Transaction is guaranteed cryptographically.
Which can be written to back up accounts
and account files encryptrd with passwords to make sure worthless if stolen.
because Sumokoin is one of the few rare cryptocurrencies with fungibility
Topic: [ANN] [SUMO] SUMOKOIN - 🔏 Digital Cash For Highly-Confidential Transactions 🔏 - page 25. (Read 202439 times)
April 09, 2018, 12:25:09 PM
April 09, 2018, 12:14:00 PM
I installed the new wallet v3 and it started syncing with my original address and seeds..up to block 2101. Then it stopped.
I closed the wallet to run again as administrator and now wallet won't open. Any help please? thx
EDIT: Got it syncing now. When I deleted the old wallet ... there was still files that didn't delete. So syncing from the beginning .. going to take days.... maybe a week at log level 3.
New wallet sync much faster than the old one. I closed the wallet to run again as administrator and now wallet won't open. Any help please? thx
EDIT: Got it syncing now. When I deleted the old wallet ... there was still files that didn't delete. So syncing from the beginning .. going to take days.... maybe a week at log level 3.
April 09, 2018, 08:38:37 AM
I installed the new wallet v3 and it started syncing with my original address and seeds..up to block 2101. Then it stopped.
I closed the wallet to run again as administrator and now wallet won't open. Any help please? thx
EDIT: Got it syncing now. When I deleted the old wallet ... there was still files that didn't delete. So syncing from the beginning .. going to take days.... maybe a week at log level 3.
I closed the wallet to run again as administrator and now wallet won't open. Any help please? thx
EDIT: Got it syncing now. When I deleted the old wallet ... there was still files that didn't delete. So syncing from the beginning .. going to take days.... maybe a week at log level 3.
April 09, 2018, 08:24:45 AM
It wont grow that quick anymore, but it won't get smaller. BP's don't work backwards.
April 09, 2018, 06:55:54 AM
Does anyone know what is the current size of blockchain right now?
7.3 GB
April 09, 2018, 02:59:16 AM
My wallet is stuck at block 116524. Do I need to update? If so..is the wallet file "wallet.exe.manifest" the file I should copy and then paste back when the new wallet syncs? I'm unable to get the seeds. Thx
Hi tbearhere,
Deleting the folder Imdb, then open Sumo GUI Wallet (Run as Admin...) to re-sync.
Normally it locates at "C:\ProgramData\sumokoin\" if you are running Windows.
Please do not delete the wallets folder (C:\ProgramData\SumokoinGUIWallet\wallets).
Once the restore is done, I recommend you to generate the seeds and save to a safe place.
Ok thx. I have the older GUI from before the fork. If I copy the wallet file and reinstall newer GUI then delete new wallet folder and put old wallet folder back....will that work? Thx again.
PS I think it's stuck at the block when the fork occured.
April 09, 2018, 12:19:59 AM
My wallet is stuck at block 116524. Do I need to update? If so..is the wallet file "wallet.exe.manifest" the file I should copy and then paste back when the new wallet syncs? I'm unable to get the seeds. Thx
Hi tbearhere,
Deleting the folder Imdb, then open Sumo GUI Wallet (Run as Admin...) to re-sync.
Normally it locates at "C:\ProgramData\sumokoin\" if you are running Windows.
Please do not delete the wallets folder (C:\ProgramData\SumokoinGUIWallet\wallets).
Once the restore is done, I recommend you to generate the seeds and save to a safe place.
April 08, 2018, 10:51:58 PM
Hi,
Does anyone know when will the lite wallet be released?
Leo
Does anyone know when will the lite wallet be released?
Leo
April 08, 2018, 10:44:48 PM
My wallet is stuck at block 116524. Do I need to update? If so..is the wallet file "wallet.exe.manifest" the file I should copy and then paste back when the new wallet syncs? I'm unable to get the seeds. Thx
April 08, 2018, 10:43:16 PM
Changes for me:
GTX 1070s went from ~630 H/s to ~660 H/s (memory oc'd to 4 GHz; core @ 1.9 GHz)
RX 570s went from ~700 H/s to ~575 H/s (BIOS timing mod; memory oc'd to 2.4 GHz; core uc'd to 1.1 GHz)
Rig using 900W total compared to previous 1100W
Using xmr-stak (latest) w/ Ubuntu 16.0.3
GTX 1070s went from ~630 H/s to ~660 H/s (memory oc'd to 4 GHz; core @ 1.9 GHz)
RX 570s went from ~700 H/s to ~575 H/s (BIOS timing mod; memory oc'd to 2.4 GHz; core uc'd to 1.1 GHz)
Rig using 900W total compared to previous 1100W
Using xmr-stak (latest) w/ Ubuntu 16.0.3
What's your 1070 settings?
Anyone else with 1070s, can you please share optimal settings. Thanks!
Pretty much what I listed above -- heavy oc on the memory, I think the core speed is stock
April 08, 2018, 08:51:57 PM
Does anyone know what is the current size of blockchain right now?
7.3 GB
April 08, 2018, 05:04:39 PM
i like today low net diff... thanks for fork :-) i was suprised how much hashrate was lowered
April 08, 2018, 04:41:40 PM
Changes for me:
GTX 1070s went from ~630 H/s to ~660 H/s (memory oc'd to 4 GHz; core @ 1.9 GHz)
RX 570s went from ~700 H/s to ~575 H/s (BIOS timing mod; memory oc'd to 2.4 GHz; core uc'd to 1.1 GHz)
Rig using 900W total compared to previous 1100W
Using xmr-stak (latest) w/ Ubuntu 16.0.3
GTX 1070s went from ~630 H/s to ~660 H/s (memory oc'd to 4 GHz; core @ 1.9 GHz)
RX 570s went from ~700 H/s to ~575 H/s (BIOS timing mod; memory oc'd to 2.4 GHz; core uc'd to 1.1 GHz)
Rig using 900W total compared to previous 1100W
Using xmr-stak (latest) w/ Ubuntu 16.0.3
What's your 1070 settings?
Anyone else with 1070s, can you please share optimal settings. Thanks!
April 08, 2018, 04:13:24 PM
Hi folks,
I need a little help with my macOS High Sierra GUI wallet.
After I downloaded the latest version it's stuck on "syncing" 116524.... any idea how to fix this?
I need a little help with my macOS High Sierra GUI wallet.
After I downloaded the latest version it's stuck on "syncing" 116524.... any idea how to fix this?
Find and delete the lmdb folder. Then restart your gui and let it sync from scratch
Thank you, that worked.
April 08, 2018, 03:33:46 PM
Does anyone know what is the current size of blockchain right now?
April 08, 2018, 03:33:10 PM
That's a nice HBM clock you have there!
With Stak-XMR set intensity to 1008/904, worksize 4 or 8, strided index 2, mem chunk 8 or 16. Should get you over 1500H/s
https://www.upload.ee/image/8299205/memchunk16.PNG
Or use SRBminer, really easy to set up and only 0,85% dev fee. Dual threads and intensity 60 nets also 1500H/s
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/srbminer-cryptonight-amd-gpu-miner-v193-native-algo-switching-3167363
Weird thing with my Vega is that I have to restart the miner several times until the first hashrate reports are above 1500, then it stays like that...
With Stak-XMR set intensity to 1008/904, worksize 4 or 8, strided index 2, mem chunk 8 or 16. Should get you over 1500H/s
https://www.upload.ee/image/8299205/memchunk16.PNG
Or use SRBminer, really easy to set up and only 0,85% dev fee. Dual threads and intensity 60 nets also 1500H/s
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/srbminer-cryptonight-amd-gpu-miner-v193-native-algo-switching-3167363
Weird thing with my Vega is that I have to restart the miner several times until the first hashrate reports are above 1500, then it stays like that...
What are the clocks and voltages?
1407/1100, edited powerplay tables from hellae. Main monitor is connected to 280x but Vega64 has one connected also. Here is an example, been running rock steady +-5H/s:
https://www.upload.ee/image/8305523/SRB.PNG
Edit: just noticed from my screenshot that I've had 1 error, it is not reported on the pool side though...
I see thanks for sharing. You've it at 969mV on load at those clocks. You might want to check the power consumption levels.
Mine was at 881mV and I didn't change that for cn-heavy. Clocks are higher tho using Adrenalin drivers than BC (at similar voltages)
April 08, 2018, 02:59:00 PM
That's a nice HBM clock you have there!
With Stak-XMR set intensity to 1008/904, worksize 4 or 8, strided index 2, mem chunk 8 or 16. Should get you over 1500H/s
https://www.upload.ee/image/8299205/memchunk16.PNG
Or use SRBminer, really easy to set up and only 0,85% dev fee. Dual threads and intensity 60 nets also 1500H/s
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/srbminer-cryptonight-amd-gpu-miner-v193-native-algo-switching-3167363
Weird thing with my Vega is that I have to restart the miner several times until the first hashrate reports are above 1500, then it stays like that...
With Stak-XMR set intensity to 1008/904, worksize 4 or 8, strided index 2, mem chunk 8 or 16. Should get you over 1500H/s
https://www.upload.ee/image/8299205/memchunk16.PNG
Or use SRBminer, really easy to set up and only 0,85% dev fee. Dual threads and intensity 60 nets also 1500H/s
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/srbminer-cryptonight-amd-gpu-miner-v193-native-algo-switching-3167363
Weird thing with my Vega is that I have to restart the miner several times until the first hashrate reports are above 1500, then it stays like that...
What are the clocks and voltages?
1407/1100, edited powerplay tables from hellae. Main monitor is connected to 280x but Vega64 has one connected also. Here is an example, been running rock steady +-5H/s:
https://www.upload.ee/image/8305523/SRB.PNG
Edit: just noticed from my screenshot that I've had 1 error, it is not reported on the pool side though...
April 08, 2018, 02:44:50 PM
Of course the hashrate is different, we changed the PoW ALGO
Yes, but Monero also changed the algo and the hashrate did not change. So without knowing how exactly Cryptonight Heavy was changed, I cannot tell whether 10% less is what can be expected or whether it should be better, that's why I asked
crytonight-heavy is using 4M blocks (cryptonight heavy) instead of 2M blocks (monerov7).
Hashrates dropped by 20-30% except for RX570/RX580 8gb variants (I am unsure why this is the case while Vegas have dropped performance. Perhaps difference in HBM2 vs GDDR5)
April 08, 2018, 02:09:39 PM
April 08, 2018, 01:54:10 PM
Of course the hashrate is different, we changed the PoW ALGO
Yes, but Monero also changed the algo and the hashrate did not change. So without knowing how exactly Cryptonight Heavy was changed, I cannot tell whether 10% less is what can be expected or whether it should be better, that's why I asked
Jump to: