[ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine - page 256.

Soots

sr. member

Activity: 1050

Merit: 251

what gpu are you using to mine this coin?

or maybe its good to buy and hold this or start mining to any one suggest please?

jimboscott

full member

Activity: 254

Merit: 110

Quote from: avilolo0101 on August 18, 2017, 01:33:35 PM

Quote from: jimboscott on August 18, 2017, 01:26:11 PM

Quote from: avilolo0101 on August 18, 2017, 12:59:05 PM

Quote from: uhro on August 18, 2017, 12:53:49 PM

Quote from: avilolo0101 on August 18, 2017, 12:44:50 PM

need yours help !!
I have 2 rigs, the problem is when I connect the 2 rigs to the same pool (mn pool or yip pool) I'm get reported hash rate equal to hath of every single rig.
if I connect them in separate pools everything work perfect.
for the numerical example: each rig provide 110 mh/s
2 rigs on yiimp=110 mh/s
2 rigs on mn pool=110 mh/s
1 rig on yiimp & 1 rig on mn pool=220 mh/s
help me solve it I want they will both work on the same pool-and yes I'm mn pool I have 2 workers (I'm not trying to operate them on the same worker)
thanks ahead guys and sorry for the long.

this sounds like you are connecting 2 miners as the same worker (not sure if it's possible, never tried...)...
Do you have a worker setup for each rig on the pools your trying and setting your configs different so they each connect?

I'm have 2 workers in MN pool.and its not working correctly maybe its relative to they both use the same port.
in yip I didn't try 2 workers name cause I don't know how to do this, maybe I can add it somewhere in the bat file.
thanks for the help mate.

I am not using the same pool as you, but you might need to create your worker's accounts at your pool when you log in. Different pools do things differently. If you did NOT make a worker for your account then you might be working under a default name. What will happen then is each time your rig reports hashrate your pool sees 'default worker = 110' then the second rig reports 'default worker = 110'. If you named your workers AND had your .bat files set up properly, then your pool sees 'worker one = 110' then 'worker two = 110' and the pool then adds them up since they are from different workers.

You are likely STILL being credited for shares since shares have a unique identity. Still best to sort it out properly.

I can help out if you want - what pool are you wanting to consolidate both rigs on?

first of all thank you for the elaborate answer,i would like to work on the yiimp pool and as you say in yip I see 2 same identical users which are the name of the miner (ccminer/alexis-1.1_p) I try to add a worker name by edit the .bat file that after my wallet address I add /name.
it didn't work I wasn't able to connect the pool like this.

I just went to your pool's site and they did not seem to give any instructions or even mention worker names in their setup guide. Not sure where to go with that unless you are willing to try another pool. I am using suprnova and am also testing at CWI.

jimboscott

full member

Activity: 254

Merit: 110

Quote from: avilolo0101 on August 18, 2017, 12:59:05 PM

Quote from: uhro on August 18, 2017, 12:53:49 PM

Quote from: avilolo0101 on August 18, 2017, 12:44:50 PM

need yours help !!
I have 2 rigs, the problem is when I connect the 2 rigs to the same pool (mn pool or yip pool) I'm get reported hash rate equal to hath of every single rig.
if I connect them in separate pools everything work perfect.
for the numerical example: each rig provide 110 mh/s
2 rigs on yiimp=110 mh/s
2 rigs on mn pool=110 mh/s
1 rig on yiimp & 1 rig on mn pool=220 mh/s
help me solve it I want they will both work on the same pool-and yes I'm mn pool I have 2 workers (I'm not trying to operate them on the same worker)
thanks ahead guys and sorry for the long.

this sounds like you are connecting 2 miners as the same worker (not sure if it's possible, never tried...)...
Do you have a worker setup for each rig on the pools your trying and setting your configs different so they each connect?

I'm have 2 workers in MN pool.and its not working correctly maybe its relative to they both use the same port.
in yip I didn't try 2 workers name cause I don't know how to do this, maybe I can add it somewhere in the bat file.
thanks for the help mate.

Go here - https://pool.mn/sigt/index.php?page=gettingstarted

The first two steps -

1. Create account.

1 Register here, or login if you already have account
2 Create a worker that will be used by the miner to login

Each rig needs to have its own unique name. When you set up the .bat file for your miner it can seem a little counter-intuitive. You will use THREE things that identify you and your rigs.

-u Weblogin.WorkerName -p WorkerPassword

Strangely, you will NOT be asked to use your login PASSWORD for your pool account. You use your login account NAME, a period, then your worker name. For me it would look something like this:

-u jimboscott.RigOne

Then finish the FIRST .bat file with the worker's password like this...

-u jimboscott.RigOne -p p455w0rd

Remember, the -p is the WORKER password and not your pool account login password.

Your second rig will look like this (sort of)

-u jimboscott.RigTwo -p PaSsWoRd

This should fix things.

avilolo0101

member

Activity: 118

Merit: 10

Quote from: jimboscott on August 18, 2017, 01:26:11 PM

Quote from: avilolo0101 on August 18, 2017, 12:59:05 PM

Quote from: uhro on August 18, 2017, 12:53:49 PM

Quote from: avilolo0101 on August 18, 2017, 12:44:50 PM

need yours help !!
I have 2 rigs, the problem is when I connect the 2 rigs to the same pool (mn pool or yip pool) I'm get reported hash rate equal to hath of every single rig.
if I connect them in separate pools everything work perfect.
for the numerical example: each rig provide 110 mh/s
2 rigs on yiimp=110 mh/s
2 rigs on mn pool=110 mh/s
1 rig on yiimp & 1 rig on mn pool=220 mh/s
help me solve it I want they will both work on the same pool-and yes I'm mn pool I have 2 workers (I'm not trying to operate them on the same worker)
thanks ahead guys and sorry for the long.

this sounds like you are connecting 2 miners as the same worker (not sure if it's possible, never tried...)...
Do you have a worker setup for each rig on the pools your trying and setting your configs different so they each connect?

I'm have 2 workers in MN pool.and its not working correctly maybe its relative to they both use the same port.
in yip I didn't try 2 workers name cause I don't know how to do this, maybe I can add it somewhere in the bat file.
thanks for the help mate.

I am not using the same pool as you, but you might need to create your worker's accounts at your pool when you log in. Different pools do things differently. If you did NOT make a worker for your account then you might be working under a default name. What will happen then is each time your rig reports hashrate your pool sees 'default worker = 110' then the second rig reports 'default worker = 110'. If you named your workers AND had your .bat files set up properly, then your pool sees 'worker one = 110' then 'worker two = 110' and the pool then adds them up since they are from different workers.

You are likely STILL being credited for shares since shares have a unique identity. Still best to sort it out properly.

I can help out if you want - what pool are you wanting to consolidate both rigs on?

first of all thank you for the elaborate answer,i would like to work on the yiimp pool and as you say in yip I see 2 same identical users which are the name of the miner (ccminer/alexis-1.1_p) I try to add a worker name by edit the .bat file that after my wallet address I add /name.
it didn't work I wasn't able to connect the pool like this.

jimboscott

full member

Activity: 254

Merit: 110

Quote from: avilolo0101 on August 18, 2017, 12:59:05 PM

Quote from: uhro on August 18, 2017, 12:53:49 PM

Quote from: avilolo0101 on August 18, 2017, 12:44:50 PM

need yours help !!
I have 2 rigs, the problem is when I connect the 2 rigs to the same pool (mn pool or yip pool) I'm get reported hash rate equal to hath of every single rig.
if I connect them in separate pools everything work perfect.
for the numerical example: each rig provide 110 mh/s
2 rigs on yiimp=110 mh/s
2 rigs on mn pool=110 mh/s
1 rig on yiimp & 1 rig on mn pool=220 mh/s
help me solve it I want they will both work on the same pool-and yes I'm mn pool I have 2 workers (I'm not trying to operate them on the same worker)
thanks ahead guys and sorry for the long.

this sounds like you are connecting 2 miners as the same worker (not sure if it's possible, never tried...)...
Do you have a worker setup for each rig on the pools your trying and setting your configs different so they each connect?

I'm have 2 workers in MN pool.and its not working correctly maybe its relative to they both use the same port.
in yip I didn't try 2 workers name cause I don't know how to do this, maybe I can add it somewhere in the bat file.
thanks for the help mate.

I am not using the same pool as you, but you might need to create your worker's accounts at your pool when you log in. Different pools do things differently. If you did NOT make a worker for your account then you might be working under a default name. What will happen then is each time your rig reports hashrate your pool sees 'default worker = 110' then the second rig reports 'default worker = 110'. If you named your workers AND had your .bat files set up properly, then your pool sees 'worker one = 110' then 'worker two = 110' and the pool then adds them up since they are from different workers.

You are likely STILL being credited for shares since shares have a unique identity. Still best to sort it out properly.

I can help out if you want - what pool are you wanting to consolidate both rigs on?

avilolo0101

member

Activity: 118

Merit: 10

Quote from: uhro on August 18, 2017, 12:53:49 PM

Quote from: avilolo0101 on August 18, 2017, 12:44:50 PM

need yours help !!
I have 2 rigs, the problem is when I connect the 2 rigs to the same pool (mn pool or yip pool) I'm get reported hash rate equal to hath of every single rig.
if I connect them in separate pools everything work perfect.
for the numerical example: each rig provide 110 mh/s
2 rigs on yiimp=110 mh/s
2 rigs on mn pool=110 mh/s
1 rig on yiimp & 1 rig on mn pool=220 mh/s
help me solve it I want they will both work on the same pool-and yes I'm mn pool I have 2 workers (I'm not trying to operate them on the same worker)
thanks ahead guys and sorry for the long.

this sounds like you are connecting 2 miners as the same worker (not sure if it's possible, never tried...)...
Do you have a worker setup for each rig on the pools your trying and setting your configs different so they each connect?

I'm have 2 workers in MN pool.and its not working correctly maybe its relative to they both use the same port.
in yip I didn't try 2 workers name cause I don't know how to do this, maybe I can add it somewhere in the bat file.
thanks for the help mate.

uhro

full member

Activity: 209

Merit: 100

Join Cashbery Coin!

Quote from: avilolo0101 on August 18, 2017, 12:44:50 PM

need yours help !!
I have 2 rigs, the problem is when I connect the 2 rigs to the same pool (mn pool or yip pool) I'm get reported hash rate equal to hath of every single rig.
if I connect them in separate pools everything work perfect.
for the numerical example: each rig provide 110 mh/s
2 rigs on yiimp=110 mh/s
2 rigs on mn pool=110 mh/s
1 rig on yiimp & 1 rig on mn pool=220 mh/s
help me solve it I want they will both work on the same pool-and yes I'm mn pool I have 2 workers (I'm not trying to operate them on the same worker)
thanks ahead guys and sorry for the long.

this sounds like you are connecting 2 miners as the same worker (not sure if it's possible, never tried...)...
Do you have a worker setup for each rig on the pools your trying and setting your configs different so they each connect?

dodongminero

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

Quote from: jimboscott on August 18, 2017, 12:19:27 PM

Quote from: dodongminero on August 18, 2017, 12:10:23 PM

greedy whales are just waiting the price to hit above 4k then dump, price will be in the bottom again.

I do not think there is any such thing as a whale when the largest trade on the books at Cryptopia is currently 36,000 SIGT. That's less than 3 grand.

Right now it is guppies and minnows with an occasional bream.

yah, maybe you are right mate.

avilolo0101

member

Activity: 118

Merit: 10

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: avilolo0101 on August 18, 2017, 12:44:50 PM

need yours help !!
I have 2 rigs, the problem is when I connect the 2 rigs to the same pool (mn pool or yip pool) I'm get reported hash rate equal to hath of every single rig.
if I connect them in separate pools everything work perfect.
for the numerical example: each rig provide 110 mh/s
2 rigs on yiimp=110 mh/s
2 rigs on mn pool=110 mh/s
1 rig on yiimp & 1 rig on mn pool=220 mh/s
help me solve it I want they will both work on the same pool-and yes I'm mn pool I have 2 workers (I'm not trying to operate them on the same worker)
thanks ahead guys and sorry for the long.

Have you tried to set workers name in miner?

how I set workers names in yiimp bat file?
I'm using plaginmod miner

Legis

member

Activity: 74

Merit: 10

Even after 15 mins of mining still showing only half?

avilolo0101

member

Activity: 118

Merit: 10

need yours help !!
I have 2 rigs, the problem is when I connect the 2 rigs to the same pool (mn pool or yip pool) I'm get reported hash rate equal to hath of every single rig.
if I connect them in separate pools everything work perfect.
for the numerical example: each rig provide 110 mh/s
2 rigs on yiimp=110 mh/s
2 rigs on mn pool=110 mh/s
1 rig on yiimp & 1 rig on mn pool=220 mh/s
help me solve it I want they will both work on the same pool-and yes I'm mn pool I have 2 workers (I'm not trying to operate them on the same worker)
thanks ahead guys and sorry for the long.

Legis

member

Activity: 74

Merit: 10

Bought some "kilos" of SIGT at 1k sat and have on/off mined thus far around 5000 coins after block ~32000 (I missed the start, damn).

With 12k coins one gets around 2 SIGT per day after the PoS hits. 18k = 3 SIGT per day, 60k = 10 SIGT per day. The coin can give OK returns in PoS phase when/if the price reaches 0,5 USD and upwards.

Accumulate and HODL is the only right thing to do. I liquidate some only for my electricity bill. Wink

dodongminero

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

Quote from: Thergud on August 18, 2017, 12:16:26 PM

Quote from: dodongminero on August 18, 2017, 12:10:23 PM

greedy whales are just waiting the price to hit above 4k then dump, price will be in the bottom again.

So then buy some and dump at 3800 if you're so sure.

definitely, it worked for me before. Grin

xixou

member

Activity: 153

Merit: 11

Quote from: BitPotus on August 18, 2017, 09:05:42 AM

Quote from: xixou on August 18, 2017, 08:57:19 AM

I see sats everywere (4500 sats),
what is a sat?
(I know satellite but ..)

1 Bitcoin has 100 Million Satoshis.

1 satoshi is the smallest unit of a Bitcoin.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Satoshi_(unit)

https://99bitcoins.com/satoshi-usd-converter/

Thanks !

jimboscott

full member

Activity: 254

Merit: 110

Quote from: dodongminero on August 18, 2017, 12:10:23 PM

greedy whales are just waiting the price to hit above 4k then dump, price will be in the bottom again.

I do not think there is any such thing as a whale when the largest trade on the books at Cryptopia is currently 36,000 SIGT. That's less than 3 grand.

Right now it is guppies and minnows with an occasional bream.

Thergud

newbie

Activity: 59

Merit: 0

Quote from: dodongminero on August 18, 2017, 12:10:23 PM

greedy whales are just waiting the price to hit above 4k then dump, price will be in the bottom again.

So then buy some and dump at 3800 if you're so sure.

jimboscott

full member

Activity: 254

Merit: 110

Quote from: fergany on August 18, 2017, 11:43:54 AM

Total selling BitCoin to 4200 = 135 Bitcoin its huge number i don't think we will reach 4200 very soon untill people change the price and there selling orders

4000 is closer than one might think. That is the problem with arithmetic charts. We see a move from 1000 to 2000 and on an arithmetic chart it looks as if 2000 to 3000 is the same accomplishment. On a log chart, the vertical distances show similar PERCENT gain.

As an illustration only...

The low of around 600 to our present level of 1900 is more than a 200% gain (1900 - 600 = 1300 and 1300 is more than 200% of 600).

IF (not a prediction) SIGT were to apply that same percent gain from where we sit at 1900, we would be around 6000.

An arithmetic chart would show the move from 600 to 1900 (1300) as being a much smaller move when compared to going from 1900 to 6000. But, a log chart shows these as the exact same magnitude. Why? Because they actually are.

ETH's chart looks completely bonkers in arithmetic scale. That is the chart that is almost always seen when people write stories about Ethereum. But, on a log chart it actually is understandable as it ran from the low teens to over 400. See ETH's log chart here - https://www.tradingview.com/chart/rhofKf4L/

That is why I want to find a log scale chart of SIGT. It makes no sense in any other scale.

dodongminero

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

greedy whales are just waiting the price to hit above 4k then dump, price will be in the bottom again.

fergany

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 10

Total selling BitCoin to 4200 = 135 Bitcoin its huge number i don't think we will reach 4200 very soon untill people change the price and there selling orders

Zarg0n

full member

Activity: 448

Merit: 170

Quote from: hous26 on August 18, 2017, 11:25:17 AM

I was hoping it would crash again because I wasn't done buying. I won't partake in spreading fud but I won't lie, i sit back with a grin when others do. Simply put, this coin has a solid future ahead of it.

a lot off ppl sold a little early and trying to buy again , some days ago we had only 5BTC in buy orders, today 41BTC

Topic: [ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine - page 256. (Read 823858 times)