Topic: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs - page 365. (Read 1260354 times)

Don't touch it now


Bitfury has >30% of the network. Bitmain has TONS of hashpower too (no idea how much, but it must be 10-20%). AM has what? 200TH/s on BTCGuild? Come on. Don't put the big boys in the same line with AM because they still have a long road ahead until AM equals Bitfury and Bitmain.

I'd like to congratulate AM for dramatically decreasing the $/GH cost of equipment and shipping from stock.  I'd like to boo them for the shocking controllers and terrible power consumption.

I'd like to congratulate SP for the excellent engineered products, good power consumption and first class customer support.  I'd like to boo them for the high prices compared to similar products and not having stock.

There you go pleased and upset everyone in 1 post

It is funny. It is called emotions i guess. I would do the same as well sometimes. Point is spondo, bitfury, bitmain & AM are all serious but very different competitors and businesses. May the best one wins. ^^

Reboot -
OK!  Now it looks like they all came up fine.  Now I am running at 4300 4455 on that one.  Been at 3000 all week.

Thank you for posting. 9 more pages and we'll be the third longest threads in "Hardware".
Not bad for less than 6 months.

Still in good mood.

Actually, I didn't say anything positive about any products. I just stated you could get x amount of y for the cost of z, making z terrible value. Also, given that I'm not promoting any miner and that I don't even have a mining banner in my sig, how could you possibly accuse me of being a shill for a Spondoolies competitor? How does that even make sense? When I have an AM banner in my sig and I'm promoting AM products (like you and Spondoolies) in competitors threads, then you can call me a shill.

Sales are good. Thank you.
Still in good mood.

Why not state your AM affiliation in your signature so that everyone can know that you are an AM shareholder that is shilling for AM products? When I was stating my opinions in the AM thread everyone (you included) accused me about being an SP-Tech shill that just wants to troll the AM thread. But when you come here praising AM products you are hiding that fact that you are an AM shareholder and that you have a gain from promoting the Tubes. You are talking about hypocrisy when you are doing the exact same thing. I date you to state your AM affiliation in your signature, but I know that you will not do it. Move along now...

What was the point of that little rant of yours? It is a fact that you can buy 3 AM Tubes + PSUs for less than you can buy an SP20 + PSU for. That's why you didn't even bother trying to deny it. You just rant about AM zealots coming here which is even funnier considering that you were actually trolling the AM thread yourself, have spouted lots of misleading nonsense over there and an actual zealot - RoadStress is still there making up crap and pretending its facts.

Talk about hypocrisy.

Instead of trying to create diversions, why not respond to the actual issue - the price of SP20 being far to high. If you don't like that fact, you actually have the ability to do something about it.

Usually you don't see the "New!" laber in the Firmware tab right away so it's normal.

OK- doing that now.  I didn't see the 'New!' label in the Firmware Upgrade tab.  So I assumed I was current.  But I see that it did indeed get a newer version.  I'll report back after an hour of observations.

Thanks!

Edit: Ooops - got worse.  Loops 5 - 9 are now off. 
LOOP[5] OFF (test serial failed)
15: disabled (i2c BAD, btw!)
16: disabled (i2c BAD, btw!)
17: disabled (i2c BAD, btw!)

Yes. Last FW is 2.3.46.

Updated software about an hour ago!  

It was running slow all last week and this morning I did the update.  After turning back on, I put the Max Watts to 1360.  But it doesn't get up to 4.0.

Firmware is 2.3.43
Do SW update again?  

Update sw and see if issue reproduced

Always pleasure to have another AM devotee in our little thread.

I must say, compare to his horde of zealots, FC in person is a great guy.

Usually, I would have asked about dividends, but since AM gen4 is around the corner, it saves me the trouble.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirage

Beside, Athens is great and I have good mood.

Guy

Zvi,
I've got a slow SP30.  I don't understand what is going on with Loop(7) - Loop(9) but I've got this data from the asics page:

Uptime:396 | FPGA ver:32
-----BOARD-0-----
PSU-TOP[EMERSON1200]: 1536->1348w[1348 1344 1348] (lim=1360) 0c cooling:0/0x7000
-----BOARD-1-----
PSU-TOP[EMERSON1200]: 624->540w[540 540 536] (lim=1360) 0c cooling:0/0x7000
LOOP[0] ON
 0: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 62W  90A  67c] ASIC:[ 85c  710hz(BL: 710)   71 (E:193) F:0]
 1: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:693 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 68W  98A  72c] ASIC:[ 85c  765hz(BL: 765)   80 (E:193) F:0]
 2: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:691 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 67W  96A  65c] ASIC:[ 85c  745hz(BL: 745)   82 (E:192) F:0]
LOOP[1] ON
 3: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 71W 102A  71c] ASIC:[ 85c  770hz(BL: 770)   85 (E:193) F:0]
 4: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 70W 100A  76c] ASIC:[ 85c  775hz(BL: 775)   74 (E:193) F:0]
 5: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 66W  96A  76c] ASIC:[ 85c  745hz(BL: 745)   84 (E:193) F:0]
LOOP[2] ON
 6: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:693 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 66W  95A  80c] ASIC:[ 85c  740hz(BL: 740)   84 (E:193) F:0]
 7: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:693 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 73W 105A  85c] ASIC:[ 85c  795hz(BL: 795)   84 (E:193) F:0]
 8: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:691 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 69W  99A  71c] ASIC:[ 85c  760hz(BL: 760)   67 (E:193) F:0]
LOOP[3] ON
 9: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:691 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 75W 109A  85c] ASIC:[ 85c  805hz(BL: 805)   74 (E:193) F:0]
10: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:693 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 74W 106A  90c] ASIC:[ 85c  805hz(BL: 805)   80 (E:193) F:0]
11: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:693 vlt2:698(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 67W  96A  84c] ASIC:[ 85c  745hz(BL: 745)   80 (E:193) F:0]
LOOP[4] ON
12: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:691 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:695 Ul:749) 77W 111A  98c] ASIC:[105c  835hz(BL: 835)   75 (E:193) F:0]
13: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:679 vlt2:682(DCl:794 Tl:682 Ul:749) 67W  99A  90c] ASIC:[105c  760hz(BL: 760)   97 (E:192) F:0]
14: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:693(DCl:794 Tl:693 Ul:749) 71W 103A  79c] ASIC:[105c  785hz(BL: 785)   85 (E:193) F:0]
LOOP[5] ON
15: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:699 vlt2:701(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 71W 101A  75c] ASIC:[ 85c  785hz(BL: 785)   75 (E:192) F:0]
16: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:697 vlt2:701(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 71W 101A  77c] ASIC:[ 85c  785hz(BL: 785)  100 (E:193) F:0]
17: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:699 vlt2:701(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 72W 102A  68c] ASIC:[ 85c  795hz(BL: 795)   74 (E:193) F:0]
LOOP[6] ON
18: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:697 vlt2:701(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 75W 107A  71c] ASIC:[ 85c  805hz(BL: 805)   87 (E:193) F:0]
19: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:697 vlt2:701(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 70W 100A  76c] ASIC:[ 85c  760hz(BL: 760)   76 (E:193) F:0]
20: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:697 vlt2:703(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 70W 100A  77c] ASIC:[ 85c  780hz(BL: 780)   84 (E:193) F:0]
LOOP[7] OFF (no data on loop)
21: disabled (i2c good, no OC)
22: disabled (i2c good, no OC)
23: disabled (i2c good, no OC)
LOOP[8] OFF (no data on loop)
24: disabled (i2c good, no OC)
25: disabled (i2c good, no OC)
26: disabled (i2c good, no OC)
LOOP[9] OFF (no data on loop)
27: disabled (i2c good, no OC)
28: disabled (i2c good, no OC)
29: disabled (i2c good, no OC)

[H:HW:3136Gh[2227+909],W:1479,L:0,A:21,MMtmp:0 TMP:(37)=>=>=>(82,46)]
Pushed 27 jobs , in HW queue 4 jobs (sw:3, hw:3)!
min:28 wins:1698[this/last min:25/42] bist-fail:254, hw-err:8
leading-zeroes:42 idle promils[s/m]:0/3, rate:2936gh/s
Fan:90, conseq:200
AC2DC BAD: 0 0
R/NR: 259/0
RTF asics: 0
[0 restarted][0 unexpected_reset][0 unexpected_reset2][0 too_much_fake_wins][0 stuck_bist][0 low_power_chiko][0 stuck_pll][0 runtime_disable][0 purge_queue][0 read_timeouts][0 dc2dc_oc][0 read_timeouts2][0 read_corruption][0 purge_queue3][0 bad_idle]
Adapter queues: rsp=0, req=22
FET:
TOP:1 BOTTOM:1

That's nothing to do with the SP-30 and everything to do with bad luck on eligius. 

What's with the weird calculations?

An SP20 with shipping and PSU costs 1600 USD whereas an AM Tube with shipping and PSU costs 500 USD. For 100 USD less I can get 0.7 Th/s more from AM hardware. As for the running costs working out over 6 months, how long do you expect the hardware to stay up and running for? The impression I've gotten from most miners is that they don't expect their hardware to last that long.

That SP20 price is simply terrible.

tube 0.8Th
S3 0.453TH
SP-20 1.7TH

so 2.125 (equivalent of SP-20) tubes would be $1062. Plus, you also use ~2kw vs 1.1kw for Sp-20 or ~$80 extra/mo for the equivalent number of tubes/Sp-20.
So, after 5-6 mo, cost is roughly the same (if everything works 100%).

Why low % of rewarded shares on Eligius for SP-30?
83%? What could cause this?