Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest - page 83. (Read 181863 times)

member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
Is the coin already being traded on exchanges?
copper member
Activity: 33
Merit: 0


Suqa order books are now active at Injex.io!
Suqa's decision to be listed was successful, we have now opened the order books for trading!
Suqa has 1 active pair - SUQA_BTC

Trade here: Injex Market  - SUQA_BTC

This place is a scam.
Not responding to messages on discord,  support email is bouncing.
I tried making a withdrawl yesterday of some SUQA, and Today its not showing in my wallet, and my balance is gone.
Looks like they were waiting for enough BTC to be brought in before running.
DO NOT TRADE ON HERE.


This exchange has 0.03 BTC daily volumen 5 days ago Cheesy very small exchange.... i use not.

I hope everyone has received the warning.  Injex is nothing more than cyber vandalism.  you may get lucky and get a few coins but if you risk more you will lose it and eventually what little assets that are on the site will disappear. 

They DO NOT have 10M SUQA for sale at prices 10 times cheaper than what is for sale through secure escrow.  This is what I mean by cyber vandalism.  INJEX IS NOTHING MORE THAN VANDALISM...

come on, are the ones who does trying not actually asking for it to be cheated? It's written dozen times everywhere Suqa coin is not listed on any exchange yet and they still insist doing trading on a vague website and then afterwards come crying here " i've been scammed"
Isn't everybody since the first day of internet you've allready been warned for internet fraud, cheat, scam,etc etc what includes money? They should have been more careful, it's money where you talking about.
I dont feel sorry for them.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Please do not trust the not approved exchanges. We see that our members want to make trading and they try to use many ways like otc or unapproved exchanges. We will solve this soon and we will not wait until the first week of November. We are working on it.
Please be patient.

More Hash and Miners incoming after approved exchanges will get announced :-)
member
Activity: 653
Merit: 11
Please do not trust the not approved exchanges. We see that our members want to make trading and they try to use many ways like otc or unapproved exchanges. We will solve this soon and we will not wait until the first week of November. We are working on it.
Please be patient.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1031


Suqa order books are now active at Injex.io!
Suqa's decision to be listed was successful, we have now opened the order books for trading!
Suqa has 1 active pair - SUQA_BTC

Trade here: Injex Market  - SUQA_BTC

This place is a scam.
Not responding to messages on discord,  support email is bouncing.
I tried making a withdrawl yesterday of some SUQA, and Today its not showing in my wallet, and my balance is gone.
Looks like they were waiting for enough BTC to be brought in before running.
DO NOT TRADE ON HERE.


This exchange has 0.03 BTC daily volumen 5 days ago Cheesy very small exchange.... i use not.

I hope everyone has received the warning.  Injex is nothing more than cyber vandalism.  you may get lucky and get a few coins but if you risk more you will lose it and eventually what little assets that are on the site will disappear. 

They DO NOT have 10M SUQA for sale at prices 10 times cheaper than what is for sale through secure escrow.  This is what I mean by cyber vandalism.  INJEX IS NOTHING MORE THAN VANDALISM...
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

Sorry, but I dont call XCN a solid coin, if there is no value of coins and there is none bigger exchange with this coin after 4 years of development. It is fine you are still developing XCN but it seems there is nothing new what this coin can offer and to be more interesting. Maybe because of this, we have now SUQA? Who knows...

Coming from a newbie account, those comments are rich ...

Remember who you are talking to when you comment in that prose, as Pallas has been in this industry longer than you can imagine, has implemented more than you can bother to research, and has done more for the OpenSource Community than you are making out. Just because he is the Lead Developer for XCN and one of the the Developers or SUQA does NOT mean he is juggling one against the other as you inferred. In fact, most of the LEGENDARY positioned 'players' in this industry are the ones you REALLY need to take into account and listen to, as these are the people that have been around and worked more INSIDE the CryptoIndustry than you could imagine. I know, I am one.

I guess it is the way Crypto is going unfortunately, with the lack of education and knowledge by those that think they know it all. Even after Pallas explained to you, you continue on your merry way to restate what you already said.

Amazing!

XCN to this day still has tech that others have yet to even scrape the surface, so when you can actually MAKE better, we would all like to see your amazing remarks about what YOU have created and whether someone berates you in the same fashion. Just be mindful that there is little in this industry that can be called your own. So when you say 'sorry', actually BE sorry and not say it for the sake of just pushing your point again, of which is pretty much moot anyway.

#crysx

Haha, my account is maybe a newbie account, but I'm here registered longer than you and in cryptoworld for long time, I only dont need to comment everything like you and respond to attacks like yours. So calm down boy.

Boy? ...

This shows YOU as the professional you are. Longer than me? OK Smiley

You speak rubbish, yet claim fact, even though you prove nothing but your lack of experience in all you do. Boy - HA!

In layman terms, you prove nothing more than what you display. Luck is certainly not dealing you a good card here.

Have fun, and don't forget to respect pays dividends in more ways than you think.

#crysx
Very well said....

Agreed. Poeople want to pump and dump and get rich quick but seem to forget that even bitcoin was not worth much in the beginning and its value is purely based on the trust miners/sellers/buyers have in it. But that sounds like how fiat works, a coin and paper money system based on trust.
copper member
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
Yo guys. The diff really2 goes to moon even block hasnt reach 22k which will halving reward but right now its feel like getting halving already lol...
Wish suqa all the best for us. And im glad if it doesn't come to exchanger for this month at least we will reach 22k block before we enter the market

yeah starting next week I expect rewards go down with another 50%. Nethash is increasing rapidly.
newbie
Activity: 141
Merit: 0
Yo guys. The diff really2 goes to moon even block hasnt reach 22k which will halving reward but right now its feel like getting halving already lol...
Wish suqa all the best for us. And im glad if it doesn't come to exchanger for this month at least we will reach 22k block before we enter the market
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
Just mining for fun
I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

Sorry, but I dont call XCN a solid coin, if there is no value of coins and there is none bigger exchange with this coin after 4 years of development. It is fine you are still developing XCN but it seems there is nothing new what this coin can offer and to be more interesting. Maybe because of this, we have now SUQA? Who knows...

Coming from a newbie account, those comments are rich ...

Remember who you are talking to when you comment in that prose, as Pallas has been in this industry longer than you can imagine, has implemented more than you can bother to research, and has done more for the OpenSource Community than you are making out. Just because he is the Lead Developer for XCN and one of the the Developers or SUQA does NOT mean he is juggling one against the other as you inferred. In fact, most of the LEGENDARY positioned 'players' in this industry are the ones you REALLY need to take into account and listen to, as these are the people that have been around and worked more INSIDE the CryptoIndustry than you could imagine. I know, I am one.

I guess it is the way Crypto is going unfortunately, with the lack of education and knowledge by those that think they know it all. Even after Pallas explained to you, you continue on your merry way to restate what you already said.

Amazing!

XCN to this day still has tech that others have yet to even scrape the surface, so when you can actually MAKE better, we would all like to see your amazing remarks about what YOU have created and whether someone berates you in the same fashion. Just be mindful that there is little in this industry that can be called your own. So when you say 'sorry', actually BE sorry and not say it for the sake of just pushing your point again, of which is pretty much moot anyway.

#crysx

Haha, my account is maybe a newbie account, but I'm here registered longer than you and in cryptoworld for long time, I only dont need to comment everything like you and respond to attacks like yours. So calm down boy.

Boy? ...

This shows YOU as the professional you are. Longer than me? OK Smiley

You speak rubbish, yet claim fact, even though you prove nothing but your lack of experience in all you do. Boy - HA!

In layman terms, you prove nothing more than what you display. Luck is certainly not dealing you a good card here.

Have fun, and don't forget to respect pays dividends in more ways than you think.

#crysx
Very well said....
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
How to mine SUQA with only 1 or 2 cards on my AMD rig? What is the example for bat file?
I use zjazz_amd_win64_1.1 miner.

Add -d 0 -d 1 to your batch file  or whatever your amd cards order like.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 2
How to mine SUQA with only 1 or 2 cards on my AMD rig? What is the example for bat file?
I use zjazz_amd_win64_1.1 miner.
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

Sorry, but I dont call XCN a solid coin, if there is no value of coins and there is none bigger exchange with this coin after 4 years of development. It is fine you are still developing XCN but it seems there is nothing new what this coin can offer and to be more interesting. Maybe because of this, we have now SUQA? Who knows...

Coming from a newbie account, those comments are rich ...

Remember who you are talking to when you comment in that prose, as Pallas has been in this industry longer than you can imagine, has implemented more than you can bother to research, and has done more for the OpenSource Community than you are making out. Just because he is the Lead Developer for XCN and one of the the Developers or SUQA does NOT mean he is juggling one against the other as you inferred. In fact, most of the LEGENDARY positioned 'players' in this industry are the ones you REALLY need to take into account and listen to, as these are the people that have been around and worked more INSIDE the CryptoIndustry than you could imagine. I know, I am one.

I guess it is the way Crypto is going unfortunately, with the lack of education and knowledge by those that think they know it all. Even after Pallas explained to you, you continue on your merry way to restate what you already said.

Amazing!

XCN to this day still has tech that others have yet to even scrape the surface, so when you can actually MAKE better, we would all like to see your amazing remarks about what YOU have created and whether someone berates you in the same fashion. Just be mindful that there is little in this industry that can be called your own. So when you say 'sorry', actually BE sorry and not say it for the sake of just pushing your point again, of which is pretty much moot anyway.

#crysx

Haha, my account is maybe a newbie account, but I'm here registered longer than you and in cryptoworld for long time, I only dont need to comment everything like you and respond to attacks like yours. So calm down boy.

Boy? ...

This shows YOU as the professional you are. Longer than me? OK Smiley

You speak rubbish, yet claim fact, even though you prove nothing but your lack of experience in all you do. Boy - HA!

In layman terms, you prove nothing more than what you display. Luck is certainly not dealing you a good card here.

Have fun, and don't forget to respect pays dividends in more ways than you think.

#crysx
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

Sorry, but I dont call XCN a solid coin, if there is no value of coins and there is none bigger exchange with this coin after 4 years of development. It is fine you are still developing XCN but it seems there is nothing new what this coin can offer and to be more interesting. Maybe because of this, we have now SUQA? Who knows...

Coming from a newbie account, those comments are rich ...

Remember who you are talking to when you comment in that prose, as Pallas has been in this industry longer than you can imagine, has implemented more than you can bother to research, and has done more for the OpenSource Community than you are making out. Just because he is the Lead Developer for XCN and one of the the Developers or SUQA does NOT mean he is juggling one against the other as you inferred. In fact, most of the LEGENDARY positioned 'players' in this industry are the ones you REALLY need to take into account and listen to, as these are the people that have been around and worked more INSIDE the CryptoIndustry than you could imagine. I know, I am one.

I guess it is the way Crypto is going unfortunately, with the lack of education and knowledge by those that think they know it all. Even after Pallas explained to you, you continue on your merry way to restate what you already said.

Amazing!

XCN to this day still has tech that others have yet to even scrape the surface, so when you can actually MAKE better, we would all like to see your amazing remarks about what YOU have created and whether someone berates you in the same fashion. Just be mindful that there is little in this industry that can be called your own. So when you say 'sorry', actually BE sorry and not say it for the sake of just pushing your point again, of which is pretty much moot anyway.

#crysx

Haha, my account is maybe a newbie account, but I'm here registered longer than you and in cryptoworld for long time, I only dont need to comment everything like you and respond to attacks like yours. So calm down boy.
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

Sorry, but I dont call XCN a solid coin, if there is no value of coins and there is none bigger exchange with this coin after 4 years of development. It is fine you are still developing XCN but it seems there is nothing new what this coin can offer and to be more interesting. Maybe because of this, we have now SUQA? Who knows...

Coming from a newbie account, those comments are rich ...

Remember who you are talking to when you comment in that prose, as Pallas has been in this industry longer than you can imagine, has implemented more than you can bother to research, and has done more for the OpenSource Community than you are making out. Just because he is the Lead Developer for XCN and one of the the Developers or SUQA does NOT mean he is juggling one against the other as you inferred. In fact, most of the LEGENDARY positioned 'players' in this industry are the ones you REALLY need to take into account and listen to, as these are the people that have been around and worked more INSIDE the CryptoIndustry than you could imagine. I know, I am one.

I guess it is the way Crypto is going unfortunately, with the lack of education and knowledge by those that think they know it all. Even after Pallas explained to you, you continue on your merry way to restate what you already said.

Amazing!

XCN to this day still has tech that others have yet to even scrape the surface, so when you can actually MAKE better, we would all like to see your amazing remarks about what YOU have created and whether someone berates you in the same fashion. Just be mindful that there is little in this industry that can be called your own. So when you say 'sorry', actually BE sorry and not say it for the sake of just pushing your point again, of which is pretty much moot anyway.

#crysx
member
Activity: 653
Merit: 11
I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

Sorry, but I dont call XCN a solid coin, if there is no value of coins and there is none bigger exchange with this coin after 4 years of development. It is fine you are still developing XCN but it seems there is nothing new what this coin can offer and to be more interesting. Maybe because of this, we have now SUQA? Who knows...
A solid coin means good team with good support not price. Total Cap is 210 billion now but it was 700 billion in January. Look at the Market cap of XCN in January too. Prices increase or decrease the most important thing is when crypto goes mainstream with trillions of dollars of market cap, then the solid coins with good teams and support like XCN will have hundreds of millions of dollars of Market Cap. Considering our rapid growth i don't know where SUQA will be when the trillion dollars market cap arrives Smiley
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

Sorry, but I dont call XCN a solid coin, if there is no value of coins and there is none bigger exchange with this coin after 4 years of development. It is fine you are still developing XCN but it seems there is nothing new what this coin can offer and to be more interesting. Maybe because of this, we have now SUQA? Who knows...
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.
sr. member
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
...

Check Youtube for that.

Checked, interesting info. Trend continues. Like with Maxwell cards vs Pascal we see ~40% improvement of Turing vs Pascal at practically the same power consumption. So it could be quite interesting for mining. Will wait price stabilization  Smiley
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).
Pages:
Jump to: