Pages:
Author

Topic: ⭐️ [ANN] [STO] Cancer Treatment Proven Since '09 ⭐️ MINIMUM INVESTMENT ONLY $90 ⭐️ - page 49. (Read 8237 times)

full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
Quote
2.  Yes we could raise the money from institutional lenders, VC's, Angel Investors and more.  And we are talking with them as we speak.  And moving forward well.  But with all of the big money coming it, control can be lost which can turn what we want to be a treatment for the masses to become cost prohibitive for the masses.  Big investors are interested in big profits.  We are interesting is good profits and help as many dogs and people we can.

I think you should take their money too, but only if there won't be a danger to lose your company. So, you need a very good lawer.

We will if the deal is right for all parties.  I have dealt with institutional investors before and they are demanding and some will ultimately end up with them owner 75% or more of the company. 

Gary

I've heard about that before. It is very difficult to get direct funds from institutional investors and not to lose your company. As for me, I understand why you are here.
copper member
Activity: 154
Merit: 18
I have to repeat the question again. Will SANA tokens be frozen for any period of time or not. This questions is very important.

Hi Valera sorry I am taking so long to answer your question.  I prefer to use the legal term of restricted from selling instead of frozen.

For International Investors under Regulation S, investors SANA tokens will be restricted from sell them for only 90 days.

For US investors under Regulations D,  investors SANA tokens will be restricted from selling them for 12 months.  That said, US investors are used to this.  It is the same case for investing into any private company.

THAT SAID, this is only for the initial investment. There are NO RESTRICTIONS, when someone buys them on an secondary exchange AND when we go over 2000 individual investors and we are considered a public company, there are no restrictions of when you sell.  You could buy it and 10 seconds later sell it on any exchange.

Gary
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 100
Do not believe them for a second.
Cancer treatment ans blockchain? Run as far as you can get form this one, 100% scam.

No legitimate cancer treatment which has shown good trails needs tokens to get them going, big pharma would rush in with stacks of money before we could blink.

RED FLAGS ALL OVER HERE

What prooves do you have? For now, it is just your opinion. Can you prove somehow that this project is scam? It has US registration, and it is a STO, so it should be accepted by SEC.

The opposite what proof you have that this is NOT a SCAM?
The logic and rational thinking indicates that it is a scam, noone in this field of business needs money from ICO.

I will change my mind if they have SEC approval ut it wont happen Tongue

Hi prehisto,  I will answer your comments one by one.

1.  I have said over and over that WE DO NOT HAVE A NEW DRUG, we are using already FDA approved and patented drug.  One of the drugs has been on the market for over 30 year but no one has every thought of using it in combinations with chemotherapy drugs until Dr. Tsang tried it and it worked and has been working on people in China since 2009. SO there is no reasons for a Big Pharma company to rush in with stacks of money.

2.  Yes we could raise the money from institutional lenders, VC's, Angel Investors and more.  And we are talking with them as we speak.  And moving forward well.  But with all of the big money coming it, control can be lost which can turn what we want to be a treatment for the masses to become cost prohibitive for the masses.  Big investors are interested in big profits.  We are interesting is good profits and help as many dogs and people we can.

We are hoping that since this is a cancer treatment we are making affordable for dogs and people that we would give those same people a chance to become part of it.  That is why we are doing it as a STO.  Plus if you read the whitepaper or website you can see some distinct advantages of using the blockchain to help run our company.

3.  AS PER SEC APPROVAL. We are doing everything legal and according to the SEC's rules under the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506(c) under Regulation D for US investors and under Regulation S for International investors.  I live in the US with my wife and two kids, we have a securities attorney, we use Polymath smart contract to create the SANA security tokens and to mint them.   We had to prove to Polymath we were legal under SEC's 506(c).  How? Buy submitting to them our business plan, our Subscription Agreement and our PPM (Private Placement Memorandum).  ALL documents require to have via Rule 506(c) of the Securities Act.  I would be happy to send anyone who wants to review these.

Do you really thing I would risk going to jail by running a STO scam if I lived in the US causing me to be away from my wife and kids? NEVER Do you think Polymath would have accepted us if we could not prove we were a legal STO?

On our website, I have links to FB, LinkedIn and more that show who I am and what I have been doing for years. People who are running a scam hide who they are or put up false or vague Identities.  Besides myself, our Chief Operating Officer's LinkedIn can show exactly who he is and what he has been doing.  Same with Dr. Tsang and his CV that we have a link to on our website which shows his years of research.

Only legitimate people would give out as much information about them as we do.  

4.  And finally if you don't believe in us or think we are wrong then I encourage you to do more research on us.  

Gary

US registration by US citizen. The project uses Polymath. How thoughts about scam project could come in someone's head? Such nonsense.
copper member
Activity: 154
Merit: 18
Quote
2.  Yes we could raise the money from institutional lenders, VC's, Angel Investors and more.  And we are talking with them as we speak.  And moving forward well.  But with all of the big money coming it, control can be lost which can turn what we want to be a treatment for the masses to become cost prohibitive for the masses.  Big investors are interested in big profits.  We are interesting is good profits and help as many dogs and people we can.

I think you should take their money too, but only if there won't be a danger to lose your company. So, you need a very good lawer.

We will if the deal is right for all parties.  I have dealt with institutional investors before and they are demanding and some will ultimately end up with them owner 75% or more of the company. 

Gary
full member
Activity: 359
Merit: 100
Quote
But some cancers like brain cancer cannot be treated with our treatment because of the blood/brain barrier.

So, you have a lot of work to do to find out how to treat these types of cancer.  Smiley Is it the only type of cancer you can't treat?
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
Quote
2.  Yes we could raise the money from institutional lenders, VC's, Angel Investors and more.  And we are talking with them as we speak.  And moving forward well.  But with all of the big money coming it, control can be lost which can turn what we want to be a treatment for the masses to become cost prohibitive for the masses.  Big investors are interested in big profits.  We are interesting is good profits and help as many dogs and people we can.

I think you should take their money too, but only if there won't be a danger to lose your company. So, you need a very good lawer.
copper member
Activity: 154
Merit: 18
Hi prehisto,  I will answer your comments one by one.

1.  I have said over and over that WE DO NOT HAVE A NEW DRUG, we are using already FDA approved and patented drug.  One of the drugs has been on the market for over 30 year but no one has every thought of using it in combinations with chemotherapy drugs until Dr. Tsang tried it and it worked and has been working on people in China since 2009. SO there is no reasons for a Big Pharma company to rush in with stacks of money.

2.  Yes we could raise the money from institutional lenders, VC's, Angel Investors and more.  And we are talking with them as we speak.  And moving forward well.  But with all of the big money coming it, control can be lost which can turn what we want to be a treatment for the masses to become cost prohibitive for the masses.  Big investors are interested in big profits.  We are interesting is good profits and help as many dogs and people we can.

We are hoping that since this is a cancer treatment we are making affordable for dogs and people that we would give those same people a chance to become part of it.  That is why we are doing it as a STO.  Plus if you read the whitepaper or website you can see some distinct advantages of using the blockchain to help run our company.

3.  AS PER SEC APPROVAL. We are doing everything legal and according to the SEC's rules under the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506(c) under Regulation D for US investors and under Regulation S for International investors.  I live in the US with my wife and two kids, we have a securities attorney, we use Polymath smart contract to create the SANA security tokens and to mint them.   We had to prove to Polymath we were legal under SEC's 506(c).  How? Buy submitting to them our business plan, our Subscription Agreement and our PPM (Private Placement Memorandum).  ALL documents require to have via Rule 506(c) of the Securities Act.  I would be happy to send anyone who wants to review these.

Do you really thing I would risk going to jail by running a STO scam if I lived in the US causing me to be away from my wife and kids? NEVER Do you think Polymath would have accepted us if we could not prove we were a legal STO?

On our website, I have links to FB, LinkedIn and more that show who I am and what I have been doing for years. People who are running a scam hide who they are or put up false or vague Identities.  Besides myself, our Chief Operating Officer's LinkedIn can show exactly who he is and what he has been doing.  Same with Dr. Tsang and his CV that we have a link to on our website which shows his years of research.

Only legitimate people would give out as much information about them as we do.  

4.  And finally if you don't believe in us or think we are wrong then I encourage you to do more research on us.  

Gary

I don't understand that guy. Didn't he hear about the presumption of innocence? He says that the project is a scam, because he thinks he knows what's going on in this sphere of business?

I did want to add something to this string of post but wanted to let it be by itself.  There is both a benefit and additional requirements if we have over 2000 investors in our SANA tokens.  Which when I brought this to the cryptocurrency world and lowered the minimum requirement to $90, I knew would happen.   SEC rules state that if a company have over 2000 individual investor that they are then considered a public company and must file all the require documents including a registration statement, Form 10K and quarterly statements.

Giving more credibility to our company plus more accountability.  And even easier to be listed on all the larger security exchanges

If you want to read more about this here is a link directly to the SEC's website

Garyhttps://www.sec.gov/smallbusiness/goingpublic/exchangeactreporting
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
Do not believe them for a second.
Cancer treatment ans blockchain? Run as far as you can get form this one, 100% scam.

No legitimate cancer treatment which has shown good trails needs tokens to get them going, big pharma would rush in with stacks of money before we could blink.

RED FLAGS ALL OVER HERE

What prooves do you have? For now, it is just your opinion. Can you prove somehow that this project is scam? It has US registration, and it is a STO, so it should be accepted by SEC.

The opposite what proof you have that this is NOT a SCAM?
The logic and rational thinking indicates that it is a scam, noone in this field of business needs money from ICO.

I will change my mind if they have SEC approval ut it wont happen Tongue

Hi prehisto,  I will answer your comments one by one.

1.  I have said over and over that WE DO NOT HAVE A NEW DRUG, we are using already FDA approved and patented drug.  One of the drugs has been on the market for over 30 year but no one has every thought of using it in combinations with chemotherapy drugs until Dr. Tsang tried it and it worked and has been working on people in China since 2009. SO there is no reasons for a Big Pharma company to rush in with stacks of money.

2.  Yes we could raise the money from institutional lenders, VC's, Angel Investors and more.  And we are talking with them as we speak.  And moving forward well.  But with all of the big money coming it, control can be lost which can turn what we want to be a treatment for the masses to become cost prohibitive for the masses.  Big investors are interested in big profits.  We are interesting is good profits and help as many dogs and people we can.

We are hoping that since this is a cancer treatment we are making affordable for dogs and people that we would give those same people a chance to become part of it.  That is why we are doing it as a STO.  Plus if you read the whitepaper or website you can see some distinct advantages of using the blockchain to help run our company.

3.  AS PER SEC APPROVAL. We are doing everything legal and according to the SEC's rules under the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506(c) under Regulation D for US investors and under Regulation S for International investors.  I live in the US with my wife and two kids, we have a securities attorney, we use Polymath smart contract to create the SANA security tokens and to mint them.   We had to prove to Polymath we were legal under SEC's 506(c).  How? Buy submitting to them our business plan, our Subscription Agreement and our PPM (Private Placement Memorandum).  ALL documents require to have via Rule 506(c) of the Securities Act.  I would be happy to send anyone who wants to review these.

Do you really thing I would risk going to jail by running a STO scam if I lived in the US causing me to be away from my wife and kids? NEVER Do you think Polymath would have accepted us if we could not prove we were a legal STO?

On our website, I have links to FB, LinkedIn and more that show who I am and what I have been doing for years. People who are running a scam hide who they are or put up false or vague Identities.  Besides myself, our Chief Operating Officer's LinkedIn can show exactly who he is and what he has been doing.  Same with Dr. Tsang and his CV that we have a link to on our website which shows his years of research.

Only legitimate people would give out as much information about them as we do.  

4.  And finally if you don't believe in us or think we are wrong then I encourage you to do more research on us.  

Gary

I don't understand that guy. Didn't he hear about the presumption of innocence? He says that the project is a scam, because he thinks he knows what's going on in this sphere of business?

There are many forum users, who doesn't understand anything in fundraising. They think, that if the project is so unique, than it can't be here.
copper member
Activity: 154
Merit: 18
Multiple Comments and Responses
Is cancer "per se" curable? I always thought that it is possible for some new form of cancer or something similar to cancer to emerge. Is that thinking wrong?

Hi dzonikg28, that is a great questions.  There are some researchers who will then use the word curable but instead controllable. 

And with our treatment it can be both.  For example in some of the hospitals in China people being treated need to travel and cannot take off of their work for 7 to 10 weeks.  So they come for 2 to 3 weeks every year and their fatal cancer becomes a controllable chronic cancer.

Other go through the treatment and AFTER the treatment have the remaining tumor take out and they are cancer free for the rest of their life. 

But some cancers like brain cancer cannot be treated with our treatment because of the blood/brain barrier.

Gary

You definitely need to visit as many blockchain events as you can. Which one will be the first and will you be the only one, who will visit them?

I will have a list by end of this week.  Gary
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 100
Do not believe them for a second.
Cancer treatment ans blockchain? Run as far as you can get form this one, 100% scam.

No legitimate cancer treatment which has shown good trails needs tokens to get them going, big pharma would rush in with stacks of money before we could blink.

RED FLAGS ALL OVER HERE

What prooves do you have? For now, it is just your opinion. Can you prove somehow that this project is scam? It has US registration, and it is a STO, so it should be accepted by SEC.

The opposite what proof you have that this is NOT a SCAM?
The logic and rational thinking indicates that it is a scam, noone in this field of business needs money from ICO.

I will change my mind if they have SEC approval ut it wont happen Tongue

Hi prehisto,  I will answer your comments one by one.

1.  I have said over and over that WE DO NOT HAVE A NEW DRUG, we are using already FDA approved and patented drug.  One of the drugs has been on the market for over 30 year but no one has every thought of using it in combinations with chemotherapy drugs until Dr. Tsang tried it and it worked and has been working on people in China since 2009. SO there is no reasons for a Big Pharma company to rush in with stacks of money.

2.  Yes we could raise the money from institutional lenders, VC's, Angel Investors and more.  And we are talking with them as we speak.  And moving forward well.  But with all of the big money coming it, control can be lost which can turn what we want to be a treatment for the masses to become cost prohibitive for the masses.  Big investors are interested in big profits.  We are interesting is good profits and help as many dogs and people we can.

We are hoping that since this is a cancer treatment we are making affordable for dogs and people that we would give those same people a chance to become part of it.  That is why we are doing it as a STO.  Plus if you read the whitepaper or website you can see some distinct advantages of using the blockchain to help run our company.

3.  AS PER SEC APPROVAL. We are doing everything legal and according to the SEC's rules under the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506(c) under Regulation D for US investors and under Regulation S for International investors.  I live in the US with my wife and two kids, we have a securities attorney, we use Polymath smart contract to create the SANA security tokens and to mint them.   We had to prove to Polymath we were legal under SEC's 506(c).  How? Buy submitting to them our business plan, our Subscription Agreement and our PPM (Private Placement Memorandum).  ALL documents require to have via Rule 506(c) of the Securities Act.  I would be happy to send anyone who wants to review these.

Do you really thing I would risk going to jail by running a STO scam if I lived in the US causing me to be away from my wife and kids? NEVER Do you think Polymath would have accepted us if we could not prove we were a legal STO?

On our website, I have links to FB, LinkedIn and more that show who I am and what I have been doing for years. People who are running a scam hide who they are or put up false or vague Identities.  Besides myself, our Chief Operating Officer's LinkedIn can show exactly who he is and what he has been doing.  Same with Dr. Tsang and his CV that we have a link to on our website which shows his years of research.

Only legitimate people would give out as much information about them as we do.  

4.  And finally if you don't believe in us or think we are wrong then I encourage you to do more research on us.  

Gary

I don't understand that guy. Didn't he hear about the presumption of innocence? He says that the project is a scam, because he thinks he knows what's going on in this sphere of business?
copper member
Activity: 154
Merit: 18
If you will put all tokens that you wanted to sell on main sale to the treasury, what will happen to them?

Different things that happen such as:

1. They stay there and the demand for the outstanding tokens go up.
2. We could offer for dividends either USD or, if an existing token holder wants, we can pay their dividend in SANA tokens so they have a chance to get more SANA tokens without buying them.
3. We could use them to buy companies, clinics and such that can help, with just one purchase, improve our client base and revenue/profit.
4. We could use them up there road to raise more money
full member
Activity: 270
Merit: 100
Perhaps I missed what exchanges plan to add the project token? Maybe it makes sense to conduct IEO? Or is it against some rules?

Was said, that team has negotiations with several top 10 exchanges that are able to list security tokens. There were no information what exact exchanges they are talking with.
That is, IEO is likely to be? It would be great to have it at Binance. I don’t know how difficult it is to do it. But there would be a lot of investors.

Binance is the most interesting exchange at the moment, right. But, the team hasn't enough money for Binance at the moment. Maybe, after they find that money.
You can try to take several stage to raise money. When there is the necessary amount to organize IEO to collect the remaining amount of money.

Got you. And these gaps, as I understand it, are needed to balance the price? That is, between stages so that the price recovers?

I think, they need to get enough money for at least 1 clinic. That they should stop the fundraising. Work for a while, and after that open the fundraising again.

Do you think they will not be able to raise enough funds? After all, the problem is really relevant and significant, there are many caring people who want to help.

They can. But we are talking about another way of token sale, when it is devided to several stages with big period of time between them.

For example, now token's price is $0.1, it will be $0.2 on main sale. But, what if not to sale all tokens with this price? What if they will open a new stage of sales in a year with price about $1.

This is a fascinating conversation going on in this post and its response.  Let me try and answer all of them.

I like the idea of raising enough money and then stop fundraising, and work the clinics as suggested above but not with just one clinic.  I have mentioned before if I could raise at least $10 Million, I would stop the fundraising and open about 5 to 7 clinics for dogs and a few clinics for people in the Caribbean.

Then say in a year or so, we launch the main sale and instead of at $.20 the price could be significantly higher.   And what else would happen is the demand for the SANA token will be much higher.  And your SANA tokens will be worth a lot more.  And we will also be on exchanges by then.

But this means that IF we are holding the Main Sale and the SANA tokens owners from the pre-sale have the ability to sells their SANA tokens that if SANA  token holders want to sell their SANA tokens they will be in directly competition with our delayed main sale. 

But here is another concept. One I like even better. If we raise the $10 million and we can open us the 5 to 7 clinics for dogs and a few clinics for people in the Caribbean, the we just STOP the fundraising completely.  We do not have a main sale.  And we just put all remaining unsold SANA tokens in the companies treasury.  And we grow slower but steady opening new clinics when we can.

We then run the clinics, use part of the profits to open more, use part of the profits to pay out dividends and let the SANA token holders trade on the Exchanges.  This has two very big benefits

1.  There are less SANA token holders so every token gets more of the dividends paid out.
2.  The supply is much lower and so the demand is much higher and the price of the SANA token goes up.

But to do that we need to raise the $10 Million.  And to do that we need to push this STO every where and I need to get to as many events as I can.

Gary

You definitely need to visit as many blockchain events as you can. Which one will be the first and will you be the only one, who will visit them?
copper member
Activity: 154
Merit: 18
Do not believe them for a second.
Cancer treatment ans blockchain? Run as far as you can get form this one, 100% scam.

No legitimate cancer treatment which has shown good trails needs tokens to get them going, big pharma would rush in with stacks of money before we could blink.

RED FLAGS ALL OVER HERE

What prooves do you have? For now, it is just your opinion. Can you prove somehow that this project is scam? It has US registration, and it is a STO, so it should be accepted by SEC.

The opposite what proof you have that this is NOT a SCAM?
The logic and rational thinking indicates that it is a scam, noone in this field of business needs money from ICO.

I will change my mind if they have SEC approval ut it wont happen Tongue

Hi prehisto,  I will answer your comments one by one.

1.  I have said over and over that WE DO NOT HAVE A NEW DRUG, we are using already FDA approved and patented drug.  One of the drugs has been on the market for over 30 year but no one has every thought of using it in combinations with chemotherapy drugs until Dr. Tsang tried it and it worked and has been working on people in China since 2009. SO there is no reasons for a Big Pharma company to rush in with stacks of money.

2.  Yes we could raise the money from institutional lenders, VC's, Angel Investors and more.  And we are talking with them as we speak.  And moving forward well.  But with all of the big money coming it, control can be lost which can turn what we want to be a treatment for the masses to become cost prohibitive for the masses.  Big investors are interested in big profits.  We are interesting is good profits and help as many dogs and people we can.

We are hoping that since this is a cancer treatment we are making affordable for dogs and people that we would give those same people a chance to become part of it.  That is why we are doing it as a STO.  Plus if you read the whitepaper or website you can see some distinct advantages of using the blockchain to help run our company.

3.  AS PER SEC APPROVAL. We are doing everything legal and according to the SEC's rules under the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506(c) under Regulation D for US investors and under Regulation S for International investors.  I live in the US with my wife and two kids, we have a securities attorney, we use Polymath smart contract to create the SANA security tokens and to mint them.   We had to prove to Polymath we were legal under SEC's 506(c).  How? Buy submitting to them our business plan, our Subscription Agreement and our PPM (Private Placement Memorandum).  ALL documents require to have via Rule 506(c) of the Securities Act.  I would be happy to send anyone who wants to review these.

Do you really thing I would risk going to jail by running a STO scam if I lived in the US causing me to be away from my wife and kids? NEVER Do you think Polymath would have accepted us if we could not prove we were a legal STO?

On our website, I have links to FB, LinkedIn and more that show who I am and what I have been doing for years. People who are running a scam hide who they are or put up false or vague Identities.  Besides myself, our Chief Operating Officer's LinkedIn can show exactly who he is and what he has been doing.  Same with Dr. Tsang and his CV that we have a link to on our website which shows his years of research.

Only legitimate people would give out as much information about them as we do.  

4.  And finally if you don't believe in us or think we are wrong then I encourage you to do more research on us.  

Gary
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 100
Perhaps I missed what exchanges plan to add the project token? Maybe it makes sense to conduct IEO? Or is it against some rules?

Was said, that team has negotiations with several top 10 exchanges that are able to list security tokens. There were no information what exact exchanges they are talking with.
That is, IEO is likely to be? It would be great to have it at Binance. I don’t know how difficult it is to do it. But there would be a lot of investors.

Binance is the most interesting exchange at the moment, right. But, the team hasn't enough money for Binance at the moment. Maybe, after they find that money.
You can try to take several stage to raise money. When there is the necessary amount to organize IEO to collect the remaining amount of money.

Got you. And these gaps, as I understand it, are needed to balance the price? That is, between stages so that the price recovers?

I think, they need to get enough money for at least 1 clinic. That they should stop the fundraising. Work for a while, and after that open the fundraising again.

Do you think they will not be able to raise enough funds? After all, the problem is really relevant and significant, there are many caring people who want to help.

They can. But we are talking about another way of token sale, when it is devided to several stages with big period of time between them.

For example, now token's price is $0.1, it will be $0.2 on main sale. But, what if not to sale all tokens with this price? What if they will open a new stage of sales in a year with price about $1.

This is a fascinating conversation going on in this post and its response.  Let me try and answer all of them.

I like the idea of raising enough money and then stop fundraising, and work the clinics as suggested above but not with just one clinic.  I have mentioned before if I could raise at least $10 Million, I would stop the fundraising and open about 5 to 7 clinics for dogs and a few clinics for people in the Caribbean.

Then say in a year or so, we launch the main sale and instead of at $.20 the price could be significantly higher.   And what else would happen is the demand for the SANA token will be much higher.  And your SANA tokens will be worth a lot more.  And we will also be on exchanges by then.

But this means that IF we are holding the Main Sale and the SANA tokens owners from the pre-sale have the ability to sells their SANA tokens that if SANA  token holders want to sell their SANA tokens they will be in directly competition with our delayed main sale. 

But here is another concept. One I like even better. If we raise the $10 million and we can open us the 5 to 7 clinics for dogs and a few clinics for people in the Caribbean, the we just STOP the fundraising completely.  We do not have a main sale.  And we just put all remaining unsold SANA tokens in the companies treasury.  And we grow slower but steady opening new clinics when we can.

We then run the clinics, use part of the profits to open more, use part of the profits to pay out dividends and let the SANA token holders trade on the Exchanges.  This has two very big benefits

1.  There are less SANA token holders so every token gets more of the dividends paid out.
2.  The supply is much lower and so the demand is much higher and the price of the SANA token goes up.

But to do that we need to raise the $10 Million.  And to do that we need to push this STO every where and I need to get to as many events as I can.

Gary

If you will put all tokens that you wanted to sell on main sale to the treasury, what will happen to them?
copper member
Activity: 154
Merit: 18
Perhaps I missed what exchanges plan to add the project token? Maybe it makes sense to conduct IEO? Or is it against some rules?

Was said, that team has negotiations with several top 10 exchanges that are able to list security tokens. There were no information what exact exchanges they are talking with.
That is, IEO is likely to be? It would be great to have it at Binance. I don’t know how difficult it is to do it. But there would be a lot of investors.

Binance is the most interesting exchange at the moment, right. But, the team hasn't enough money for Binance at the moment. Maybe, after they find that money.
You can try to take several stage to raise money. When there is the necessary amount to organize IEO to collect the remaining amount of money.

Got you. And these gaps, as I understand it, are needed to balance the price? That is, between stages so that the price recovers?

I think, they need to get enough money for at least 1 clinic. That they should stop the fundraising. Work for a while, and after that open the fundraising again.

Do you think they will not be able to raise enough funds? After all, the problem is really relevant and significant, there are many caring people who want to help.

They can. But we are talking about another way of token sale, when it is devided to several stages with big period of time between them.

For example, now token's price is $0.1, it will be $0.2 on main sale. But, what if not to sale all tokens with this price? What if they will open a new stage of sales in a year with price about $1.

This is a fascinating conversation going on in this post and its response.  Let me try and answer all of them.

I like the idea of raising enough money and then stop fundraising, and work the clinics as suggested above but not with just one clinic.  I have mentioned before if I could raise at least $10 Million, I would stop the fundraising and open about 5 to 7 clinics for dogs and a few clinics for people in the Caribbean.

Then say in a year or so, we launch the main sale and instead of at $.20 the price could be significantly higher.   And what else would happen is the demand for the SANA token will be much higher.  And your SANA tokens will be worth a lot more.  And we will also be on exchanges by then.

But this means that IF we are holding the Main Sale and the SANA tokens owners from the pre-sale have the ability to sells their SANA tokens that if SANA  token holders want to sell their SANA tokens they will be in directly competition with our delayed main sale. 

But here is another concept. One I like even better. If we raise the $10 million and we can open us the 5 to 7 clinics for dogs and a few clinics for people in the Caribbean, the we just STOP the fundraising completely.  We do not have a main sale.  And we just put all remaining unsold SANA tokens in the companies treasury.  And we grow slower but steady opening new clinics when we can.

We then run the clinics, use part of the profits to open more, use part of the profits to pay out dividends and let the SANA token holders trade on the Exchanges.  This has two very big benefits

1.  There are less SANA token holders so every token gets more of the dividends paid out.
2.  The supply is much lower and so the demand is much higher and the price of the SANA token goes up.

But to do that we need to raise the $10 Million.  And to do that we need to push this STO every where and I need to get to as many events as I can.

Gary
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 100
Perhaps I missed what exchanges plan to add the project token? Maybe it makes sense to conduct IEO? Or is it against some rules?

Was said, that team has negotiations with several top 10 exchanges that are able to list security tokens. There were no information what exact exchanges they are talking with.
That is, IEO is likely to be? It would be great to have it at Binance. I don’t know how difficult it is to do it. But there would be a lot of investors.

Binance is the most interesting exchange at the moment, right. But, the team hasn't enough money for Binance at the moment. Maybe, after they find that money.
You can try to take several stage to raise money. When there is the necessary amount to organize IEO to collect the remaining amount of money.

Got you. And these gaps, as I understand it, are needed to balance the price? That is, between stages so that the price recovers?

I think, they need to get enough money for at least 1 clinic. That they should stop the fundraising. Work for a while, and after that open the fundraising again.

Do you think they will not be able to raise enough funds? After all, the problem is really relevant and significant, there are many caring people who want to help.

They can. But we are talking about another way of token sale, when it is devided to several stages with big period of time between them.

For example, now token's price is $0.1, it will be $0.2 on main sale. But, what if not to sale all tokens with this price? What if they will open a new stage of sales in a year with price about $1.

This price is impossible right now, but in year, when all world will know that this approach is 100% workable and is extremely successful, investors will buy tokens in any price.
hero member
Activity: 1106
Merit: 508
Bisq Market Day - March 20th 2023
Is cancer "per se" curable? I always thought that it is possible for some new form of cancer or something similar to cancer to emerge. Is that thinking wrong?
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
Perhaps I missed what exchanges plan to add the project token? Maybe it makes sense to conduct IEO? Or is it against some rules?

Was said, that team has negotiations with several top 10 exchanges that are able to list security tokens. There were no information what exact exchanges they are talking with.
That is, IEO is likely to be? It would be great to have it at Binance. I don’t know how difficult it is to do it. But there would be a lot of investors.

Binance is the most interesting exchange at the moment, right. But, the team hasn't enough money for Binance at the moment. Maybe, after they find that money.
You can try to take several stage to raise money. When there is the necessary amount to organize IEO to collect the remaining amount of money.

Got you. And these gaps, as I understand it, are needed to balance the price? That is, between stages so that the price recovers?

I think, they need to get enough money for at least 1 clinic. That they should stop the fundraising. Work for a while, and after that open the fundraising again.

Do you think they will not be able to raise enough funds? After all, the problem is really relevant and significant, there are many caring people who want to help.

They can. But we are talking about another way of token sale, when it is devided to several stages with big period of time between them.

For example, now token's price is $0.1, it will be $0.2 on main sale. But, what if not to sale all tokens with this price? What if they will open a new stage of sales in a year with price about $1.
full member
Activity: 882
Merit: 112
Your Data Belongs To You
Do not believe them for a second.
Cancer treatment ans blockchain? Run as far as you can get form this one, 100% scam.

No legitimate cancer treatment which has shown good trails needs tokens to get them going, big pharma would rush in with stacks of money before we could blink.

RED FLAGS ALL OVER HERE

What prooves do you have? For now, it is just your opinion. Can you prove somehow that this project is scam? It has US registration, and it is a STO, so it should be accepted by SEC.

The opposite what proof you have that this is NOT a SCAM?
The logic and rational thinking indicates that it is a scam, noone in this field of business needs money from ICO.

I will change my mind if they have SEC approval ut it wont happen Tongue
jr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 1
Perhaps I missed what exchanges plan to add the project token? Maybe it makes sense to conduct IEO? Or is it against some rules?

Was said, that team has negotiations with several top 10 exchanges that are able to list security tokens. There were no information what exact exchanges they are talking with.
That is, IEO is likely to be? It would be great to have it at Binance. I don’t know how difficult it is to do it. But there would be a lot of investors.

Binance is the most interesting exchange at the moment, right. But, the team hasn't enough money for Binance at the moment. Maybe, after they find that money.
You can try to take several stage to raise money. When there is the necessary amount to organize IEO to collect the remaining amount of money.

I think, they need to get enough money for at least 1 clinic. That they should stop the fundraising. Work for a while, and after that open the fundraising again.

Do you think they will not be able to raise enough funds? After all, the problem is really relevant and significant, there are many caring people who want to help.

They can. But we are talking about another way of token sale, when it is devided to several stages with big period of time between them.
Got you. And these gaps, as I understand it, are needed to balance the price? That is, between stages so that the price recovers?

[mod note: fixed broken quote]
Pages:
Jump to: