Waouh ! Lots of blabla in the last pages !
What's the "standard" hashrate on a 6950 for the SPR sgminer ?
Thanks a lot
What's the "standard" hashrate on a 6950 for the SPR sgminer ?
Thanks a lot
I get 1.2mh on a 6970
Topic: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes - page 164. (Read 810098 times)
February 04, 2015, 12:59:20 AM
I get 1.2mh on a 6970
February 04, 2015, 12:05:21 AM
Good stuff. Thanks for the link mate. I'll have a read up now.
February 04, 2015, 12:04:06 AM
FFS people, just ignore them!!
So how is MN testing going?
So how is MN testing going?
Mn's and instant transactions are pretty damn smooth. Everything you need to know about Round 1 of testing is in this thread. http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37.0
February 03, 2015, 11:57:09 PM
FFS people, just ignore them!!
So how is MN testing going?
So how is MN testing going?
February 03, 2015, 10:55:36 PM
February 03, 2015, 10:51:36 PM
Troll Challenge: start an open registration SPR pool so we can all see how long it takes one person to sweep all the mined coins and run off.
Trolls, don't you think the major pools would have done so by now if it were feasible?
Ill give 100 SPR to anyone willing to operate a puplic SPR pool.
February 03, 2015, 10:48:20 PM
I did say that this project won't amount to much because there isn't enough FUD going on to demonstrate others feeling threatened, etc.
Looks like you went out and got some FUD going on.
This project looks more promising now.
Watching.
edit
who is selling / distributing those optimized miners? Links?
thanks.
pm wolf0 or the big farmer ,they own optimized miners. Looks like you went out and got some FUD going on.
This project looks more promising now.
Watching.
edit
who is selling / distributing those optimized miners? Links?
thanks.
February 03, 2015, 10:43:05 PM
This is too funny and another reason to get a better forum. I was thinking the same thing that it seemed fishy that Mr. Spread was banned for something so stupid yet every "report to moderator" link I pushed on these fudmuffins goes unanswered. Oh well such is the way of corruption.
Yes please take your scammy activities to a better forum. You guys keep talking about it. Do it. Only problem is that you can't. You need bitcointalk more than it needs you. Bitcointalk is your hunting grounds. Without it you'd go hungry.
Maybe if this coin hadn't turned into the obvious pump and dump orchestrated by some of the same well known pump and dumpers it could have been a decent coin. As it turned out, the filth has covered up all of the shine the coin had when it was new.
February 03, 2015, 10:29:14 PM
Waouh ! Lots of blabla in the last pages !
What's the "standard" hashrate on a 6950 for the SPR sgminer ?
Thanks a lot
What's the "standard" hashrate on a 6950 for the SPR sgminer ?
Thanks a lot
Ignore the blabla and move on.
February 03, 2015, 10:20:14 PM
Waouh ! Lots of blabla in the last pages !
What's the "standard" hashrate on a 6950 for the SPR sgminer ?
Thanks a lot
What's the "standard" hashrate on a 6950 for the SPR sgminer ?
Thanks a lot
February 03, 2015, 10:07:00 PM
This is too funny and another reason to get a better forum. I was thinking the same thing that it seemed fishy that Mr. Spread was banned for something so stupid yet every "report to moderator" link I pushed on these fudmuffins goes unanswered. Oh well such is the way of corruption.
Yes please take your scammy activities to a better forum. You guys keep talking about it. Do it. Only problem is that you can't. You need bitcointalk more than it needs you. Bitcointalk is your hunting grounds. Without it you'd go hungry.
Maybe if this coin hadn't turned into the obvious pump and dump orchestrated by some of the same well known pump and dumpers it could have been a decent coin. As it turned out, the filth has covered up all of the shine the coin had when it was new.
February 03, 2015, 10:04:20 PM
I'd be fine with Mr Spread closing this thread and starting a new moderated one.
I'm generally against censorship, but I'm more against having my time wasted by the technicolour bullshit of halfwits, and people so cowardly they're afraid to post under their usual pseudonyms.
Hard questions should be welcomed, and debated. Spammers can fuck right off.
I'm generally against censorship, but I'm more against having my time wasted by the technicolour bullshit of halfwits, and people so cowardly they're afraid to post under their usual pseudonyms.
Hard questions should be welcomed, and debated. Spammers can fuck right off.
Look in the mirror king of shill accounts.
There's only one of me, the clue's in the name.
As you may have noticed I'm not afraid to speak my mind, I have no need of sockpuppet accounts.
February 03, 2015, 10:02:33 PM
Im bringing in alot of new faces into crypto on twitter this will be fun. #SpreadCoin Keep it positive guys.
February 03, 2015, 09:59:34 PM
I'd be fine with Mr Spread closing this thread and starting a new moderated one.
I'm generally against censorship, but I'm more against having my time wasted by the technicolour bullshit of halfwits, and people so cowardly they're afraid to post under their usual pseudonyms.
Hard questions should be welcomed, and debated. Spammers can fuck right off.
I'm generally against censorship, but I'm more against having my time wasted by the technicolour bullshit of halfwits, and people so cowardly they're afraid to post under their usual pseudonyms.
Hard questions should be welcomed, and debated. Spammers can fuck right off.
Look in the mirror king of shill accounts.
February 03, 2015, 09:47:54 PM
I'd be fine with Mr Spread closing this thread and starting a new moderated one.
I'm generally against censorship, but I'm more against having my time wasted by the technicolour bullshit of halfwits, and people so cowardly they're afraid to post under their usual pseudonyms.
Hard questions should be welcomed, and debated. Spammers can fuck right off.
I'm generally against censorship, but I'm more against having my time wasted by the technicolour bullshit of halfwits, and people so cowardly they're afraid to post under their usual pseudonyms.
Hard questions should be welcomed, and debated. Spammers can fuck right off.
February 03, 2015, 09:46:53 PM
This is too funny and another reason to get a better forum. I was thinking the same thing that it seemed fishy that Mr. Spread was banned for something so stupid yet every "report to moderator" link I pushed on these fudmuffins goes unanswered. Oh well such is the way of corruption.
I have to disagree with you on this one. I have been reporting the FUDers consistently, and while they have not been banned, their spams are being removed from th thread. Check some pages back and you'll see that many of them only appear as quotes, the originals are missing. The problem is, while they do clean up what we report, they do it slowly, and thus we can't really get rid of the newer posts from the trolls. So, moderators are doing their job of cleaning up the mess, it's just not an efficient way to deal with it. Specially if people keep quoting them.
Please, just ignore all of them. Don't quote, don't answer! When the mods clean the posts, they will be gone!
So are you saying deleting my post instantly and banning Mr.spread on the same day is ok, But removing Trolls from SPR need to be waited(eventhough reported multiple times)??
Nope, i'm saying you are using double standards when dealing with moderators. They are doing their job according to the rules in the speed they can. Neither your post nor the thread by Mr. Spread were deleted/banned instantly, it took time. On average, the same time it takes them to delete the spam here. But you will only notice what you look for, so if you don't look for deleted spam, you wont notice it got deleted. There don't seem to have any prejudice from moderators here, just them doing their job as always.
hey dear DRK fellows, SPR successfuly tested InstantX.
That is not spam, just "off topic" and possibly got deleted for that.
February 03, 2015, 09:45:06 PM
This is too funny and another reason to get a better forum. I was thinking the same thing that it seemed fishy that Mr. Spread was banned for something so stupid yet every "report to moderator" link I pushed on these fudmuffins goes unanswered. Oh well such is the way of corruption.
I have to disagree with you on this one. I have been reporting the FUDers consistently, and while they have not been banned, their spams are being removed from th thread. Check some pages back and you'll see that many of them only appear as quotes, the originals are missing. The problem is, while they do clean up what we report, they do it slowly, and thus we can't really get rid of the newer posts from the trolls. So, moderators are doing their job of cleaning up the mess, it's just not an efficient way to deal with it. Specially if people keep quoting them.
Please, just ignore all of them. Don't quote, don't answer! When the mods clean the posts, they will be gone!
So are you saying deleting my post instantly and banning Mr.spread on the same day is ok, But removing Trolls from SPR need to be waited(eventhough reported multiple times)??
Nope, i'm saying you are using double standards when dealing with moderators. They are doing their job according to the rules in the speed they can. Neither your post nor the thread by Mr. Spread were deleted/banned instantly, it took time. On average, the same time it takes them to delete the spam here. But you will only notice what you look for, so if you don't look for deleted spam, you wont notice it got deleted. There don't seem to have any prejudice from moderators here, just them doing their job as always.
hey dear DRK fellows, SPR successfuly tested InstantX.
February 03, 2015, 09:38:40 PM
This is too funny and another reason to get a better forum. I was thinking the same thing that it seemed fishy that Mr. Spread was banned for something so stupid yet every "report to moderator" link I pushed on these fudmuffins goes unanswered. Oh well such is the way of corruption.
I have to disagree with you on this one. I have been reporting the FUDers consistently, and while they have not been banned, their spams are being removed from th thread. Check some pages back and you'll see that many of them only appear as quotes, the originals are missing. The problem is, while they do clean up what we report, they do it slowly, and thus we can't really get rid of the newer posts from the trolls. So, moderators are doing their job of cleaning up the mess, it's just not an efficient way to deal with it. Specially if people keep quoting them.
Please, just ignore all of them. Don't quote, don't answer! When the mods clean the posts, they will be gone!
So are you saying deleting my post instantly and banning Mr.spread on the same day is ok, But removing Trolls from SPR need to be waited(eventhough reported multiple times)??
Nope, i'm saying you are using double standards when dealing with moderators. They are doing their job according to the rules in the speed they can. Neither your post nor the thread by Mr. Spread were deleted/banned instantly, it took time. On average, the same time it takes them to delete the spam here. But you will only notice what you look for, so if you don't look for deleted spam, you wont notice it got deleted. There don't seem to have any prejudice from moderators here, just them doing their job as always.
February 03, 2015, 09:33:14 PM
This is too funny and another reason to get a better forum. I was thinking the same thing that it seemed fishy that Mr. Spread was banned for something so stupid yet every "report to moderator" link I pushed on these fudmuffins goes unanswered. Oh well such is the way of corruption.
I have to disagree with you on this one. I have been reporting the FUDers consistently, and while they have not been banned, their spams are being removed from th thread. Check some pages back and you'll see that many of them only appear as quotes, the originals are missing. The problem is, while they do clean up what we report, they do it slowly, and thus we can't really get rid of the newer posts from the trolls. So, moderators are doing their job of cleaning up the mess, it's just not an efficient way to deal with it. Specially if people keep quoting them.
Please, just ignore all of them. Don't quote, don't answer! When the mods clean the posts, they will be gone!
So are you saying deleting my post instantly and banning Mr.spread on the same day is ok, But removing Trolls from SPR need to be waited(eventhough reported multiple times)??
February 03, 2015, 09:26:38 PM
This is too funny and another reason to get a better forum. I was thinking the same thing that it seemed fishy that Mr. Spread was banned for something so stupid yet every "report to moderator" link I pushed on these fudmuffins goes unanswered. Oh well such is the way of corruption.
I have to disagree with you on this one. I have been reporting the FUDers consistently, and while they have not been banned, their spams are being removed from th thread. Check some pages back and you'll see that many of them only appear as quotes, the originals are missing. The problem is, while they do clean up what we report, they do it slowly, and thus we can't really get rid of the newer posts from the trolls. So, moderators are doing their job of cleaning up the mess, it's just not an efficient way to deal with it. Specially if people keep quoting them.
Please, just ignore all of them. Don't quote, don't answer! When the mods clean the posts, they will be gone!
Jump to: