Topic: [ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine - page 299. (Read 823858 times)

Im getting pretty much exactly what whattomine calculates with this

Now that I have switched to the palginmod version of ccminer I am getting what the calculator says.  Of course, I only switched to it a little less than 4 hours ago.

Let me further quantify what I have seen.  My last 8 payouts of 50 coins took the following minutes to accomplish.  All were with the KRNLX version.  Top being the more recent figures.

335 minutes with KRNLX_170810
331 minutes with KRNLX_170810
329 minutes with KRNLX_170810
340 minutes with KRNLX_170810
360 minutes with KRNLX-80
362 minutes with KRNLX-80
392 minutes with KRNLX (some down time for tinkering)
383 minutes KRNLX (maybe some minor down time here too)

All of these were with reported hashrates from the miner of between 245 and 257 Mh/s.

I have now been running the NON-KRNLX palingmod ccminer, reporting 227 Mh/s for exactly 240 minutes and am 5 coins shy of 50.  I should come in on this next 50 coins in about 265 minutes.  That's 4 hours and 25 minutes versus an average above that is closer to 6 hours.  And, that 4 hours 25 minutes is almost exactly what the calculator projected while ALL of the previous 50 coin segments took 30-35% longer than what they should have.

I am not trying to do anything here but help.  Been reading for days about the strange discrepancies in calculated earnings versus real earnings.  Just trying to parse it all out in an open and transparent manner.  Everyone is looking for the best way to do this and I think something odd is going on here.  

Im getting pretty much exactly what whattomine calculates with this

You should use CWI 0.9.8 to mine SIGT, no exceptions)

You should use CWI 0.9.8 to mine SIGT, no exceptions)

Very detailed explanation on profit calculator. I would like to replenish another point:
c) And also the luck of you (and all the miners in the pool), maybe poor luck in last few hours, then no block found, no reward.

If SIGT is indeed dying...

1. Why all the discussion of it?  Ideas that die are not talked about.  Products that die are not attacked OR defended.

2. If it is 'dying' then how is it that it is within ~5% of the profitability of one of the MOST LIVING coins... ETH?  Right now, with similar Nvidia setups, ETH is giving me about 22.00/day while the DYING SIGT is in its 'death throes' while STILL delivering 20.86 per day while in a really bad SIGT/USD slump?

I thought dead things not only stopped breathing, they stopped moving, they stopped EVERYTHING.

Dead?  I don't think so.

Whattomine is only accurate for that one split second you hit refresh. Not saying you shouldn't be skeptical, I am skeptical myself.

Did not quite understand what you was saying then, some burbling about me being mad, it was hard to understand with all the slurping, groans and goat bleets pal, not to mention your dad in the background shouting some shit about swallowing, gets a bit distracting if you know what i mean.

Get off the thread, your contributions are that of a spazmoid, i am not pro sigt, im pro crypto with fingers in many coins, because i understand what benefits it has for the future (cryptocurrency as a whole), if we all backed coins we could all be rich, but there is always one tit who thinks he can be richer than the rest. It is unhealthy for crypto to let BTC monopolize, it needs competition to prosper. but there is always some uneducated goons that come along and chat shit while their dad slaps his cock in their face.

Interesting findings with ccminer versions.  Very interesting.

I had been using various versions of the 'krnlx' ccminer for the last 5 days or so and when I plugged in my MINER-reported hashrate into the profitability calculators, my actual results were immediately proven to be significantly LESS than what the calculators were saying.  Using 'whattomine', and the krnlx_170810 version (32 bit Cuda 7.5) I was getting a MINER reported overall hashrate of 255 Mh/s.  But, my rewards were coming at a 190 Mh/s rate.  Ie., if I adjusted hashrate in the calculator to match my rewards, I had to go from my reported rate of 255 all the way down to 190.

So, I have these 12 GPU's getting 9.09 coins per hour while the calculator says I should be getting 13.5. 

Reading a post that I initially through was born of paranoia, insinuating that it was possible that some of these 'faster' modded ccminer versions might be skimming hashrate and delivering it elsewhere, I decided to go with the version that poster recommended, the palingmod versions.

So, I fired that up using the exact same settings for cards and the exact same .bat files.  And, this is what happened...

My MINER reported rate went from 255 to 233. 


At 233, whattomine tells me to look for 12 coins per hour.  That is one coin every 5 minutes.  I have been running on palingmod for 138 minutes.  I am told by whattomine, adjusted for difficulty mind you, that I should have 27 coins.  I have 25.  At my previous 'rate' of 255 I was losing 33% of what I was 'supposed to get' when using the krnlx version.  I am now off by about 8%.

So, I am running SLOWER and getting MORE. 

I know this is not a static environment, but I can tell you that since day one of mining this, I have been consistently OFF by 30-35% on the 'expected' numbers. 

If someone has the expertise to sniff out all the network traffic that the krnlx versions are making, it might be interesting to see if anything suspicious is taking place.