Author

Topic: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming) - page 322. (Read 790393 times)

full member
Activity: 171
Merit: 100
The maximum number of service nodes at the moment is ~880 based on a coin supply of ~2,540,000.

This means that number 1 wallet would be able to run ~68 service nodes ( without worry about being dropped by the spread.  Interesting stuff.

68 full service/bitcoin nodes.  That would be a serious commitment to bandwidth bills Cheesy

Interesting, what is the calculation that you made to come up with 68?

I was going by mental arithmetic so I'll show you my rough working from memory.  I apologise for the mental back of fag packet calculations!

Number 1 wallet has ~200k SPR

Current coin supply is ~2,500,000

Max number of snodes (coin supply/2880)= 868

Based on the false premise that every coin will be used in a servicenode (I have no data to guess how many coins will be in snodes):

Max coin supply / Max snodes = 2880SPR

Meaning that if I was the owner of #1 wallet and I wanted to guarantee that all of my service nodes were in the spread I'd load each node with  2800SPR which means that I'd be able to afford to fund roughly 68 snodes in this way.



EDIT:  Correcting price error

A quick check on AWS estimates that it would cost $3000pm to run the following:

68 x T2.micro
68 x 60GB magnetic volumes
13,600GB outbound traffic
1360GB inbound traffic (free anyway)

This means the #1 wallet holder would need to see about 130,000SPR per month (at current price) to break even)






goodness gracious, that's certainly cost prohibitive.  I was thinking a remote server in the range of $ 5 month/node would be borderline feasible but would need the price of spr to reach beyond .000205 to be profitable.

Since the primary objective is decentralization, why not tie cpu mining to spr's first reward service?  It would strengthen the network, be something anyone could jump into with little cost, wouldn't be too difficult to implement, and provide preliminary insight into how the competition dynamics will play out.   

full member
Activity: 178
Merit: 100
Nodes That Serve
I have two graphics cards R9 290 (XFX and Sapphire)
But they don't want to work with the mining SPR, although perfectly produce any X11, n-scrypt.
Spread-GPU-miner and spreadcoinx11-sgminer-girino behave exactly the same. The Assembly is the kernel (*.bin) and all. Stop.
All other video cards work fine with both miners. (HD7970, R9 270X, R9 280X)

no problems with 290 cards at my end.

whats your operating system?
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
......

Thanks for the tip, but with these problems I handle easily.
In this case, were used a farm, working on darkcoin, with the best settings and drivers for maximum performance.
Only changed the program-miner - "spreadminer".
HD7970, R9 270X, R9 280X - involved in work on the first try. But the R9 290 in two different system blocks stay with exactly the same errors.
Perhaps the reason is that I have Russian version of win7 Ultimate with Russian drivers.
There will be time, will try to collect from source miner directly for this machine, and while they may produce a different currency.

If you're a farmer, then you might want to check the github page.

https://github.com/spreadcoin-project/SpreadCoin-Wiki/wiki/Mining-Guide

Some of the links work, spreadcoin.info now has the latest links.
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
I have two graphics cards R9 290 (XFX and Sapphire)
But they don't want to work with the mining SPR, although perfectly produce any X11, n-scrypt.
Spread-GPU-miner and spreadcoinx11-sgminer-girino behave exactly the same. The Assembly is the kernel (*.bin) and all. Stop.
All other video cards work fine with both miners. (HD7970, R9 270X, R9 280X)

I run an AMD r9 290 sapphire.

update to latest AMD drivers. Then try again.

can't help with xfx. never touched that flavour.

Follow the links to the youtube video for some help. There is also a link to AMD's auto driver check and download.

http://spreadcoin.info/downloads.php
Thanks for the tip, but with these problems I handle easily.
In this case, were used a farm, working on darkcoin, with the best settings and drivers for maximum performance.
Only changed the program-miner - "spreadminer".
HD7970, R9 270X, R9 280X - involved in work on the first try. But the R9 290 in two different system blocks stay with exactly the same errors.
Perhaps the reason is that I have Russian version of win7 Ultimate with Russian drivers.
There will be time, will try to collect from source miner directly for this machine, and while they may produce a different currency.
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
Looks like the spam filters are either working, or working too well. Sounds like the latter.
Very similar to this, unless of course it is not sanctions against Russia.  Grin

Please try another email, maybe create a gmail account or something.

Sorry to be like that, but I am happy to not have the spam problem anymore.  Grin
I already tried that one.
It seems that the ban on the IP.
I go to the forum, and once there all the same message.
No action, except you leave a page have no effect.

P.S. Just, accidentally went to http://spreadcoin.us and saw this page:
http://upload.akusherstvo.ru/image784693.png
horror
 Grin
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
I have two graphics cards R9 290 (XFX and Sapphire)
But they don't want to work with the mining SPR, although perfectly produce any X11, n-scrypt.
Spread-GPU-miner and spreadcoinx11-sgminer-girino behave exactly the same. The Assembly is the kernel (*.bin) and all. Stop.
All other video cards work fine with both miners. (HD7970, R9 270X, R9 280X)

I run an AMD r9 290 sapphire.

update to latest AMD drivers. Then try again.

can't help with xfx. never touched that flavour.

Follow the links to the youtube video for some help. There is also a link to AMD's auto driver check and download.

http://spreadcoin.info/downloads.php
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
I have two graphics cards R9 290 (XFX and Sapphire)
But they don't want to work with the mining SPR, although perfectly produce any X11, n-scrypt.
Spread-GPU-miner and spreadcoinx11-sgminer-girino behave exactly the same. The Assembly is the kernel (*.bin) and all. Stop.
All other video cards work fine with both miners. (HD7970, R9 270X, R9 280X)
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
Looks like the spam filters are either working, or working too well. Sounds like the latter.
Very similar to this, unless of course it is not sanctions against Russia.  Grin

Please try another email, maybe create a gmail account or something.

Sorry to be like that, but I am happy to not have the spam problem anymore.  Grin
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
Looks like the spam filters are either working, or working too well. Sounds like the latter.
Very similar to this, unless of course it is not sanctions against Russia.  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
Been syncing for a few hours, gone from 7 to 17 connections.

Code:
{
"version" : 91504,
"protocolversion" : 70019,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 820215.08398676,
"blocks" : 380782,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 17,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 14.37477669,
"networkhashps" : 1116043155,
"moneysupply" : 2549741.55788166,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1429366695,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : ""
}
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
Looks like the spam filters are either working, or working too well. Sounds like the latter.



I think it works perfect now.

I prefer working too well over not good enough...  Smiley

ok, maybe 1 false positive (that guy) but in the last 24 hours we have prevented a whooping 720 (!) registrations and postings from happening.
Say the log files.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
You should also tell georgem your email address (only the ending @xxxxx.xxx)

You are right, I informed him about that.

Anyway, maybe a little bit too much effort put in for a 1 post guy from russia.  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
I am gonna release a new updated wallet soon, with new DNS seed, and updated list of seed nodes,
and new alert key.

So, who here is running a full spreadcoin node?

And how many connections do you on average get?

Mine has about 50 connections ATM.

I'm happy to run a full SPR node.  How do I do it? Cheesy

1) You need a server with static IP (D'uh)
 
Are you sure about that?
Because I have a dynamic ip and if I leave my computer on all day I get 100+ connections. Keep in mind this was back when Mr. Spread was around.

Well, if you want your spreadcoin full node to go hardcoded in the next wallet I release (as a seeder node) then I NEED it to be a static ip.
I was not talking about servicenodes ...
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1001
Crypto since 2014
I am gonna release a new updated wallet soon, with new DNS seed, and updated list of seed nodes,
and new alert key.

So, who here is running a full spreadcoin node?

And how many connections do you on average get?

Mine has about 50 connections ATM.

I'm happy to run a full SPR node.  How do I do it? Cheesy

1) You need a server with static IP (D'uh)
 
Are you sure about that?
Because I have a dynamic ip and if I leave my computer on all day I get 100+ connections. Keep in mind this was back when Mr. Spread was around.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1001
Crypto since 2014
Looks like the spam filters are either working, or working too well. Sounds like the latter.


It most likely would have happened before the new server anyway, so I would say the former.
It was either his ip address or his email address, and we have a lot of ips and email addresses banned.



Why?
All fields were filled out correctly.
You should also tell georgem your email address (only the ending @xxxxx.xxx)
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
Looks like the spam filters are either working, or working too well. Sounds like the latter.

legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info


Why?
All fields were filled out correctly.

Could be many different things,
probably someone with the same or very similar IP tried to spam us in the past weeks.

Please PM me your IP and I might unban you specifically.

you are from russia I presume?
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
Anybody who is serious about running a full node please tell me your IP.

5.9.56.229 runs a full node with txindex=1 and a full testnet node ditto.

IP address is of minkiz.co where I'm developing a lightweight block explorer: https://minkiz.co/acme/spr amongst other things.

Cheers

Graham


About the txindex=1,

I thought this is only needed if you want to do commands like gettransaction from your wallet/daemon,
but the blockchain stays exactly the same, with txindex=1 or txindex=0.

This will just built an index for your convenience (see folder /blocks/index within your spreadcoin folder), and like any index it will help you look up entries/transactions more easily.

So I guess it's not helping at all to run a full node with txindex=1...
(...if your goal is to have a more "complete" blockchain, because the index isn't going to be shared with other nodes AT ALL, it's only being built on your server to make transaction lookups faster)

Just saying: this will do nothing to help spread the blockchain to other nodes.
It will have exactly the same effect like a full node with txindex=0 in that respect.

EDIT: wait, I guess txindex=1 makes sense because a full node doesn't only download and share blocks, but also transactions, and that's where the index comes in handy.
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1278
Anybody who is serious about running a full node please tell me your IP.

5.9.56.229 runs a full node with txindex=1 and a full testnet node ditto.

IP address is of minkiz.co where I'm developing a lightweight block explorer: https://minkiz.co/acme/spr amongst other things.

Cheers

Graham
Jump to: