Below is the list I pulled together based on previous posts. With each idea is a WC address. Future coin addresses will be added to allow other coins to be donated as well. The funds donated can be returned at this point should an idea evolve to the point where you no longer support it. Refunds will only be sent to the address from which the coins were sent. As more information comes forth from the Dev team and/or other DEVS I will update you. I have backed up the wallet for these addresses and is password protected. I will work transparently with you before releasing funds to anyone and will give 48 hrs notice before any transfer. Refunds will only be for the original amount, the interest earned would be fwd to the WCF.
1. Anon - Mindfox said it can be implemented from other work when its tested and working
WmFfYh4Y5rEpAmt31zmWHjEiSDBteRL7AF
2. Privacy - Implementation of TOR
WaTdeGtNSkW7oLDsZoZA1BNMwaTpvquXAj
3. Smart Contract - What would it take, what does a framework look like
WgMvUeu6vf7vFb1PVGmnfD6tvyFqSh7oWC
4. Reduce Confirmation Times - This could be reviewed now and determined what is required to make
this happen
WUET4WgYwz4HLx54faKYyRWMNbfa6K5gjj
5. Built in Voting App-propose new features, vote from wallet
WSYDAdSrx23BpC6MjBJ2pdWvfkVjYu6tEB
6. Wallet to wallet exchange - place your buys and sells and would then need to be a multicoin wallet
WffKeSgypEsHAYkZTMP6iXWws4Mn5By74G
I will send 100k to speed up confirmations project, but would really like to see an option that is polar opposite of ANON and privacy as well by providing a Verification and Validation option for those folks that wish to be extremely open with their transactions and being able to prove their identify. Seems logical as Shair does have holdings that do provide nature of a service and might be able to leverage something there? Will my silly small coin donation buy me this option on the leaderboard lol?
That's an interesting request! Could you elaborate more?
I'm totally down for adding as many options as possible. Should they conflict and we begin to move forward the most supported option would seem to prevail. But could see the option of a public, normal, or anon being options in loose terms. This is still a brainstorming phase, just adding in the option to put your money where your mind is.
Your wallet would be certified by a trusted third-party entity that has established authenticity of your identify based on information that would normally be deemed too confidential to provide to a point-to-point entity. Along the same concept has acquiring an SSL Certification for your Web Site whereas you have public and private keys. Thus, when transacting business peer-to-peer, identity is established without either party needing to question the trust relationship. Shair has holdings via DandyID, so conceptually may work in and around that type of service where you actually have a third-party entity to broker and administer that relationship in the coin (and could extend to other coins as a value). Lots of possibilities exist within that framework, but it could be my meds kicking in...
Wow pretty cool, I'd like to get a rep from there to discuss but I'll add it to the list for sure!
It may be something that could actually be done within smart contracts as well. Thank you for adding!