sync.
OK - i did following. i copied roaming signatum folder to another computer. launched v1.0.0.0-g32a928e downloaded from https://signatum.org/download/original-qt-wallet/ (tho versions are same - design is not). and it seems it works.
there are both wallets side by side
https://www.dropbox.com/s/qt4tdz91hmjxw64/signatum-wallets.jpg?dl=0
create "signatum.conf" file in notepad, with node list in it and put into data folder (where is file wallet.dat)
Any chance to swap old signatum coins to new signatum 2.0?
That will be the process of swapping.Not mandatory but suggested I guess. Unless you believe SIGT 1.0 will have value. When it is ready. Will be announced.
when this swap will be handled exactly? and on what exchange? cryptopia or novaexchange?
Any chance to swap old signatum coins to new signatum 2.0?
That will be the process of swapping.Not mandatory but suggested I guess. Unless you believe SIGT 1.0 will have value. When it is ready. Will be announced.
Is it okay here?
I download Wallet, but I can not synchronize.
Can I create a conf file? Where can I learn about nodes?
I download Wallet, but I can not synchronize.
Can I create a conf file? Where can I learn about nodes?
go to signatum.org and read the news the wallet is not syncing because the signatum 1.0 developer
is gone.
addnode=104.197.159.83
addnode=104.197.145.21
addnode=104.197.80.61
addnode=146.148.55.27
addnode=162.222.176.74
addnode=104.154.95.6
addnode=104.154.94.55
addnode=104.154.76.142
addnode=104.211.186.5
addnode=52.172.209.58
addnode=52.174.102.46
addnode=52.187.13.149
addnode=54.175.225.242
addnode=122.129.64.13
addnode=122.129.64.14
addnode=122.129.64.15
addnode=122.129.64.16
addnode=203.128.6.219
addnode=104.154.193.236
addnode=104.198.232.113
addnode=104.199.11.56
addnode=130.211.127.202
addnode=35.184.49.142
addnode=35.189.14.132
addnode=35.185.18.85
addnode=35.184.121.184
addnode=45.77.51.253
addnode=45.32.102.240
addnode=35.184.49.142
addnode=35.189.14.132
addnode=35.185.18.85
addnode=35.184.121.184
addnode=45.32.102.240
addnode=45.77.51.253
addnode=52.172.209.58
addnode=52.174.102.46
addnode=52.187.13.149
addnode=54.175.225.242
addnode=104.154.94.55
addnode=104.154.95.6
addnode=104.154.76.142
addnode=104.154.193.236
addnode=104.197.80.61
addnode=104.197.159.83
addnode=104.197.145.21
addnode=104.198.232.113
addnode=104.199.11.56
addnode=104.211.186.5
addnode=122.129.64.13
addnode=122.129.64.14
addnode=122.129.64.15
addnode=122.129.64.16
addnode=130.211.127.202
addnode=146.148.55.27
addnode=162.222.176.74
addnode=203.128.6.219
addnode=45.76.92.227
could someone add details here? what filename? where to put that file? which wallet to use now? i am using right now v1.0.0.0-g32a928e which seems to work. but that one downloaded from here https://signatum.org/download/original-qt-wallet/ does not sync.
OK - i did following. i copied roaming signatum folder to another computer. launched v1.0.0.0-g32a928e downloaded from https://signatum.org/download/original-qt-wallet/ (tho versions are same - design is not). and it seems it works.
there are both wallets side by side
https://www.dropbox.com/s/qt4tdz91hmjxw64/signatum-wallets.jpg?dl=0
Any chance to swap old signatum coins to new signatum 2.0?
how to swop it ?
o Boy, there is just too much Drama around sigt,
this seems like a never ending Story.. ive had a good read on the Website,
thanks for all the Information, sadly its all Drama and no Innovation.
lets look into the future.. im ready to swap
this seems like a never ending Story.. ive had a good read on the Website,
thanks for all the Information, sadly its all Drama and no Innovation.
lets look into the future.. im ready to swap
however if there is an Bitcoin Fork every Bitcoin holder gets coins for free and there is no swap 
I have a very simple question, I'd like to know what the community has to say about this.
Wouldn't it be a sign of good intentions on devs' part just to let people keep their original signatums during the swap process?
(btw Please don't tell me to wait for the swap announcement, there is no point in arguing the swap after things are already set in stone. )
I hope my question is not judged unnecessary, hostile, fud etc.
Imo it is not an unncessary or hostile or whatever question...Wouldn't it be a sign of good intentions on devs' part just to let people keep their original signatums during the swap process?
(btw Please don't tell me to wait for the swap announcement, there is no point in arguing the swap after things are already set in stone. )
I hope my question is not judged unnecessary, hostile, fud etc.
I'm pretty sure it can be discussed.
But the question is : what will be the point to keep a useless dead currency ? Let people buy a dead coin just to let you dump and limit your loss ?
It is pretty clear that the original devs have abandoned the coin. If nobody has access to the core, I don't see any benefit to keep the chain alive.
If anyone can prove doc and gab have plans to develop the coin in the future, so yes, you should be able to keep your coins. But obviously it is not the case.
Better finish with all the drama and shit and make a new clean start. It will not be signatum, it sounds more like a new coin to me (different algo, PoW, masternode, different supply and goals...), but a new coin that care about signatum holders. I am fine with it.
I don't understand how this coin cares for signatum owners. If the old owners won't be able to double dip, how can they be considered cared about?
And as of now, signatum 1.0 still has a 182 satoshi value to it, you can buy it, sell it, convert it to btc, eth whatever you want. So anyone without any prior signatum, can come now, and accumulate sigt at a very low price, at a fraction of what we believers and holders bought, and get the same 4:1 ratio conversion. This is no different than a premined coin sale, or an ICO.
I fail to see any serious priority given to previous signatum owners. The only privilege we get is we don't have to open a new account at yobit to buy sigt for the swap, since we already have an account and sigts in our wallet.
The new sigt 2.0 dev team were also devs of 1.0. They have some form of responsibility for those who expected to see doc back, as it was stated officially that he would be back multiple times in the old discord. I know they were fooled aswell, but still, they do have and obviously feel some responsibility for it, as they state in their announcement for 2.0.
While this is a well thought-out and warm mutual feeling between us and them, they fail to prove that in their action. Because more CAN be done, let us keep 1.0. If you are true to your word, 1.0 has no chance to live while 2.0 exists, and maybe we can dump some of our 1.0's and make a little extra, a small gift for those who held for long.
And as an added extra, this is a very powerful proof that the devs of 2.0 are in for the long haul.
I have been blocked in the discord channel for these very same views. Let's see what happens here.
I have a very simple question, I'd like to know what the community has to say about this.
Wouldn't it be a sign of good intentions on devs' part just to let people keep their original signatums during the swap process?
(btw Please don't tell me to wait for the swap announcement, there is no point in arguing the swap after things are already set in stone. )
I hope my question is not judged unnecessary, hostile, fud etc.
Imo it is not an unncessary or hostile or whatever question...Wouldn't it be a sign of good intentions on devs' part just to let people keep their original signatums during the swap process?
(btw Please don't tell me to wait for the swap announcement, there is no point in arguing the swap after things are already set in stone. )
I hope my question is not judged unnecessary, hostile, fud etc.
I'm pretty sure it can be discussed.
But the question is : what will be the point to keep a useless dead currency ? Let ignorant people buy a dead coin just to let you dump and limit your loss ?
It is pretty clear that the original devs have abandoned the coin. If nobody has access to the core, I don't see any benefit to keep the chain alive.
If anyone can prove doc and gab have plans to develop the coin in the future, so yes, you should be able to keep your coins. But obviously it is not the case.
Better finish with all the drama and shit and make a clean new start. It will not be signatum, it sounds more like a new coin to me (different algo, PoW, masternode, different supply and goals...), but a new coin that cares about signatum holders. I am fine with it.
I have a very simple question, I'd like to know what the community has to say about this.
Wouldn't it be a sign of good intentions on devs' part just to let people keep their original signatums during the swap process?
(btw Please don't tell me to wait for the swap announcement, there is no point in arguing the swap after things are already set in stone. )
I hope my question is not judged unnecessary, hostile, fud etc.
Wouldn't it be a sign of good intentions on devs' part just to let people keep their original signatums during the swap process?
(btw Please don't tell me to wait for the swap announcement, there is no point in arguing the swap after things are already set in stone. )
I hope my question is not judged unnecessary, hostile, fud etc.
Stop spamming with swap, it will be available sometime at the end of november. Try reading first people.
Hi there! Any chance to swap old signatum coins to new signatum 2.0?
SIGNATUM 2.0
Is
A decentralised, open source, community driven digital currency, focusing on e-commerce utility.
A decentralised, open source, community driven digital currency, focusing on e-commerce utility.
THIS IS YOUR SIGNATUM 2.0
E-commerce
Global e-commerce sales are projected to reach $2.2 trillion for 2017 and to increase two-fold by 2021 to $4.4 trillion. Signatum 2.0 seeks to position itself as a competitive altcoin for e-commerce application. This will be achieved through developing and implementing relevant technology that facilitates e-commerce transactions as smoothly as possible. We will always strive to create partnerships and increase real-world utilisation.
Open Source
Signatum is open source. Anyone is free to contribute to Signatum 2.0’s development and make a pull request through Github. Further details making community contributions as smooth as possible, will become available in the future on the new website.
Decentralized Ownership
Ownership and access rights are decentralized. This ensures that the long-term application and longevity is not dependent on a single individual anylonger. This safeguards not only Signatum 2.0’s future, but also your investment and partnerships.
Community Oriented
One of Signatum 2.0 core values is being community oriented. Rest assured knowing that the Signatum 2.0 foundation team will always strive to collect feedback and suggestions from the community and evaluate the input.
With the upcoming SignatumVote you will be able to not only propose ideas publicly to all Signatum 2.0 holders but also vote on what needs developing or prioritising next. Look out for SignatumVote on the Roadmap.
Speed & Privacy
Speed and privacy are core concerns for users today as well as e-commerce businesses. To ensure that Signatum is as effective as possible for e-commerce application, Signatum will maintain a high focus on increasing anonymity and most important on increasing speed of transactions - to always be at the forefront.
Global e-commerce sales are projected to reach $2.2 trillion for 2017 and to increase two-fold by 2021 to $4.4 trillion. Signatum 2.0 seeks to position itself as a competitive altcoin for e-commerce application. This will be achieved through developing and implementing relevant technology that facilitates e-commerce transactions as smoothly as possible. We will always strive to create partnerships and increase real-world utilisation.
Open Source
Signatum is open source. Anyone is free to contribute to Signatum 2.0’s development and make a pull request through Github. Further details making community contributions as smooth as possible, will become available in the future on the new website.
Decentralized Ownership
Ownership and access rights are decentralized. This ensures that the long-term application and longevity is not dependent on a single individual anylonger. This safeguards not only Signatum 2.0’s future, but also your investment and partnerships.
Community Oriented
One of Signatum 2.0 core values is being community oriented. Rest assured knowing that the Signatum 2.0 foundation team will always strive to collect feedback and suggestions from the community and evaluate the input.
With the upcoming SignatumVote you will be able to not only propose ideas publicly to all Signatum 2.0 holders but also vote on what needs developing or prioritising next. Look out for SignatumVote on the Roadmap.
Speed & Privacy
Speed and privacy are core concerns for users today as well as e-commerce businesses. To ensure that Signatum is as effective as possible for e-commerce application, Signatum will maintain a high focus on increasing anonymity and most important on increasing speed of transactions - to always be at the forefront.
Signatum 2.0 Foundation Team
Squbs - Developer
Cryptovore - Business Development & Marketing
SonnysDaytona - Developer
Eikcam - Developer
Eskodhi - Developer
Ned Stark - Web Developer
John Smith - Public Relations Manager
Kasper - Community Manager & Developer
Squbs - Developer
Cryptovore - Business Development & Marketing
SonnysDaytona - Developer
Eikcam - Developer
Eskodhi - Developer
Ned Stark - Web Developer
John Smith - Public Relations Manager
Kasper - Community Manager & Developer
We advocate an internal flat hierarchy in order to ensure that everyone’s contribution and feedback are valued equally. We always strive to ensure that everyone has a word in the direction and get to vote and voice their opinion on suggestions. Nobody’s voice is ignored.
Exchanges
https://yobit.net/en/trade/SIGT/BTC
https://novaexchange.com/market/BTC_SIGT/
Wallet Downloads
Windows Wallet: https://signatum.org/download/original-qt-wallet/
OSX Wallet: https://signatum.io/Signatum-Qt.dmg
Mac Wallet: https://github.com/signatumd/releases/blob/master/signatum-qt
Official Links
Official Website: http://signatum.org/
Discord: https://discord.gg/PM9j5XQ
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/FytCFUKnIJ0XCyK6Jp5XMA
Twitter: https://twitter.com/SigtOfficial
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SignatumPay
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Signatum/
Coin Features
- Name: Signatum
- Symbol: SIGT
- Algorithm Skunk
- Total Supply: 137,500,000
- PoS Reward: 5% p/a (per annum)
- PoW Period: 16th July to 29th September 2017 (COMPLETED)
- Block Time: ~64 seconds
Well, new thread...
I wiah you good luck, maybe I'll getsomething more than useless bytes on disk this time :-)
This is beyond me. never speak evil of signatum
but I lost 80% of my investment
Buy signatum for more than 3k satoshis and sell it at 300 satohis
This was my experience.
but I lost 80% of my investment
Buy signatum for more than 3k satoshis and sell it at 300 satohis
This was my experience.
Jump to: