[ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes - page 30.

coins101

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Scamalert on April 22, 2015, 04:15:42 PM

OP:
I cannot access or download the white paper.
It is supose to be here: http://spreadcoin.net/files/SpreadCoin-WhitePaper.pdf
BUT, The link is broken.
Is there an alternativ address where I can access the whitepaper?

try here

http://spreadcoin.us/

edit - actually, that's down too.

new ANN and websites are due any day.

Scamalert

hero member

Activity: 490

Merit: 500

Captain

OP:
I cannot access or download the white paper.
It is supose to be here: http://spreadcoin.net/files/SpreadCoin-WhitePaper.pdf
BUT, The link is broken.
Is there an alternativ address where I can access the whitepaper?

coins101

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

Quote from: rahmad2nd on April 22, 2015, 02:46:18 PM

Price growing up...
i'm late to buy cheap coin yesterday Sad

QED

Quote from: coins101 on April 22, 2015, 09:18:21 AM

Got to say, the liquidity is pretty good. No arguments and fud on that front as the project moves on.

Get'em while you can.

No, things haven't started cooking yet.

rahmad2nd

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1009

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Price growing up...
i'm late to buy cheap coin yesterday Sad

Scamalert

hero member

Activity: 490

Merit: 500

Captain

Quote from: e1ghtSpace on April 19, 2015, 05:04:49 PM

Quote from: AnotherNode on April 19, 2015, 03:24:52 PM

Quote from: georgem on April 19, 2015, 02:25:47 PM

Quote from: loomdart on April 19, 2015, 10:57:24 AM

Maybe it's time to make a brandnew ANN, as it seems apparent Mr Spread isn't returning?

Yes, new ANN is approaching fast, just a few more things I have to finish first.
Stay tuned.

Good news

Solo mining Spread is so easy. Once people get it, its really hard to find anything better.

Yeah, whats the spr/Mhash/day rate?

Ỏ̷͖͈̞̩͎̻̫̫̜͉̠̫͕̭̭̫̫̹̗̹͈̼̠̖͍͚̥͈̮̼͕̠̤̯̻̥̬̗̼̳̤̳̬̪̹͚̞̼̠͕̼̠̦͚̫͔̯̹͉͉̘͎͕̼̣̝͙̱̟̹̩̟̳̦̭͉̮̖̭̣̣̞̙̗̜̺̭̻̥͚͙̝̦̲̱͉͖͉̰̦͎̫̣̼͎͍̠̮͓̹̹͉̤̰̗̙͕͇͔̱͕̭͈̳̗̭͔̘̖̺̮̜̠͖̘͓̳͕̟̠̱̫̤͓͔̘̰̲͙͍͇̙͎̣̼̗̖͙̯͉̠̟͈͍͕̪͓̝̩̦̖̹̼̠̘̮͚̟͉̺̜͍͓̯̳̱̻͕̣̳͉̻̭̭̱͍̪̩̭̺͕̺̼̥̪͖̦̟͎̻̰_Ỏ̷͖͈̞̩͎̻̫̫̜͉̠̫͕̭̭̫̫̹̗̹͈̼̠̖͍͚̥͈̮̼͕̠̤̯̻̥̬̗̼̳̤̳̬̪̹͚̞̼̠͕̼̠̦͚̫͔̯̹͉͉̘͎͕̼̣̝͙̱̟̹̩̟̳̦̭͉̮̖̭̣̣̞̙̗̜̺̭̻̥͚͙̝̦̲̱͉͖͉̰̦͎̫̣̼͎͍̠̮͓̹̹͉̤̰̗̙͕͇͔̱͕̭͈̳̗̭͔̘̖̺̮̜̠͖̘͓̳͕̟̠̱̫̤͓͔̘̰̲͙͍͇̙͎̣̼̗̖͙̯͉̠̟͈͍͕̪͓̝̩̦̖̹̼̠̘̮͚̟͉̺̜͍͓̯̳̱̻͕̣̳͉̻̭̭̱͍̪̩̭̺͕̺̼̥̪͖̦̟͎̻̰

Wow that text thing is weird... Long live S̷̡̭͕͈̫͓͈̯̥̖̝̬̭̟͓̮̥ͫ̾ͬͤ̈̑̆̌̌p̘͚̠͓͙͉͈̹̺̣̺͓̞͆͆ͫ̑͛ͩ͛̕͝r͔̼͙͖̭͉͔̤̦̯̫͇̠̬͕̈́́̾̇̂ͥ̅̌̔ͤ̅̌ͪ̀̉ͭ̽̓̚͢͡ę̵̷̛̭̞̙͖̯̙̩͚̞̠͉̜͓͈͚ͣ̿̌ͯͩ̓̔̎ͬͦͯͧͤ̌̿ą̶̡̲̝̭̫̯̙̻͍̰̫̜̟̟ͯ̂̒ͧ͡ḋ̶̷̥̣͖̖̻͈͓͔̞̜̗̬̭̯͙̒̇̋͐̌̒c̨̙̦̖̻̖̬̩̗͎̜̻̺̙̩̰̬ͯ̂̀ͦ̏͌͆͊͑͂ͪ̈͑ͩͪ̉ͬ̔͝ͅơ̸͉̟̞͇͇̻̟̙̠͎̼͔̗̝̩̺̦͔͌́̋ͤ̏̔ͯ͋̑̑̊͛͘i̵̫̠̹̭͓̝͉̫͛͂͆͌͆̄̋̂͆̒̎ͯ̃̂͞n̡͕͔̮̟̹͉̫̜̯̳͖̠̭ͭͮ̂͛ͦ̑ͪ͋̒̔ͫͦͩͭ̋̀̚͢͞

How do you make that weird text?
What kinda witchcraft are you using?

coins101

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

Quote from: defunctec on April 22, 2015, 01:16:40 PM

WTH is going on at bittrex?

I put a buy wall up for some bounties, and then it went mad.

defunctec

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1000

WTH is going on at bittrex?

xojex

member

Activity: 111

Merit: 10

Quote from: stonehedge on April 21, 2015, 03:26:56 PM

Quote from: coins101 on April 21, 2015, 03:22:43 PM

600 Altcoins, with a combined value of $460m, $200m excluding Ripple.

600 projects! Lets say 100-200 Devs, 2,000-4,000 supporters overall.

Imagine if those projects coordinated efforts around a handful of projects. Bitcoin wouldn't have a chance.

All the scams would be significantly reduced too.

You can see people dumping alts all over the place to go and try to make a quick buck on the various altcoin mafia scams going on at the moment. Some genuine projects getting hurt. Its a real shame.

Greed beats technological advancement hands down I guess.

Know how much is traded daily in the traditional global financial system? Trillions.

It boggles the mind the actions they take for just a few quid.

coins101

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

Got to say, the liquidity is pretty good. No arguments and fud on that front as the project moves on.

Get'em while you can.

AnotherNode

full member

Activity: 178

Merit: 100

Nodes That Serve

Quote from: popshot on April 21, 2015, 06:04:47 PM

Quote from: coins101 on April 21, 2015, 03:57:07 PM

I've seen several projects now all launching with 'masternodes'

Maybe what we need to do at this early point is start a Node Trust Alliance - possibly a Decentralized Node Alliance or DNA Grin

We don't all need to be working and struggling in our little silos on the same code to run the nodes. We can work on the same code to run our networks, but build different applications for our projects and then we can all run PR through the Alliance; kick-out scam coins; promote best practice; etc.

No fees, just a code of professionalism.

DNA

Lets make it so, Nr.1

Are you suggesting a non coin bound project that is open to anyone while the final say when it comes to merging submitted changes has a non profit foundation?

The idea seems too idyllic, too utopian. Wink

Common good is seldom experienced in crypto at least not as often as it used to be.

Sounds like a good plan.

Try it and see how it goes. What's to lose vs. potential upside?

coins101

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

Good (cross post) from sub-ether:

Quote from: Sub-Ether on April 21, 2015, 02:13:57 PM

Quote from: pbleak on April 21, 2015, 01:49:24 PM

Great stuff in the new paper.

Yer, not only are the number of nodes decreasing overall but there is almost a 10% variance over a typical 24 hour period that will lead to a daily cycle of instabilities, and sinusoidal mapped delays.
A Masternode never sleeps, its 24/7 all the way resulting in uniform stability and speed consistantly Grin

http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-nodes-need/
''What's interesting is that during a recent 24-hour period, the number of reachable nodes went down from 8,200 to 7,600 and back to 8,200 again. This suggests that a portion of users running nodes are turning off their machines at night, meaning that this contingent of nodes are being run on desktops or laptops.''

Bitcoin nodes don't get paid, so there are future risks to the bitcoin network. Incentives to pay bitcoin nodes are not considered realistic, but the alternative is to rely on businesses that have a stake in bitcoin's success running nodes - that's another centralisation issue, along with commercial mining.

Taking into account the possible use of ServiceNodes as [link to be included when update is provided by devs], perhaps some of the servicenodes / masternodes can create an incentive structure for bitcoin nodes.

That would benefit SPR, other potential participants of DNA and Bitcoin.

People are creating sidechains for bitcoin:

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2k1ayi/adam_back_greg_maxwell_and_pieter_wuille_will_be/

But what if ServiceNodes could create sidechains just as easily? That's where there could be incentives to run bitcoin nodes.

Explanation to follow:

coins101

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

Quote from: popshot on April 21, 2015, 06:04:47 PM

Quote from: coins101 on April 21, 2015, 03:57:07 PM

I've seen several projects now all launching with 'masternodes'

Maybe what we need to do at this early point is start a Node Trust Alliance - possibly a Decentralized Node Alliance or DNA Grin

We don't all need to be working and struggling in our little silos on the same code to run the nodes. We can work on the same code to run our networks, but build different applications for our projects and then we can all run PR through the Alliance; kick-out scam coins; promote best practice; etc.

No fees, just a code of professionalism.

DNA

Lets make it so, Nr.1

Are you suggesting a non coin bound project that is open to anyone while the final say when it comes to merging submitted changes has a ~~non profit foundation~~?

The idea seems too idyllic, too utopian. Wink

Common good is seldom experienced in crypto at least not as often as it used to be.

"....consensus", yes.

Foundation? They hardly ever work. Just a code of ethics to not scam or your project is not recognized and therefore not taken seriously by investors.

Gentlemen's agreement was tried, but it didn't work.

Quote from: satoshi on December 12, 2009, 12:52:44 PM

The average total coins generated across the network per day stays the same. Faster machines just get a larger share than slower machines. If everyone bought faster machines, they wouldn't get more coins than before.

We should have a gentleman's agreement to postpone the GPU arms race as long as we can for the good of the network. It's much easer to get new users up to speed if they don't have to worry about GPU drivers and compatibility. It's nice how anyone with just a CPU can compete fairly equally right now.

Maybe try again and see how it goes. There is no arms race as such on a DNA.

popshot

hero member

Activity: 774

Merit: 554

CEO Diamond Foundation

Quote from: coins101 on April 21, 2015, 03:57:07 PM

I've seen several projects now all launching with 'masternodes'

Maybe what we need to do at this early point is start a Node Trust Alliance - possibly a Decentralized Node Alliance or DNA Grin

We don't all need to be working and struggling in our little silos on the same code to run the nodes. We can work on the same code to run our networks, but build different applications for our projects and then we can all run PR through the Alliance; kick-out scam coins; promote best practice; etc.

No fees, just a code of professionalism.

DNA

Lets make it so, Nr.1

Are you suggesting a non coin bound project that is open to anyone while the final say when it comes to merging submitted changes has a non profit foundation?

The idea seems too idyllic, too utopian. Wink

Common good is seldom experienced in crypto at least not as often as it used to be.

coins101

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

Quote from: stonehedge on April 21, 2015, 03:26:56 PM

Quote from: coins101 on April 21, 2015, 03:22:43 PM

600 Altcoins, with a combined value of $460m, $200m excluding Ripple.

600 projects! Lets say 100-200 Devs, 2,000-4,000 supporters overall.

Imagine if those projects coordinated efforts around a handful of projects. Bitcoin wouldn't have a chance.

All the scams would be significantly reduced too.

You can see people dumping alts all over the place to go and try to make a quick buck on the various altcoin mafia scams going on at the moment. Some genuine projects getting hurt. Its a real shame.

Greed beats technological advancement hands down I guess.

I recall starting a thread of all the new coins launching with x11

Quote from: coins101 on April 09, 2014, 06:24:35 AM

DARKCOIN is one of the few coins with a full time developer, and a developer that is open about who he really is: Evan Duffield.

While working on Darkcoin, Evan has created a number of new innovations. These are now starting to be used by other coins, including clones of Darkcoin or existing coins that are changing to adopt Darkcoin innovations.

This is a list of the the coins that are using Darkcoin innovations.

* Badgercoin - x11
-snip-

I've seen several projects now all launching with 'masternodes'

Maybe what we need to do at this early point is start a Node Trust Alliance - possibly a Decentralized Node Alliance or DNA Grin

We don't all need to be working and struggling in our little silos on the same code to run the nodes. We can work on the same code to run our networks, but build different applications for our projects and then we can all run PR through the Alliance; kick-out scam coins; promote best practice; etc.

No fees, just a code of professionalism.

DNA

Lets make it so, Nr.1

stonehedge

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1002

Decentralize Everything

Quote from: coins101 on April 21, 2015, 03:22:43 PM

600 Altcoins, with a combined value of $460m, $200m excluding Ripple.

600 projects! Lets say 100-200 Devs, 2,000-4,000 supporters overall.

Imagine if those projects coordinated efforts around a handful of projects. Bitcoin wouldn't have a chance.

All the scams would be significantly reduced too.

You can see people dumping alts all over the place to go and try to make a quick buck on the various altcoin mafia scams going on at the moment. Some genuine projects getting hurt. Its a real shame.

Greed beats technological advancement hands down I guess.

coins101

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

600 Altcoins, with a combined value of $460m, $200m excluding Ripple.

600 projects! Lets say 100-200 Devs, 2,000-4,000 supporters overall.

Imagine if those projects coordinated efforts around a handful of projects. Bitcoin wouldn't have a chance.

All the scams would be significantly reduced too.

coins101

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000