Do not believe them for a second.
Cancer treatment ans blockchain? Run as far as you can get form this one, 100% scam.
No legitimate cancer treatment which has shown good trails needs tokens to get them going, big pharma would rush in with stacks of money before we could blink.
RED FLAGS ALL OVER HERE
What prooves do you have? For now, it is just your opinion. Can you prove somehow that this project is scam? It has US registration, and it is a STO, so it should be accepted by SEC.
The opposite what proof you have that this is NOT a SCAM?
The logic and rational thinking indicates that it is a scam, noone in this field of business needs money from ICO.
I will change my mind if they have SEC approval ut it wont happen
Hi prehisto, I will answer your comments one by one.
1. I have said over and over that WE DO NOT HAVE A NEW DRUG, we are using already FDA approved and patented drug. One of the drugs has been on the market for over 30 year but no one has every thought of using it in combinations with chemotherapy drugs until Dr. Tsang tried it and it worked and has been working on people in China since 2009. SO there is no reasons for a Big Pharma company to rush in with stacks of money.
2. Yes we could raise the money from institutional lenders, VC's, Angel Investors and more. And we are talking with them as we speak. And moving forward well. But with all of the big money coming it, control can be lost which can turn what we want to be a treatment for the masses to become cost prohibitive for the masses. Big investors are interested in big profits. We are interesting is good profits and help as many dogs and people we can.
We are hoping that since this is a cancer treatment we are making affordable for dogs and people that we would give those same people a chance to become part of it. That is why we are doing it as a STO. Plus if you read the whitepaper or website you can see some distinct advantages of using the blockchain to help run our company.
3. AS PER SEC APPROVAL. We are doing everything legal and according to the SEC's rules under the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506(c) under Regulation D for US investors and under Regulation S for International investors. I live in the US with my wife and two kids, we have a securities attorney, we use Polymath smart contract to create the SANA security tokens and to mint them.
We had to prove to Polymath we were legal under SEC's 506(c). How? Buy submitting to them our business plan, our Subscription Agreement and our PPM (Private Placement Memorandum). ALL documents require to have via Rule 506(c) of the Securities Act. I would be happy to send anyone who wants to review these.
Do you really thing I would risk going to jail by running a STO scam if I lived in the US causing me to be away from my wife and kids?
NEVER Do you think Polymath would have accepted us if we could not prove we were a legal STO?
On our website, I have links to FB, LinkedIn and more that show who I am and what I have been doing for years. People who are running a scam hide who they are or put up false or vague Identities. Besides myself, our Chief Operating Officer's LinkedIn can show exactly who he is and what he has been doing. Same with Dr. Tsang and his CV that we have a link to on our website which shows his years of research.
Only legitimate people would give out as much information about them as we do.
4. And finally if you don't believe in us or think we are wrong then I encourage you to do more research on us.
Gary