[ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming) - page 317.

minerpage

sr. member

Activity: 268

Merit: 250

Good job on the new website!

I'm interested in running a node, but I have Windows 2003 Server: how does it work on this platform?

just2laff

member

Activity: 96

Merit: 10

Quote from: xojex on May 07, 2015, 01:38:43 PM

Step-By-Step: Creating a Spreadcoin Node

http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=710.0

Perfect! Thank you

stonehedge

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1002

Decentralize Everything

Quote from: xojex on May 07, 2015, 01:38:43 PM

Step-By-Step: Creating a Spreadcoin Node

http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=710.0

Bounty won Cool

xojex

member

Activity: 111

Merit: 10

Step-By-Step: Creating a Spreadcoin Node

http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=710.0

coins101

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

Quote from: georgem on May 07, 2015, 10:56:02 AM

Quote from: CHAOSiTEC on May 07, 2015, 10:15:06 AM

on a side note, i think its time to debate on upgrading our sources to core.. the question is should we base it on bitcoin core, litecoin core or darkcoin core, that is the question... i will start the process when we have figured out which path to walk...

CHAOSiTEC

We are going to need to upgrade to core code at some point in time, it brings many benefits.

Probably wait until I have a working servicenode implementation ready, ...

But I am not going to stop you if you already want to start porting current spreadcoin code to core.

+1 for bitcoin core.

It's been discussed in the background as something that needed attention.

It was just a matter of immediate needs.

stonehedge

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1002

Decentralize Everything

My gut feeling (as a non developer) is that Bitcoin core is the only way to go for now.

Big thanks to Xojex for his help with a full node user guide. It will shortly be published (with screenshots) on the SPR forum and also in the new Github when it arrives.

georgem

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1007

spreadcoin.info

Quote from: CHAOSiTEC on May 07, 2015, 10:15:06 AM

on a side note, i think its time to debate on upgrading our sources to core.. the question is should we base it on bitcoin core, litecoin core or darkcoin core, that is the question... i will start the process when we have figured out which path to walk...

CHAOSiTEC

We are going to need to upgrade to core code at some point in time, it brings many benefits.

Probably wait until I have a working servicenode implementation ready, ...

But I am not going to stop you if you already want to start porting current spreadcoin code to core.

CHAOSiTEC

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1002

Quote from: georgem on May 07, 2015, 09:47:36 AM

Quote from: stonehedge on May 07, 2015, 08:46:46 AM

I have total trust in Kristov's integrity and acknowledge that he devoted a lot of time for not very much recompense to his Darkcoin review but the fact he was receiving donations in DRK left him open to challenges on his impartiality. Credit where credit is due, he picked enough holes in Darkcoin at the time that this was never seen as an issue

You are right, this was a bit of a controversy.
But in the end, let the person decide what he prefers.

It was Kristov Atlas himself who initiated the donation process, and he specifically asked for DRK:
http://www.reddit.com/r/DRKCoin/comments/2aw4wy/donations_for_darksend_code_review/

So impartiality aside,... we DO want people to look at SPR as a valuable means of exchange.

(even from our reviewers, and the idea is, that if a reviewer finds a bug in SPR this will not diminish the value, but rather increase it. Bugs can be fixed.)

I am totally biased for sure: ATM as main dev I DO prefer SPR over BTC or fiat... Grin

(any BTC or Fiat donation will just be converted to SPR anyway... so why not skip this step)

i have also slowly but surely increased my spr holdings.. especially at the current level.

on a side note, i think its time to debate on upgrading our sources to core.. the question is should we base it on bitcoin core, litecoin core or darkcoin core, that is the question... i will start the process when we have figured out which path to walk...

CHAOSiTEC

georgem

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1007

spreadcoin.info

Quote from: stonehedge on May 07, 2015, 08:46:46 AM

I have total trust in Kristov's integrity and acknowledge that he devoted a lot of time for not very much recompense to his Darkcoin review but the fact he was receiving donations in DRK left him open to challenges on his impartiality. Credit where credit is due, he picked enough holes in Darkcoin at the time that this was never seen as an issue

You are right, this was a bit of a controversy.
But in the end, let the person decide what he prefers.

It was Kristov Atlas himself who initiated the donation process, and he specifically asked for DRK:
http://www.reddit.com/r/DRKCoin/comments/2aw4wy/donations_for_darksend_code_review/

So impartiality aside,... we DO want people to look at SPR as a valuable means of exchange.

(even from our reviewers, and the idea is, that if a reviewer finds a bug in SPR this will not diminish the value, but rather increase it. Bugs can be fixed.)

I am totally biased for sure: ATM as main dev I DO prefer SPR over BTC or fiat... Grin

(any BTC or Fiat donation will just be converted to SPR anyway... so why not skip this step)

stonehedge

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1002

Decentralize Everything

Quote from: georgem on May 07, 2015, 07:54:21 AM

I'd rather we repeat what Darkcoin did with Kristov Atlas. (when they raised 1000 DRK for his review),
instead of "employing" someone.

Interested people should approach us on their own (because they like our project, not because we are going to pay them),
and if they are going to make extensive technical reviews, we should start a donation based crowd funding as happened with Kristov Atlas.
(plus what will come out of the devfund).

Just one small observation if I may. I'm sure many people spotted it from outside the community but nobody within the DRK community voiced concerns about this at the time.

I think it is important that if we raise donations for somebody to do technical/code/security reviews then MUST make sure that we don't donate to them in Spreadcoins. BTC or FIAT should be the only options.

I have total trust in Kristov's integrity and acknowledge that he devoted a lot of time for not very much recompense to his Darkcoin review but the fact he was receiving donations in DRK left him open to challenges on his impartiality. Credit where credit is due, he picked enough holes in Darkcoin at the time that this was never seen as an issue

coins101

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

Sounds like a good idea, boss.

georgem

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1007

spreadcoin.info

Quote from: coins101 on May 07, 2015, 12:24:02 AM

Looks like some VPS providers have an affiliate program.

Well, that got me thinking. 10%-20% going to a dev fund? I'll take a look at which ones pay for referrals and the devs can think about signing up and putting various links on the website.

2,000 instances * $10/instance * 12 months * 20% = $48k Tongue

I am fine with affiliate links... when I have them ready we can start using them in tutorials or on the forum,
just never spam people, only use it when it makes sense to offer the service.

(Using affiliate links about servers in a tutorial that explains setup of spreadcoin nodes makes sense.)

I will research this over the next few weeks and start official affiliate partnerships with allkinds of service providers (in Europe and US)
I can then make monthly reports about the devfund.

This sounds like a good first step to start a devfund by having a source of income thru affiliate partnerships.

Quote from: coins101 on May 07, 2015, 12:24:02 AM

Just a thought - if we are going to be running bitcoin nodes and we did get an affiliates program going, perhaps we can allocate some of this dev fund from affiliates to retain technical input from a bitcoin core dev, say $10k/year?

I'd rather we repeat what Darkcoin did with Kristov Atlas. (when they raised 1000 DRK for his review),
instead of "employing" someone.

Interested people should approach us on their own (because they like our project, not because we are going to pay them),
and if they are going to make extensive technical reviews, we should start a donation based crowd funding as happened with Kristov Atlas.
(plus what will come out of the devfund).

coins101

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

Quote from: e1ghtSpace on May 05, 2015, 06:34:37 PM

Quote from: coins101 on May 05, 2015, 05:38:15 PM

Quote from: georgem on May 05, 2015, 04:40:43 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Here 54.77.37.133:41678

Thank you, I will add you to the list.

So we have 6 Fallback nodes now,
they will serve as last resort for wallets who have trouble connecting and synching.

Another 2 please... who is up to the job?

One left.

If e1ghtspace wants to take up the offer of a paid vps when he gets back to his pc, that's another one.

If he can't , I'll set up another on vps tomorrow pm (sorry, can't get to it before).

edit

Just goes to show, need those $$ rewards to kick people into action.

Ok i'll take that VPS.

...

E1ghtspace has confirmed a video will be available to set-up an spr node on a vps.

a follow-up video will be made on setting up servicenode testing, once that is released.

stonehedge

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1002

Decentralize Everything

Quote from: coins101 on May 07, 2015, 12:24:02 AM

snip

Just a thought - if we are going to be running bitcoin nodes and we did get an affiliates program going, perhaps we can allocate some of this dev fund from affiliates to retain technical input from a bitcoin core dev, say $10k/year?

Sounds like a great idea to me. It could be used to fund/resource testnet.

I know it is very early days yet but any idea when we will see the first glimpse of a high level roadmap? Are we talking days, weeks or months?

coins101

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

I am in communication with the vps that said they didn't want to host bitcoin nodes.

They are reviewing their TOS again.

I also posted a question on r/bittcoin and I've had a few helpful responses:

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3531q1/vps_wont_let_me_setup_a_full_bitcoin_node_why/

Interestingly, while initially being up voted, its since been down voted.

edit

Looks like some VPS providers have an affiliate program.

Well, that got me thinking. 10%-20% going to a dev fund? I'll take a look at which ones pay for referrals and the devs can think about signing up and putting various links on the website.

2,000 instances * $10/instance * 12 months * 20% = $48k Tongue

edit edit

Just a thought - if we are going to be running bitcoin nodes and we did get an affiliates program going, perhaps we can allocate some of this dev fund from affiliates to retain technical input from a bitcoin core dev, say $10k/year?

chrysophylax

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1091

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

hi all ...

we have a few issues that we need to fix today - so the install of the node will be delayed ... by half a day ...

the install will consist of a dedicated server with a dedicated ip address specifically for the running of the node for testing ...

question - how large is the blockchain download when fully synced? ...

georgem - how many nodes are you willing to accept from our end ( on separate servers and locations ) if the first install is successful? ...

#crysx

Ezravdb

hero member

Activity: 1680

Merit: 506