Correct. Everything shipped for $900. I will also take offers. I will toss in Rm 850 Gold PSU And m board.
What is the average hashrate for this rig? Can you post a screenshot of the web admin page?
Topic: [ANN] US/North American Bitfury sales NEW STOCK ***NOW SHIPPING*** - page 2. (Read 576785 times)
April 20, 2014, 10:04:28 PM
What is the average hashrate for this rig? Can you post a screenshot of the web admin page?
April 20, 2014, 10:02:29 AM
Correct. Everything shipped for $900. I will also take offers. I will toss in Rm 850 Gold PSU And m board.
April 20, 2014, 08:53:14 AM
I have 9 PCI 3.0 H cards I would like to sell. Purchase all 9 and I will include the M board for free.
$105 USD, .215 BTC shipped USPS Priorty Mail. Escrow, PayPal Accepted however Buyer must cover third party costs. Any Interested Parties please PM me.
$105 USD, .215 BTC shipped USPS Priorty Mail. Escrow, PayPal Accepted however Buyer must cover third party costs. Any Interested Parties please PM me.
You mean $105 per board, right? Assuming each card gets 31 gh that's a total of 279 gh which currently earns $307 /month.
April 18, 2014, 05:21:16 PM
I have 9 PCI 3.0 H cards I would like to sell. Purchase all 9 and I will include the M board for free.
$105 USD, .215 BTC shipped USPS Priorty Mail. Escrow, PayPal Accepted however Buyer must cover third party costs. Any Interested Parties please PM me.
$105 USD, .215 BTC shipped USPS Priorty Mail. Escrow, PayPal Accepted however Buyer must cover third party costs. Any Interested Parties please PM me.
April 17, 2014, 06:11:13 PM
+[(e^i*pi)+2]
Ugh. Nerd jokes.
Just when this forum seems to nerdy to be real, someone has to go and up the nerd-quotient.
It simplifies to 1
I added it for the shits and giggles
Explaining the nerd joke is even worse!
Lol
April 17, 2014, 02:54:52 AM
+[(e^i*pi)+2]
Ugh. Nerd jokes.
Just when this forum seems to nerdy to be real, someone has to go and up the nerd-quotient.
It simplifies to 1
I added it for the shits and giggles
Explaining the nerd joke is even worse!
April 16, 2014, 08:15:49 PM
+[(e^i*pi)+2]
Ugh. Nerd jokes.
Just when this forum seems to nerdy to be real, someone has to go and up the nerd-quotient.
It simplifies to 1
I added it for the shits and giggles
April 16, 2014, 07:14:35 PM
+[(e^i*pi)+2]
Ugh. Nerd jokes.
Just when this forum seems to nerdy to be real, someone has to go and up the nerd-quotient.
April 16, 2014, 02:34:52 PM
Hi guys, just wondering, how 55nm bitfury ASICs still going good when KNC is releasing 20nm ASICs?
If I can afford more space then I should choose bit fury over KNC?
If I can afford more space then I should choose bit fury over KNC?
The only outlet you can presently get bitfury hardware through is the EU site
Bitfurystrikesback.com
With the way KnC has been recently, I'd personally go bitfury
There are many other more desirable options these days. Just have a look at the rest of the Hardware forum. The current Bitfury products just aren't competitive price-wise. Perhaps the next generation Bitfury products will be more reasonably priced.
And for god's sake, don't preorder from anyone if the product ships more than two weeks from the time of order. There is no need to gamble like that anymore.
+[(e^i*pi)+2]
April 15, 2014, 09:03:44 PM
Hi guys, just wondering, how 55nm bitfury ASICs still going good when KNC is releasing 20nm ASICs?
If I can afford more space then I should choose bit fury over KNC?
If I can afford more space then I should choose bit fury over KNC?
The only outlet you can presently get bitfury hardware through is the EU site
Bitfurystrikesback.com
With the way KnC has been recently, I'd personally go bitfury
There are many other more desirable options these days. Just have a look at the rest of the Hardware forum. The current Bitfury products just aren't competitive price-wise. Perhaps the next generation Bitfury products will be more reasonably priced.
And for god's sake, don't preorder from anyone if the product ships more than two weeks from the time of order. There is no need to gamble like that anymore.
April 15, 2014, 08:08:59 PM
Hi guys, just wondering, how 55nm bitfury ASICs still going good when KNC is releasing 20nm ASICs?
If I can afford more space then I should choose bit fury over KNC?
If I can afford more space then I should choose bit fury over KNC?
The only outlet you can presently get bitfury hardware through is the EU site
Bitfurystrikesback.com
With the way KnC has been recently, I'd personally go bitfury
April 15, 2014, 06:38:38 PM
Hi guys, just wondering, how 55nm bitfury ASICs still going good when KNC is releasing 20nm ASICs?
If I can afford more space then I should choose bit fury over KNC?
If I can afford more space then I should choose bit fury over KNC?
April 08, 2014, 09:52:08 PM
No, they are Rev1
April 08, 2014, 01:31:37 PM
I've got 8 Bitfury ASIC chips that I don't want/need. I will send them to anyone who wants them if they cover shipping costs. PM me.
Are they Rev2? April 08, 2014, 01:21:16 PM
I've got 8 Bitfury ASIC chips that I don't want/need. I will send them to anyone who wants them if they cover shipping costs. PM me.
March 31, 2014, 12:53:19 PM
posted an RMA request for 3 h-cards. just a heads up MBP 
March 31, 2014, 08:11:56 AM
All my v1.2 h-cards are overclocked so maybe cgminer does not like that. The v2.3 is not overclocked by me but it comes out of the box pretty much pushed to the limits (ie the adjustable voltage pot is aggressively tuned already). I dunno, I will wait until the next release of cgminer and see if kano/ckolivas make any improvements. I said it before and I will say it again, I wish cgminer/bfgminer had a chip table that allowed me to manually set which chips I want to be completely turned off or tuned down from the start.
bfgminer already support table with per chip start value.
Here is part of my bfgminer config file that I use on my system where I have about 14 bad chips and I want them to start very low (at 32) but everything else to start at 56. If you want you can set start value for every single chip (like on chainminer).
Code:
"scan-serial" : [ "bfsb:auto" ],
"set-device" : [
"bfsb:osc6_bits=56",
"bfsb0av:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb0be:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb0bi:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb0cj:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb1ar:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb1aw:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb1bn:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2ag:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2av:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2ay:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2ch:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb3ad:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb3bn:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb3cb:osc6_bits=32"
]
"set-device" : [
"bfsb:osc6_bits=56",
"bfsb0av:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb0be:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb0bi:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb0cj:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb1ar:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb1aw:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb1bn:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2ag:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2av:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2ay:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2ch:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb3ad:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb3bn:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb3cb:osc6_bits=32"
]
How do you identify the chips? I'm assuming the number after "bfsb" is the bank number but the rest of the characters are? Is there some logic to it.
March 31, 2014, 07:25:33 AM
All my v1.2 h-cards are overclocked so maybe cgminer does not like that. The v2.3 is not overclocked by me but it comes out of the box pretty much pushed to the limits (ie the adjustable voltage pot is aggressively tuned already). I dunno, I will wait until the next release of cgminer and see if kano/ckolivas make any improvements. I said it before and I will say it again, I wish cgminer/bfgminer had a chip table that allowed me to manually set which chips I want to be completely turned off or tuned down from the start.
bfgminer already support table with per chip start value.
Here is part of my bfgminer config file that I use on my system where I have about 14 bad chips and I want them to start very low (at 32) but everything else to start at 56. If you want you can set start value for every single chip (like on chainminer).
Code:
"scan-serial" : [ "bfsb:auto" ],
"set-device" : [
"bfsb:osc6_bits=56",
"bfsb0av:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb0be:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb0bi:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb0cj:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb1ar:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb1aw:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb1bn:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2ag:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2av:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2ay:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2ch:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb3ad:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb3bn:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb3cb:osc6_bits=32"
]
"set-device" : [
"bfsb:osc6_bits=56",
"bfsb0av:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb0be:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb0bi:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb0cj:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb1ar:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb1aw:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb1bn:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2ag:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2av:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2ay:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2ch:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb3ad:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb3bn:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb3cb:osc6_bits=32"
]
How do you identify the chips? I'm assuming the number after "bfsb" is the bank number but the rest of the characters are? Is there some logic to it.
March 31, 2014, 07:12:57 AM
All my v1.2 h-cards are overclocked so maybe cgminer does not like that. The v2.3 is not overclocked by me but it comes out of the box pretty much pushed to the limits (ie the adjustable voltage pot is aggressively tuned already). I dunno, I will wait until the next release of cgminer and see if kano/ckolivas make any improvements. I said it before and I will say it again, I wish cgminer/bfgminer had a chip table that allowed me to manually set which chips I want to be completely turned off or tuned down from the start.
bfgminer already support table with per chip start value.
Here is part of my bfgminer config file that I use on my system where I have about 14 bad chips and I want them to start very low (at 32) but everything else to start at 56. If you want you can set start value for every single chip (like on chainminer).
Code:
"scan-serial" : [ "bfsb:auto" ],
"set-device" : [
"bfsb:osc6_bits=56",
"bfsb0av:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb0be:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb0bi:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb0cj:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb1ar:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb1aw:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb1bn:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2ag:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2av:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2ay:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2ch:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb3ad:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb3bn:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb3cb:osc6_bits=32"
]
"set-device" : [
"bfsb:osc6_bits=56",
"bfsb0av:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb0be:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb0bi:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb0cj:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb1ar:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb1aw:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb1bn:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2ag:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2av:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2ay:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb2ch:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb3ad:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb3bn:osc6_bits=32",
"bfsb3cb:osc6_bits=32"
]
March 30, 2014, 11:42:13 PM
All my v1.2 h-cards are overclocked so maybe cgminer does not like that. The v2.3 is not overclocked by me but it comes out of the box pretty much pushed to the limits (ie the adjustable voltage pot is aggressively tuned already). I dunno, I will wait until the next release of cgminer and see if kano/ckolivas make any improvements. I said it before and I will say it again, I wish cgminer/bfgminer had a chip table that allowed me to manually set which chips I want to be completely turned off or tuned down from the start.
Jump to: