Topic: [ANN][1000 SYNC] Proof of Stake now run by BLOCKCHAIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - page 189. (Read 816006 times)

totally - and not to Forget: donating - he just works for free - every Piece of a coin counts

first of all sorry wishing you a nice sunday - saturday were meant  im the future man 

------------

a good multipool grow with good member - ive mined for scrypt sometimes half of the whole hashspeed

if they have no miners they cant hold the market up and you re totally right: YOU cant make a difference on your own but together we can...

As for the graph a good multipool should effectivley go a long way to helping achieve this
looking at all other coins and their multipools i see that ours does not function in the same way or is not
having the desired effect on the sync price and volume structure in the markets as other coins

I have been purchasing here and there and on different exchanges when i can
but i can't make a difference on my own

It would seem that other than LT CAG, Chronikka has some good questions about nitesend
as i understand very little about coding as i'm sure 90% of the community is in the same boat as I am
I propose that nite69 and chronikka work together to come up with solutions for these problems.
Ofcourse the community is actively encouraged to take part, but from what i can tell very few actually
understand how this all works, so its in our best interests to encourage all those interested in how nitesend
functions to work with nite69 directly.

I for one support Nite69 100% and so far all his decisions have been working great!

What about block chain bloat? Implementing this solution in a way that isn't easy to trace will require a lot of "mixing" transactions. It will take time for those transactions to confirm, slowing the overall nitesend transaction time and adding extra "bloat" to the block chain.


This to me seems ambitious. Not going to say impossible because I don't know much about cjdns, just what it does. I think this could work but it would not be simple. The first question to ask, does this mean each of the smallest fractions of sync (i.e. 1 satoshi) will have an ipv6? Who initially determines the table and how is it verified? In order for it to work if I understand, there is a distributed hash table with all of the stored  network addresses, so how do you drop that on the network?

Nite69, we support you!
Maybe you will implement autosend without tax for your no-transaction problems

Nexus00 I added you to the list.

I will give 10btc if we can get 1 sync to be worth 10btc in value by july14th and it stays that way for 3 days.

I'm still wondering these problems that are related to coinjoin in general. There are 2 main problems: If there is not any other transaction to join, there won't be any nitesend/coinjoin transaction. The other problem is that when generating the joined transaction, someone who peeks and logs *all* transaction offers 24/8 would find out some information about coin owners.

But there are solutions to fix these. One idea to fix the first would be 'spontaneous nitesend mixer'. The basic idea is to allow wallets to collectively mix their coins to a brand new, first time used coins. This mixing transaction could happen either on predefined time or after wallets collectively find enought participants. In practise that would mean: you check the 'mix my wallet' checkbox. Wallet broadcasts a mixing request and counts all received requests. When a treshold has been reached, all wallets send one transaction with random sized newly generated output coins. This could be repeated just as often as wanted.

Another idea to prevent peeking the nitesend transactions would be using crypted communication. In this case, we could use for example hyperboria (cjdns) technology; combined with sync, that would mean all sync coins would have an own ipv6 address and an encrypted communication link! Nitesend transaction could be collected by sending the offers throught these kind of links, securing them from all peekers. Actually, the whole comunication between peers could be done throught private hyperboria network. I guess it would be better than TOR and vpn together.

What do you think? The problem is that these (specially nr 2) need some work to do and I really am not sure if they are worth implementing. Would they add enought anonymity to be worth implementing?

Nice idea!

Will you add Sync to be traded on your exchange?

Will it be possible to deposit goldcoins in Europe?

Thanks

Still Sat

New Zealand? 

Sunday ?

Thanks for your support.

I opened my wallet few days ago and got 0.7 SYNC. I was amazed, i guess that's why a lot of people don't want me to change the interest rate due to the minted coins they are getting.

we have been buying a lof of sync last days, especially with the short dip recently (multipool prevented probably further dumping, by stopping the sell-out). We always have a buy order standing by below market level to support the coin if it sudden drops (and give the miners a bargain buy order, lots of sync for you share)

Payouts within the next hour or so..  

think about it - a nice sunday

then we have to Change it - or it will be worth .... NOTHING

it has to be your skill to believe in what you have made or pay for 

This is going to the best investment coin ever   I think it's time to get this coin going up, We have delivered NiteSend and Synclub - the first loyalty programs based on cryptocurrency is under development. Phase 1 should be ready next week. I will give LTCagt/sovie access to the staging website so that he can give feedbacks