Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [VNL] Vanillacoin Beta Pre-Release - page 3. (Read 48229 times)

sr. member
Activity: 614
Merit: 254
December 21, 2014, 12:54:21 PM



    VvJ6Ww97hTDtMoqyqaXLwmb97Hzh9dYm7U      Wink

sent 350+35 but received 96 in return???

 i see the 35, (thanks) havn't seen any other addys...


Thats because cant send 350, trying again

EDIT: Sending failed, unspecified error, dev please help

try sending a smaller amt, 200 maybe
-just rec. 10 ty

sent 200
sr. member
Activity: 268
Merit: 250
December 21, 2014, 12:54:03 PM



    VvJ6Ww97hTDtMoqyqaXLwmb97Hzh9dYm7U      Wink

10 VNL sent Smiley

 yes gottem post an addy!

VrpTxafKuwSvvciJ7ej2tmmm6hLiNMwyM4
sr. member
Activity: 614
Merit: 254
December 21, 2014, 12:51:06 PM



    VvJ6Ww97hTDtMoqyqaXLwmb97Hzh9dYm7U      Wink

sent 350+35 but received 96 in return???

 i see the 35, (thanks) havn't seen any other addys...


Thats because cant send 350, trying again

EDIT: Sending failed, unspecified error, dev please help

try sending a smaller amt, 200 maybe
-just rec. 10 ty

Sent 2 times 350 coins, my wallet have less 750 coins but you did not received?

We have a problem...
legendary
Activity: 1894
Merit: 1001
December 21, 2014, 12:49:05 PM



    VvJ6Ww97hTDtMoqyqaXLwmb97Hzh9dYm7U      Wink

10 VNL sent Smiley

 yes gottem post an addy!
sr. member
Activity: 268
Merit: 250
December 21, 2014, 12:48:01 PM



    VvJ6Ww97hTDtMoqyqaXLwmb97Hzh9dYm7U      Wink

10 VNL sent Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1894
Merit: 1001
December 21, 2014, 12:47:19 PM



    VvJ6Ww97hTDtMoqyqaXLwmb97Hzh9dYm7U      Wink

sent 350+35 but received 96 in return???

 i see the 35, (thanks) havn't seen any other addys...


Thats because cant send 350, trying again

EDIT: Sending failed, unspecified error, dev please help

try sending a smaller amt, 200 maybe
-just rec. 10 ty
sr. member
Activity: 614
Merit: 254
December 21, 2014, 12:44:37 PM



    VvJ6Ww97hTDtMoqyqaXLwmb97Hzh9dYm7U      Wink

sent 350+35 but received 96 in return???

 i see the 35, (thanks) havn't seen any other addys...


Thats because cant send 350, trying again

EDIT: Sending failed, unspecified error, dev please help
legendary
Activity: 1894
Merit: 1001
December 21, 2014, 12:43:50 PM



    VvJ6Ww97hTDtMoqyqaXLwmb97Hzh9dYm7U      Wink

sent 350+35 but received 96 in return???

 i see the 35, (thanks) havn't seen any other addys...

just noticed can't copy-paste from history tab
sr. member
Activity: 614
Merit: 254
December 21, 2014, 12:38:20 PM



    VvJ6Ww97hTDtMoqyqaXLwmb97Hzh9dYm7U      Wink

sent 350+35 but received 96 in return???
sr. member
Activity: 614
Merit: 254
December 21, 2014, 12:33:42 PM
I am not sure mine is working correctly.  It seems like I mined way too many coins over night compared to what I had mined the previous days.  I also notice it says I have 0 connections but coins continue to mine and mint.  Any ideas?

I have 2400 coins mined in 21 hours. Thats fine for me  Grin

6 connections to network
legendary
Activity: 1894
Merit: 1001
December 21, 2014, 12:32:51 PM



    VvJ6Ww97hTDtMoqyqaXLwmb97Hzh9dYm7U      Wink
legendary
Activity: 1131
Merit: 1007
December 21, 2014, 12:11:50 PM
I am not sure mine is working correctly.  It seems like I mined way too many coins over night compared to what I had mined the previous days.  I also notice it says I have 0 connections but coins continue to mine and mint.  Any ideas?
sr. member
Activity: 882
Merit: 250
December 21, 2014, 12:11:03 PM
my pc works fine in testnet

Mine also and have no problem so far.
sr. member
Activity: 614
Merit: 254
December 21, 2014, 12:06:32 PM
Excellent... first time I have a balance of 128 coins with the newest version... let me know if anybody wants a transaction of some Vanilla coins to their wallet (to test)...

+1 post here adress i will send some...  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 268
Merit: 250
December 21, 2014, 11:41:46 AM
Excellent... first time I have a balance of 128 coins with the newest version... let me know if anybody wants a transaction of some Vanilla coins to their wallet (to test)...
legendary
Activity: 895
Merit: 1001
December 20, 2014, 10:05:02 PM
my pc works fine in testnet
sr. member
Activity: 596
Merit: 251
December 20, 2014, 09:12:06 PM
Lol, so let me get this straight. In order to make it fair you are going to penalize a few home users who have access to multiple machines from a single IP address, but yet allow the botnet operators free reign, as the 1000's of computers they could potentially control would all be from different addresses...

One of the reasons I am following this is I admire your attempt for a fair distribution, but think about this aspect a little. I do not think you will be able to find a way to 100% guarantee fair distribution to everyone, but I would rather it error on the side of a few users with many legitimate PCs, than with the botnet operators.

Do you intend to run 100 peers from one IP address at your home? If not then it's fair, if so then you are trying to mine selfishly and the consensus will not allow it. Regarding "Bot Nets", it is impossible for someone to implement a Vanillacoin "Bot Net" but if you want to try it then go ahead and have a very successful failure. Cool

Thank you for your support.

How would it be impossible may I ask?  If I control a few hundred PCs, I could simply install the wallet on them and begin mining, xfer all the coins to central address ...

*Disclaimer considering where I am posting, the above is hypothetical, I do not have 100's of PCs, nor do I have anything to do with botnets, I am just looking for an explanation on how this coin is supposedly protected from such scenarios.

The Mac and Windows binaries take zero command line arguments so mining cannot be started without human intervention and I have zero concerns about Linux. The miner source code and fairness algorithm will not be released to the public until RPC is implemented and the first pool is online. All other source code will be released in a timely manner sometime after launch.

The coin is protected from selfishness and greed from all angles so lets stop with the FUD and focus on the testing. Cool

Thank you for your support.
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 254
December 20, 2014, 09:04:35 PM
Lol, so let me get this straight. In order to make it fair you are going to penalize a few home users who have access to multiple machines from a single IP address, but yet allow the botnet operators free reign, as the 1000's of computers they could potentially control would all be from different addresses...

One of the reasons I am following this is I admire your attempt for a fair distribution, but think about this aspect a little. I do not think you will be able to find a way to 100% guarantee fair distribution to everyone, but I would rather it error on the side of a few users with many legitimate PCs, than with the botnet operators.

Do you intend to run 100 peers from one IP address at your home? If not then it's fair, if so then you are trying to mine selfishly and the consensus will not allow it. Regarding "Bot Nets", it is impossible for someone to implement a Vanillacoin "Bot Net" but if you want to try it then go ahead and have a very successful failure. Cool

Thank you for your support.

How would it be impossible may I ask?  If I control a few hundred PCs, I could simply install the wallet on them and begin mining, xfer all the coins to central address ...

*Disclaimer considering where I am posting, the above is hypothetical, I do not have 100's of PCs, nor do I have anything to do with botnets, I am just looking for an explanation on how this coin is supposedly protected from such scenarios.
sr. member
Activity: 596
Merit: 251
December 20, 2014, 08:32:49 PM
Lol, so let me get this straight. In order to make it fair you are going to penalize a few home users who have access to multiple machines from a single IP address, but yet allow the botnet operators free reign, as the 1000's of computers they could potentially control would all be from different addresses...

One of the reasons I am following this is I admire your attempt for a fair distribution, but think about this aspect a little. I do not think you will be able to find a way to 100% guarantee fair distribution to everyone, but I would rather it error on the side of a few users with many legitimate PCs, than with the botnet operators.

Do you intend to run 100 peers from one IP address at your home? If not then it's fair, if so then you are trying to mine selfishly and the consensus will not allow it. Regarding "Bot Nets", it is impossible for someone to implement a Vanillacoin "Bot Net" but if you want to try it then go ahead and have a very successful failure. Cool

Thank you for your support.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1005
My mule don't like people laughing
December 20, 2014, 08:13:52 PM
I had forks happen when the wallet started to mint staked coins. It looked like 2 different forks but for all I know it could have been more. I think PoS needs more testing.

Also, has anyone else noticed that the current blockchain is moving along very slowly. The previous one was going good until the PoS blocks kicked in.
Pages:
Jump to: