[ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine - page 48.

cryptodevil

legendary

Activity: 2240

Merit: 1254

Thread-puller extraordinaire

Quote from: luismibit on October 03, 2017, 03:43:59 AM

https://preview.ibb.co/gxf8yw/20171001_210459.png
In 4 days staking, free and without electricity consumption:
0.41; 4.01; 15.18; 2.09; 16,99 SIGT, Total:
38.68 SIGT
Stake is 5% annually, I have 56,657 sigt (56,6k) therefore: 56657 x 5% = 2832 sigt that I should get free and in a year of pos.
https://preview.ibb.co/gxf8yw/20171001_210459.png
Now only 4 days have passed in the phase of Pos, therefore:
2832: 365 days = 7.7 SIGT per day would be 5% interest in the pos.
7.7 sigt x 4 days = 31 sigt
I have obtained 38.68 sigt, which means that I am getting 24% more than what corresponds to me after 4 days
This is very nice !! I can not be happier and more satisfied.
The Pos phase is giving more rewards than any of us can expect
This currency is very similar to many others, but soon developers will implement new features and functionalities ... following the established roadmap.
Dev and developers are active, since they themselves own a lot of coins, are most interested in that signatum grow and develop.
This currency only has 3 months ... any previous currency I need at least 1 year to be listed in bittrex, for example.
Let's give this coin time

Posting it again a day later, after removing your bold highlights and smiley faces doesn't make it any more valid:

Quote from: luismibit on October 02, 2017, 04:41:31 AM

https://preview.ibb.co/gxf8yw/20171001_210459.png"
In 4 days staking, free and without electricity consumption:
0.41; 4.01; 15.18; 2.09; 16,99 SIGT, Total:
38.68 SIGT
Stake is 5% annually, I have 56,657 sigt (56,6k) therefore: 56657 x 5% = 2832 sigt that I should get free and in a year of pos.
https://preview.ibb.co/gxf8yw/20171001_210459.png"
Now only 4 days have passed in the phase of Pos, therefore:
2832: 365 days = 7.7 SIGT per day would be 5% interest in the pos.
7.7 sigt x 4 days = 31 sigt
I have obtained 38.68 sigt, which means that I am getting 24% more than what corresponds to me after 4 days
This is very nice !! I can not be happier and more satisfied.

The Pos phase is giving more rewards than any of us can expect
This currency is very similar to many others, but soon developers will implement new features and functionalities ... following the established roadmap.
Dev and developers are active, since they themselves own a lot of coins, are most interested in that signatum grow and develop.
This currency only has 3 months ... any previous currency I need at least 1 year to be listed in bittrex, for example.
Let's give this coin time

It simply makes you a desperate shill.

switz

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Quote from: cryptodevil on October 03, 2017, 03:43:31 AM

Quote from: switz on October 03, 2017, 03:37:09 AM

We need to wait and see what will happen next.

First everyone said that SIGT is the new Monero. Is this possible ?

SMH. Monero is a completely different coin in almost every possible way!

Stop trying to compare a lazy copy-paste clonecoin with coin projects which were developed with actual new technologies and innovation. Wishing that Signatum will be the next Monero does not, in any way, make it anything like Monero.

Look again at that list of Carsen's clonecoins from back in 2014. THEY are exactly like Signatum, code-wise, and EVERY SINGLE ONE was pumped and then abandoned.

As I told before, what is your benefit to spent your priceless time for informing us with infinite knowledge ?
Or your time is really worthless to being here ?

jootn2kx

full member

Activity: 378

Merit: 101

Estimated.Pro - Crypto Signals. Free.

Quote from: switz on October 03, 2017, 03:37:09 AM

We need to wait and see what will happen next.

First everyone said that SIGT is the new Monero. Is this possible ?

Lets look at the same window for each coin.

First months of XMR

First months of SIGT

Look familiar ?

Lets look what did XMR do in 2 years.

Nothing actually !

After XMR is 3 years old. Here is the result.

Bingo!

It's not about only XMR, you can inspect all major coin history. All of them have same behavior.
All coins need time for acceptance.

IMO SIGT has a future. If you want to gain profit in cryptocurrency you need to trust things you believe and you must to give them time.
I am planning to hold my coins at least 2 years in my wallet.

Last words, If you dont believe this coin, just leave and dont spend your priceless time for this coin.

As i told you at the beginning;
We need to wait and see what will happen next.

Typical succes-story "Wait couple of years and it will moon" i mean how many coins are there floating around?
What are the odds this SIGT coin will boom in couple months/years?
Don't stare blind to a couple of successtories because 99% of the floating coins in cryptocurrency are failing this will be same story here
It's even less risk if you are gambling with your money in a casino

luismibit

newbie

Activity: 44

Merit: 0

Quote from: DroidR17A on October 02, 2017, 10:49:07 PM

Proof of Stake is a joke. 8000 coins 5 days staking, nothing. Time went from 3 days to 7, increasing every day, instead of going down.

Sig PoS=Sig Proof of Shitcoin

Sold a couple of days ago, thankfully before it dropped even more.

Buy this coin is you like. Unless you hold 100k Sig PoS is pointless.

I have only 57k, much less than 100k coins, so you are not telling the truth

https://preview.ibb.co/gxf8yw/20171001_210459.png

In 4 days staking, free and without electricity consumption:

0.41; 4.01; 15.18; 2.09; 16,99 SIGT, Total:

38.68 SIGT

Stake is 5% annually, I have 56,657 sigt (56,6k) therefore: 56657 x 5% = 2832 sigt that I should get free and in a year of pos.

https://preview.ibb.co/gxf8yw/20171001_210459.png

Now only 4 days have passed in the phase of Pos, therefore:
2832: 365 days = 7.7 SIGT per day would be 5% interest in the pos.
7.7 sigt x 4 days = 31 sigt
I have obtained 38.68 sigt, which means that I am getting 24% more than what corresponds to me after 4 days

This is very nice !! I can not be happier and more satisfied.
The Pos phase is giving more rewards than any of us can expect

This currency is very similar to many others, but soon developers will implement new features and functionalities ... following the established roadmap.
Dev and developers are active, since they themselves own a lot of coins, are most interested in that signatum grow and develop.
This currency only has 3 months ... any previous currency I need at least 1 year to be listed in bittrex, for example.
Let's give this coin time

cryptodevil

legendary

Activity: 2240

Merit: 1254

Thread-puller extraordinaire

Quote from: switz on October 03, 2017, 03:37:09 AM

We need to wait and see what will happen next.

First everyone said that SIGT is the new Monero. Is this possible ?

SMH. Monero is a completely different coin in almost every possible way!

Stop trying to compare a lazy copy-paste clonecoin with coin projects which were developed with actual new technologies and innovation. Wishing that Signatum will be the next Monero does not, in any way, make it anything like Monero.

Look again at that list of Carsen's clonecoins from back in 2014. THEY are exactly like Signatum, code-wise, and EVERY SINGLE ONE was pumped and then abandoned.

switz

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

We need to wait and see what will happen next.

First everyone said that SIGT is the new Monero. Is this possible ?

Lets look at the same window for each coin.

First months of XMR
https://i.imgur.com/ujhKYoN.png

First months of SIGT
https://i.imgur.com/dLXQuAm.png

Look familiar ?

Lets look what did XMR do in 2 years.
https://i.imgur.com/43Zuipc.png

Nothing actually !

After XMR is 3 years old. Here is the result.
https://i.imgur.com/fXEVpoO.png

Bingo!

It's not about only XMR, you can inspect all major coin history. All of them have same behavior.
All coins need time for acceptance.

IMO SIGT has a future. If you want to gain profit in cryptocurrency you need to trust things you believe and you must to give them time.
I am planning to hold my coins at least 2 years in my wallet.

Last words, If you dont believe this coin, just leave and dont spend your priceless time for this coin.

As i told you at the beginning;
We need to wait and see what will happen next.

easyrimka

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 261

Quote from: cryptodevil on October 03, 2017, 03:25:19 AM

Quote from: vikingchild on October 02, 2017, 08:34:26 PM

New Article Out! Past, Present, Future - This is Signatum - The Complete Status Update

http://cryptovore.com/2017/10/02/signatum-and-its-future-overview/

Dan, I'm still on the fence about your role in this pump-and-dump scam. I'm torn between you simply not giving a shit about it being so blatant a scam because you're making money off it, or you are just one epic noob who seriously cannot bring himself to even consider how deep into this scam he's allowed himself to be drawn.

Quote from: webcoinx14 on July 19, 2014, 05:30:12 PM

Quote from: bathrobehero on July 19, 2014, 05:19:45 PM

Would you list all the coins you launched so far?

Yes of course: My entry to the crypto-world in order is:
Timecoin (Scrypt based, terrible clone)
Matrixcoin (Sha256 based, terrible clone)
Hashcoin (X11 based, first animated logo, DGW V3, coin ended up forking due to no one updating to the latest wallet from all the FUD, coin could still work)
Dreamcoin (X11 based first PoW/PoS crypto I created, HUGE amount of FUD with threats, so I removed the coin to hurt the community because I was hurt, which was wrong, looks like community took it over though, still working)
Nebulacoin (X13 based PoW/PoS, Still lives on to this day)
Techcoin (X13 based PoW/PoS, Still lives on to this day, looks like the community is taking it over, fixing block times (it was too slow)).
Firecoin (X15 based first PoW/PoS, block times were faster, smoother launch, FUD killed it)
Isiscoin (X15 based PoW/PoS, smooth launch, hit Mintpal second day of ninja launch (No bribes were made), Premine was dumped before we hit Mintpal (which a lot of people thought i dumped on mintpal, I did not), HUGE FUD followed, along with government talk of Isiscoin, Death Threats, etc. Bad choice of name and bad launch date made me remove this coin, also because I do not support terrorism and that is what people were thinking. Just overall bad ideas on my end, My intention was the Egyptian god ISIS but as you all know, people twist things around)
Webcoin (X14 PoW/PoS, By far my best coin ever, Extremely stable, Smooth launch, Fair distribution)

Any other coin is not made by me, these are the only coins I have worked on.

The process involved launching multiple coins as being 'new' in some way, with a variety of configurations in terms of whether it had pre-mine, instamine, 'dev rewards' etc. Releasing a slow and steady stream of 'features' and 'services' to make it look like there was legitimate development work going on (all just more copy-pasted code of other people's work) and then abandoning each coin once he'd managed to get as much profit out of it as he could.

I propose you click on that link above to Carsen's GitHub repo. That bitcointalk forum post was from over three years ago. His GitHub repo has been active this entire time and is still currently active, chock-full of forked code, from 'multi-algo' clonecoins, to 'webwallet' and 'payment gateway' services.

Which part of Signatum differentiates from every single cut-and-paste pump-and-dump committed by Carsen Klock over the past 3+ years?

thanks to let us know dude

cryptodevil

legendary

Activity: 2240

Merit: 1254

Thread-puller extraordinaire

Quote from: ?? on ??

It does not matter what the address starts with. B refers to Blockchain address.

As I understanding first B in bitcoin address is a prefix for address.

No, Bitcoin addresses begin with a number.

Blackcoin [BLK] addresses begin with an upper-case 'B'.

cryptodevil

legendary

Activity: 2240

Merit: 1254

Thread-puller extraordinaire

Quote from: vikingchild on October 02, 2017, 08:34:26 PM

New Article Out! Past, Present, Future - This is Signatum - The Complete Status Update

http://cryptovore.com/2017/10/02/signatum-and-its-future-overview/

Dan, I'm still on the fence about your role in this pump-and-dump scam. I'm torn between you simply not giving a shit about it being so blatant a scam because you're making money off it, or you are just one epic noob who seriously cannot bring himself to even consider how deep into this scam he's allowed himself to be drawn.

Quote from: webcoinx14 on July 19, 2014, 05:30:12 PM

Quote from: bathrobehero on July 19, 2014, 05:19:45 PM

Would you list all the coins you launched so far?

Yes of course: My entry to the crypto-world in order is:
Timecoin (Scrypt based, terrible clone)
Matrixcoin (Sha256 based, terrible clone)
Hashcoin (X11 based, first animated logo, DGW V3, coin ended up forking due to no one updating to the latest wallet from all the FUD, coin could still work)
Dreamcoin (X11 based first PoW/PoS crypto I created, HUGE amount of FUD with threats, so I removed the coin to hurt the community because I was hurt, which was wrong, looks like community took it over though, still working)
Nebulacoin (X13 based PoW/PoS, Still lives on to this day)
Techcoin (X13 based PoW/PoS, Still lives on to this day, looks like the community is taking it over, fixing block times (it was too slow)).
Firecoin (X15 based first PoW/PoS, block times were faster, smoother launch, FUD killed it)
Isiscoin (X15 based PoW/PoS, smooth launch, hit Mintpal second day of ninja launch (No bribes were made), Premine was dumped before we hit Mintpal (which a lot of people thought i dumped on mintpal, I did not), HUGE FUD followed, along with government talk of Isiscoin, Death Threats, etc. Bad choice of name and bad launch date made me remove this coin, also because I do not support terrorism and that is what people were thinking. Just overall bad ideas on my end, My intention was the Egyptian god ISIS but as you all know, people twist things around)
Webcoin (X14 PoW/PoS, By far my best coin ever, Extremely stable, Smooth launch, Fair distribution)

Any other coin is not made by me, these are the only coins I have worked on.

The process involved launching multiple coins as being 'new' in some way, with a variety of configurations in terms of whether it had pre-mine, instamine, 'dev rewards' etc. Releasing a slow and steady stream of 'features' and 'services' to make it look like there was legitimate development work going on (all just more copy-pasted code of other people's work) and then abandoning each coin once he'd managed to get as much profit out of it as he could.

I propose you click on that link above to Carsen's GitHub repo. That bitcointalk forum post was from over three years ago. His GitHub repo has been active this entire time and is still currently active, chock-full of forked code, from 'multi-algo' clonecoins, to 'webwallet' and 'payment gateway' services.

Which part of Signatum differentiates from every single cut-and-paste pump-and-dump committed by Carsen Klock over the past 3+ years?

Ergo_Proxy

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

I hope Signatum will be OK

Ginzink

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 118

Quote from: Surging Chaos on October 03, 2017, 02:26:41 AM

I mentioned this in a post a while back, but SIGT needs something more than just PoS. PoS has been done before, and masternodes probably won't be enough. Many coins have their own take on balancing staking and mining. See: Ark, Decred, Neo, etc. Otherwise you're probably going to be holding onto PoS coin #34 that will probably go nowhere.

I would be very suprised if we do not get more than this POS. The developers just needs time. They have jobs outside signatum, it is more a hobby. But without a ICO that is how it is. And i would prefer this way. Also when you add how little most ICOs do in 3 months i would give the devs thumbs up on development.

Ginzink

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 118

Two days since i got reward from POS, but i have gotten my share a few times. 14k coins.
Dont see an issue with not getting micro rewards daily, id rather have some time in between and at least get a couple sigt.

It uses near zero extra power, so the only reason to complain is if you sold and want to buy cheaper imo.

Surging Chaos

newbie

Activity: 46

Merit: 0

I mentioned this in a post a while back, but SIGT needs something more than just PoS. PoS has been done before, and masternodes probably won't be enough. Many coins have their own take on balancing staking and mining. See: Ark, Decred, Neo, etc. Otherwise you're probably going to be holding onto PoS coin #34 that will probably go nowhere.

longestday3030

member

Activity: 132

Merit: 10

Quote from: DroidR17A on October 02, 2017, 10:49:07 PM

Proof of Stake is a joke. 8000 coins 5 days staking, nothing. Time went from 3 days to 7, increasing every day, instead of going down.

Sig PoS=Sig Proof of Shitcoin

Sold a couple of days ago, thankfully before it dropped even more.

Buy this coin is you like. Unless you hold 100k Sig PoS is pointless.

Staking is 5% per annum. You'll get around 400 coins in a year, a little more if the interest is compounded.

Dark12

member

Activity: 100

Merit: 10

Quote from: DroidR17A on October 02, 2017, 10:49:07 PM

Proof of Stake is a joke. 8000 coins 5 days staking, nothing. Time went from 3 days to 7, increasing every day, instead of going down.

Sig PoS=Sig Proof of Shitcoin

Sold a couple of days ago, thankfully before it dropped even more.

Buy this coin is you like. Unless you hold 100k Sig PoS is pointless.

You staked for 5 days and sold a couple days ago? Weird!

zero_sight

member

Activity: 71

Merit: 10

Quote from: DroidR17A on October 02, 2017, 10:49:07 PM

Proof of Stake is a joke. 8000 coins 5 days staking, nothing. Time went from 3 days to 7, increasing every day, instead of going down.

Sig PoS=Sig Proof of Shitcoin

Sold a couple of days ago, thankfully before it dropped even more.

Buy this coin is you like. Unless you hold 100k Sig PoS is pointless.

Time between staking increases as more coins in the network is staked. This is good as it means more people are putting the currency to use in the network.
I have less than you staked and have received small payouts, similar to another coin i stake in based on my stake weight

At the day - staking is still luck based. Consider it solo mining with more or less hashrate than others

oslak

sr. member

Activity: 273

Merit: 250

Quote from: xtraelv on October 02, 2017, 10:41:29 PM

Quote from: vikingchild on October 02, 2017, 07:50:50 PM

Quote from: clan23 on October 02, 2017, 12:18:35 PM

Cryptopia delisting Signatum because they have always trouble with the signatum wallet...the web wallet https://wallet.signatum.io
doesn not work for over 7 days at least maybe more...
such a shame!

That is not true. Cryptopia blamed the earlier version of LevelDB as being the reason. This however was never the case. They blamed similar reasons on Siacoin and VISIO delisting (well established projects!).

SIA coin had known wallet problem. Even tge devs released this statement regarding wallet issues on Poloniex :

I wanted to give you guys an update about Poloniex. We were hoping to have the issues resolved a lot quicker, but given that withdrawals are still somewhat flaky, we want to reassure everyone that we're focused on fixing the issue quickly, and that to the best of our knowledge coins are not missing.

What we know about the issue
Poloniex is having issues where they are submitting transactions to the network, but the transactions are not appearing in the blockchain. I think that this problem covers 90%+ of all withdrawal issues that people are having with Poloniex.

The Sia wallet has a transaction pool. Transactions are put in the pool and sent to miners, and then miners use the pool to pick transactions to put into blocks. When we created the transaction pool, there was some issue that prevented us from making a large transaction pool - it started having significant performance issues once the pool got to something like 2mb in size (the size of one block). Rather than fix the issues, we capped the size of the pool to 2mb and decided we would fix it later, once we had more users. This decision was made more than 2 years ago, and we did not expect to hit the block size limit as fast as we did. Bitcoin for example did not start to have problems with full blocks until a few years ago.

https://cryptorum.com/threads/sia-coin-wallet-problems-on-poloniex.176/

Cryptopia and signatum devs both have attitude problem. Instead of settling in gentleman's manner, both raised their schlong to see who's longer. Hodlers are suffering.

DroidR17A

full member

Activity: 490

Merit: 101

Proof of Stake is a joke. 8000 coins 5 days staking, nothing. Time went from 3 days to 7, increasing every day, instead of going down.

Sig PoS=Sig Proof of Shitcoin

Sold a couple of days ago, thankfully before it dropped even more.

Buy this coin is you like. Unless you hold 100k Sig PoS is pointless.

xtraelv

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1926

฿ear ride on the rainbow slide

Quote from: vikingchild on October 02, 2017, 07:50:50 PM

Quote from: clan23 on October 02, 2017, 12:18:35 PM

Cryptopia delisting Signatum because they have always trouble with the signatum wallet...the web wallet https://wallet.signatum.io
doesn not work for over 7 days at least maybe more...
such a shame!

That is not true. Cryptopia blamed the earlier version of LevelDB as being the reason. This however was never the case. They blamed similar reasons on Siacoin and VISIO delisting (well established projects!).

SIA coin had known wallet problem. Even tge devs released this statement regarding wallet issues on Poloniex :

I wanted to give you guys an update about Poloniex. We were hoping to have the issues resolved a lot quicker, but given that withdrawals are still somewhat flaky, we want to reassure everyone that we're focused on fixing the issue quickly, and that to the best of our knowledge coins are not missing.

What we know about the issue
Poloniex is having issues where they are submitting transactions to the network, but the transactions are not appearing in the blockchain. I think that this problem covers 90%+ of all withdrawal issues that people are having with Poloniex.

The Sia wallet has a transaction pool. Transactions are put in the pool and sent to miners, and then miners use the pool to pick transactions to put into blocks. When we created the transaction pool, there was some issue that prevented us from making a large transaction pool - it started having significant performance issues once the pool got to something like 2mb in size (the size of one block). Rather than fix the issues, we capped the size of the pool to 2mb and decided we would fix it later, once we had more users. This decision was made more than 2 years ago, and we did not expect to hit the block size limit as fast as we did. Bitcoin for example did not start to have problems with full blocks until a few years ago.

https://cryptorum.com/threads/sia-coin-wallet-problems-on-poloniex.176/

oslak

sr. member

Activity: 273

Merit: 250

Quote from: d3athgu1s3 on October 02, 2017, 10:03:58 PM

Bloody sad watching the coin going down the drain now.

Indeed.

Topic: [ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine - page 48. (Read 823858 times)