any updates for this coin?
sooon 
Topic: [ANN] $XQN Quotient Financial Network | PoW Scrypt, PoS Blake-256 | UPDATE NOW - page 9. (Read 194399 times)
April 15, 2015, 01:45:48 PM
April 15, 2015, 09:31:06 AM
Enhance coin control and you will see your coin age.
Coin age timer in main wallet window can decrease faster than real time.
You can also check the staking explorer.
Coin age timer in main wallet window can decrease faster than real time.
You can also check the staking explorer.
April 14, 2015, 10:34:14 PM
WTF is up with wallet? I downloaded and synced wallet awhile ago. I was staking but had to shut down my computer. Now it says it'll be two days before I stake when before I shut down it was 2 hours. Does coin age reset to zero when wallet is shut down?
?
? 
April 13, 2015, 11:04:59 PM
I agree, this is a very nice coin to be held, just hoping that devs make some times to stop by 
Quotient is a really cool project!
I see you are a XMG fan
I consider XMG a great project with an epic community. XQN and XAI community's could learn something from XMG
Please elaborate. PM me if you need to if you don't want to do it here.Thanks!
April 13, 2015, 02:12:59 PM
any updates for this coin?
None that I know of.Dev is focused on building xai core.
so we need to wait til he finishes that?
well i just hope he doesnt abandon this coin.
No need to wait around we can all do our part to get the coin exposed while the dev gets the really hard part done.
April 11, 2015, 10:26:36 PM
I agree, this is a very nice coin to be held, just hoping that devs make some times to stop by
April 11, 2015, 09:13:55 PM
any updates for this coin?
None that I know of.Dev is focused on building xai core.
so we need to wait til he finishes that?
well i just hope he doesnt abandon this coin.
April 11, 2015, 09:09:23 PM
any updates for this coin?
None that I know of.Dev is focused on building xai core.
April 11, 2015, 08:20:30 PM
any updates for this coin?
April 11, 2015, 06:09:08 PM
It's XQN thread here :p
April 10, 2015, 05:23:23 PM
crave thread crazy i came to bitstake thread for some peace and no trolls 
April 10, 2015, 03:45:59 PM
Hi Cedric, been chatting with some friends lately and heard some good things about Blake and how light weight it is, and that XQN uses it for PoS hashing. I am looking through your source code and it appears that kernel hashing is still using standard SHA256. Am I missing something in the code?
Yes, you are missing something 
Do some more exploring...Dev can you tell me that XQN wallet looks for kernel with blak hash or has it use ppcoin sha hash? Can you explain how it is working? I can have my ppcoin friends look at code if you want
April 08, 2015, 10:42:07 PM
I don't believe you know what you're talking about.
No disrespect intended, but you seem to invade threads with unfounded accusations.
I remember you accusing another developer and you had those accusations thrown in your face.
How long have you been coding for if you don't mind me asking?
No disrespect intended, but you seem to invade threads with unfounded accusations.
I remember you accusing another developer and you had those accusations thrown in your face.
How long have you been coding for if you don't mind me asking?
If you have any questions for me, feel free to contact me outside of this thread.
April 08, 2015, 09:30:56 PM
This a repeat of what went down with iGotSpots?
Seems very similiar.
Care to link me? I don't know what you are talking about.
You can go find it yourself. You know exactly what I'm talking about.
I actually have no idea, but no worries. Good talking to you sir. I am sure I won't be the last one asking this question while the OP says that "stake mining" uses Blake. Just a simple miscommunication it looks like, I am deeply sorry if i offended you by asking a question to the developer of the coin...
I don't believe you know what you're talking about.
No disrespect intended, but you seem to invade threads with unfounded accusations.
I remember you accusing another developer and you had those accusations thrown in your face.
How long have you been coding for if you don't mind me asking?
April 08, 2015, 07:19:48 PM
This a repeat of what went down with iGotSpots?
Seems very similiar.
Care to link me? I don't know what you are talking about.
You can go find it yourself. You know exactly what I'm talking about.
I actually have no idea, but no worries. Good talking to you sir. I am sure I won't be the last one asking this question while the OP says that "stake mining" uses Blake. Just a simple miscommunication it looks like, I am deeply sorry if i offended you by asking a question to the developer of the coin...
April 08, 2015, 07:03:53 PM
This a repeat of what went down with iGotSpots?
Seems very similiar.
Care to link me? I don't know what you are talking about.
You can go find it yourself. You know exactly what I'm talking about.
April 08, 2015, 06:54:08 PM
This a repeat of what went down with iGotSpots?
Seems very similiar.
Care to link me? I don't know what you are talking about.
April 08, 2015, 06:48:04 PM
Hi Cedric, been chatting with some friends lately and heard some good things about Blake and how light weight it is, and that XQN uses it for PoS hashing. I am looking through your source code and it appears that kernel hashing is still using standard SHA256. Am I missing something in the code?
Yes, you are missing something Do some more exploring...
Case solved!
This a repeat of what went down with iGotSpots?
Seems very similiar.
April 08, 2015, 06:41:41 PM
Hi Cedric, been chatting with some friends lately and heard some good things about Blake and how light weight it is, and that XQN uses it for PoS hashing. I am looking through your source code and it appears that kernel hashing is still using standard SHA256. Am I missing something in the code?
Yes, you are missing something Do some more exploring...Case solved!
April 08, 2015, 05:40:47 PM
Hi Cedric, been chatting with some friends lately and heard some good things about Blake and how light weight it is, and that XQN uses it for PoS hashing. I am looking through your source code and it appears that kernel hashing is still using standard SHA256. Am I missing something in the code?
Yes, you are missing something Do some more exploring... Jump to: