Topic: [ANN][Blocknet] truly decentralized exchange | token ecosystem infrastructure - page 200. (Read 1103293 times)

Yes ... actually. But why negatively ... rather call that positively an INVESTOR PROTECTION.

I don't know why you started with cryptos ... but considerable parts of this scene are now worse than the banksters against whom this revolutionary new technology set off to protect us.  
And crypto ICO/IPO/ITOs seem to have become the new scam scheme to make a tiny group very rich, by making many many people poorer.

What I am talking about is not a worsening ("manipulation") but an improvement ("protection") of the situation, and it only needs to happen in the first ~3 weeks after an ICO/IPO/ITO. And as you can see in his answer and in my former posts about this, the people behind this coin were actually considering it. Good. I would like an update on that now.   But think for yourself - perhaps I am wrong with this suggestion, then find the flaw please.  So: What are the ingredients of my thinking?

• ICO/IPO/ITO s have become a terrible trap in the past months ...
• ... often because usually one (only very small) group panics, and immediately sells, at a loss.
• Understandable, because there is a lot of scam in cryptos, and you never know for sure until after the big-dump-without-recovery. Then it's bagholding for life, or selling at a huge loss.
• To buy at 25000, and the next day sell at 18000 might look irrational, at first...
• ...but look at it now: Those few who immediately dumped their BLOCK at a loss, were the only rational people. Everyone who hodled was not. Sell at 18000 buy back at 12000 - isn't that rationality?
• That immediate minidump to far below ICO prices ... happened before a good buy support had started to build up. Clearly, in the first days how can there be buy support? - Most of the people interested in the coin have already invested - into the ICO.

It's all so easy to understand. And thus, there is a supereasy way out ... to protect the value, support, trust, good atmosphere among the vast majority of the investors ... and it takes only a tiny little minuscule abstinence from greed. Sharing is caring.

Look at the example of BLOCK: To protect 98.3%, you now only need 1.7%. Only 1.7% of the IPO money will get the price back up.

The makers of this software here were trusted with 364 BTC. It would have been an easy act of pure cold-blooded cleverness (or call it team spirit, or even altruism, or business manners), to re-invest 3% of that, directly after the IPO, into stabilizing the price.  (And a lot of the fudding would not have happened, by the way).

And all this is rational for the ICO organizers, because with a rising price they can then later sell what they bought ...

... during the INVESTOR PROTECTION WEEKS  - every I(CPT)O should have IPW^(tm)
(... I invent that term now ... could that actually become a paid service?, contact me for details! ... I just locked it into the blockchain, to prove it was me :-) )

Anyways ... is all of the above ... just wrong? Then please help me to understand the flaw in my thinking.

Last but not least, there is another spin on this ... not my words:  "neither is it a bad idea for the Foundation to be invested in BLOCK"
 
Enjoy your weekend!

Discussion was moved to slack.  And the FUD doesn't exist...it's pleasant!

For what might seem like incomprehensible reasons to the BTCtalk community, some people really would like for the team(s) to work in peace and not have to worry about posts here.

As it should be.  I still think Dan is one of the best devs here...

A FUD free thread? Sign me up...

Who locked the thread only knows the reason.

any ideas on why the XC thread got locked?

Is it so difficult to sign up? No it is not. They moved to slack because they wish to continue their work in peace.  

As far as looking for investors? They do not really need them. XC and Blocknet will be completed regardless of price.

I have not yet verified that this is the case but why would a company looking for users/investors make them jump thru hoops for info?  Making things difficult for what reason?

Your quote "Please do tell...how do we access the XC forums?."

The XC forums are accessible thou Slack.

So you mean that if a team believes in their coin they ought to divert money from development to invest in price manipulation?

Update of the numbers, not 100%, because of partly hidden orderbooks, but still ...

1.76 BTC = Poloniex sell orders until 24999
4.42 BTC = Bittrex sell orders until 24400
0.07 BTC = Bter sell orders until 23995
----------
6.25 BTC - that is a ridiculous 1.7% of your ICO wealth.

So ... how much DO you believe in your own coin?

How does this address my question?  I wasn't asking about Slack or btctalk.

On slack, I setup my slack last night and it's a huge leap forward in tech compared to this 90's era forum. I'm gonna be setting up the port for IRC tonight, thanks infinitechaos for helping your truly a good guy!

Please do tell...how do we access the XC forums?

Easy to do 

Hopefully Blocknet comes of age.

I know BitSwift is awesome and en-route to huge results!!!  Price is holding strong too.  Locked the thread though, thus I have to post here now instead of there lol

Oh ok, it's so easy to misread things sometimes

Sorry. Didn't mean to take time out of your life. Not interested in Blocknet Slack, thanks.

But I hear they are taking a principled stand against any coin with connection to Bob Surplus. Excellent news.

IDK, IDC it's not my coin.

Edit, I had to take the time out of my life to paste this link. Bitswift is here. Sign up for slack because real investors are tired of this nonsense.

https://theblocknet.slack.com/

I get it.

Peace

Newbie account, nuff said.