Author

Topic: [ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine - page 255. (Read 823878 times)

full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
Just been pointed towards this coin, cannot believe I did not hear about this sooner, running on NVIDA. Also, read the road map, some exciting things ahead, star in a sea of shit.

 Cheesy Cheesy star in a sea of shit, i like that, there are many things to come with this coin, it is refreshing to see a newbie not here to FUD, good luck with mining.
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Just been pointed towards this coin, cannot believe I did not hear about this sooner, running on NVIDA. Also, read the road map, some exciting things ahead, star in a sea of shit.
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
Last 15 pages of this thread is like a guided tour in a museum of amateurism. Unbelievable, how many mentally-challenged individuals whattomine has attracted. Manipulating this crowd will be a cakewalk for veteran pumpers. With sell orders set at three different price points this will be the easiest dump ever. I will just sit back, relax & profit  Cool

By the way, any idea when can we expect the next halving? It would be nice to have a single piece of useful information in this sea of spam.


It's not exactly rocket surgery to estimate when it gets to 60K.

Since you are such a wise and seasoned pro at this, I am a bit shocked that you would posit your query to such a rambling bunch of amateurs.

Maybe I just wanted to redirect this thread to a slightly more constructive topic. Pardon my boldness  Wink I am saving my pumping shoes for laters...  Grin
full member
Activity: 254
Merit: 110
Last 15 pages of this thread is like a guided tour in a museum of amateurism. Unbelievable, how many mentally-challenged individuals whattomine has attracted. Manipulating this crowd will be a cakewalk for veteran pumpers. With sell orders set at three different price points this will be the easiest dump ever. I will just sit back, relax & profit  Cool

By the way, any idea when can we expect the next halving? It would be nice to have a single piece of useful information in this sea of spam.


It's not exactly rocket surgery to estimate when it gets to 60K.

Since you are such a wise and seasoned pro at this, I am a bit shocked that you would posit your query to such a rambling bunch of amateurs.
newbie
Activity: 71
Merit: 0
Well it looks as if I'll need to switch to mining a different coin if the hashrate stays where it's at or increases.  Better off mining ETH or ZEC and playing the volatility of this coin if anybody wants to make anything from SIGT at the moment.
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 2691
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Today, after a long time, I turned on Wallet but has no connection. Addnode has all the ones listed at the beginning. As I see many, they have a similar problem. What about that ?  Sad


My walllet synced in less than one minute with no issue.



Mine is working without problems as well. I turn it on every few days and 10-20 minutes later all synced and redy to use.
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
Today, after a long time, I turned on Wallet but has no connection. Addnode has all the ones listed at the beginning. As I see many, they have a similar problem. What about that ?  Sad


My walllet synced in less than one minute with no issue.

newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
Next halving at block 60000.  At 43600+ now
member
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
By the way, any idea when can we expect the next halving? It would be nice to have a single piece of useful information in this sea of spam.

My quess 2-3 weeks. Closer to 2 weeks but I hope 3 weeks so my upcoming batch of 1080 Ti's would have some time to mine before the halving. Smiley
full member
Activity: 448
Merit: 170
Today, after a long time, I turned on Wallet but has no connection. Addnode has all the ones listed at the beginning. As I see many, they have a similar problem. What about that ?  Sad

i cant find the cfg file to add nodes, where is it?

clean install i have only 1 connection but can't sync
full member
Activity: 644
Merit: 100
Today, after a long time, I turned on Wallet but has no connection. Addnode has all the ones listed at the beginning. As I see many, they have a similar problem. What about that ?  Sad
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
I heard some community members where testing the beta marketplace, any information on how it is so far, I am intrigued, or is info not allowed to be disclosed at this time?
member
Activity: 120
Merit: 10
My Windows wallet have only one connection and even that is dropping. Can't get syncronized. My Internet connection is OK.

Code:
socket recv flood control disconnect (5018124 bytes)
socket recv error 10054
socket recv error 10054
socket recv error 10054
socket recv error 10054
socket recv error 10054
socket recv error 10054
socket recv error 10054
socket recv error 10054
socket recv error 10054
socket recv error 10054
socket recv error 10054
socket recv error 10054
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
need yours help !!
I have 2 rigs, the problem is when I connect the 2 rigs to the same pool (mn pool or yip pool) I'm get reported hash rate equal to hath of every single rig.
if I connect them in separate pools everything work perfect.
for the numerical example: each rig provide 110 mh/s
2 rigs on yiimp=110 mh/s
2 rigs on mn pool=110 mh/s
1 rig on yiimp & 1 rig on mn pool=220 mh/s
help me solve it I want they will both work on the same pool-and yes I'm mn pool I have 2 workers (I'm not trying to operate them on the same worker)
thanks ahead guys and sorry for the long.
how a noob u are Grin

0.2 btc and i give u the solution,do we have a deal?
sounds sweet-send me your btc address!!
full member
Activity: 435
Merit: 125
need yours help !!
I have 2 rigs, the problem is when I connect the 2 rigs to the same pool (mn pool or yip pool) I'm get reported hash rate equal to hath of every single rig.
if I connect them in separate pools everything work perfect.
for the numerical example: each rig provide 110 mh/s
2 rigs on yiimp=110 mh/s
2 rigs on mn pool=110 mh/s
1 rig on yiimp & 1 rig on mn pool=220 mh/s
help me solve it I want they will both work on the same pool-and yes I'm mn pool I have 2 workers (I'm not trying to operate them on the same worker)
thanks ahead guys and sorry for the long.
how a noob u are Grin

0.2 btc and i give u the solution,do we have a deal?
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 101
Estimated.Pro - Crypto Signals. Free.
greedy whales are just waiting the price to hit above 4k then dump, price will be in the bottom again.
Haha nono greedy whales are waiting for crash to 800 satoshi to buy
1000 would be good price too maybe
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
need yours help !!
I have 2 rigs, the problem is when I connect the 2 rigs to the same pool (mn pool or yip pool) I'm get reported hash rate equal to hath of every single rig.
if I connect them in separate pools everything work perfect.
for the numerical example: each rig provide 110 mh/s
2 rigs on yiimp=110 mh/s
2 rigs on mn pool=110 mh/s
1 rig on yiimp & 1 rig on mn pool=220 mh/s
help me solve it I want they will both work on the same pool-and yes I'm mn pool I have 2 workers (I'm not trying to operate them on the same worker)
thanks ahead guys and sorry for the long.

this sounds like you are connecting 2 miners as the same worker (not sure if it's possible, never tried...)...
Do you have a worker setup for each rig on the pools your trying and setting your configs different so they each connect?

I'm have 2 workers in MN pool.and its not working correctly maybe its relative to they both use the same port.
in yip I didn't try 2 workers name cause I don't know how to do this, maybe I can add it somewhere in the bat file.
thanks for the help mate.

I am not using the same pool as you, but you might need to create your worker's accounts at your pool when you log in.  Different pools do things differently.  If you did NOT make a worker for your account then you might be working under a default name.  What will happen then is each time your rig reports hashrate your pool sees 'default worker = 110' then the second rig reports 'default worker = 110'.  If you named your workers AND had your .bat files set up properly, then your pool sees 'worker one = 110' then 'worker two = 110' and the pool then adds them up since they are from different workers.  

You are likely STILL being credited for shares since shares have a unique identity.  Still best to sort it out properly.

I can help out if you want - what pool are you wanting to consolidate both rigs on?
first of all thank you for the elaborate answer,i would like to work on the yiimp pool and as you say in yip I see 2 same identical users which are the name of the miner (ccminer/alexis-1.1_p) I try to add a worker name by edit the .bat file that after my wallet address I add /name.
it didn't work I wasn't able to connect the pool like this.

I just went to your pool's site and they did not seem to give any instructions or even mention worker names in their setup guide.  Not sure where to go with that unless you are willing to try another pool.  I am using suprnova and am also testing at CWI. 

would be interested to hear of your results at CWI Jimbo  Wink
full member
Activity: 243
Merit: 100
Did palgin fix the new ccminer version?
full member
Activity: 254
Merit: 110
what gpu are you using to mine this coin?

or maybe its good to buy and hold this or start mining to any one suggest please?

If you are going to mine it, start doing it about an hour ago.  The difficulty is increasing and there are under 27,000 blocks left to mine before the reward rate per block is cut in half.

Nvidia cards are better at this than AMD.  If you use Nvidia, the latest version of ccminer works well.  The file is labeled ccminer-x64-2.2 and it extracts to an .exe file that is 16,997,408 bytes.  There are a few other small files too.  I mention this only because there is ANOTHER 2.2 version that runs a lot slower.  

Right now, it is the latest release at https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases and was released on 8/13.

If you run AMD cards I am somewhat clueless.  
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
need yours help !!
I have 2 rigs, the problem is when I connect the 2 rigs to the same pool (mn pool or yip pool) I'm get reported hash rate equal to hath of every single rig.
if I connect them in separate pools everything work perfect.
for the numerical example: each rig provide 110 mh/s
2 rigs on yiimp=110 mh/s
2 rigs on mn pool=110 mh/s
1 rig on yiimp & 1 rig on mn pool=220 mh/s
help me solve it I want they will both work on the same pool-and yes I'm mn pool I have 2 workers (I'm not trying to operate them on the same worker)
thanks ahead guys and sorry for the long.

this sounds like you are connecting 2 miners as the same worker (not sure if it's possible, never tried...)...
Do you have a worker setup for each rig on the pools your trying and setting your configs different so they each connect?

I'm have 2 workers in MN pool.and its not working correctly maybe its relative to they both use the same port.
in yip I didn't try 2 workers name cause I don't know how to do this, maybe I can add it somewhere in the bat file.
thanks for the help mate.

I am not using the same pool as you, but you might need to create your worker's accounts at your pool when you log in.  Different pools do things differently.  If you did NOT make a worker for your account then you might be working under a default name.  What will happen then is each time your rig reports hashrate your pool sees 'default worker = 110' then the second rig reports 'default worker = 110'.  If you named your workers AND had your .bat files set up properly, then your pool sees 'worker one = 110' then 'worker two = 110' and the pool then adds them up since they are from different workers.  

You are likely STILL being credited for shares since shares have a unique identity.  Still best to sort it out properly.

I can help out if you want - what pool are you wanting to consolidate both rigs on?
first of all thank you for the elaborate answer,i would like to work on the yiimp pool and as you say in yip I see 2 same identical users which are the name of the miner (ccminer/alexis-1.1_p) I try to add a worker name by edit the .bat file that after my wallet address I add /name.
it didn't work I wasn't able to connect the pool like this.

I just went to your pool's site and they did not seem to give any instructions or even mention worker names in their setup guide.  Not sure where to go with that unless you are willing to try another pool.  I am using suprnova and am also testing at CWI. 

yes yip does not give any instructions for such problem.
ill try again with mn pool in the worst case I will just go back for miner on each pool.
thanks a lot!!!
Jump to: