Topic: [ANN] [SPOT] | SUCCESSFUL FORK COMPLETE - On CoinPayments.net/Cryptsy/Coins-e - page 8. (Read 166062 times)

block 79002, out of sync, crosschatting.
iGotSpots?

Upd:
hardfork has shorter blockchain vs previous wallets....
"12 blocks left...."

Cryptsy is on new wallet or old? What wold happen, if cryptsy is on old wallet? This 12 (now) block will flood cryptsy, then more. What would be next? Cryptsy will delist spots?
iGotSpots, coin need your attention NOW.

[
{
"addr" : "54.201.183.106:4588",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1392389879,
"lastrecv" : 1392389886,
"conntime" : 1392389562,
"version" : 60080,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.1.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 79002,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "72.78.100.12:4588",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1392389887,
"lastrecv" : 1392389877,
"conntime" : 1392389563,
"version" : 60080,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.1.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 79002,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "72.8.181.74:4588",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1392389886,
"lastrecv" : 1392389874,
"conntime" : 1392389569,
"version" : 60001,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 79014,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "193.68.21.38:4588",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1392389885,
"lastrecv" : 1392389874,
"conntime" : 1392389570,
"version" : 60080,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.1.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 79002,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "162.220.246.58:4588",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1392389888,
"lastrecv" : 1392389847,
"conntime" : 1392389578,
"version" : 60001,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 79014,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "216.56.62.132:4588",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1392389887,
"lastrecv" : 1392389879,
"conntime" : 1392389591,
"version" : 60001,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 79014,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "178.79.190.235:4588",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1392389879,
"lastrecv" : 1392389884,
"conntime" : 1392389665,
"version" : 60001,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 79014,
"banscore" : 0
}
]

OK, it's awesome that we've officially hit the hardfork, but I'm having the same problem as djmuk.

On a separate topic, how is it that the difficulty of block 78992 went up by a factor of four (to 13.53539526) after the previous block, 78991 (diff 3.38384881) , took fourteen hours to find?

EDIT: Removing the bad addnodes and adding in
resulted in the error going away and the block sync bar appearing, but it's stuck at 12 blocks left (79902 downloaded)

Can you confirm version numbers for new wallet as I am getting an error:

WARNING: Displayed transactions may not be correct! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade

I thought I had the latest version:

Getinfo gives me:

"version" : 1010000,
"protocolversion" : 60080,
"walletversion" : 60000,

Thanks

The fork will make diff jumps moved much slower instead of large leaps from 0 to 20

The new website for both the coin and metals market is on hold right now while we catch up on orders.  The new year set us back a bit with having new licenses to file for this year and we ended with a backlog of about 8 weeks

Once all the orders are filled it'll be reopened when everyone's order is filled instead of increasing the backlog

SWKineo, first line of my prev message was to you. Other lines, except last line - for all peoples here. Last line - for that dumper russian moscow bastard.
Sorry for confusing/misunderstanding.

Eh... I was just repeating a possibly inaccurate piece of information from back in mid January.

Believe me, I haven't sold since Spots were worth 18579, and I've bought back nearly ten times the total amount I've ever sold. I understand the potential value of the coin. However, I can not understand who your post was aimed at, or what you were trying to demonstrate by alluding to them as a character rather than as a real person.

SWKineo, you working on it (site)?
I know who dumps now. Know for sure. This man was in our group. He turned out as awful creature and scum. He decided to make money on others in group. He is a rat. Moscow vile creature. And i see that he reads this topic. Now i'm 100% sure.
Do not fall for his provocation if you believe in this coin and wish it to skyrocket. Do not let him buy back coins that he spent for dump. It's craziness to sell coin that are very rare, very hard to mine, eats so much electricity to mine one block. You decide, but think of that. There are not so much coins mined and will be total, block reward is not so big. It's not litecoin or doge, but it can be traded much-much higher.
Hello, moscow bastard!

The new site's supposedly going up this month. At the very least, that should make the coin easier to find and more appealing.

They will see after few blocks that something wrong and will update their wallets.. And will jump in and out again.
To protect coin from multipools there must be twice or triple miners power more than all jumping multipools together.
Now we at price point 15'000-130'000 times lower than doge... 130 thousand times (!) lower. It's a crazy number.
Coin need good PR. Very good and strong PR.

Too late for that;' they will be jumping in. I think with luck most of the multipools will be on the old fork(s) and thus won't be able to capitalize.

With any luck, the difficulty algorithm will see how long it took to find 79992 and set the diff super low. We just have to hope that multipools won't jump on at that point.

Nine blocks to nobody knows what to.
iGotSpots?

I don't feel so lonely - someone else is on the pool...

How many people are actually mining at the moment?
Would it make more sense for us to all use one pool - then we might get this block (78992) solved... it should have gone by now - even solo I should have solved a 3.8 diff in 3-4 hours...

Since nobody's replied yet, I'll try to answer this with my somewhat limited knowledge (so don't take my word for it).

As far as I understand, clients are hardwired to use a certain block chain for a certain set of blocks, which is why hard forks require a new client. A 51% attack generates false blocks on the current chain, rather than creating a whole new one.

Seems like the ETA of Feb 13th was a good guess. 13 blocks to go

I thought in the event of a fork the longest block chain won, so a chain that has been generating blocks every minute will win out over one where the difficulty gets spiked and so the block generation slows right down... Basis of the 51% attack - generate a 'false' block chain faster than the 'real' one...

iGotSpots, any positive news? Services, sites? Plans?

Go ahead. Those coins would be useless though since all the exchanges and everything else would be on a different fork

perhaps we should do a deliberate fork? Set up a pool that the diff hoppers don't know about, mine on that with the wallet unsynced - the diff should drop off so we get consistent (~1min) block times with a consistent hash rate, then we have the longest chain once we resync... Just bar any userid that mines for <10minutes?