Topic: [ANN][Blocknet] truly decentralized exchange | token ecosystem infrastructure - page 434. (Read 1103293 times)
October 27, 2014, 08:33:01 AM
all i want is your money.let's sing all together.
October 27, 2014, 08:26:42 AM
Why no whitepaper this will bring confidence in Investors. Xbridge is open source
exactly, this is all i really want...
not a pr person who admits not know the technics very well to describe something about it
All I want is a member who doesn't butcher the English language.
October 27, 2014, 08:25:11 AM
Why no whitepaper this will bring confidence in Investors. Xbridge is open source
exactly, this is all i really want...
The Blocknet does not have a "whitepaper".
What we do have, which is better, is:
- the Xnode protocol, which is already coded, live and functioning on XCurrency nodes.
- Telehash v.3 documentation: https://github.com/telehash/telehash.org/tree/v3/v3
- Serverless Telehash with DHT: see the above link, and also https://github.com/quartzjer/TeleHash/blob/master/org/proto/kademlia.md
P.S. Personally I would like it if there was a whitepaper, because it would set certain people's minds at rest. However a whitepaper by no means guarantees the success of a project. Spelling out a solution is not some sort of guarantee that the solution will work.
October 27, 2014, 07:48:39 AM
Why no whitepaper this will bring confidence in Investors. Xbridge is open source
exactly, this is all i really want...
not a pr person who admits not know the technics very well to describe something about it
October 27, 2014, 07:48:12 AM
OnemoreBTC, it is completely unethical to start a Blocknet FUD thread claiming that "Blocknet people don't give consistent answers" when the people answering your questions this morning aren't from the Blocknet (excepting me).
1) you claimed and described using other coins features for a little fee: i told you this wont work
- We have not discussed slippage. I linked you to my last post about it, but you haven't referred to it yet.
Quote
2) now its about services: you fail to deliever ANY technical infos about how to implement, find and use them
- Services aren't some new idea I've just introduced. Read the OP and the FAQ. It's not complicated.
- I have not delivered "technical infos" on implementing services because the application platform has not been created yet.
Quote
only thing left is the exchange between participating coins...
please provide technical infos (as you should have done weeks before your ipo start so people have a chance to check them)
please provide technical infos (as you should have done weeks before your ipo start so people have a chance to check them)
- refer to the post I linked earlier and we can discuss it.
- the decentralised exchange has not been created yet, so the "technical infos" will not be code repos or something similar.
Quote
so i really think you just want to scam. i am not unethical: proove me wrong and i will reedit my other thread - i dont have a problem to be wrong.
- Starting a project with clear high-level information on what we're going to do,
- stating that we need funding to create this tech,
- and having am impressive track record of similar tech (XC's Xnode protocol, its ad hoc mesh networking, etc.),
does not constitute a scam, it constitutes a project in its early stages.
If you don't like the level of risk in our ITO, don't buy.
The level of risk is clear. We're not hiding anything about the stage the project is at.
for an ipo you need more than an idea saying "we want to join coins and have some kind of service marketplace"
i dont ask for sourcecode
Yes, this is something we're considering seriously.
Part of the XBridge code is completed already, and it would make sense for us to make it public.
October 27, 2014, 07:47:18 AM
OnemoreBTC, it is completely unethical to start a Blocknet FUD thread claiming that "Blocknet people don't give consistent answers" when the people answering your questions this morning aren't from the Blocknet (excepting me).
1) you claimed and described using other coins features for a little fee: i told you this wont work
- We have not discussed slippage. I linked you to my last post about it, but you haven't referred to it yet.
Quote
2) now its about services: you fail to deliever ANY technical infos about how to implement, find and use them
- Services aren't some new idea I've just introduced. Read the OP and the FAQ. It's not complicated.
- I have not delivered "technical infos" on implementing services because the application platform has not been created yet.
Quote
only thing left is the exchange between participating coins...
please provide technical infos (as you should have done weeks before your ipo start so people have a chance to check them)
please provide technical infos (as you should have done weeks before your ipo start so people have a chance to check them)
- refer to the post I linked earlier and we can discuss it.
- the decentralised exchange has not been created yet, so the "technical infos" will not be code repos or something similar.
Quote
so i really think you just want to scam. i am not unethical: proove me wrong and i will reedit my other thread - i dont have a problem to be wrong.
- Starting a project with clear high-level information on what we're going to do,
- stating that we need funding to create this tech,
- and having am impressive track record of similar tech (XC's Xnode protocol, its ad hoc mesh networking, etc.),
does not constitute a scam, it constitutes a project in its early stages.
If you don't like the level of risk in our ITO, don't buy.
The level of risk is clear. We're not hiding anything about the stage the project is at.
for an ipo you need more than an idea saying "we want to join coins and have some kind of service marketplace"
i dont ask for sourcecode
We have a provided whole lot more than that.
Have you read this thread? I've provided fairly in-depth information on how the XBridge will work, what technologies it'll employ (telehash v.3 mesh, DHT, and the Xnode protocol), and how the technologies will work together.
Furthermore we'll be releasing info today on the development timeline, budget, and accountability measures for the funding.
Why no whitepaper this will bring confidence in Investors. Xbridge is open source
October 27, 2014, 07:46:21 AM
OnemoreBTC, it is completely unethical to start a Blocknet FUD thread claiming that "Blocknet people don't give consistent answers" when the people answering your questions this morning aren't from the Blocknet (excepting me).
1) you claimed and described using other coins features for a little fee: i told you this wont work
- We have not discussed slippage. I linked you to my last post about it, but you haven't referred to it yet.
Quote
2) now its about services: you fail to deliever ANY technical infos about how to implement, find and use them
- Services aren't some new idea I've just introduced. Read the OP and the FAQ. It's not complicated.
- I have not delivered "technical infos" on implementing services because the application platform has not been created yet.
Quote
only thing left is the exchange between participating coins...
please provide technical infos (as you should have done weeks before your ipo start so people have a chance to check them)
please provide technical infos (as you should have done weeks before your ipo start so people have a chance to check them)
- refer to the post I linked earlier and we can discuss it.
- the decentralised exchange has not been created yet, so the "technical infos" will not be code repos or something similar.
Quote
so i really think you just want to scam. i am not unethical: proove me wrong and i will reedit my other thread - i dont have a problem to be wrong.
- Starting a project with clear high-level information on what we're going to do,
- stating that we need funding to create this tech,
- and having am impressive track record of similar tech (XC's Xnode protocol, its ad hoc mesh networking, etc.),
does not constitute a scam, it constitutes a project in its early stages.
If you don't like the level of risk in our ITO, don't buy.
The level of risk is clear. We're not hiding anything about the stage the project is at.
for an ipo you need more than an idea saying "we want to join coins and have some kind of service marketplace"
i dont ask for sourcecode
October 27, 2014, 07:45:58 AM
Exactly this can be resolved simply by letting join all the coins that want to join the blocknet and then the fundation will then mark them as reputable of trust or not. that's it. the customer than can differ scam coins from others and no centralized control
still a little centralized (esp if you look at WHO is at the blocknet foundation - coindevs) but its ok - its a little like googles playstore vs amazons app store..
i can live with that
Someone can offer as well an indipendent escrow service for that in the blocknet as a service multiple indipendent escrows to review new coins will be created and the most respectfull will be followed and enstablished in the free Market. The foundation can still express their opinion upon other Escrow services.
October 27, 2014, 07:44:23 AM
OnemoreBTC, it is completely unethical to start a Blocknet FUD thread claiming that "Blocknet people don't give consistent answers" when the people answering your questions this morning aren't from the Blocknet (excepting me).
1) you claimed and described using other coins features for a little fee: i told you this wont work
- We have not discussed slippage. I linked you to my last post about it, but you haven't referred to it yet.
Quote
2) now its about services: you fail to deliever ANY technical infos about how to implement, find and use them
- Services aren't some new idea I've just introduced. Read the OP and the FAQ. It's not complicated.
- I have not delivered "technical infos" on implementing services because the application platform has not been created yet.
Quote
only thing left is the exchange between participating coins...
please provide technical infos (as you should have done weeks before your ipo start so people have a chance to check them)
please provide technical infos (as you should have done weeks before your ipo start so people have a chance to check them)
- refer to the post I linked earlier and we can discuss it.
- the decentralised exchange has not been created yet, so the "technical infos" will not be code repos or something similar.
Quote
so i really think you just want to scam. i am not unethical: proove me wrong and i will reedit my other thread - i dont have a problem to be wrong.
- Starting a project with clear high-level information on what we're going to do,
- stating that we need funding to create this tech,
- and having am impressive track record of similar tech (XC's Xnode protocol, its ad hoc mesh networking, etc.),
does not constitute a scam, it constitutes a project in its early stages.
If you don't like the level of risk in our ITO, don't buy.
The level of risk is clear. We're not hiding anything about the stage the project is at.
for an ipo you need more than an idea saying "we want to join coins and have some kind of service marketplace"
i dont ask for sourcecode
We have a provided whole lot more than that.
Have you read this thread? I've provided fairly in-depth information on how the XBridge will work, what technologies it'll employ (telehash v.3 mesh, DHT, and the Xnode protocol), and how the technologies will work together.
Furthermore we'll be releasing info today on the development timeline, budget, and accountability measures for the funding.
October 27, 2014, 07:40:53 AM
OnemoreBTC, it is completely unethical to start a Blocknet FUD thread claiming that "Blocknet people don't give consistent answers" when the people answering your questions this morning aren't from the Blocknet (excepting me).
1) you claimed and described using other coins features for a little fee: i told you this wont work
- We have not discussed slippage. I linked you to my last post about it, but you haven't referred to it yet.
Quote
2) now its about services: you fail to deliever ANY technical infos about how to implement, find and use them
- Services aren't some new idea I've just introduced. Read the OP and the FAQ. It's not complicated.
- I have not delivered "technical infos" on implementing services because the application platform has not been created yet.
Quote
only thing left is the exchange between participating coins...
please provide technical infos (as you should have done weeks before your ipo start so people have a chance to check them)
please provide technical infos (as you should have done weeks before your ipo start so people have a chance to check them)
- refer to the post I linked earlier and we can discuss it.
- the decentralised exchange has not been created yet, so the "technical infos" will not be code repos or something similar.
Quote
so i really think you just want to scam. i am not unethical: proove me wrong and i will reedit my other thread - i dont have a problem to be wrong.
- Starting a project with clear high-level information on what we're going to do,
- stating that we need funding to create this tech,
- and having am impressive track record of similar tech (XC's Xnode protocol, its ad hoc mesh networking, etc.),
does not constitute a scam, it constitutes a project in its early stages.
If you don't like the level of risk in our ITO, don't buy.
The level of risk is clear. We're not hiding anything about the stage the project is at.
for an ipo you need more than an idea saying "we want to join coins and have some kind of service marketplace"
i dont ask for sourcecode
October 27, 2014, 07:40:01 AM
ito launch time & zone? (sorry if asked before)
October 27, 2014, 07:38:19 AM
OnemoreBTC, it is completely unethical to start a Blocknet FUD thread claiming that "Blocknet people don't give consistent answers" when the people answering your questions this morning aren't from the Blocknet (excepting me).
1) you claimed and described using other coins features for a little fee: i told you this wont work
- We have not discussed slippage. I linked you to my last post about it, but you haven't referred to it yet.
Quote
2) now its about services: you fail to deliever ANY technical infos about how to implement, find and use them
- Services aren't some new idea I've just introduced. Read the OP and the FAQ. It's not complicated.
- I have not delivered "technical infos" on implementing services because the application platform has not been created yet.
Quote
only thing left is the exchange between participating coins...
please provide technical infos (as you should have done weeks before your ipo start so people have a chance to check them)
please provide technical infos (as you should have done weeks before your ipo start so people have a chance to check them)
- refer to the post I linked earlier and we can discuss it.
- the decentralised exchange has not been created yet, so the "technical infos" will not be code repos or something similar.
Quote
so i really think you just want to scam. i am not unethical: proove me wrong and i will reedit my other thread - i dont have a problem to be wrong.
- Starting a project with clear high-level information on what we're going to do,
- stating that we need funding to create this tech,
- and having am impressive track record of similar tech (XC's Xnode protocol, its ad hoc mesh networking, etc.),
does not constitute a scam, it constitutes a project in its early stages.
If you don't like the level of risk in our ITO, don't buy.
The level of risk is clear. We're not hiding anything about the early stage the project is at.
October 27, 2014, 07:31:41 AM
OnemoreBTC, I have deleted links to your FUD thread because, in my opinion, you have severely insufficient basis for starting that thread.
I ask you please to delete your thread and to discuss things respectfully here.
I ask you please to delete your thread and to discuss things respectfully here.
as i said above: answer my question and i will happily remove it.
October 27, 2014, 07:30:32 AM
OnemoreBTC, I have deleted links to your FUD thread because, in my opinion, you have severely insufficient basis for starting that thread.
I ask you please to delete your thread and to discuss things respectfully here.
I ask you please to delete your thread and to discuss things respectfully here.
October 27, 2014, 07:30:20 AM
OnemoreBTC, it is completely unethical to start a Blocknet FUD thread claiming that "Blocknet people don't give consistent answers" when the people answering your questions this morning aren't from the Blocknet (excepting me).
1) you claimed and described using other coins features for a little fee: i told you this wont work
2) now its about services: you fail to deliever ANY technical infos about how to implement, find and use them
only thing left is the exchange between participating coins...
please provide technical infos (as you should have done weeks before your ipo start so people have a chance to check them)
so i really think you just want to scam. i am not unethical: proove me wrong and i will reedit my other thread - i dont have a problem to be wrong.
but there is a need to act fast because your ipo starts so damn fast
October 27, 2014, 07:29:07 AM
OnemoreBTC, it is completely unethical to start a Blocknet FUD thread claiming that "Blocknet people don't give consistent answers" when the people answering your questions this morning aren't from the Blocknet (excepting me).
You FUD thread claims there's an issue with slippage, but I've linked you to a post that in my opinion resolves any questions about slippage and shows that it's not an issue. Yet you have not discussed this with me at all.
What's your problem? You've made a hasty and shabby case and now want to try spread FUD.
Get out.
October 27, 2014, 07:27:07 AM
as i understand it blocknet doesn't implement services. its just the summ of all coins and by so their nodes connected by enabling the xbridge. so if amazon is a coin in you example. the walmart shop would be another coin joining OR the amazon coin expanding its service by hosting shops on its blockchain. both is possible.
the Blocknet is not an entity . Its the joining coins offering services.
this contradicts what synechist was saying
hoertest isnt part of the XC team as far as I can see..
no i'm not. just wanted to state how i unerstand the blocknet. don't get his problem. I i sounded like a team meber sorry but i don't see it that way. just was engaging in the conversation
October 27, 2014, 07:26:48 AM
OnemoreBTC, it is completely unethical to start a Blocknet FUD thread claiming that "Blocknet people don't give consistent answers" when the people answering your questions this morning aren't from the Blocknet (excepting me).
October 27, 2014, 07:24:46 AM
as i understand it blocknet doesn't implement services. its just the summ of all coins and by so their nodes connected by enabling the xbridge. so if amazon is a coin in you example. the walmart shop would be another coin joining OR the amazon coin expanding its service by hosting shops on its blockchain. both is possible.
the Blocknet is not an entity . Its the joining coins offering services.
this contradicts what synechist was saying
hoertest isnt part of the XC team as far as I can see..
October 27, 2014, 07:16:31 AM
as i understand it blocknet doesn't implement services. its just the summ of all coins and by so their nodes connected by enabling the xbridge. so if amazon is a coin in you example. the walmart shop would be another coin joining OR the amazon coin expanding its service by hosting shops on its blockchain. both is possible.
the Blocknet is not an entity . Its the joining coins offering services.
this contradicts what synechist was saying
Jump to: